Characterizing Urban-Rural Differences in Colon Cancer Outcomes: A Population-based Analysis Based on Travel Distance to Cancer Center

Effects of Rurality, Socioeconomic Status, and Race on Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Outcomes

OBJECTIVE

To examine how rural residence interacts with SES and race/ethnicity relative to Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) treatment delay and outcomes.

METHODS

The SEER database was queried for patients aged ≥18 with HNSCC. Out of 164,337 cases, 126,052 remained after exclusions for missing data. Statistical tests performed included Chi-squared tests, log-binomial regression models, and parametric accelerated failure time (AFT) models, with a significance level of α < 0.05.

RESULTS

About 38% of patients residing in lowest SES census tracts were rural, whereas over 98% of patients from highest SES tracts were urban. Delayed treatment was associated with shorter median survival [aTR = 0.968, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.939, 0.999]. Risk for treatment delay increased with decreasing SES and was greater for those with minoritized race/ethnicity status. Rurality was associated with a lower risk [aRR: 0.917, 95% CI: 0.892, 0.946] of treatment delays but was not predictive for patient survival (aTR: 1.019 [0.978, 1.061]). Cancer-specific mortality increased with decreasing SES and was higher in patients with minoritized race/ethnicity status.

CONCLUSION

Rurality was associated with decreased risk for treatment delay but not with worse survival relative to urban residence, whereas low SES and minority status remained predictive for poor outcome regardless of geographic context (level of evidence: 4). Although these findings argue against HNSCC survival deficits specific to rural populations, there remains concern regarding potential care shortfalls in rural populations not detected in this sample. Confirmatory patient-level analysis should be prioritized to optimize support along the rural/urban divide.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4 Laryngoscope, 135:1715-1723, 2025.

The role of innovative technologies in reducing health system inequity

The scarcity of Health Human Resources (HHR), regional disparities, and decentralized healthcare systems have profoundly affected health equity in Canada. Adequate HHR allocation is essential for equitable healthcare delivery, and the COVID-19 pandemic has revealed the importance of resilient and culturally diverse organizational HHR. Geography and infrastructure shortcomings aggravate healthcare equity. This study examines the role of innovative technologies in reducing inequity and provides four practice-based examples in different therapeutic areas. Long-term solutions such as collaborative networks, infrastructure improvements, and effective HHR planning can mitigate current challenges. However, in the short and medium terms, advanced medical technologies, digital health, and artificial intelligence can reduce health inequities by improving access, reducing disparities, optimizing resource utilization, and providing skill development opportunities for healthcare professionals.

Evaluating geographical disparities on clinical outcomes following cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Rural Australians typically encounter disparities in healthcare access leading to adverse health outcomes, delayed diagnosis and reduced quality of life (QoL) parameters. These disparities may be exacerbated in advanced malignancies, where treatment is only available at highly specialised centres with appropriate multidisciplinary expertise. Thus, this study aims to determine the association between patient residence on oncological, surgical and QoL outcomes following cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intra-peritoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC).

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on consecutive patients undergoing CRS and HIPEC at Royal Prince Alfred Hospital from January 2017 to March 2022. On the basis of their postcode of residence, patients were stratified into metropolitan and regional groups. Data encompassing demographics, oncological, surgical and QoL outcomes were compared. Statistical analysis included chi-square test, t-tests and Kaplan-Meier survival curves.

RESULTS

Among the 317 patients, 228 (72%) were categorised as metropolitan and 89 (28%) as regional. Metropolitan patients presented higher rates of recurrence (61.8% versus 40.0%, p = 0.014) and shorter overall mean survival [3.8 years (95% CI: 3.44-4.09) versus 4.2 years (95% CI: 3.76-4.63), p = 0.019] compared with regional patients. No other statistically significant differences were observed in oncological, surgical and QoL outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Most oncological, surgical and QoL parameters did not differ by geographical location of patients undergoing CRS and HIPEC for peritoneal malignancies at a high-volume quaternary referral centre. Observed differences in recurrence and survival may be attributed to the selective nature of surgical referrals and variable follow-up patterns. Future research should focus on characterising referral pathways and its influence on post-operative outcomes.

Rural versus urban commuting patients with stage III colon cancer: is there a difference in treatment and outcome?

BACKGROUND

To evaluate if there are differences in outcomes for patients with stage III colon cancer in those from urban vs. rural commuting areas.

METHODS

Data were evaluated on patients diagnosed with stage III colon cancer between 2012 and2018 from the Louisiana Tumor Registry. Patients were classified into rural and urban groups. Data on overall survival, time from diagnosis to surgery and time from surgery to chemotherapy, and sociodemographic factors (including race, age, and poverty level) were recorded.

RESULTS

Of 2652 patients identified, 2159 were urban (81.4%) and 493 rural (18.6%). No age difference between rural and urban patients (p = 0.56). Stage IIIB accounted for 66.7%, followed by IIIC (21.6%) and IIIA (11%), with a significant difference between rural and urban patients based on stage (p = 0.02). There was no difference in the extent of surgery (p = 0.34) or tumor size (p = 0.72) between urban and rural settings. No difference in undergoing chemotherapy (p = 0.12). There was a statistically significant difference in receiving timely treatment for hospital volume (p < 0.0001) and poverty level (p < 0.0001), but no difference in time from diagnosis to surgery (p = 0.48), and time from surgery to chemotherapy (p = 0.27). Non-Hispanic Blacks were less likely to receive timely treatment when compared with non-Hispanic Whites for both surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy, (aHR 0.91, 95% CI 0.83-0.99) and (aHR 0.86, 95% CI 0.77-0.97), respectively. There was no difference in Kaplan-Meier overall survival curves comparing rural vs. urban patients (p = 0.77).

CONCLUSIONS

There was no statistical difference in overall survival, time to surgery, and time to adjuvant chemotherapy between rural and urban patients with Stage III colon cancer.

Access to Specialized Care Across the Lifespan in Tetralogy of Fallot

Individuals living with tetralogy of Fallot require lifelong specialized congenital heart disease care to monitor for and manage potential late complications. However, access to cardiology care remains a challenge for many patients, as does access to mental health services, dental care, obstetrical care, and other specialties required by this population. Inequities in health care access were highlighted by the COVID-19 pandemic and continue to exist. Paradoxically, many social factors influence an individual's need for care, yet inadvertently restrict access to it. These include sex and gender, being a member of a racial or ethnic historically excluded group, lower educational attainment, lower socioeconomic status, living remotely from tertiary care centres, transportation difficulties, inadequate health insurance, occupational instability, and prior experiences with discrimination in the health care setting. These factors may coexist and have compounding effects. In addition, many patients believe that they are cured and unaware of the need for specialized follow-up. For these reasons, lapses in care are common, particularly around the time of transfer from paediatric to adult care. The lack of trained health care professionals for adults with congenital heart disease presents an additional barrier, even in higher income countries. This review summarizes challenges regarding access to multiple domains of specialized care for individuals with tetralogy of Fallot, with a focus on the impact of social determinants of health. Specific recommendations to improve access to care within Canadian and American systems are offered.

Association of Rural Residence and Receipt of Guideline-Concordant Care for Locoregional Colon Cancer

BACKGROUND

Incidence and mortality rates of colon cancer (CC) are higher in rural populations. This study aimed to determine whether rural residence is associated with differences in guideline-concordant care for patients with locoregional CC.

METHODS

Patients with stages I-III CC from 2006 to 2016 were identified in the National Cancer Database. Guideline-concordant care (GCC) was defined as resection with negative margins, adequate nodal harvest, and receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with high-risk stage II or III disease. Multivariable logistic regression (MVR) was performed to evaluate the association between rural residence and the odds of receiving GCC. Effect modification was evaluated using a two-way interaction for rurality by insurance status.

RESULTS

Of 320,719 identified patients, 6191 (2%) were rural. The rural patients had lower income and lower educational status than the urban patients and were more often Medicare-insured (p < 0.001). The rural patients traveled farther (44.5 vs. 7.5 miles; p < 0.001), although time to surgery was similar (8 vs. 9 days). The two cohorts had similar resection rates (98.8% vs. 98.0%), margin positivity (5.4% vs. 4.8%), adequate lymphadenectomy (80.9% vs. 83.0%), adjuvant chemotherapy (stage III: 69.2% vs. 68.7%), and receipt of GCC (66.5% vs. 68.3%). In the MVR, the odds of receiving GCC did not differ between the rural and urban patients (odds ratio, 0.99; 95% confidence interval, 0.94-1.05%). Insurance status did not differentially influence the receipt of GCC by the rural versus the urban patients (interaction: p = 0.83).

CONCLUSIONS

Rural and urban patients with locoregional CC are equally likely to receive GCC, suggesting that differences in cancer care delivery may not explain rural-urban disparities.

Associations of Socioeconomic Status and Rurality With New-Onset Cardiovascular Disease in Cancer Survivors: A Population-Based Analysis

PURPOSE

Patients with cancer are predisposed to develop new-onset cardiovascular disease (CVD). We aimed to assess if rural residence and low socioeconomic status modify such a risk.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with solid organ cancers without any baseline CVD and on a follow-up of at least 1 year in a large Canadian province from 2004 to 2017 were identified using the population-based registry. We performed logistic regression analyses to examine the associations of rural residence and low socioeconomic status with the development of CVD.

RESULTS

We identified 81,418 patients eligible for the analysis. The median age was 62 years, and 54.3% were women. At a median follow-up of 68 months, 29.4% were diagnosed with new CVD. The median time from cancer diagnosis to CVD diagnosis was 29 months. Rural patients (32.3% v 28.5%; P < .001) and those with low income (30.4% v 25.9%; P < .001) or low educational attainment (30.7% v 27.6%; P < .001) experienced higher rates of CVD. After adjusting for baseline factors and treatment, rural residence (odds ratio [OR], 1.07; 95% CI, 1.04 to 1.11; P < .001), low income (OR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.12 to 1.21; P < .001), and low education (OR, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.04 to 1.11; P < .001) continued to be associated with higher odds of CVD. A multivariate Cox regression model showed that patients with low socioeconomic status were more likely to die, but patients residing rurally were not.

CONCLUSION

Despite universal health care, marginalized populations experience different CVD risk profiles that should be considered when operationalizing lifestyle modification strategies and cardiac surveillance programs for the growing number of cancer survivors.

Real-world patterns of chemotherapy administration and attrition among patients with metastatic colorectal cancer

OBJECTIVE

To assess the real-world patterns of systemic treatment attrition rates among patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

METHODS

Databases based from the provincial cancer registry and electronic medical records in Alberta were accessed, and cases with a de novo diagnosis of metastatic colorectal cancer with no history of other primary cancers (2004-2017) were reviewed. Rates of chemotherapy administration in first and subsequent lines of treatment were assessed. Multivariable logistic regression analysis for factors associated with non-administration of chemotherapy was evaluated. The impact of administration of all three chemotherapy agents (fluoropyrimidines, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan) across the course of treatment was assessed through multivariable Cox regression analysis with time-dependent covariates.

RESULTS

A total of 4179 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer were included in the current study. This includes 1988 patients receiving at least one cycle of chemotherapy and 2191 patients who did not receive any chemotherapy. The following factors were associated with a higher probability of no chemotherapy use: older age (OR 1.064; 95% CI 1.057-1.070), higher Charlson comorbidity index (OR 1.444; 95% CI 1.342-1.554), female sex (OR for male sex versus female sex 0.763; 95% CI 0.660-0.881), rural residence (OR for residence in zone 2 (Calgary) versus zone 5 (North zone) 0.346; 95% CI 0.272-0.440), proximal tumor location (OR 1.255; 95% CI 1.083-1.454), and earlier year at diagnosis (OR (continuous) 0.895; 95% CI 0.879-0.911). Within the cohort of patients who received at least one cycle of chemotherapy, 42.5% received one line of chemotherapy only, and 30.5% received two lines of chemotherapy. The use of all three chemotherapy drugs was associated with better overall survival (HR 3.305; 95% CI 2.755-3.965) and colorectal cancer-specific survival (HR 3.367; 95% CI 2.753-4.117).

CONCLUSIONS

A considerable proportion of metastatic colorectal cancer patients who received active chemotherapy in this population-based study received only one line of therapy. This highlights the significance of choosing effective treatments in the first-line treatment as the attrition rate is high. Furthermore, the use of all three chemotherapy agents across the course of treatment was associated with better outcomes.