Assessing the association of appropriateness of coronary revascularization and 1-year clinical outcomes for patients with stable coronary artery disease in China

Safety and feasibility of a real-time electronic heart team decision-making approach in patients with complex coronary artery disease: a protocol for a randomised controlled trial (EHEART trial)

INTRODUCTION

The implementation of a heart team still faces many challenges which may be facilitated with advanced communication technology. There is a knowledge gap to support the use of an electronic real-time heart team decision-making approach based on communication technology in the real clinical practice and evaluate its safety and feasibility in patients with complex coronary artery disease (CAD).

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The EHEART (Electronic HEArt team with Real-Time decision-making) trial is a prospective, multicentre, two-arm, randomised controlled trial that will randomise 490 patients with complex CAD to either an electronic real-time heart team group or conventional heart team group. For patients allocated to the real-time electronic group, heart team meetings will be initiated during the coronary angiography and guided by a supporting system based on communication technology to help with information synchronisation, real-time communication between specialists, meeting process recording and assistance and joint decision-making with patients' families. The primary and safety endpoint is a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke, revascularisation or re-angina hospital admission at 1 year. The primary secondary outcome is the time interval from the coronary angiography to the final treatment, which is the major indicator of feasibility. We will also compare the practical feasibility from the specialist's and patient's perspectives (for example, specialist's workload and patient's decision results) between the two groups.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Fuwai Hospital (no. 2022-1749). Informed consent will be obtained from all participants. The results of this trial will be disseminated through manuscript publication and national/international conferences, and reported in the trial registry entry.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ClinicalTrials.gov Registry (NCT05514210).

Financial and clinical outcomes of CT myocardial perfusion imaging and coronary CT angiography-guided versus coronary CT angiography-guided strategy

OBJECTIVES

To compare the financial and clinical outcomes of CT myocardial perfusion imaging (CT-MPI) + coronary CT angiography (CCTA)-guided versus CCTA-guided strategy in patients suspected of chronic coronary syndrome (CCS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study retrospectively included consecutive patients suspected of CCS and referred for CT-MPI+CCTA-guided and CCTA-guided treatment. The details of medical costs within 3 months after index imaging, including downstream invasive procedures, hospitalization, and medications, were recorded. All patients were followed up for major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at a median time of 22 months.

RESULTS

A total of 1335 patients (559 in the CT-MPI+CCTA group and 776 in the CCTA group) were finally included. In the CT-MPI+CCTA group, 129 patients (23.1%) underwent ICA and 95 patients (17.0%) received revascularization. In the CCTA group, 325 patients (41.9%) underwent ICA whereas 194 patients (25.0%) received revascularization. An addition of CT-MPI in the evaluation strategy remarkably reduced the healthcare expenditure, compared with CCTA-guided strategy (USD 1441.36 vs. USD 232.91, p < 0.001). After adjustment for potential cofounders after inverse probability weighting, the CT-MPI+CCTA strategy was significantly associated with lower medical expenditure [adjusted cost ratio (95% CI) for total costs: 0.77 (0.65-0.91), p < 0.001]. In addition, there was no significant difference regarding the clinical outcome between the two groups (adjusted HR= 0.97; p = 0.878).

CONCLUSIONS

CT-MPI+CCTA considerably reduced medical expenditures in patients suspected of CCS, compared to the CCTA strategy alone. Moreover, CT-MPI+CCTA led to a lower rate of invasive procedures with a similar long-term prognosis.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

CT myocardial perfusion imaging + coronary CT angiography-guided strategy reduced medical expenditure and invasive procedure rate.

KEY POINTS

• CT-MPI+CCTA strategy yielded significantly lower medical expenditure than did the CCTA strategy alone in patients with suspected CCS. • After adjustment for potential confounders, the CT-MPI+CCTA strategy was significantly associated with lower medical expenditure. • No significant difference was observed regarding the long-term clinical outcome between the two groups.

Low-Value Surgical Procedures in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Scoping Review

Importance

Overuse of surgical procedures is increasing around the world and harms both individuals and health care systems by using resources that could otherwise be allocated to addressing the underuse of effective health care interventions. In low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), there is some limited country-specific evidence showing that overuse of surgical procedures is increasing, at least for certain procedures.

Objectives

To assess factors associated with, extent and consequences of, and potential solutions for low-value surgical procedures in LMICs.

Evidence Review

We searched 4 electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, and Global Index Medicus) for studies published from database inception until April 27, 2022, with no restrictions on date or language. A combination of MeSH terms and free-text words about the overuse of surgical procedures was used. Studies examining the problem of overuse of surgical procedures in LMICs were included and categorized by major focus: the extent of overuse, associated factors, consequences, and solutions.

Findings

Of 4276 unique records identified, 133 studies across 63 countries were included, reporting on more than 9.1 million surgical procedures (median per study, 894 [IQR, 97-4259]) and with more than 11.4 million participants (median per study, 989 [IQR, 257-6857]). Fourteen studies (10.5%) were multinational. Of the 119 studies (89.5%) originating from single countries, 69 (58.0%) were from upper-middle-income countries and 30 (25.2%) were from East Asia and the Pacific. Of the 42 studies (31.6%) reporting extent of overuse of surgical procedures, most (36 [85.7%]) reported on unnecessary cesarean delivery, with estimated rates in LMICs ranging from 12% to 81%. Evidence on other surgical procedures was limited and included abdominal and percutaneous cardiovascular surgical procedures. Consequences of low-value surgical procedures included harms and costs, such as an estimated US $3.29 billion annual cost of unnecessary cesarean deliveries in China. Associated factors included private financing, and solutions included social media campaigns and multifaceted interventions such as audits, feedback, and reminders.

Conclusions and Relevance

This systematic review found growing evidence of overuse of surgical procedures in LMICs, which may generate significant harm and waste of limited resources; the majority of studies reporting overuse were about unnecessary cesarean delivery. Therefore, a better understanding of the problems in other surgical procedures and a robust evaluation of solutions are needed.

Impact of a medical supply bulk-buy program on treatment of patients with coronary artery disease in China: A single-center study

BACKGROUND

The Chinese government recently introduced a program to buy medical supplies in bulk to reduce the patient cost burden. For patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), little is known about the effect on outcomes of this bulk-buy program.

AIMS

This study investigated whether the bulk-buy program to decrease the price of stents used in PCI affected clinical decision-making and outcomes.

METHODS

This single-center study enrolled patients undergoing PCI from January 2020-December 2021. Prices decreased for stents on January 1, 2021, and balloons on March 1, 2021. Patients were grouped by surgical year as either before (2020) or after (2021) policy implementation. All clinical data were collected. To examine whether clinical decision-making for PCI was affected by the bulk-buy program, procedure appropriateness was analyzed using the 2017 appropriate use criteria (AUC). To assess outcomes, the rates of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) and complications were compared between groups.

RESULTS

Study participants were 601 patients in 2020 (before bulk buying) and 699 patients in 2021 (after bulk buying). Results of analysis by AUC for procedure appropriateness were 74.5% appropriate, 21.6% may be appropriate, and 3.8% rarely appropriate in 2020, with no differences for patients who underwent PCI in 2021. Between-group comparisons showed MACCE rates of 0.5% in 2020 and 0.6% in 2021, whereas complication rates were 5.5% and 5.7%, respectively. No statistically significant differences were found between groups (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The bulk-buy program did not impact physician clinical decision-making or surgical outcomes for patients undergoing PCI.

Effect of a standardised heart team protocol versus a guideline-based protocol on revascularisation decision stability in stable complex coronary artery disease: rationale and design of a randomised trial of cardiology specialists using historic cases

INTRODUCTION

A multidisciplinary heart team approach has been recommended by revascularisation guidelines, but how to organise and implement the heart team in a standardised way has not been validated. Inter-team and intra-team decision instability existed in the guideline-based heart team protocol, and our standardised heart team protocol based on a mixed method study may improve decision stability. The objective of this study is to evaluate the effect of the standardised heart team protocol versus the guideline-based protocol on decision-making stability in stable complex coronary artery disease (CAD).

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Eighty-four eligible interventional cardiologists, cardiac surgeons or non-interventional cardiologists from 26 hospitals in China have been enrolled. They will be randomised to a standardised heart team protocol group or a guideline-based protocol group to make revascularisation decisions for 480 historic cases (from a prospective registry) with stable complex CAD. In the standardised group, we will establish 12 heart teams based on an evidence-based protocol, including specialist selection, specialist training, team composition, team training and a standardised meeting process. In the guideline-based group, we will organise 12 heart teams according to the guideline principles, including team composition and standardised meeting process. The primary outcome is the overall percent agreement in revascularisation decisions between heart teams within a group. To demonstrate the clinical implication of decision-making stability, we will further explore the association between decision stability and 1-year clinical outcomes.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Fuwai Hospital (No. 2019-1303). All participants have provided informed consent and all patients included as historic cases provided written informed consent at the time of entry to the prospective registry. The results of this trial will be disseminated through manuscript publication and national/international conferences, and reported in the trial registry entry.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT05039567.

Exploring optimal heart team protocol to improve decision-making stability for complex coronary artery disease: a sequential explanatory mixed method study

AIMS

Current guidelines recommend a heart team in the decision making for patients with complex coronary artery disease (CAD). However, the decision-making stability of these teams has not been evaluated and the optimum protocol is unknown. We assessed inter-team agreement for revascularization decision-making and influencing factors to inform the development of a heart team protocol.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This sequential, explanatory mixed methods study included (1) a cross-sectional quantitative study to assess inter-team agreement on treatment strategy for retrospectively enrolled complex CAD patients and (2) a qualitative study that used semi-structured interviews with heart team members to identify factors influencing decision-making discrepancy. We randomly selected 101 complex CAD patients. Sixteen specialists were randomly assigned to 4 heart teams to make decisions for these patients. The primary outcome kappa of inter-team decision-making agreement was moderate (kappa 0.58). Factors influencing decision-making were generated through inductive thematic analysis and were summarized by 3 themes (specialist quality, team composition, meeting process) and 10 subthemes. Recommendations of heart team implementation were generated based on qualitative and quantitative data at 5 levels: specialist selection, specialist training, team composition, team training, and meeting process. A detailed protocol on the integration of guidelines, previous experience and recommendations was generated to establish and deploy a qualified heart team.

CONCLUSIONS

Agreement between heart teams for revascularization decision-making in complex CAD patients was moderate. Potential factors associated with decision discrepancies were summarized and recommendations were generated. A detailed heart team protocol was designed and should be validated in future.