Does the Rule of Thirds Adequately Detect Deficient and Excessive Acetabular Coverage?

Anterior Center-Edge Angle Is Less Reliable Than Anterior Wall Index to Predict Anterior Coverage of the Femoral Head

BACKGROUND

No consensus is available regarding which radiographic measurement most accurately correlates with anterior coverage of the femoral head.

PURPOSE

(1) To determine the correlation between 2 measurements of anterior wall coverage: total anterior coverage (TAC) calculated from radiographs and equatorial anterior acetabular sector angle (eAASA) calculated from computed tomography (CT) scans; (2) to define the correlation between anterior center-edge angle (ACEA) and anterior wall index (AWI) with TAC and eAASA; and (3) to investigate what other radiographic metrics may help predict anterior coverage.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study (Diagnosis); Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

The authors retrospectively reviewed 77 hips (48 patients) for which radiographs and CT scans were obtained for reasons other than hip-related pain. Mean age of the population was 62 ± 22 years; 48 (62%) hips were from female patients. Two observers measured lateral center-edge angle (LCEA), AWI, Tönnis angle, ACEA, CT-based pelvic tilt, and CT-based acetabular version, with all Bland-Altman plots within 95% agreement. Correlation between intermethod measurements was estimated with a Pearson coefficient. Linear regression was used to test the ability of baseline radiographic measurements to predict both TAC and eAASA.

RESULTS

Pearson coefficients were r = 0.164 (ACEA vs TAC; P = .155), r = 0.170 (ACEA vs eAASA; P = .140), r = 0.58 (AWI vs TAC; P = .0001), and r = 0.693 (AWI vs eAASA; P < .0001). Multiple linear regression model 1 showed that AWI (β = 17.8; 95% CI, 5.7 to 29.9; P = .004), CT acetabular version (β = -0.45; 95% CI, -0.71 to -0.22; P = .001), and LCEA (β = 0.33; 95% CI, 0.19 to 0.47; P = .001) were useful to predict TAC. Multiple linear regression model 2 revealed that AWI (β = 25; 95% CI, 15.67 to 34.4; P = .001), CT acetabular version (β = -0.48; 95% CI, -0.67 to -0.29; P = .001), CT pelvic tilt (β = 0.26; 95% CI, 0.12 to 0.4; P = .001), and LCEA (β = 0.21; 95% CI, 0.1 to 0.3; P = .001) accurately predicted eAASA. Model-based estimates and 95% CIs using 2000 bootstrap samples from the original data were 6.16 to 28.6 for AWI in model 1 and 15.1 to 34.26 for AWI in model 2.

CONCLUSION

There was a moderate to strong correlation between AWI and both TAC and eAASA, whereas ACEA correlated weakly with the former measurements, thus not being useful to quantify anterior acetabular coverage. Other variables such as LCEA, acetabular version, and pelvic tilt may also help predict anterior coverage in asymptomatic hips.

Can we determine anterior hip coverage from pelvic anteroposterior radiographs? A study of patients with hip dysplasia

PURPOSE

Insufficient coverage causes hip joint instability and results in hip pain. Anterior hip coverage can be determined on both pelvic anteroposterior (AP) radiographs and false profile (FP) radiographs. Four parameters are commonly used to determine the anterior coverage on pelvic AP radiographs: the crossover index, crossover sign, anterior wall index (AWI), and rule of thirds. This study aims to clarify the relationship between these 4 parameters on AP radiographs and the anterior center edge angle (ACEA) on FP radiographs.

METHODS

In this study, 53 patients who underwent periacetabular osteotomy for hip dysplasia at our center between July 2020 and October 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Four parameters on AP radiographs and the ACEA on FP radiographs before surgery and 6 months after surgery were measured and compared for each hip.

RESULTS

Upon examining the 53 hips in this study, there was no correlation between either the crossover index and the ACEA (P = 0.66) or the crossover sign before surgery. The postoperative correlation between the crossover index and the ACEA was weak (r = 0.36, P = 0.007), and that between the crossover sign and the ACEA was moderate (r = 0.41, P = 0.003). There was a weak correlation between the AWI and ACEA both before (r = 0.288, P = 0.036) and after (r = 0.349, P = 0.011) the operation. Evaluation of the anterior coverage by the rule of thirds was also not consistent when determining the anterior coverage with the ACEA.

CONCLUSION

Anterior coverage on AP radiographs is largely inconsistent with ACEA on FP radiographs, especially before the surgery. It is recommended to take FP radiographs routinely for determining anterior hip coverage.

[Definition of hip dysplasia in 2023 : Signs of macro and micro instability]

BACKGROUND

Hip dysplasia is a complex static-dynamic pathology leading to chronic joint instability and osteoarthritis. Because our understanding of the underlying pathomorphologies of hip dysplasia, both on the macro and micro levels, has evolved, an updated definition is needed.

QUESTION

What is the definition of hip dysplasia in 2023?

METHODS

By summarizing and reviewing relevant literature, we provide an up-to-date definition of hip dysplasia with a guide to appropriately making the diagnosis.

RESULTS

In addition to the pathognomonic parameters, supportive and descriptive indicators, as well as secondary changes are used to fully characterize instability inherent in hip dysplasia. The primary diagnostic tool is always the plain anteroposterior pelvis radiograph, which can be supplemented by additional investigations (MRI of the hip with intraarticular contrast agent; CT) if necessary.

CONCLUSION

The complexity, subtlety, and diversity of the pathomorphology of residual hip dysplasia requires careful, multilevel diagnosis and treatment planning in specialized centers.

The Acetabular Wall Index Is Associated with Long-term Conversion to THA after PAO

BACKGROUND

Periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) has been shown to be a valuable option for delaying the onset of osteoarthritis in patients with hip dysplasia. Published studies at 30 years of follow-up found that postoperative anterior overcoverage and posterior undercoverage were associated with early conversion to THA. The anterior and posterior wall indices are practical tools for assessing AP coverage on standard AP radiographs of the pelvis pre-, intra-, and postoperatively. However, no study that we know of has evaluated the relationship between the postoperative anterior and posterior wall indices and survivorship free from arthroplasty.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

In a study including patients after PAO for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH), we evaluated whether the acetabular wall index is associated with conversion to THA in the long-term after PAO. We asked: (1) Is an abnormal postoperative anterior wall index associated with conversion to THA after PAO? (2) Is an abnormal postoperative posterior wall index associated with conversion to THA after PAO? (3) Are there other factors associated with joint replacement after PAO?

METHODS

This retrospective study involved pooling data of PAO for DDH from two previously published sources. The first series (1984-1987) comprised the very first 75 PAOs for symptomatic DDH performed at the inventor's institution. The second (1997-2000) comprised a series of PAOs for symptomatic DDH completed at the same institution 10 years later. No patient was lost to follow-up. Fifty hips (44 patients) were excluded for predefined reasons (previous surgery, substantial femoral pathomorphologies, poor-quality radiographs), leaving 115 hips (102 patients, mean age 29 ± 11 years, 28% male) for analysis with a mean follow-up of 22 ± 6 years. One observer not involved in patient treatment digitally measured the anterior and posterior wall indices on postoperative AP pelvic radiographs of all patients. All patients were contacted by mail or telephone to confirm any conversion to THA and the timing of that procedure relative to the index procedure. We performed univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses using conversion to THA as our endpoint to determine whether the anterior and posterior wall indices are associated with prosthetic replacement in the long-term after PAO. Thirty-one percent (36 of 115) of hips were converted to THA within a mean of 15 ± 7 years until failure. The mean follow-up duration of the remaining patients was 22 ± 6 years.

RESULTS

A deficient anterior wall index was associated with conversion THA in the long-term after PAO (adjusted hazard ratio 10 [95% CI 3.6 to 27.9]; p < 0.001). Although observed in the univariate analysis, we could not find a multivariate association between the posterior wall index and a higher conversion rate to THA. Grade 0 Tönnis osteoarthritis was associated with joint preservation (adjusted HR 0.2 [95% CI 0.07 to 0.47]; p = 0.005). Tönnis osteoarthritis Grades 2 and 3 were associated with conversion to THA (adjusted HR 2.3 [95% CI 0.9 to 5.7]; p = 0.08).

CONCLUSION

A deficient anterior wall index is associated with a decreased survivorship of the native hip in the long-term after PAO. Intraoperatively, in addition to following established radiographical guidelines, the acetabular wall indices should be measured systematically to ascertain optimal acetabular fragment version to increase the likelihood of reconstructive survival after PAO for DDH.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic study.