1
|
Qiu Y, Xie M, Song B, Wang M, Ji N, Yin Z, Li J, Tang X, Ma C, Wang Z. Association of Breast Cancer and Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulators on the Risk of Meningioma: Insights from Mendelian Randomization. Mol Neurobiol 2025:10.1007/s12035-025-04979-2. [PMID: 40304968 DOI: 10.1007/s12035-025-04979-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2024] [Accepted: 04/17/2025] [Indexed: 05/02/2025]
Abstract
Considering the potential links between breast cancer (BC), selective estrogen receptor modulators, and meningioma in previous epidemiology studies, this study aimed to investigate them through the Mendelian randomization approach. We extracted instrumental variables (IVs) of different subtypes of BC from the largest genome-wide association study. Gene targets of SERMs were obtained from the Drug-Gene Interaction Database. Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis applied inverse variance weighted approach to evaluate causality. A series of sensitivity analyses and reverse MR were used to evaluate the stability of the MR results. Genetically determined estrogen receptor (ER) positive BC, luminal A-like breast cancer (OR 1.17, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.32, p = 0.01), and luminal B-like breast cancer (OR 1.20, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.37, p = 0.009) were associated with an increased odds ratio of meningioma (OR 1.18, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.32, p = 0.005). Among SERM-targeted genes, CYP2D6 (OR 1.37, 95% CI 1.23 to 1.54, p = 4.15 × 10- 8), NGR1 (OR 1.15, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.20, p = 2.59 × 10- 11), and MAPT (OR 10.20, 95% CI 2.90 to 35.84, p = 0.0003) were associated with increased meningioma risk, while BRCA1 (OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.80, p = 4.88 × 10- 6) showed negative causal association with meningioma risk. The outcome of the sensitivity analysis and reverse MR analysis corroborated the findings. These findings suggested a causal relationship between BC and meningioma, and identified potential target genes associated with meningioma, which was beneficial to early identification and prevention of meningioma risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Youjia Qiu
- Department of Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Jiangsu Province, Suzhou, 215006, China
| | - Minjia Xie
- Department of Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Jiangsu Province, Suzhou, 215006, China
| | - Bingyi Song
- Department of Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Jiangsu Province, Suzhou, 215006, China
| | - Menghan Wang
- Department of Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Jiangsu Province, Suzhou, 215006, China
| | - Na Ji
- Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Jiangsu Province, Suzhou, 215006, China
| | - Ziqian Yin
- Department of Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Jiangsu Province, Suzhou, 215006, China
| | - Jinglin Li
- Department of Otolaryngology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Jiangsu Province, Suzhou, 215006, China
| | - Xinling Tang
- Department of Urology Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Jiangsu Province, Suzhou, 215006, China
| | - Chao Ma
- Department of Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Jiangsu Province, Suzhou, 215006, China.
| | - Zhong Wang
- Department of Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Jiangsu Province, Suzhou, 215006, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wang D, Sadek AR, Vaseeharan S, Manivannan S, Walker M, Nader-Sepahi A. Presentation and management of spinal meningioma and its association with breast carcinoma-case series and systematic review. Br J Neurosurg 2024; 38:1460-1465. [PMID: 35435093 DOI: 10.1080/02688697.2022.2061419] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2020] [Revised: 12/18/2021] [Accepted: 03/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/02/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Benign spinal intradural tumors are rare entities and there have been relatively few case series describing the epidemiology and characteristics of these tumors. Here, we evaluate the presentation, demographics, pathology and outcomes associated with the surgical management of spinal meningioma in our unit over a 6-year period. RESULTS A total of 68 cases presented to the operating surgeon during a 6-year period. Of these, over 80% (n = 55) were in females. Seventy-nine percent of the meningiomas were observed in the thoracic region (n = 54). Weakness and gait disturbance were the most common presenting complaints. Surgery significantly improved both motor outcome (p < 0.001) and health related qualities of life (SF36, p < 0.01).Seventeen percent of spinal meningioma cases (n = 12) had a preceding cancer diagnosis. Of these 75% (n = 9/12) were attributable to breast cancer. Overall, breast cancer preceded a diagnosis of a spinal meningioma in 16.4% of female cases (9/55). This is higher than expected number of breast cancer based on UK population and those reported in literature for breast cancer and intracranial meningioma. CONCLUSION Spinal meningioma is disproportionately over-represented in females. Patients present with neurological deficits and surgery improved both neurology and patient reported quality of life. Relative to the known UK prevalence of breast cancer, there is a significantly higher than expected association between spinal meningioma and a preceding history of breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Difei Wang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Wessex Neurological Centre, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
- Division of Clinical Neurosciences, School of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Ahmed-Ramadan Sadek
- Department of Neurosurgery, Wessex Neurological Centre, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
- Division of Clinical Neurosciences, School of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- Department of Neurosurgery, Queens Hospital, Barking Havering Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Romford, UK
| | - Shathana Vaseeharan
- Division of Clinical Neurosciences, School of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Susruta Manivannan
- Department of Neurosurgery, Wessex Neurological Centre, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Mark Walker
- Department of Cellular Pathology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Ali Nader-Sepahi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Wessex Neurological Centre, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Sharma S, Rana R, Prakash P, Ganguly NK. Drug target therapy and emerging clinical relevance of exosomes in meningeal tumors. Mol Cell Biochem 2024; 479:127-170. [PMID: 37016182 PMCID: PMC10072821 DOI: 10.1007/s11010-023-04715-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2022] [Accepted: 03/17/2023] [Indexed: 04/06/2023]
Abstract
Meningioma is the most common central nervous system (CNS) tumor. In recent decades, several efforts have been made to eradicate this disease. Surgery and radiotherapy remain the standard treatment options for these tumors. Drug therapy comes to play its role when both surgery and radiotherapy fail to treat the tumor. This mostly happens when the tumors are close to vital brain structures and are nonbenign. Although a wide variety of chemotherapeutic drugs and molecular targeted drugs such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors, alkylating agents, endocrine drugs, interferon, and targeted molecular pathway inhibitors have been studied, the roles of numerous drugs remain unexplored. Recent interest is growing toward studying and engineering exosomes for the treatment of different types of cancer including meningioma. The latest studies have shown the involvement of exosomes in the theragnostic of various cancers such as the lung and pancreas in the form of biomarkers, drug delivery vehicles, and vaccines. Proper attention to this new emerging technology can be a boon in finding the consistent treatment of meningioma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Swati Sharma
- Department of Research, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, New Delhi, 110060 India
| | - Rashmi Rana
- Department of Research, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, New Delhi, 110060 India
| | - Prem Prakash
- Department of Molecular Medicine, Jamia Hamdard, New Delhi, 110062 India
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Grzbiela H, Nowicka E, Gawkowska M, Tarnawska D, Tarnawski R. Robotic Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Intracranial Meningiomas-An Opportunity for Radiation Dose De-Escalation. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:5436. [PMID: 38001695 PMCID: PMC10670356 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15225436] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2023] [Revised: 10/27/2023] [Accepted: 11/14/2023] [Indexed: 11/26/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the possibility of dose de-escalation, with consideration of the efficacy and safety of robotic stereotactic CyberKnife radiotherapy in patients diagnosed with intracranial meningiomas. METHODS The study group consisted of 172 patients (42 men and 130 women) treated in III Radiotherapy and Chemotherapy Clinic of Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology in Gliwice between January 2011 and July 2018. The qualification for dose de-escalation was based on MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) features: largest tumor diameter less than 5 cm, well-defined tumor margins, no edema, and no brain infiltration. The age of patients was 21-79 years (median 59 years) at diagnosis and 24-80 years (median 62 years) at radiotherapy. Sixty-seven patients (Group A) were irradiated after initial surgery. Histopathological findings were meningioma grade WHO 1 in 51 and WHO 2 in 16 cases. Group B (105 patients) had no prior surgery and the diagnosis was based on the typical features of meningioma on MRI. All patients qualified for the robotic stereotactic CyberKnife radiotherapy, and the total dose received was 18 Gy in three fractions to reference isodose 78-92%. RESULTS Follow-up period was 18 to 124 months (median 67.5 months). Five- and eight-year progression free survival was 90.3% and 89.4%, respectively. Two patients died during the follow-up period. Progression of tumor after radiotherapy was registered in 16 cases. Four patients required surgery due to progressive disease, and three of them were progression free during further follow-up. Twelve patients received a second course of robotic radiotherapy, 11 of them had stable disease, and one patient showed further tumor growth but died of heart failure. Crude progression free survival after both primary and secondary treatment was 98.8%. Radiotherapy was well-tolerated: acute toxicity grade 1/2 (EORTC-RTOG scale) was seen in 10.5% of patients. We did not observe any late effects of radiotherapy. CONCLUSION Stereotactic CyberKnife radiotherapy with total dose of 18 Gy delivered in three fractions showed comparable efficacy to treatment schedules with higher doses. This could support the idea of dose de-escalation in the treatment of intracranial meningiomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hanna Grzbiela
- III Radiotherapy and Chemotherapy Clinic, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Gliwice Branch, Wybrzeze Armii Krajowej 15, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland
| | - Elzbieta Nowicka
- III Radiotherapy and Chemotherapy Clinic, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Gliwice Branch, Wybrzeze Armii Krajowej 15, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland
| | - Marzena Gawkowska
- III Radiotherapy and Chemotherapy Clinic, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Gliwice Branch, Wybrzeze Armii Krajowej 15, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland
| | - Dorota Tarnawska
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Silesia in Katowice, 75 Pulku Piechoty 1A, 41-500 Chorzow, Poland
| | - Rafal Tarnawski
- III Radiotherapy and Chemotherapy Clinic, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Gliwice Branch, Wybrzeze Armii Krajowej 15, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Li Y, Drappatz J. Advances in the systemic therapy for recurrent meningiomas and the challenges ahead. Expert Rev Neurother 2023; 23:995-1004. [PMID: 37695700 DOI: 10.1080/14737175.2023.2254498] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2023] [Accepted: 08/29/2023] [Indexed: 09/13/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Meningiomas represent the most common primary neoplasms of the central nervous system (CNS). 20% present with atypical (WHO grade II) or malignant (grade III) meningiomas, which show aggressive biologic behavior and high recurrence. Although surgical resection and radiation therapy are the primary treatment options for these tumors, there is a subgroup of patients who do not respond well to or are poor candidates for these approaches, leading to the exploration of systemic therapies as an alternative. AREAS COVERED The literature on different therapeutic groups of systemic drugs for recurrent meningiomas is reviewed, with a focus on the different molecular targets. Past and current ongoing clinical trials are also discussed. EXPERT OPINION To date, there is no recognized treatment that has demonstrated a substantial increase in progression-free or overall survival rates. Nonetheless, therapies targeting anti-VEGF have exhibited more encouraging results in general. The examination of genomic and epigenomic traits of meningiomas, along with the integration of molecular markers into the latest WHO tumor grading system, has provided valuable insights. This has opened avenues for exploring numerous intracellular and extracellular pathways, as well as mutations, that have been targeted in ongoing clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yi Li
- Department of Neurology and Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Center for Neuro-Oncology, Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Jan Drappatz
- Department of Neurology and Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Center for Neuro-Oncology, Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Degeneffe A, De Maertelaer V, De Witte O, Lefranc F. The Association Between Meningioma and Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Netw Open 2023; 6:e2318620. [PMID: 37326990 PMCID: PMC10276307 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.18620] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2022] [Accepted: 05/02/2023] [Indexed: 06/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Importance A potential relationship between meningioma and breast cancer was suggested 70 years ago. However, to date, no conclusive evidence is available on this topic. Objective To provide a comprehensive review of the literature on the association of meningioma with breast cancer, supported by a meta-analysis. Data Sources A systematic PubMed search was performed up to April 2023 to identify articles on the association of meningioma with breast cancer. The following key words were used strategically: meningioma, breast cancer, breast carcinoma, association, relation. Study Selection All studies reporting women diagnosed with meningioma and breast cancer were identified. The search strategy was not limited by study design or publication date but only included articles in English. Additional articles were identified via citation searching. Studies reporting a complete population of meningiomas or breast cancer patients throughout a specific study period and a proportion of patients with a second pathology could be used for the meta-analysis. Data Extraction and Synthesis Data extraction was performed by 2 authors in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews (PRISMA) statement. Meta-analyses regarding both populations were performed using a random-effects model. Risk of bias was assessed. Main Outcomes and Measures The main measures were whether there was an increased prevalence of breast cancer in female patients with meningioma and whether there was an increased prevalence of meningioma in female patients with breast cancer. Results A total of 51 retrospective studies (case reports, case series, and cancer registry reports) describing 2238 patients with both diseases were identified; 18 studies qualified for prevalence analyses and meta-analysis. The random-effects meta-analysis (13 studies) revealed a significantly greater prevalence of breast cancer in female patients with meningioma than in the overall population (odds ratio [OR], 9.87; 95% CI, 7.31-13.32). Meningioma incidence in patients with breast cancer (11 studies) was greater than that in the baseline population; however, the difference according to the random-effects model was not statistically significant (OR, 1.41; 95% CI, 0.99-2.02). Conclusions and Relevance This large systematic review and the meta-analysis on the association between meningioma and breast cancer found nearly 10-fold higher odds of breast cancer in female patients with meningioma compared with the general female population. These findings suggest that female patients with meningioma should be screened more intensively for breast cancer. Further research is required to identify the factors causing this association.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aurélie Degeneffe
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Viviane De Maertelaer
- Biostatistical Unit, Institute of Interdisciplinary Research in Human and Molecular Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Olivier De Witte
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Florence Lefranc
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Miyagishima DF, Moliterno J, Claus E, Günel M. Hormone therapies in meningioma-where are we? J Neurooncol 2023; 161:297-308. [PMID: 36418843 PMCID: PMC10371392 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-022-04187-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2022] [Accepted: 10/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Meningiomas are associated with several gonadal steroid hormone-related risk factors and demonstrate a predominance in females. These associations led to investigations of the role that hormones may have on meningioma growth and development. While it is now accepted that most meningiomas express progesterone and somatostatin receptors, the conclusion for other receptors has been less definitive. METHODS We performed a review of what is known regarding the relationship between hormones and meningiomas in the published literature. Furthermore, we reviewed clinical trials related to hormonal agents in meningiomas using MEDLINE PubMed, Scopus, and the NIH clinical trials database. RESULTS We identify that all steroid-hormone trials lacked receptor identification or positive receptor status in the majority of patients. In contrast, four out of five studies involving somatostatin analogs used positive receptor status as part of the inclusion criteria. CONCLUSIONS Several clinical trials have recently been completed or are now underway using somatostatin analogs in combination with other therapies that appear promising, but a reevaluation of hormone-based monotherapy is warranted. Synthesizing this evidence, we clarify the remaining questions and present future directions for the study of the biological role and therapeutic potential of hormones in meningioma and discuss how the stratification of patients using features such as grade, receptor status, and somatic mutations, might be used for future trials to select patients most likely to benefit from specific therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Elizabeth Claus
- Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Murat Günel
- Department of Neurosurgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Hage M, Plesa O, Lemaire I, Raffin Sanson ML. Estrogen and Progesterone Therapy and Meningiomas. Endocrinology 2022; 163:6479628. [PMID: 34935947 DOI: 10.1210/endocr/bqab259] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
Meningiomas are common intracranial tumors with a female predominance. Their etiology is still poorly documented. The role of sexual hormones has long been evoked, and data have been conflicting across studies. However, a dose-dependent relationship between the incidence and growth of meningiomas and hormonal treatment with the progestin cyproterone acetate (CPA) has recently been established. CPA-associated meningiomas seem to be mainly located in the anterior and middle skull base, are more likely to be multiple, may harbor P1K3CA mutations in up to one-third of cases, and are more common with a longer duration of treatment. A similar but lower risk of meningiomas has been recently reported with the use of chlormadinone acetate and nomegestrol acetate as progestin treatments. Concerning hormonal replacement therapy (HRT) in menopausal patients, evidence from epidemiological studies seem to favor an increased risk of meningiomas in treated patients although a recent study failed to show an increased growth of meningiomas in HRT treated vs nontreated patients. Until larger studies are available, it seems wise to recommend avoiding HRT in patients with meningiomas. Evidence from published data does not seem to support an increased risk of meningiomas with oral contraceptive oral contraceptive (OR) use. Data are too scarce to conclude on fertility treatments. Based on studies demonstrating the expression of hormonal receptors in meningiomas, therapies targeting these receptors have been tried but have failed to show an overall favorable clinical outcome in meningioma treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mirella Hage
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Ambroise Paré, Service d'Endocrinologie Diabétologie et Nutrition, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, F-92100 Boulogne Billancourt, France
| | - Oana Plesa
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Ambroise Paré, Service d'Endocrinologie Diabétologie et Nutrition, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, F-92100 Boulogne Billancourt, France
| | - Isabelle Lemaire
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Ambroise Paré, Service d'Endocrinologie Diabétologie et Nutrition, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, F-92100 Boulogne Billancourt, France
| | - Marie Laure Raffin Sanson
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Ambroise Paré, Service d'Endocrinologie Diabétologie et Nutrition, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, F-92100 Boulogne Billancourt, France
- EA4340, Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, UFR des Sciences de la Santé Simone Veil, F-78423 Montigny-le-Bretonneux, France
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Nassiri F, Wang JZ, Au K, Barnholtz-Sloan J, Jenkinson MD, Drummond K, Zhou Y, Snyder JM, Brastianos P, Santarius T, Suppiah S, Poisson L, Gaillard F, Rosenthal M, Kaufmann T, Tsang D, Aldape K, Zadeh G. Consensus core clinical data elements for meningiomas. Neuro Oncol 2021; 24:683-693. [PMID: 34791428 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noab259] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND With increasing molecular analyses of meningiomas, there is a need to harmonize language used to capture clinical data across centers to ensure that molecular alterations are appropriately linked to clinical variables of interest. Here the International Consortium on Meningiomas presents a set of core and supplemental meningioma-specific Common Data Elements (CDEs) to facilitate comparative and pooled analyses. METHODS The generation of CDEs followed the four-phase process similar to other National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) CDE projects: discovery, internal validation, external validation, and distribution. RESULTS The CDEs were organized into patient- and tumor-level modules. In total, 17 core CDEs (10 patient-level and 7-tumour-level) as well as 14 supplemental CDEs (7 patient-level and 7 tumour-level) were defined and described. These CDEs are now made publicly available for dissemination and adoption. CONCLUSIONS CDEs provide a framework for discussion in the neuro-oncology community that will facilitate data sharing for collaborative research projects and aid in developing a common language for comparative and pooled analyses. The meningioma-specific CDEs presented here are intended to be dynamic parameters that evolve with time and The Consortium welcomes international feedback for further refinement and implementation of these CDEs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Farshad Nassiri
- MacFeeters Hamilton Neuro-Oncology Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network and University of Toronto, ON, Canada.,Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Justin Z Wang
- MacFeeters Hamilton Neuro-Oncology Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network and University of Toronto, ON, Canada.,Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Karolyn Au
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, AB, Canada
| | - Jill Barnholtz-Sloan
- Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States
| | - Michael D Jenkinson
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Liverpool, England, United Kingdom
| | - Kate Drummond
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Yueren Zhou
- Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, United States
| | | | - Priscilla Brastianos
- Dana Farber/Harvard Cancer Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Thomas Santarius
- Department of Neurosurgery, Cambridge University Hospitals, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Suganth Suppiah
- MacFeeters Hamilton Neuro-Oncology Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network and University of Toronto, ON, Canada.,Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Laila Poisson
- Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, United States
| | - Francesco Gaillard
- Department of Radiology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Mark Rosenthal
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Timothy Kaufmann
- Department of Radiology, The Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Min, United States
| | - Derek Tsang
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Kenneth Aldape
- National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States
| | - Gelareh Zadeh
- MacFeeters Hamilton Neuro-Oncology Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network and University of Toronto, ON, Canada.,Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Altinoz MA. Tamoxifen prevention of meningioma and its proposal for the treatment of meningioma. Revisiting old data in the light of recent epidemiological observations. Eur J Cancer Prev 2021; 30:409-412. [PMID: 33086249 DOI: 10.1097/cej.0000000000000634] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
Epidemiological studies reported in 2016 and 2019 demonstrated that breast cancer patients under tamoxifen treatment had significantly reduced risks of meningioma development. Tamoxifen treatment duration longer than 1500 days or with cumulative dosage higher than 26 320 mg have especially lowered risk of meningioma. Clinical long-term anticancer efficacy of tamoxifen shall associate with simultaneous suppression of estrogen receptor and downregulation of certain growth factor pathways, which may associate with - but not limited to - protein kinase-C (PKC) signaling. In this study, we will put the evidence together and indicate that tamoxifen may be effective in meningioma treatment in some patients who do not express estrogen receptor but expresses PKC, yet much higher doses of tamoxifen will be needed to treat meningiomas than those applied to treat breast cancer. We underline the fact that immunohistochemical analysis of both estrogen receptor and PKC (especially α, δ, λ and ι isoenzymes) may guide in patient stratification for selective benefitting from tamoxifen in management of meningiomas. Lastly, it would also be logical to test individual responses of meningiomas to tamoxifen in primary monolayer and spheroid cultures before starting treatment in each patient as the differential distribution of PCK isoenzymes may cause also untoward effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meric A Altinoz
- Department of Medical Biochemistry, Acibadem University, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Zhang Z, Ji J, Liu H. Drug Repurposing in Oncology: Current Evidence and Future Direction. Curr Med Chem 2021; 28:2175-2194. [PMID: 33109032 DOI: 10.2174/0929867327999200820124111] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2020] [Revised: 07/17/2020] [Accepted: 07/29/2020] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Drug repurposing, the application of known drugs and compounds with a primary non-oncology purpose, might be an attractive strategy to offer more effective treatment options to cancer patients at a low cost and reduced time. METHODS This review described a total of 10 kinds of non-oncological drugs from more than 100 mechanical studies as well as evidence from population-based studies. The future direction of repurposed drug screening is discussed by using patient-derived tumor organoids. RESULTS Many old drugs showed previously unknown effects or off-target effects and can be intelligently applied for cancer chemoprevention and therapy. The identification of repurposed drugs needs to combine evidence from mechanical studies and population-based studies. Due to the heterogeneity of cancer, patient-derived tumor organoids can be used to screen the non-oncological drugs in vitro. CONCLUSION These identified old drugs could be repurposed in oncology and might be added as adjuvants and finally benefit patients with cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhenzhan Zhang
- Department of General Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jianguang Ji
- Center for Primary Health Care Research, Lund University/Region Skåne, Sweden
| | - Hao Liu
- Department of General Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
The risk of developing a meningioma during and after pregnancy. Sci Rep 2021; 11:9153. [PMID: 33911184 PMCID: PMC8080659 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-88742-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2020] [Accepted: 04/09/2021] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Pregnancy has been associated with diagnosis or growth of meningiomas in several case reports, which has led to the hypothesis that pregnancy may be a risk factor for meningiomas. The aim of this study was to test this hypothesis in a large population-based cohort study. Women born in Sweden 1958–2000 (N = 2,204,126) were identified and matched with the Medical Birth Register and the Cancer Register. The expected number of meningioma cases and risk ratios were calculated for parous and nulliparous women and compared to the observed number of cases. Compared to parous women, meningiomas were more common among nulliparous (SIR = 1.73; 95% CI 1.52–1.95). The number of meningioma cases detected during pregnancy was lower than the expected (SIR = 0.40; 95% CI 0.20–0.72). Moreover, no increased risk was found in the first-year post-partum (SIR = 1.04; 95% CI 0.74–1.41). Contrary to our hypothesis, there was no increased risk for diagnosing a meningioma during pregnancy or 1-year post-partum. A lower detection rate during pregnancy, may reflect under-utilization of diagnostic procedures, but the actual number of meningiomas was homogenously lower among parous than nulliparous women throughout the study period, indicating that pregnancy is not a risk factor for meningioma.
Collapse
|
13
|
Tamoxifen. A treatment for meningioma? Cancer Treat Res Commun 2021; 27:100343. [PMID: 33647870 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctarc.2021.100343] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2020] [Revised: 02/17/2021] [Accepted: 02/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND No large-scale study evaluating the usefulness of tamoxifen after meningioma surgery has been undertaken. METHODS We processed the French Système National des Données de Santé (SNDS) database using an algorithm combining the type of surgical procedure and the International Classification of Diseases to retrieve cases of meningiomas operated between 2007 and 2017. Survival analyses were performed using a matched cohort study. RESULTS 251 patients treated by tamoxifen were extracted from a nationwide population-based cohort of 28 924 patients operated on for a meningioma over a 10-year period. 94% were female and median age at meningioma first surgery was 57 years IQR[47-67]. Tamoxifen treatment median duration was 1.4 years IQR[0.4-3.2]. Tamoxifen treatment median cumulative given dose was 11.4 gs, IQR[3.6-24.9]. There was a strong positive correlation between treatment duration and cumulative dose (τ=0.81, p<0.001). 6% of the patient had to be reoperated for a meningioma recurrence and 26.3% had radiotherapy. OS rates at 5 and 10 years were: 92.3%, 95%CI[90.3-94.3] and 81.3%, 95%CI[75.2-88] respectively. These 251 patients were matched by gender, age at surgery and grade with the same number of subjects within the nationwide cohort. Nor overall (HR=1.46, 95%CI[0.86- 2.49], p=0.163) or progression-free survival (HR=1.2, 95%CI[0.89- 1.62], p=0.239) were significantly improved by the tamoxifen treatment. CONCLUSION Using this unique database, in the setting of breast cancer, we could not conclude on a favourable effect of tamoxifen to prevent recurrence after meningioma surgery or to increase meningioma-related survival even in case of prolonged treatment duration or high cumulative given dose.
Collapse
|
14
|
Drewes AM, Møller ME, Hertzum-Larsen R, Engholm G, Storm HH. Risk of primary brain tumour after breast cancer. Endocr Connect 2020; 9:28-33. [PMID: 31821158 PMCID: PMC6993258 DOI: 10.1530/ec-19-0498] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2019] [Accepted: 12/09/2019] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Cancer registry data in the USA indicated that women diagnosed with breast cancer before the age of 40 were at increased risk of a new primary tumour within the brain and women aged 50 years or above were at lower risk than expected. Our aim was to investigate if similar results could be found in Danish population-based data, considering an explanatory role of hormonal status. METHODS Our study cohort included all women diagnosed with breast cancer below the age of 60 between 1978 and 2013 in Denmark. A total of 47,920 women were followed up in the Danish Cancer Registry for primary brain cancer. Standardized incidence ratios (observed/expected cases (O/E)) were used to estimate the risk of getting a primary brain tumour in the breast cancer cohort. RESULTS Data indicated an increased tendency of brain cancer following breast cancer at ages below 60 years (O/E = 1.24). For premenopausal women (age <49 at the diagnosis of breast cancer) the O/E was 1.25. Stratifying by time of breast cancer diagnosis, we observed an increased risk of being diagnosed with a brain tumour among women aged 49 years or younger at breast cancer diagnosis between 2004 and 2013. CONCLUSION The results indicate an increased tendency of developing a primary brain tumour in women with previous breast cancer history. Whereas the finding in premenopausal women is in line with the SEER data, the finding among postmenopausal is not. Primary brain tumours in breast cancer patients call for research in genetics and hormones to establish common risk factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Maria E Møller
- The Danish Cancer Society, Denmark (Kræftens Bekæmpelse), København Ø, Denmark
| | | | - Gerda Engholm
- The Danish Cancer Society, Denmark (Kræftens Bekæmpelse), København Ø, Denmark
| | - Hans H Storm
- The Danish Cancer Society, Denmark (Kræftens Bekæmpelse), København Ø, Denmark
- Correspondence should be addressed to H H Storm:
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Sun LM, Lin CL, Sun S, Hsu CY, Shae Z, Kao CH. Long-Term Use of Tamoxifen Is Associated With a Decreased Subsequent Meningioma Risk in Patients With Breast Cancer: A Nationwide Population-Based Cohort Study. Front Pharmacol 2019; 10:674. [PMID: 31249531 PMCID: PMC6582668 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2019.00674] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2018] [Accepted: 05/23/2019] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Earlier studies have indicated a relatively higher risk of occurring meningioma among female breast cancer survivors and have suggested that tamoxifen might decrease this risk. The present study evaluated whether tamoxifen use in breast cancer patients can reduce the risk of meningioma. Methods: We designed a population-based cohort study by using data from the National Health Insurance system of Taiwan to assess this issue. Between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2008, women with breast cancer and of age ≥20 years were included. They were divided into two groups: those who had not received tamoxifen therapy and those who had. The Cox’s proportion hazard regression analysis was conducted to estimate the effects of tamoxifen treatment and the subsequent meningioma risk. Results: We identified a total of 50,442 tamoxifen users and 30,929 non-tamoxifen users. Tamoxifen users had a borderline significantly lower overall risk of meningioma than non-tamoxifen users [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) = 0.64, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) = 0.40–1.02]. A statistically significant difference was found in those patients with tamoxifen treatment duration longer than 1,500 days (aHR = 0.42, 95% CI = 0.19–0.91) or with cumulative dosage exceeding 26,320 mg (aHR = 0.44, 95% CI = 0.22–0.88). Furthermore, no statistically significant joint effect of aromatase inhibitors and tamoxifen on the occurrence of meningioma among breast cancer patients was seen. Conclusion: Tamoxifen users had a non-significantly (36%) lower risk of developing meningioma than did tamoxifen non-users; however, our data indicated that tamoxifen therapy is associated with a reduced meningioma risk for Taiwanese breast cancer patients receiving long duration or high cumulative dosage treatment with tamoxifen.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Li-Min Sun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Zuoying Branch of Kaohsiung Armed Forces General Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Cheng-Li Lin
- Management Office for Health Data, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.,College of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Sean Sun
- Department of Cardiovascular Science, Midwestern University, Glendale, AZ, United States
| | - Chung Y Hsu
- Graduate Institute of Biomedical Sciences and School of Medicine, College of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Zonyin Shae
- Department of Computer Science and Information Engineering, Asia University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Chia-Hung Kao
- Graduate Institute of Biomedical Sciences and School of Medicine, College of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan.,Department of Nuclear Medicine, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.,Department of Bioinformatics and Medical Engineering, Asia University, Taichung, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Liao GJ, Clark AS, Schubert EK, Mankoff DA. 18F-Fluoroestradiol PET: Current Status and Potential Future Clinical Applications. J Nucl Med 2016; 57:1269-75. [DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.116.175596] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2016] [Accepted: 05/16/2016] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
|
17
|
Karsy M, Guan J, Cohen A, Colman H, Jensen RL. Medical Management of Meningiomas: Current Status, Failed Treatments, and Promising Horizons. Neurosurg Clin N Am 2016; 27:249-60. [PMID: 27012389 DOI: 10.1016/j.nec.2015.11.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
Meningiomas are benign tumors of the central nervous system, with low recurrence risk for World Health Organization (WHO) grade I lesions but a high risk for WHO grade II and III lesions. Current standard treatments include maximum safe surgical resection when indicated and radiation. Only three systemic therapies alpha-interferon, somatostatin receptor agonists, and vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors are currently recommended by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network for treatment of recurrent meningioma. This paper aims to review medical approaches in the treatment of meningiomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Karsy
- Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neurosciences Center, University of Utah, 175 N. Medical Drive East, Salt Lake City, UT 84132, USA
| | - Jian Guan
- Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neurosciences Center, University of Utah, 175 N. Medical Drive East, Salt Lake City, UT 84132, USA
| | - Adam Cohen
- Department of Oncological Sciences, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, 2000 Circle of Hope, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA
| | - Howard Colman
- Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neurosciences Center, University of Utah, 175 N. Medical Drive East, Salt Lake City, UT 84132, USA; Department of Oncological Sciences, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, 2000 Circle of Hope, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA
| | - Randy L Jensen
- Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neurosciences Center, University of Utah, 175 N. Medical Drive East, Salt Lake City, UT 84132, USA; Department of Oncological Sciences, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, 2000 Circle of Hope, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, 2000 Circle of Hope, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA.
| |
Collapse
|