No Increase in Survival for 36-mm versus 32-mm Femoral Heads in Metal-on-polyethylene THA: A Registry Study

Influence of highly cross-linked polyethylene manufacturing characteristics on femoral head penetration in total hip arthroplasty : a ten- to 22-year follow-up study

Aims

Highly cross-linked polyethylene (HXLPE) has reduced wear and revision rates in total hip arthroplasty (THA) in the long term. However, the effect of HXLPE manufacturing characteristics on femoral head penetration has not yet been clearly defined. We report this single-institution study to investigate the clinical and radiological results of various HXLPE liners in THA.

Methods

Between January 2001 and December 2013, 904 uncemented THAs using HXLPE liners were performed at our institution. Seven different HXLPE liner types were identified: remelted (n = 3), annealed (n = 2), sequentially annealed (n = 1), and vitamin E diffused (n = 1). A total of 746 hips were available for a minimum follow-up of ten years. The linear femoral head penetration rate was measured at six weeks and at one, five, ten, and 15 years, applying the Dorr criteria to digitized radiographs, using the Roman v. 1 70 software package for analysis.

Results

No patient was revised due to wear or osteolysis. The mean total femoral head penetration ten years after THA ranged from 0.14 mm (SD 0.06) to 0.20 mm (SD 0.17) for all groups (p = 0.649). Femoral head penetration > 0.40 mm at ten years was observed in 27 (3.6%) hips. From one to 15 years after surgery, mean total penetration was 0.21 mm (SD 0.13) in components with an acetabular inclination > 50° and 0.10 mm (SD 0.12) in those placed between 35° and 50° (p < 0.001). The radiological analysis did not detect osteolysis in any hip.

Conclusion

Although HXLPE characteristics can result in different wear performance in patients undergoing THA at a mean follow-up of 15 years, the clinical and radiological results were excellent in all groups. The position of the acetabular component can influence the femoral head penetration of modern HXLPEs.

Factors associated with dislocation after total hip arthroplasties performed for nontraumatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head: a multicenter cohort study of 5,983 hips

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

 Nontraumatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) patients are at a higher dislocation risk after primary total hip arthroplasties (THAs) than osteoarthrosis patients. It has not been clear how large prosthetic heads should be to reduce dislocation. A nationwide multicenter follow-up cohort study of THAs performed for ONFH aimed to evaluate risk factors associated with dislocation and whether larger head size could reduce the dislocation risk.

METHODS

 A multivariable logistic regression model analyzed factors associated with dislocation in 5,983 THAs performed for ONFH between 1996 and 2022 with a median of 7.1 (0.5-27)-year follow-up. Patient age at surgery was 52 years and BMI was 22.9, as medians. A posterior approach was employed in 59%. The head diameter was 22 mm in 4%, 26 mm in 15%, 28 mm in 24%, 32 mm in 36%, and ≥ 36 mm in 21%.

RESULTS

 288 THAs (4.8%) dislocated. Younger (1st quartile, ≤ 41 years) patient age (odds ratio [OR] 1.45 CI [95% confidence interval] 1.02-2.07 vs. 2nd quartile), higher BMI (OR 1.05, CI 1.02-1.08 per 1), posterior approach (OR 3.33, CI 1.96-5.56 vs. anterior or anterolateral approach, OR 2.27 CI 1.59-3.23 vs. lateral approach), and smaller heads were identified as risk factors. However, ≥ 36-mm heads were not different from 32-mm heads (OR 1.06 CI 0.69-1.63).

CONCLUSION

 Risk factors associated with dislocation were younger patient age, higher BMI, posterior approach, and smaller heads; however, 32-mm heads were large enough to reduce dislocation.

Callus formation after total hip arthroplasty using a short tapered-wedge stem

OBJECTIVE

The incidence of periprosthetic fractures after total hip arthroplasty using a short tapered-wedge stem is high. Callus formation preceding this fracture, which indicates postoperative stress fracture around the stem, has been reported. However, previous studies on postoperative callus are limited. Hence, the current study aimed to evaluate the prevalence and risk factors of postoperative callus after total hip arthroplasty with a short tapered-wedge stem.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included 127 patients who underwent total hip arthroplasty using a cementless short tapered-wedge stem. The depth of stem insertion was measured as the distance from the lateral corner of the stem to the most medial point of the lesser trochanter along the body axis. Postoperative callus was defined as a bridging callus on the lateral femoral cortex at the distal end of the porous coating of the stem. Plain radiography was performed before surgery and immediately and at 1, 3, and 6 months after surgery to assess postoperative callus. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify the risk factors for PC.

RESULTS

In total, 60 (47.2%) of 127 patients presented with postoperative callus. Multivariate logistic regression analysis with postoperative callus as the dependent variable revealed that the stem depth at 1 month after total hip arthroplasty (odds ratio, 1.14; 95% confidence interval, 1.04-1.24, p = 0.002) was a significant and independent risk factor of postoperative callus.

CONCLUSION

Deep insertion of a short tapered-wedge stem is a risk factor for postoperative callus.

Concerns with alumina bipolar hemiarthroplasties compared to metal bipolar hemiarthroplasties when performed for nontraumatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head

PURPOSE

A nationwide multicenter follow-up cohort study of hip replacement arthroplasties performed for nontraumatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) aimed to answer the following questions: What factors were associated with need for reoperation? Although many modifications were made in bipolar hemiarthroplasties (BPs) to improve their durability, could we find any evidence of their efficacy?

METHODS

Excluding 58 infected hips and 43 ABS THAs with very poor survivorship, we analyzed 7393 arthroplasties; 6284 total hip arthroplasties (THAs), 886 BPs, 188 total resurfacing arthroplasties, and 35 hemi-resurfacing arthroplasties (hRSs). In the 886 BPs, 440 hips had a smooth small-diameter prosthetic neck (nBPs), 667 hips had a smooth neck (sBPs), 116 hips had highly cross-linked polyethylene in the outer head (hBPs), and 238 hips had an outer head whose outer surface was alumina ceramic (aBPs) (648 hips had an outer head whose outer surface was metal [mBPs]). Multivariate analyses using a Cox proportional-hazard model analyzed risk factors.

RESULTS

Follow-up ranged from 0.1 to 27 (average, 6.9) years, during which 265 hips (3.6%) needed reoperation. Combined systemic steroid use and excessive alcohol consumption and lateral approach were associated with higher risks, aBPs were less durable than THAs or mBPs, and hRSs were inferior to the others. Regarding BPs, the following divisions did not influence their survivorship; nBP or not, sBP or not, and hBP or not.

CONCLUSIONS

Factors associated with reoperation risk were identified as described above. The modifications made in BPs did not improve their durability, but aBPs made it worse.

LEVEL OF CLINICAL EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic cohort study.

The impact of femoral head size on the wear evolution at contacting surfaces of total hip prostheses: A finite element analysis

Total Hip Arthroplasty has been a revolutionary technique in restoring mobility to patients with damaged hip joints. The introduction of modular components of the hip prosthesis allowed for bespoke solutions based on the requirements of the patient. The femoral stem is designed with a conical trunnion to allow for assembly of different femoral head sizes based on surgical requirements. The femoral head diameters for a metal-on-polyethylene hip prosthesis have typically ranged between 22 mm and 36 mm and are typically manufactured using Cobalt-Chromium alloy. A smaller femoral head diameter is associated with lower wear of the polyethylene, however, there is a higher risk of dislocation. In this study, a finite element model of a standard commercial hip arthroplasty prosthesis was modelled with femoral head diameters ranging from 22 mm to 36 mm to investigate the wear evolution and material loss at both contacting surfaces (acetabular cup and femoral stem trunnion). The finite element model, coupled with a validated in-house wear algorithm modelled a human walking for 10 million steps. The results have shown that as the femoral head size increased, the amount of wear on all contacting surfaces increased. As the femoral head diameter increased from 22 mm to 36 mm, the highly cross-linked polyethylene (XLPE) volumetric wear increased by 61% from 98.6 mm3 to 159.5 mm3 while the femoral head taper surface volumetric wear increased by 21% from 4.18 mm3 to 4.95 mm3. This study has provided an insight into the amount of increased wear as the femoral head size increased which can highlight the life span of these prostheses in the human body.

Increasing femoral head size from 32 mm to 36 mm does not increase the revision risk for total hip replacement: a New Zealand joint registry study

BACKGROUND

The use of larger femoral heads in total hip replacement (THR) has increased over the last decade. While the relationship between increasing head size and increased stability is well known, the risk of revision with increasing head size remains poorly understood. The aim of this study was to compare the outcome of total hip joint replacement with 32-mm and 36-mm heads.

METHODS

We carried out a 20-year retrospective analysis of prospective data from the New Zealand Joint Registry (NZJR). All primary total hip replacements registered between January 1999 and December 2018 were included. We compared the rate of revision of 32-mm and 36-mm heads in THR. Sub-group analysis included comparisons of bearing type and all-cause revision.

RESULTS

60,051 primary THRs met our inclusion criteria. The revision rate per 100 component years was significantly higher with a 36-mm head than with a 32-mm head (0.649 vs. 0.534, p < 0.001). Subgroup analysis of bearing type showed no significant differences in revision rates for all combinations of 36-mm heads when compared to 32-mm (p = 0.074-0.92), with the exception of metal-on-metal (MoM); p = 0.038. When MoM was removed there was no significant difference in revision rates per 100 component years between 32-mm and 36-mm heads, 0.528 versus 0.578 (p = 0.099).

CONCLUSIONS

Increasing head size from 32 mm to 36 mm results in no significant increase in revision in all bearing combinations except MoM.

Femoral head size and surgical approach affect dislocation and overall revision rates in total hip arthroplasty: up to 9-year follow-up data of 269,280 procedures in the Dutch Arthroplasty Register (LROI)

BACKGROUND

Femoral head size and surgical approach might affect the revision rate for dislocation and for any other reason after total hip arthroplasty (THA). We penetrated this question based on registry data with up to 9-year follow-up.

METHODS

269,280 primary THAs documented in the Dutch Arthroplasty Registry (LROI) between 2007 and 2019 were included. Revision rates were calculated by competing risk analyses. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression ratios (HR) were used for comparison.

RESULTS

Revisions for dislocation were rare. They were more frequent after posterolateral (1.4% [95% CI, 1.3-1.5]), compared to straight lateral (0.6% [95% CI, 0.5-0.7]), anterolateral (0.6% [95% CI, 0.5-0.7]) and anterior (0.4% [95% CI, 0.3-0.5]) approach. Larger femoral head size decreased the dislocation revision risk: 1.4% [95% CI, 1.3-1.5) for 22-28-mm heads; 0.9% (95% CI, 0.8-1.0) for 32-mm heads; 0.6% (95% CI, 0.6-0.7) for 36-mm heads. For the anterior approach, the HR for both revision for dislocation (0.3, 95% CI, 0.3-0.4) and any other reason (0.8, 95% CI, 0.8-0.9) were lowest compared to other approaches including posterolateral (HR 1). Revision risk for any other reason was highest with anterolateral (HR 1.3 (95% CI, 1.2-1.4)) and straight lateral approach (1.1 [95% CI, 1.0-1.2]).

CONCLUSIONS

The anterior approach might reduce revision rates for both dislocation and all cause revision. Posterolateral approach is associated with a higher risk of dislocation revision but has a lower risk of any other revision. Increasing femoral head size up to 36 mm reduces revision for dislocation and improves overall revision rates for all approaches.

"Incidence of Instability Following Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty Continues to Decline in the Medicare Population"

BACKGROUND

Instability has been the primary cause of failure following primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) leading to revision hip surgery. The purpose of this study was to determine if instability rates have further declined following advances in primary THA including dual mobility articulations, direct anterior approaches, advanced technologies, and improved knowledge of the hip-spine relationships.

METHODS

Using the 5% Medicare Part B claims data from 1999 to 2019, we identified 81,573 patients who underwent primary THA for osteoarthritis. Patients who experienced instability at 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years were identified. Multivariate cox regression analyses evaluated the effect of patient and procedure characteristics on the risk for instability.

RESULTS

Instability at 1 year following primary THA declined from approximately 4% in 2000 to 2.3% in 2010 and 1.6% in 2018. The leading cause of revision surgery was infection (18.6%), followed by peri-prosthetic fracture (14%), mechanical loosening (11.5%), and instability (9.4%). High risk groups for instability continue to include increased age, higher Charlson index, obesity, lumbar spine pathology, and neurocognitive disorders.

CONCLUSION

Instability is no longer the leading etiology of failure following primary THA with a decline of approximately 40% over the past decade. Infection, periprosthetic fracture, mechanical loosening, and then instability are now the leading causes of failure. Multiple factors may play a role in the decline of instability including increased use of dual mobility articulations, direct anterior approaches, improved knowledge of the hip-spine relationships, and use of advanced technologies.

A Comparison of Revision Rates and Dislocation After Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty with 28, 32, and 36-mm Femoral Heads and Different Cup Sizes: An Analysis of 188,591 Primary Total Hip Arthroplasties

This article was updated on August 17, 2022, because of previous errors, which were discovered after the preliminary version of the article was posted online. On page 1462, in the first sentence of the Abstract section entitled "Results," the phrase that had read "and 36-mm heads had fewer dislocations than 28-mm (HR = 0.33 [95% CI, 0.16 to 0.68]; p = 0.003), but more dislocations than 32-mm heads (HR for >2 weeks = 2.25 [95% CI, 1.13 to 4.49]; p = 0.021)" now reads "and 36-mm heads had fewer dislocations than 28-mm (HR = 0.33 [95% CI, 0.16 to 0.68]; p = 0.003) and 32-mm heads (HR for ≥2 weeks = 0.44 [95% CI, 0.22 to 0.88]; p = 0.021)." On page 1468, in the last sentence of the section entitled "Acetabular Components with a Diameter of <51 mm," the phrase that had read "and HR for ≥2 weeks = 2.25 [95% CI, 1.13 to 4.49; p = 0.021]) ( Fig. 3 )" now reads "and HR for ≥2 weeks = 0.44 [95% CI, 0.22 to 0.88; p = 0.021]) ( Fig. 3 )." Finally, on page 1466, in the upper right corner of Figure 3 , under "32mm vs 36mm," the second line that had read "2Wks+: HR=2.25 (1.13, 4.49), p=0.021" now reads "2Wks+: HR=0.44 (0.22, 0.88), p= 0.021."

Risk factors for revision surgery due to dislocation within 1 year after 111,711 primary total hip arthroplasties from 2005 to 2019: a study from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Dislocation of a hip prosthesis is the 3rd most frequent cause (after loosening and infection) for hip revision in Norway. Recently there has been a shift in surgical practice including preferred head size, surgical approach, articulation, and fixation. We explored factors associated with the risk of revision due to dislocation within 1 year and analyzed the impact of changes in surgical practice.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

111,711 cases of primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register were included (2005-2019) after primary THA with either 28 mm, 32 mm, or 36 mm femoral heads, or dualmobility articulations. A flexible parametric survival model was used to calculate hazard ratios for risk factors. Kaplan-Meier survival rates were calculated.

RESULTS

There was an increased risk of revision due to dislocation with 28 mm femoral heads (HR 2.6, 95% CI 2.0-3.3) compared with 32 mm heads. Furthermore, there was a reduced risk of cemented fixation (HR 0.6, CI 0.5-0.8) and reverse hybrid (HR 0.6, CI 0.5-0.8) compared with uncemented. Also, both anterolateral (HR 0.5, CI 0.4-0.7) and lateral (HR 0.6, CI 0.5-0.7) approaches were associated with a reduced risk compared with the posterior approach. The time-period 2010-2014 had the lowest risk of revision due to dislocation. The trend during the study period was towards using larger head sizes, a posterior approach, and uncemented fixation for primary THA.

INTERPRETATION

Patients with 28 mm head size, a posterior approach, or uncemented fixation had an increased risk of revision due to dislocation within 1 year after primary THA. The shift from lateral to posterior approach and more uncemented fixation was a plausible explanation for the increased risk of revision due to dislocation observed in the most recent time-period. The increased risk of revision due to dislocation was not fully compensated for by increasing femoral head size from 28 to 32 mm.

Influence of implant variations on survival of the Lubinus SP II stem: evaluation of 76,530 hips in the Swedish Arthroplasty Register, 2000-2018

Background and purpose - Almost all prosthetic implant brands include several variations. Most studies on implant performance investigate an implant system without sub-analysis of implant attributes. We studied the influence of design variations during the last 2 decades on implant survival of the most frequently used cemented femoral stem, the Lubinus SPII, reported to the Swedish Arthroplasty Register (SHAR). Patients and methods - Between 2000 and 2018, 100,032 cemented Lubinus SP II stems had been reported to SHAR. Patients with primary osteoarthritis operated on with stem length 150 mm together with a cemented cup from the same manufacturer (n = 76,530) were included in this analysis. Primary study outcome was non-infectious stem revision. Cox regression with adjustment for age, sex, surgical approach, and year of surgery was used. Hazard rates (HR) are presented with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results - Average follow-up was 7.6 years (SD 4.2). At 18 years the overall stem survival was 99.1 (CI 98.9-99.3). Increased revision rate was observed for stems with extra offset, when a long or an extra-long head length had been used. Smaller stem sizes, in particular the smallest stem size (01), substantially increased the rate of mechanical failure as reflected by an almost 10 times increased rate of revision compared with the standard size (2). Interpretation - In this study with larger sample size and longer follow-up than previously presented from the same register, we observed more pronounced effects of previously documented design variations. Based on our results, surgeons using the Lubinus SPII stems are advised to consider an alternative solution if a Lubinus stem size 01, Lubinus extra offset, or an extra-long head seems to be the most suitable choice at the preoperative planning.

Prevalence of locomotive syndrome in Japanese patients more than 10 years after total hip arthroplasty: A cross-sectional cohort study

BACKGROUND

Locomotive syndrome (LS) is a high risk condition that requires nursing care. It is important to investigate the prevalence of and factors related to LS to maintain a healthy life expectancy for patients; however, only a few reports have focused on the relationship between LS and total hip arthroplasty (THA). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of LS and to identify factors associated with LS in patients more than 10 years after THA.

METHODS

This is a cross-sectional cohort study. Patients were assessed via a mail survey that included items regarding demographic data, cardiometabolic and motor disorders, the incidence of falls, physical activity level, and the 25-question Geriatric Locomotive Function Scale (GLFS-25) questionnaire. LS was defined as having a score ≥16 on the GLFS-25, and the respondents were categorized into two groups: an LS group and a non-LS group. The prevalence of LS was calculated in each gender and age group. Differences in variables between the groups were determined using the unpaired t-test and chi-squared test.

RESULTS

A total of 593 patients were included in the study (mean age, 70.4 years; 525/593 females). According to the GLFS-25, 164 patients (27.7%; 21.1% men and 28.8% women) were classified as having LS, which increased with age. In addition, compared with the non-LS group, the LS group had a significantly higher prevalence of motor diseases, cardiometabolic diseases, and falls and significantly lower levels of activity.

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest that the prevalence of LS in patients more than 10 years after THA is 27.7%. The result suggest that the prevalence of LS in patients more than 10 years after THA is similar to the prevalence of LS in the general elderly population. Furthermore, LS is related to not only motor diseases but also cardiometabolic diseases.

Analysis of the Risk of Wear on Cemented and Uncemented Polyethylene Liners According to Different Variables in Hip Arthroplasty

Wear debris in total hip arthroplasty is one of the main causes of loosening and failure, and the optimal acetabular fixation for primary total hip arthroplasty is still controversial because there is no significant difference between cemented and uncemented types for long-term clinical and functional outcome. To assess and predict, from a theoretical viewpoint, the risk of wear with two types of polyethylene liners, cemented and uncemented, a simulation using the finite element (FE) method was carried out. The risk of wear was analyzed according to different variables: the polyethylene acetabular component’s position with respect to the center of rotation of the hip; the thickness of the polyethylene insert; the material of the femoral head; and the relationship of the cervical–diaphyseal morphology of the proximal end of the femur to the restoration of the femoral offset. In all 72 simulations studied, a difference was observed in favour of a cemented solution with respect to the risk of wear. With regard to the other variables, the acetabular fixation, the thickness of the polyethylene, and the acetabular component positioning were statistically significant. The highest values for the risk of wear corresponded to a smaller thickness (5.3 mm), and super-lateral positioning at 25 mm reached the highest value of the von Mises stress. According to our results, for the reconstruction of the acetabular side, a cemented insert with a thickness of at least 5 mm should be used at the center of rotation.

Bipolar hemiarthroplasty versus total hip arthroplasty in femoral neck fracture patients: results from Lithuanian Arthroplasty Register

INTRODUCTION

Elderly patients with displaced femoral neck fractures (FNF) are usually operated with arthroplasty but with various combinations of implants and approaches. Thus, the optimal treatment is still controversial. We aimed to compare the results between the cemented bipolar hemiarthroplasty (HA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA) patients operated for FNF regarding revision rate at 1 year postoperatively.

METHODS

The data were derived from the Lithuanian Arthroplasty Register. We included patients operated with cemented bipolar HA and compared them to the most frequently used cemented THA with 28-mm head during 2011-2016. For survival analysis, we used both revision for all reasons and for dislocations as an endpoint. Cox proportional hazards models were used to analyse the influence of covariates (age groups, gender, surgical approaches and arthroplasty groups).

RESULTS

There were 1177 bipolar HA and 514 THA included in our study. 26 (2.2%) revisions had occurred among the bipolar HAs as compared to 25 (4.9%) among the THAs 1 year after surgery. The main reason for revision was dislocation. The unadjusted cumulative revision rate for any reason at 1 year after surgery was 2.4% for the bipolar HA group and 5.1% for the THA group (p = 0.0054). Cox regression analysis showed that the use of bipolar HA, anterolateral approach and younger age groups had lower risk of revision for all reasons.

CONCLUSION

Bipolar HA and anterolateral approach had a significantly lower overall 1-year risk of revision in femoral neck fracture patients as compared to THA with 28-mm femoral heads.

Does increased diameter of metal femoral head associated with highly cross-linked polyethylene augment stress on the femoral stem and cortical hypertrophy?

PURPOSE

Cortical hypertrophy (CH) after total hip arthroplasty (THA) is thought as a process of femoral cortical functional adaptation against the stem. However, no study has been performed to investigate the association between CH and femoral head size. The purpose of this study is to investigate the factors related to femoral CH around the cementless stem after THA.

METHODS

THAs in 31 patients using 36-mm metal head and as a control, age-matched 62 THAs with 32-mm metal head have been analyzed. Radiographs were reviewed at four years to determine cortical thickness change from immediate post-operative one. Pre-operative and immediate post-operative radiographs were used to calculate the femoral morphology, canal fill ratio, stem alignment, and femoral and acetabular offset. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify the risk factors for CH.

RESULTS

Patients with a 36-mm metal head had a significantly higher rate of severe CH (P = 0.001) than those with a 32-mm metal head. The multivariate logistic regression analysis with dependent variables of CH showed that the use of a 36-mm metal head had a significantly positive effect on CH. The odds ratio of a 36-mm metal head in mild CH was 2.517 (95% confidence interval, 1.032-6.143; P = 0.043), and that in severe CH was 8.273 (95% confidence interval, 2.679-25.551; P = 0.000). Age and the canal flare index were weakly and negatively influenced by mild CH.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of a 36-mm metal head was the dominant risk factor for CH.

"True" Cumulative Incidence of and Risk Factors for Hip Dislocation within 2 Years After Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty Due to Osteoarthritis: A Nationwide Population-Based Study from the Danish Hip Arthroplasty Register

BACKGROUND

Hip dislocation is one of the leading indications for revision of total hip arthroplasty (THA) implants, and the extent of this complication is often measured by the number of revisions. The exact incidence of dislocation can be difficult to establish as closed reductions may not be captured in available registers. The purpose of this study was to identify the "true" cumulative incidence of hip dislocation (revisions and closed reductions) after primary THA, and the secondary aim was to identify risk factors for dislocation.

METHODS

From the Danish Hip Arthroplasty Register, we identified 31,105 primary THAs indicated by primary osteoarthritis that had been performed from 2010 to 2014 and had 2 years of follow-up. Dislocations were identified through extraction from the Danish National Patient Register. Matching diagnosis and procedure codes were deemed correct while non-matching codes were reviewed through a comprehensive, nationwide review of patient files. Risk factors were analyzed with multiple logistic regression analysis and presented as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

Our review of patient files identified 1,861 dislocations in 1,079 THAs, which corresponds to a 2-year cumulative incidence of 3.5% (CI = 3.3% to 3.7%). This was a 50% increase compared with the correctly coded dislocations captured by administrative register data only. Patients who were <65 years of age had a lower dislocation risk (OR = 0.70; CI = 0.59 to 0.83) and those who were >75 years of age had a higher risk (OR = 1.32; CI = 1.14 to 1.52) compared with those who were 65 to 75. Male sex (OR = 0.86; CI = 0.75 to 0.98), cemented fixation (OR = 0.71; CI = 0.58 to 0.87), and lateral approach (OR = 0.28; CI = 0.16 to 0.49) were all associated with a lower risk. A head size of 32 mm was associated with a higher risk of dislocation (OR = 1.27; CI = 1.10 to 1.46) than 36-mm heads, whereas dual-mobility cups had a reduced risk (OR = 0.13; CI = 0.05 to 0.36).

CONCLUSIONS

We found the "true" cumulative incidence of dislocations within 2 years after primary THAs performed between 2010 and 2014 in Denmark to be 3.5%. Age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, head size and type, fixation method, and surgical approach were independent significant factors for dislocation. Comprehensive search algorithms are needed in order to identify all dislocations so that this complication can be accurately reported in national registers.

Short-term clinical and radiographic outcomes of total hip arthroplasty with PMPC-grafted highly cross-linked polyethylene liners against 32-mm femoral heads

We evaluated the clinical and radiographic outcomes of femoral head penetration and total hip arthroplasties with untreated and poly (2-methacryloyloxyethyl phosphorylcholine) (PMPC)-grafted highly cross-linked polyethylene (HXLPE) acetabular liners against 26-, 28-, and 32-mm cobalt-chromium alloy femoral heads 3 years after the index surgery. Three combinations of the articulating surfaces were evaluated in the present study: untreated or PMPC-grafted HXLPE liner against 26- or 28-mm femoral heads (n = 16, 24) [control (26 or 28 mm) and PMPC (26 or 28 mm)] and PMPC-grafted HXLPE liner against 32-mm femoral heads (n = 64) [PMPC (32 mm)]. The clinical outcomes improved at 3 years postoperatively for the groups. No periprosthetic osteolysis or acetabular component migration was detected, and no revision surgery was performed among the groups. The steady-state wear rate of the PMPC (26 or 28 mm) group (0.021 mm/year) was lower than that of the control (26 or 28 mm) group (- 0.015 mm/year); the steady-state wear was under the clinical threshold. In contrast, the steady-state wear rate of the PMPC (32 mm) group (-0.006 mm/year) showed no significant difference when compared to that of the PMPC (26 or 28 mm) group (p < 0.01). The results obtained in the present study clearly demonstrate that PMPC-grafting onto an HXLPE surface improved the wear resistance of acetabular liners, even when coupled with larger femoral heads. Although further follow-up evaluations are required, PMPC-grafted HXLPE acetabular liners may be a promising approach to extend the longevity of artificial joints.

Incidence of postoperative complications and non- periprosthetic fractures after total hip arthroplasty: A more than 10-year follow-up retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

Postoperative complications and non-periprosthetic fractures (NPPFs), which was defined as a fracture existing non- periprosthetic implant, after total hip arthroplasty (THA) have a negative effect on the patients' ability to perform activities of daily living. Thus, investigating these incidences of patients after THA will be valuable as it lead to a more strategic physical therapy interventions and advanced research to prevent these problems. The purpose of this study was to investigate the incidence of postoperative complications related to implants and NPPFs in patients after THA, a more than 10-year follow-up.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study. A total 892 patients with hip osteoarthritis who underwent primary THA were analyzed (age at surgery was 45-79 years; 805 women; the average follow-up period was 12.4-year). The postoperative complications related to implants and NPPFs were calculated using data from their medical records.

RESULTS

The postoperative complications occurred in 37 patients, and NPPFs occurred in 72 patients, who were significantly older, and hip and knee OA diagnosis, compared to patients without NPPFs ( p <.05). The most common cause of NPPFs was minor trauma. In patients aged ≧ 65 years, significantly more NPPFs occurred during the first year after surgery( p <.05).

CONCLUSION

More than 10-year after THA, the incidence of NPPFs was higher than that of postoperative complications related to implants. Older patients who had hip and knee OA were a significantly higher risk of developing NPPFs due to falls within the first year after surgery.

Global diversity in bearings in primary THA

Choice of articulating materials, head size and the design of the articulation will become decisive for the long-term performance of a total hip arthroplasty (THA) and especially in terms of risk for dislocation and wear-related problems. Here we account for common alternatives based on available studies and the evidence that can be derived from them.Metal or ceramic femoral heads articulating against a liner or cup made of highly cross-linked polyethylene and ceramic-on-ceramic articulations have about similar risk for complications leading to revision, whereas the performance of metal-on-metal articulations, especially with use of big heads, is inferior. The clinical significance of problems related to ceramic-on-ceramic articulations such as squeaking remains unclear. With use of current technology ceramic fractures are rare.Large femoral heads have the potential to increase the range of hip movement before impingement occurs and are therefore expected to reduce dislocation rates. On the other hand, issues related to bearing wear, corrosion at the taper-trunnion junction and groin pain may arise with larger heads and jeopardize the longevity of THA. Based on current knowledge, 32-mm heads seem to be optimal for metal-on-polyethylene bearings. Patients with ceramic-on-ceramic bearings may benefit from even larger heads such as 36 or 40 mm, but so far there are no long-term reports that confirm the safety of bearings larger than 36 mm.Assessment of lipped liners is difficult because randomized studies are lacking, but retrospective clinical studies and registry data seem to indicate that this liner modification will reduce the rate of dislocation or revision due to dislocation without clear evidence of clinically obvious problems due to neck-liner impingement.The majority of studies support the view that constrained liners and dual mobility cups (DMC) will reduce the risk of revision due to dislocation both in primary and revision THA, the latter gaining increasing popularity in some countries. Both these devices suffer from implant-specific problems, which seem to be more common for the constrained liner designs. The majority of studies of these implants suffer from various methodological problems, not least selection bias, which calls for randomized studies preferably in a multi-centre setting to obtain sufficient power. In the 2020s, the orthopaedic profession should place more effort on such studies, as has already been achieved within other medical specialties, to improve the level of evidence in the choice of articulation when performing one of the most common in-hospital surgical procedures in Europe. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2020;5:763-775. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.5.200002.

Is there a reduction in risk of revision when 36-mm heads instead of 32 mm are used in total hip arthroplasty for patients with proximal femur fractures?

Background and purpose - 32-mm heads are widely used in total hip arthroplasty (THA) in Scandinavia, while the proportion of 36-mm heads is increasing as they are expected to increase THA stability. We investigated whether the use of 36-mm heads in THA after proximal femur fracture (PFF) is associated with a lower risk of revision compared with 32-mm heads.Patients and methods - We included 5,030 patients operated with THA due to PFF with 32- or 36-mm heads from the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association database. Each patient with a 36-mm head was matched with a patient with a 32-mm head, using propensity score. The patients were operated between 2006 and 2016, with a metal or ceramic head on a polyethylene bearing. Cox proportional hazards models were fitted to estimate the unadjusted and adjusted hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for revision for any reason and revision due to dislocation for 36-mm heads compared with 32-mm heads.Results - 36-mm heads had an HR of 0.9 (CI 0.7-1.2) for revision for any reason and 0.8 (CI 0.5-1.3) for revision due to dislocation compared with 32-mm heads at a median follow-up of 2.5 years (interquartile range 1-4.4).Interpretation - We were not able to demonstrate any clinically relevant reduction of the risk of THA revision for any reason or due to dislocation when 36-mm heads were used versus 32-mm. Residual confounding due to lack of data on patient comorbidities and body mass index could bias our results.

Absence of instabilities and intra-prosthetic dislocations at 7 to 11 years following THA using a fourth-generation cementless dual mobility acetabular cup

PURPOSE

Dual-mobility (DM) cups are increasingly used in total hip arthroplasty (THA) but there lacks literature on their long-term results. We aimed to investigate outcomes of a fourth-generation cementless DM acetabular cup at 7-11 years.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 240 consecutive hips that received cementless THA using the same dual mobility cup (Novae Sunfit TH) and femoral stem (Corail). Patients were recalled at ≥7 years to collect Oxford hip scores (OHS), Harris hip scores (HHS), and inspect for radiolucent lines and granulomas. Multi-variable analyses were performed to determine whether HHS or OHS were associated with pre- or intra-operative variables.

RESULTS

At 8.4 ± 0.8 years (range, 7-11), 6 hips were revised (2.5%), 54 deceased (22.5%), and 14 could not be reached (5.8%). Four revisions (2 cup+stem, 2 liners only) were due to sepsis (1.7%), one (cup and stem) for trauma (0.4%), and one (stem) due to aseptic loosening (0.4%). For the remaining 166 hips, HHS was 83.6 ± 13.2 and OHS was 20.3 ± 6.7. Multi-variable analysis confirmed that HHS (β = - 0.38; p = 0.039) and OHS (β = 0.36; p < 0.001) worsened with age, and that OHS was worse for Charnley C patients (β = 3.17; p = 0.009). Neither granulomas nor radiolucenies were observed around any cups, but radiolucenies were seen around 25 stems (20.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

This fourth-generation DM cup demonstrated satisfactory outcomes at 7-11 years, with no instabilities or cup revisions due to aseptic loosening. Better OHS was observed for younger patients and those presenting higher Charnley grade.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, retrospective case study.

The effect of structural parameters of total hip arthroplasty on polyethylene liner wear behavior: A theoretical model analysis

Using large femoral heads in total hip arthroplasty (THA) has been widely advocated to improve the function and longevity of the components. However, increasing the head size has been shown to accelerate polyethylene liner wear. Few studies have investigated the effect of other important structural parameters (such as polyethylene liner thickness, metal cup size, head-liner conformity, loading conditions, etc.) on the biomechanical functions of the THAs. In this study, an analytical model was used to evaluate the polyethylene liner wear characteristics of the THAs (defined using a biomechanical wear factor) with various structural parameters of the THAs and loading conditions. For all the THA systems examined in this study, under the same loading conditions, a larger head leads to increasing contact areas, lower contact stresses, and higher biomechanical wear factors. When the head size is fixed, a decrease in the polyethylene liner thickness or a decrease in the head-liner conformity leads to higher peak contact stresses and smaller contact areas and consequently, lower biomechanical wear factors. This study provides a parametric analysis tool for the optimal design/selection of the THA systems and for prediction of early effects of various structural parameters on the biomechanical function (such as contact stresses) and longevity (such as polyethylene liner wear) of the THA systems.

Increased risk for dislocation after introduction of the Continuum cup system: lessons learnt from a cohort of 1,381 THRs after 1-year follow-up

Background and purpose - The introduction of new total hip replacements (THRs) is known to be associated with an increased risk for complications. On completion of a competitive procurement process, a new uncemented cup system was introduced into general use at our institution in 2016. We launched this study after the introduction to assess (1) the incidence of early dislocations of the old (Pinnacle) and the new (Continuum) cup systems, and (2) whether the cup design would affect the risk for dislocation.Patients and methods - We assessed the incidence of dislocations after 1,381 primary THRs performed at our institution during 2016. Also, the effect of the cup system (Pinnacle, Continuum with neutral liner, Continuum with elevated rim liner) on dislocation rates was analyzed using a multivariable regression model.Results - 47 (3.4%) early dislocations were identified. The incidence of dislocations was 1.3% for the Pinnacle, 5.1% for the Continuum with neutral liner, and 1.2% for the Continuum with elevated rim liner. The Continuum with neutral liner was found to have an increased risk for dislocations compared with the Pinnacle (aOR 5, 95% CI 1.4-17). However, when an elevated rim liner was used with the Continuum, the risk for dislocation between the Continuum and the Pinnacle was similar.Interpretation - Our results emphasize the need for both careful consideration before the introduction of new implants and the systematic monitoring of early outcomes thereafter. The elevated rim liner should be preferred for use with the Continuum cup because of the poor coverage of the neutral liner that may result in dislocations.

Varying but reduced use of postoperative mobilization restrictions after primary total hip arthroplasty in Nordic countries: a questionnaire-based study

Background and purpose - Mobilization has traditionally been restricted following total hip arthroplasty (THA) in an attempt to reduce the risk of dislocation and muscle detachment. However, recent studies have questioned the effect and rationale underlying such restrictions. We investigated the use of postoperative restrictions and possible differences in mobilization protocols following primary THA in Denmark (DK), Finland (FIN), Norway (NO), and Sweden (SWE). Patients and methods - All hospitals performing primary THA in the participating countries were identified from the latest national THA registry report. A questionnaire containing questions regarding standard surgical procedure, use of restrictions, and postoperative mobilization protocol was distributed to all hospitals through national representatives for each arthroplasty registry. Results - 83% to 94% (n = 167) of the 199 hospitals performing THA in DK, FIN, NO, and SWE returned correctly filled out questionnaires. A posterolateral approach was used by 77% of the hospitals. 92% of the hospitals had a standardized mobilization protocol. 50%, 41%, 19%, and 38% of the hospitals in DK, FIN, NO, and SWE, respectively, did not have any postoperative restrictions. If utilized, restrictions were applied for a median of 6 weeks. Two-thirds of all hospitals have changed their mobilization protocol within the last 5 years-all but 2 to a less restrictive protocol. Interpretation - Use of postoperative restrictions following primary THA differs between the Nordic countries, with 19% to 50% allowing mobilization without any restrictions. There has been a strong tendency towards less restrictive mobilization over the last 5 years.

Effect of changing femoral head diameter on bony and prosthetic jumping angles

BACKGROUND

In THA, using a larger femoral head can increase the oscillation angle and jumping distance. However, there have been no reports which indicate precisely how increasing the jumping distance leads to an increase in the angle from impingement to dislocation (jumping angle). In this study, we clarified the jumping angle of various head diameters and its relationship with pelvic morphology.

METHODS

Using a three-dimensional templating system, virtual THA and ROM simulations were performed in 82 patients. We investigated the distance between bony and prosthetic impingement points and the head centre and calculated the jumping angle for various head diameters. We measured various pelvic shapes and length to clarify the relationship between pelvic morphology and impingement distance.

RESULTS

Jumping angles were 7.7° ± 3.2°, 12.1° ± 1.6°, 15.4° ± 2.5° and 10.0° ± 3.0° with flexion, internal rotation with 90° flexion (IR), extension and external rotation (ER), respectively, when we used a 22-mm head diameter. Bony jumping angle increased about 0.5°, 0.8°, 1.0° and 0.7° per 2-mm increase in head diameter with flexion, IR, extension and ER. On the other hand, prosthetic jumping angle remained almost stable at about 31°. Impingement distance was related to pelvic morphology in all directions. Bony jumping angles differed with ROM; the biggest was seen with extension, followed by IR, ER and flexion. On the other hand, bony jumping angle was less than prosthetic jumping angle in all cases.

CONCLUSION

Bony jumping angles differed with ROM; the biggest was seen with extension, followed by IR, ER and flexion. Prosthetic impingement angles were stable. In addition, the bony jumping angle was less than the prosthetic jumping angle in all cases.