Efficacy and safety of chimeric antigen receptor-T cells in the treatment of B cell lymphoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Early granulocyte colony stimulating factor administration increases the risk of cytokine release syndrome in acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients receiving anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy

Cytokine release syndrome (CRS), immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) and neutropenia are common toxicities associated with chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy. The role of granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) in CAR-T-cell-treated patients remains unclear. To explore the efficacy and safety of early G-CSF administration in patients with relapsed/refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (R/R B-ALL) who were receiving autologous anti-CD19 CAR-T cells, we retrospectively collected and summarized clinical data to compare patients receiving G-CSF within 14 days (early G-CSF group) to patients receiving later or no G-CSF (control group) after their CART infusion. The results showed that there was no significant difference in the incidence and duration of neutropenia between the early G-CSF group and the control group (77% vs. 63%, p = 0.65; 8 vs. 4 days, p = 0.37, respectively). However, the incidence and duration of CRS were significantly higher in the early G-CSF group than in the control group (81% vs. 38%, p = 0.03; 3 vs. 0 days, p = 0.004, respectively). Moreover, early G-CSF application had no significant effect on the expansion and efficacy of CAR-T cells. In conclusion, our study suggested that early G-CSF administration did not reduce the incidence and duration of neutropenia but rather increased the incidence and duration of CRS.

Targeting the HIV reservoir: chimeric antigen receptor therapy for HIV cure

ABSTRACT

Although antiretroviral therapy (ART) can reduce the viral load in the plasma to undetectable levels in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected individuals, ART alone cannot completely eliminate HIV due to its integration into the host cell genome to form viral reservoirs. To achieve a functional cure for HIV infection, numerous preclinical and clinical studies are underway to develop innovative immunotherapies to eliminate HIV reservoirs in the absence of ART. Early studies have tested adoptive T-cell therapies in HIV-infected individuals, but their effectiveness was limited. In recent years, with the technological progress and great success of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) therapy in the treatment of hematological malignancies, CAR therapy has gradually shown its advantages in the field of HIV infection. Many studies have identified a variety of HIV-specific CAR structures and types of cytolytic effector cells. Therefore, CAR therapy may be beneficial for enhancing HIV immunity, achieving HIV control, and eliminating HIV reservoirs, gradually becoming a promising strategy for achieving a functional HIV cure. In this review, we provide an overview of the design of anti-HIV CAR proteins, the cell types of anti-HIV CAR (including CAR T cells, CAR natural killer cells, and CAR-encoding hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells), the clinical application of CAR therapy in HIV infection, and the prospects and challenges in anti-HIV CAR therapy for maintaining viral suppression and eliminating HIV reservoirs.

Effectiveness and safety of CD22 and CD19 dual-targeting chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy in patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell malignancies: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of CD22 or CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cells in the management of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) was observed. Because antigen loss and lack of CAR-T-cell persistence are the leading causes of progressive disease following single-antigen targeting, we evaluated CD22/CD19 dual-targeting CAR-T-cell therapy efficacy and safety in relapsed/refractory B-cell malignancies.

METHODS

The Web of Science, PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase databases were searched until July 2022. Patients confirmed with any relapsed/refractory B-cell hematological malignancies were included regardless of age, gender, or ethnicity, receiving CD22 and CD19-dual-targeting CAR-T-cell therapy. The studies conducted on patients with coexisting other cancer were excluded. We used random-effect models to explore the outcome, and heterogeneity was investigated by subgroup analysis.

RESULTS

Fourteen studies (405 patients) were included. The pooled overall response (OR) and complete remission (CR) were 97% and 93%, respectively, for ALL patients. The 1-year proportions of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were 70% and 49%, respectively. For NHL, OR occurred in 85% of patients, and 57% experienced CR. The results illustrated that the 1-year OS and 1-year PFS were 77% and 65%, respectively. The subgroup analysis showed that the dual-targeting modality achieved higher CR in the following cases: coadministration of CD22/CD19-CAR-T cells and third-generation CAR-T cells combined with ASCT and BEAM pretreatment. The ALL and NHL groups seemed similar in treatment-related toxicity: all grade cytokine release syndrome (CRS), severe CRS, and neurotoxicity occurred in 86%, 7%, and 12% of patients, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Our meta-analysis demonstrated that the CD22/CD19 dual-targeting CAR-T-cell strategy has high efficiency with tolerable adverse effects in B-cell malignancies.

Quantitative evaluation of therapy options for relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: A model-based meta-analysis

New therapies for relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (r/rDLBCL) have emerged in recent years, but there have been no comprehensive quantitative comparisons of the efficacy of these therapies. In this study, the efficacy characteristics of 11 types of treatment strategy and 63 treatment regimens were compared by model based meta-analysis. We found that compared with monotherapy, association therapy had significant benefits in terms of overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and objective response rate (ORR). However, whereas treatment regimens involving chemotherapy contributed to significant improvements in ORR and PFS, OS was not improved. In terms of treatment strategy, we identified chemotherapy in association with immunotherapy sequential autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT), the association of two different types of immunotherapies, chemotherapy sequential ASCT, chemotherapy in association with immunotherapy, and chemotherapy in association with two types of immunotherapies as showing better efficacy. With respect to specific treatment regimens, we found that the following had better efficacy: rituximab in association with inotuzumab ozogamicin; rituximab in association with carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, and melphalan sequential ASCT (R-BEAM+ASCT); lenalidomide in association with rituximab, etoposide, cisplatin, cytarabine, and methylprednisolone; iodine-131 tositumomab in association with BEAM sequential ASCT; and chemotherapy sequential chimeric antigen receptor T-cell immunotherapy, with median OS of 48.2, 34.2, 27.8, 25.8, and 25 months, respectively. Moreover, with respect to association therapy, there was a strong correlation between the 6-month PFS and 2-year OS. The findings of this study provide the necessary quantitative information for clinical practice and clinical trial design for the treatment of r/rDLBCL.

Cardiovascular effects associated with chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy in cancer patients: A meta-analysis

Background

Although numerous studies confirmed the marked efficacy of chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CAR-T cells) in many hematologic malignancies, severe cardiovascular toxicities remain to be a major obstacle when incorporating this technology. Furthermore, previous individual investigations regarding the cardiovascular toxicities of CAR-T cell therapy also reported controversial conclusions. Therefore, a meta-analysis was performed to further evaluate the impacts of CAR-T cell therapy on cardiovascular toxicities.

Methods

The PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were searched for eligible studies up to April 2022. All analyses were carried out using the R 4.1.0 software.

Results

Eventually, 25 related studies consisting of 2,059 patients were enrolled in the current meta-analysis. We discovered that the pooled incidence rate of the all-cause mortality rate was 14.1% and that the pooled incidence rates of overall cardiovascular (CV) events and CV events with cytokine release syndrome (CRS) grade ≥ 2 were 25.6% and 14.2%, respectively. The pooled incidence of hypotension was 28.6%. Further analysis showed that the incidence rates of arrhythmias, cardiovascular dysfunction, heart failure (HF), CV deaths, acute coronary syndrome (ACS), cardiomyopathy, cardiac arrest, and other CV events were 19.2%, 8.0%, 5.3%, 1.8%, 2.5%, 2.9%, 1.3%, and 1.9%, respectively.

Conclusion

Cancer patients treated with CAR-T cell therapy were at risk for cardiovascular toxicities, of which the most common cardiovascular events were arrhythmias, cardiovascular dysfunction, and heart failure. These findings would contribute to achieving more rational and individualized use of CAR-T cells in clinical treatment.

The pathogenesis, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of CAR-T cell therapy-related adverse reactions

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy is effective in the treatment of refractory/relapsed (r/r) hematological malignancies (r/r B-cell lymphoblastic leukemia, B-cell lymphoma, and multiple myeloma). In addition, it is being explored as a treatment option for solid tumors. As of 31 March 2022, seven CAR-T therapies for hematological malignancies have been approved worldwide. Although CAR-T therapy is an effective treatment for many malignancies, it also causes adverse effects. The incidence of cytokine release syndrome (CRS), the most common adverse reaction after infusion of CAR-T cells, is as high as 93%.CRS, is the leading risk factor of immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), as well as cardiovascular, hematological, hepatorenal, skin, pulmonary, and gastrointestinal toxicity. Severe adverse reactions complicated by CRS severely impede the widespread application of CAR-T therapy. The CAR-T product was initially approved in 2017; however, only limited studies have investigated the adverse reactions owing to CAR-T therapy compared to that of clinically approved drugs. Thus, we aimed to elucidate the mechanisms, risk factors, diagnostic criteria, and treatment of toxicities concurrent with CRS, thereby providing a valuable reference for the safe, effective, and widespread application of CAR-T therapy.

Effectiveness and Safety of Anti-CD19 Chimeric Antigen Receptor-T Cell Immunotherapy in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Large B-Cell Lymphoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Aim: To investigate the effectiveness and safety of using chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapies targeting CD19 in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Methods: PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched for reports published from database inception up to July 2021. The present meta-analysis included clinical response outcomes, survival outcomes, and safety analyses. For qualitative analysis that could not be combined, the data were presented in a tabular form. Subgroup analyses were also performed according to the costimulatory domains, generic names, and study designs. Results: Twenty-seven studies (1,687 patients) were included. The pooled 12-months overall survival (OS) rate was 63% (95%CI: 56-70%). The pooled best overall response (BOR) was 74.0% (95%CI: 67-79%), with a best complete response (BCR) of 48% (95%CI: 42-54%) and a 3-months CR rate (CRR) of 41% (95%CI: 35-47%). The subgroup analyses by costimulatory domain suggested statistically significant differences in BOR and BCR, whereas not in the 12-months OS rate and 3-months CRR. Among the patients evaluable for safety, 78% (95%CI: 68-87%), 6% (95%CI: 3-10%), 41% (95%CI: 31-52%), and 16% (95%CI: 10-24%) experienced cytokine release syndrome (CRS), severe CRS, neurotoxicity, and severe neurotoxicity, respectively. Compared with the CD28 costimulatory domain, the 4-1BB-based products showed a better safety profile on any-grade CRS (p < 0.01), severe CRS (p = 0.04), any-grade neurotoxicity (p < 0.01), and severe neurotoxicity (p < 0.01). Conclusion: Anti-CD19 CAR-T cell immunotherapy has promising effectiveness and tolerable severe AE profile in DLBCL patients. 4-1BB-based CAR-T cells have a similar 12-months OS rate and 3-months CRR with CD28-based products but a better safety profile. The costimulatory domain might not affect the survival outcomes.

Effect of early granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor administration in the prevention of febrile neutropenia and impact on toxicity and efficacy of anti-CD19 CAR-T in patients with relapsed/refractory B-cell lymphoma

Chimeric Antigen Receptor T cells (CAR-T) are an outbreaking treatment option for relapsed/refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) are the most common specific toxicities, while severe neutropenia and infections are often observed as well. From March 2020, early G-CSF prophylaxis at day (D) two post-infusion was systematically proposed. We then compared patients treated before that date who did not receive G-CSF or who received late (after D5) G-CSF as control group. Patients administered with early G-CSF had similar duration of grade 4 neutropenia but significantly decreased incidence of febrile neutropenia (58% versus 81%, p = 0.018). Similar rate of toxicities was observed, including overall and grade 3-4 CRS (p = 0.93 and p = 0.28, respectively), and overall and grade 3-4 ICANS (p = 0.62 and p = 0.88, respectively). We observed no difference in the quality of CAR T-cells expansion (p = 0.79, %Cmax), nor in response rate (best ORR, 57.6% vs 61.8%, p = 0.93), nor survival even in a group of patients adjusted by a propensity score. In conclusion, early G-CSF administration was safe and effective in reducing febrile neutropenia without impact on toxicities nor on anti-lymphoma activity of CAR-T.

Adverse effects in hematologic malignancies treated with chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy: a systematic review and Meta-analysis

Background

Recently, chimeric antigen receptor-modified (CAR) T cell therapy for hematological malignancies has shown clinical efficacy. Hundreds of clinical trials have been registered and lots of studies have shown hematologic toxic effects were very common. The main purpose of this review is to systematically analyze hematologic toxicity in hematologic malignancies treated with CAR-T cell therapy.

Methods

We searched databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Embase and Cochrane up to January 2021. For safety analysis of overall hematologic toxicity, the rate of neutrophil, thrombocytopenia and anemia were calculated. Subgroup analysis was performed for age, pathological type, target antigen, co-stimulatory molecule, history of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) and prior therapy lines. The incidence rate of aspartate transferase (AST) increased, alanine transaminase (ALT) increased, serum creatine increased, APTT prolonged and fibrinogen decreased were also calculated.

Results

Overall, 52 studies involving 2004 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The incidence of any grade neutropenia, thrombocytopenia and anemia was 80% (95% CI: 68–89%), 61% (95% CI: 49–73%), and 68% (95%CI: 54–80%) respectively. The incidences of grade ≥ 3 neutropenia, thrombocytopenia and anemia were 60% (95% CI: 49–70%), 33% (95% CI: 27–40%), and 32% (95%CI: 25–40%) respectively. According to subgroup analysis and the corresponding Z test, hematological toxicity was more frequent in younger patients, in patients with ≥4 median lines of prior therapy and in anti-CD19 cases. The subgroup analysis of CD19 CAR-T cell constructs showed that 41BB resulted in less hematological toxicity than CD28.

Conclusion

CAR-T cell therapy has dramatical efficacy in hematological malignancies, but the relevant adverse effects remain its obstacle. The most common ≥3 grade side effect is hematological toxicity, and some cases die from infections or severe hemorrhage in early period. In long-term follow-up, hematological toxicity is less life-threatening generally and most suffered patients recover to adequate levels after 3 months. To prevent life-threatening infections or bleeding events, clinicians should pay attention to intervention of hematological toxicity in the early process of CAR-T cell therapy.

A scoping review of patient and public perspectives on cell and gene therapies

Aim: The development and introduction of cell and gene therapies presents complex social and economic issues. Fully addressing these challenges requires engagement with patients and the public. Materials & methods: A systematically conducted scoping review was undertaken to gauge current patient and public knowledge and perspectives, and as such inform requirements for future research, education and engagement activities. Results: A heterogeneous collection of 35 studies were identified. Levels of knowledge among patients and the public were extremely variable. Studies indicated general acceptance of therapies. Conclusion: The review identified the need for tailored educational activities, and in particular the importance of addressing misconceptions. There is also a need for robust qualitative research considering perspectives on current and forthcoming licensed therapies.

Efficacy and safety of chimeric antigen receptor T cell immunotherapy in B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Aim: The aim was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell in B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL). Materials & methods: A meta-analysis was conducted using eligible clinical trials, which were obtained from electronic medical literature databases. Results: A total of 24 clinical trials with 590 patients were included. The best overall response rate was 66% and complete remission rate was 46%. The incidence rates of cytokine-release syndrome and neurotoxicity (grade ≥ 3) were 9 and 5%, respectively. The various clinical factors were analyzed. Autogenic CAR-T cell may lead to improved efficacy than allogeneic CAR-T cell. CD20 CAR-T cell may show increased efficacy than CD19 CAR-T cell. Conclusion: CAR-T immunotherapy has remarkable efficacy and low toxicity in relapsed/refractory B-NHL.

Application of Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells in the Treatment of Hematological Malignancies

T cell immune protection plays a pivotal role in the treatment of patients with hematological malignancies. However, T cell exhaustion might lead to the possibility of immune escape of hematological malignancies. Adoptive cell therapy (ACT) with chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cells can restore the activity of exhausted T cell through reprogramming and is widely used in the treatment of relapsed/refractory (r/r) hematological malignancies. Of note, CD19, CD20, CD30, CD33, CD123, and CD269 as ideal targets have shown extraordinary potential for CAR-T cell therapy and other targets such as CD23 and SLAMF7 have brought promising future for clinical trials. However, CAR-T cells can also produce some adverse events after treatment of hematological malignancies, such as cytokine release syndrome (CRS), neurotoxicity, and on-target/off-tumor toxicity, which may cause systemic immune stress inflammation, destruction of the blood-brain barrier, and even normal tissue damage. In this review, we aim to summarize the composition of CAR-T cell and its application in the treatment of acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL), chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL), Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL), multiple myeloma (MM), and acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Moreover, we will review the disadvantages of CAR-T cell therapy and propose several comprehensive recommendations which might guide its development.

The Efficacy and Safety of Cytarabine on Newly Diagnosed Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: The role of cytarabine on newly diagnosed primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) remains controversial. The present study mainly aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of cytarabine in the induction treatment of PCNSL.

Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane library for randomized controlled trials comparing treatment of PCNSL patients with or without cytarabine. A meta-analysis was conducted to compare the odds ratios (ORs) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for complete remission (CR) rate, overall response rate (ORR), grade 3–4 toxic effects, hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs for progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) using Stata 12.0.

Results: In total, three randomized clinical trials were analyzed in this study. The result of our statistical analysis demonstrated that the application of cytarabine was closely correlated with a higher CR (OR: 2.27, 95% CI: 1.29–3.99, P < 0.01) and ORR (OR: 2.11, 95% CI: 1.14–3.93, P = 0.02). No significant difference was found in OS (HR: 0.75, 95% CI: 0.50–1.13, P = 0.17), but PFS had been improved (HR: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.45–0.97, P = 0.04) when cytarabine was added to the treatment regimen. The grade 3–4 side effect rate of the cytarabine group was higher (overall OR: 2.95, 95% CI: 1.37–6.34, P < 0.01) than that of the cytarabine-free group.

Conclusions: This meta-analysis verifies that adding cytarabine to the therapeutic regimen is helpful for newly diagnosed PCNSL patients in terms of CR, ORR, and PFS. Moreover, it should be noted that the grade 3–4 toxic effects, especially hematological toxicity, are higher in the cytarabine group than in the cytarabine-free group. The results indicate that cytarabine plays an important role in the induction therapy of PCNSL. Large-sample and high-quality RCTs should be conducted to verify our results and confirm the effects of cytarabine on newly diagnosed PCNSL.