Do Fixed or Mobile Bearing Implants Have Better Survivorship in Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty? A Study From the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry

High posterior tibial slope increases anterior cruciate ligament elongation in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty during early-flexion of lunge

BACKGROUND

In-silico and in-vitro studies have revealed an appropriate posterior tibial slope (PTS) is critical for normal anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) tension and knee biomechanical behavior of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). However, the effects of PTS on in-vivo elongation of ACL and PCL in UKA remains unknown. The study aimed to quantify in-vivo ACL and PCL elongations during lunge and analyze their relations with PTS.

METHODS

Thirteen fixed-bearing (FB) and 11 mobile-bearing (MB) UKA patients were recruited. The postoperative medial PTS was defined as the angle between the tibial transverse plane (perpendicular to mechanical axis) and cut plane. Accurate knee spatial postures of UKA and contralateral native knees during single-leg lunge were measured by the dual fluoroscopic imaging system. The ACL (AM, PL bundles) and PCL (AL, PM bundles) footprints were determined based on anatomical features on femoral and tibial 3D surface model reconstructed from CT. A validated 3D wrapping method was used to measure ligament bundle length. The paired Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to analyze the ligament elongation difference between bilateral knees. The Spearman correlation between PTS and average ligament elongation difference (ACL during 0-30° early-flexion, PCL during 60-100° deep-flexion) was calculated.

RESULTS

The elongation of FB UKA PCL double-bundle was larger than contralateral sides in most flexion range of lunge (Max-Difference: AL 7.6 ± 8.7%, PM 8.2 ± 5.1%, p < 0.05). In contrast, ACL double-bundle elongations of MB UKA in mid-flexion were larger than contralateral sides (Max-Difference: AM 8.0 ± 8.1%, PL 7.6 ± 9.8%, p < 0.05). The increased PTS was significantly relevant to the increased ACL double-bundle elongation difference of bilateral knees for both FB and MB UKA patients (R > 0.6, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

There was abnormal in-vivo elongation of PCL in FB UKA and ACL in MB UKA during lunge and cause over-constraints to the contralateral knee. There was a positive correlation between PTS and ACL elongation difference for both FB and MB UKA, indicating excessive PTS should be avoided to preserve native ACL function in further UKA implantation.

LEVELS OF EVIDENCE

III.

Long-term results of lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with a mobile-bearing device

Aims

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is one option in the treatment of isolated unicompartmental advanced osteoarthritis (OA). While long-term results exist for medial mobile-bearing (MB) UKA, evidence regarding lateral MB-UKA is still limited. The Oxford Domed Lateral (ODL) implant aims to reduce the bearing dislocation rate in lateral MB-UKA through enhanced bearing entrapment. However, the long-term performance of this implant remains unclear. This study evaluated the long-term survival and clinical outcomes of the ODL in a non-designer centre.

Methods

This single-centre retrospective analysis included 115 lateral MB-UKAs using the ODL performed between January 2006 and December 2014. The primary endpoint of the study was implant survival, defined as the time until a revision procedure was required for any reason. Secondary outcomes included Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Forgotten Joint Score (FJS), pain, satisfaction, and Tegner Activity Scale (TAS). Survival was assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis.

Results

At ten years, the cumulative implant survival rate was 74.8% (95% CI 65.2 to 82.1; number at risk = 71), with bearing dislocation (8.5%) and OA progression (10.4%) as leading revision causes. In 55 non-revised knees with a mean follow-up of 13.4 years (SD 1.8), the mean postoperative OKS improved significantly to 37.8 (SD 9.1) (p < 0.001). Additionally, 85.5% of patients (n = 47) reported satisfaction, with a mean FJS of 65.9 (SD 32.2) and TAS of 2.8 (SD 1.1). However, only 76.4% (n = 42) attained the patient-acceptable symptom state for OKS and FJS.

Conclusion

This is the first long-term ODL study from a non-designer centre; our results demonstrated high failure rates due to bearing dislocation and OA progression, despite satisfactory clinical outcomes in non-revised patients. The disproportionately high risk of failure suggests that the MB design should be abandoned in favour of a fixed-bearing device for lateral UKA.

Patient satisfaction following unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: Current concepts

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) has gained progressive popularity in recent decades, currently comprising approximately 10% of knee arthroplasties in the United States. Nonetheless, UKA has not yet solidified its position as the superior treatment for isolated compartment osteoarthritis, as initially reported implant survivorship was subpar, leading to hesitation in its utilization and stricter patient indications compared to total knee arthroplasty. Patient satisfaction following knee arthroplasty has emerged as a critical metric to gauge patient acceptance and contentment with surgical interventions. Currently, a variety of UKA types exist, differing in bearing design, fixation techniques such as cementless or cemented fixation, and robotic-assisted systems, each with its own merits and drawbacks. Multiple studies have demonstrated the contributions of these innovations to improve clinical outcomes and implant survivorship. However, the abundance of studies has made it challenging to establish a clear overview. This paper provides an overview of the current concepts of UKA, evaluating various aspects of UKA referencing to patient satisfaction and providing a recap of its historical development. Available research demonstrated no significantly universal superior variant of UKA.

The in-vivo medial and lateral collateral elongation correlated with knee functional score and joint space following unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

The medial collateral ligament (MCL) and lateral collateral ligament (LCL) are paramount for joint stability. Their elongation patterns may change during fixed-bearing and mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (FB and MB UKA). This study aims to explore the relationship between the elongation of MCL, LCL, and changes in joint space, as well as their correlation with functional scale scores during FB and MB UKA.

HYPOTHESIS

We hypothesize that MCL and LCL have different elongation patterns in UKA patients, and there is a correlation between elongation and joint space and functional scores.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study recruited 24 patients undergoing UKA on a unilateral knee (13 FB and 11 MB). A dual fluoroscopic imaging system was employed to assess in-vivo knee kinematics during static standing and single-leg lunge. The superficial and deep MCL (sMCL, dMCL) and LCL were divided into anterior, medium, and posterior portions. The virtual ligament method quantified in-vivo ligament lengths. Analysis focused on the correlation of normalized ligament lengths with functional scores and joint space.

RESULTS

1. LCL Elongation in FB UKA: There is a significant increase in LCL elongation during early and mid-flexion of the single-leg lunge (p < 0.05). 2. MCL Elongation in MB UKA: Both sMCL and dMCL exhibit significant elongation during early and mid-flexion of the single-leg lunge (p < 0.05). 3. Correlation with Functional Scores: Differences in collateral ligament elongation in FB UKA are significantly correlated with the OKS and KSS, highlighting the impact on functional outcomes. In MB UKA, differences in ligament elongation are significantly correlated with the FJS. 4. Joint Space Correlation: There is a significant correlation between the elongation of the anterior and medium portions of dMCL and joint space in the surgical compartment during mid- and deep flexion (30-100°, p < 0.05, r > 0.64).

CONCLUSION

The study reveals distinct ligament elongation patterns between UKA and native knees in LCL for FB UKA and MCL for MB UKA. These patterns are associated with knee functional scores. Moreover, dMCL elongation correlates significantly with the joint space for MB UKA during middle and deep flexion phases.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III; prospective retrospective cohort study.

Outcomes of fixed versus mobile-bearing medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

Aims

The optimal bearing surface design for medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) remains controversial. The aim of this study was to compare outcomes of fixed-bearing (FB) and mobile-bearing (MB) UKAs from a single high-volume institution.

Methods

Prospectively collected data were reviewed for all primary cemented medial UKAs performed by seven surgeons from January 2006 to December 2022. A total of 2,999 UKAs were identified, including 2,315 FB and 684 MB cases. The primary outcome measure was implant survival. Secondary outcomes included 90-day and cumulative complications, reoperations, component revisions, conversion arthroplasties, range of motion, and patient-reported outcome measures. Overall mean age at surgery was 65.7 years (32.9 to 94.3), 53.1% (1,593/2,999) of UKAs were implanted in female patients, and demographics between groups were similar (p > 0.05). The mean follow-up for all UKAs was 3.7 years (0.0 to 15.6).

Results

Using revision for any reason as an endpoint, five-year survival for FB UKAs was 97.2% (95% CI 96.4 to 98.1) compared to 96.0% for MB (95% CI 94.1 to 97.9; p = 0.008). The FB group experienced fewer component revisions (14/2,315, 0.6% vs 12/684, 1.8%; p < 0.001) and conversion arthroplasties (38/2315, 1.6% vs 24/684, 3.5%; p < 0.001). A greater number of MB UKAs underwent revision due to osteoarthritis progression (FB = 21/2,315, 0.9% vs MB = 16/684, 2.3%; p = 0.003). In the MB group, 12 (1.8%) subjects experienced bearing dislocations which required revision surgery. There were 15 early periprosthetic tibia fractures (0.6%) in the FB group compared to 0 for MB (p = 0.035).

Conclusion

In similar patient populations, FB UKAs demonstrated slightly higher survival than a commonly used MB design. Adverse event profiles differed by bearing type, with an increased risk of bearing dislocation and OA progression with MB designs, and early periprosthetic tibia fractures for FB designs.

[Research progress on unicompartmental knee arthroplasty for elderly patients with knee osteoarthritis]

Objective

To conclude the research progress of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) in the treatment of elderly patients with knee osteoarthritis (KOA).

Methods

The literature on UKA at home and abroad in recent years was reviewed to summarize the clinical characteristics of elderly patients with KOA, perioperative management (including evaluating indications preoperatively, intraoperative prosthesis selection, postoperative complication management, etc).

Results

Through reasonable preoperative evaluation, prosthesis selection, and advanced perioperative management, for elderly patients with KOA who meet the indications, UKA can be considered. Compared with total knee arthroplasty, the incidence of postoperative complications in elderly patients undergoing UKA is lower, joint awareness is reduced, functional improvement and satisfaction are higher. Meanwhile, choosing appropriate prostheses and fixation methods can lead to a good survival rate.

Conclusion

UKA can provide a safe and effective treatment option for elderly patients with KOA within a certain range of indications.

Advantages and limitations of mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: an overview of the literature

INTRODUCTION

Interest in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) has recently grown. Mobile bearing UKA, in which the bearing is not fixed but rather perfectly conforms with femoral and tibial components and moves completely passively between the femoral and tibial implant, has now been used for approximately half a century.

AREAS COVERED

Alongside the recognized advantages of UKA, the mobile-bearing variant benefits from an extremely low rate of polyethylene wear and tolerable minor malalignment. Revision rates for UKA have been reported to exceed those of total knee arthroplasty, but long-term survival rates and outcomes from mobile-bearing UKA have been found to be satisfactory. In addition to the lateral osteoarthritis and loosening, which are main complications of UKA, bearing dislocation is a specific complication of mobile bearing UKA. Fractures and valgus subsidence are more prevalent than in the cementless UKA. While these continue to be features to be addressed, they have been partially solved.

EXPERT OPINION

Given the manifold benefits of UKA, its application could be extended to a larger patient population. Successful outcomes rely on careful patient selection and the surgeon's extensive familiarity with the procedure. Looking ahead, the incorporation of robotic surgery, already a feature of some fixed-bearing UKAs, might shape the future trajectory of mobile-bearing UKA.

Regional Trends in Unicondylar and Patellofemoral Knee Arthroplasty: An Analysis of the American Joint Replacement Registry

BACKGROUND

As the popularity of unicondylar knee arthroplasty (UKA) and patellofemoral arthroplasty (PFA) have expanded, more patients who have limited arthritis are undergoing partial knee arthroplasty. No studies have evaluated if any regional differences in the United States (U.S.) exist between partial versus total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of this study was to utilize the American Joint Replacement Registry to evaluate regional differences in UKA, PFA, and TKA.

METHODS

The American Joint Replacement Registry was queried for all TKA, PFA, and UKA procedures between 2012 and 2021. Surgical volume was compared between the Midwest (MW), Northeast (NE), South, and West (W) regions. Trends were compared using multivariate logistic regression analyses and least squared mean logistic regression models.

RESULTS

Since 2012, there has been a steady increase in the amount of UKAs performed across the U.S., except during the COVID-19 pandemic when numbers decreased. Logistic regression analyses demonstrated a higher likelihood of receiving a UKA compared to TKA in the NE compared to other regions, and higher likelihood of receiving a PFA in the NE and W compared to other regions over the study period. Other factors that increased the likelihood of having a UKA nationally were men, the procedure being performed at a teaching hospital, and having surgery in urban areas. Patients were more likely to have a PFA in the NE compared to the S and MW, and higher odds in the South and W compared to the MW, with rates of PFA consistently lower in the MW compared to other regions.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients were more likely to have a UKA in the NE compared to other regions of the country. Patients had higher odds of having a PFA in the NE and W regions relative to the MW. Men had higher odds of having either UKA or PFA than women across the nation.

Presence of a Lateral Trochlear Osteophyte Predicts Medial Unicompartmental Arthroplasty Failure at Midterm Follow-up

Background

Specific clinical and radiographic risk factors for medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) failure are incompletely understood. The purpose of this study was to perform a midterm survivorship analysis of medial UKA from a single, nondesigner surgeon. Based on observations from clinical practice, we hypothesized that the presence of a lateral trochlear osteophyte on preoperative Merchant radiographs may be predictive of medial UKA failure secondary to progressive osteoarthritis (OA).

Methods

Patients who underwent a mobile-bearing medial UKA by a single surgeon with minimum 24 months of clinical follow-up from 2008 to 2019 were retrospectively identified. Radiographic parameters, including the presence of a lateral trochlear osteophyte, were measured. Kaplan-Meier survivorship analyses were performed. Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate variables as risk factors for UKA failure, defined as reoperation or component revision.

Results

A total of 233 UKAs were included. The mean age was 60 years, mean BMI 32 kg/m², and 53% of patients were male. The mean follow-up duration was 5.7 years (range, 2.0-13.1 years). Using any reoperation as an endpoint, the 10-year survival was 91%. Using any component revision as an endpoint, the 10-year survival was 93%. Using revision due to progressive OA as an endpoint, the 10-year survival was 95%. The presence of a lateral trochlear osteophyte was associated with an increased risk of any reoperation (hazard ratio 3.6; 95% confidence interval 1.3-9.5) and increased risk of revision due to progressive OA (hazard ratio 9.8; 95% confidence interval 2.9-32.7).

Conclusions

The presence of a lateral trochlear osteophyte on preoperative Merchant view radiographs was associated with an increased risk of medial UKA failure.

Mid-term survivorship of fixed bearing unicondylar knee arthroplasty with no exclusion of early PFJ arthritis or ACL deficiency: Analysis of clinical and radiological predictors

PURPOSE

Fixed bearing (FB) UKA constituted 63.7% of unicondylar knee arthroplasties in 2020 Australian Registry with the longest UKA survivorship. The significance of patellofemoral joint (PFJ) arthritis, ACL deficiency, post-operative anteromedial pain, radiosclerosis or radiolucency on survivorship of FB UKA is not established. The aim of this study was to analyze the medium-term survivorship of fixed-bearing UKA with no exclusion of PFJ OA and ACL deficiency. Predictors for failure were analyzed.

METHODS

FB UKA performed in 2011-17 were reviewed. Cases with PFJ OA or ACL deficiency were not excluded. The effect on survivorship by ACL deficiency, PFJ arthritis, post-operative anteromedial pain and radiological abnormalities were analyzed.

RESULTS

There were 96 UKA with follow-up time of 66 ± 18 months (27-98). The mean age was 70 ± 9 years, BMI 25.8 ± 2.6 kg/m². Alignment was varus 9° ± 4° pre-operatively and varus 3° ± 3° post-operatively. There were four revisions (4.2%) and 4 deaths (4.2%). Reasons for revisions were loosening (n = 1), persistent pain (n = 2) and lateral compartment disease (n = 1). Estimated survival at 8.3 years was 94.7% (95% CI 91.6-97.7). BMI ≥30 was found to be a significant predictor for failure. The incidence of radiographic abnormalities was 75% for PFJ arthritis, 39% for tibial tray overhang, 14% for radiolucency or radiosclerosis, 5% for ACL deficiency and 5% for edge loading respectively but they were not significantly associated with lower survivorship or anteromedial knee pain. The presence of anteromedial pain after surgery in 36.5% was also not significantly associated with survivorship.

CONCLUSION

FB UKA with no exclusion of early PFJ arthritis and ACL deficiency has satisfactory medium-term survivorship. BMI ≥30 could have higher risk of all-cause revision. Tibial tray overhang, non-progressive radiolucency or radiosclerosis do not seem to be associated with anteromedial knee pain or poorer medium term survivorship.