Does Augmented Reality-based Portable Navigation Improve the Accuracy of Cup Placement in THA Compared With Accelerometer-based Portable Navigation? A Randomized Controlled Trial

Use of augmented reality surgical navigation reduces intraoperative fluoroscopic imaging in anterior total hip arthroplasty with equivalent accuracy for component positioning

Background

Computer-assisted surgical navigation was designed to reduce the rates of acetabular component malpositioning, a common cause for revision following primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). We compared intraoperative measures such as radiation exposure, radiographic acetabular cup placement, and outcomes of patients who underwent a THA using computer-assisted surgical navigation with augmented reality (AR) compared to those who underwent traditional manual THA with fluoroscopic assistance (FA).

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 115 hips who underwent primary direct anterior THAs using the intraoperative AR surgical navigation system between 3/30/2021 and 12/30/2022. These were compared to a matched cohort of 115 primary THAs performed with FA through a direct anterior approach during the same time period. Patients were matched based on age, gender, American Society of Anesthesiologists score (ASA), and BMI. Goal inclination and anteversion were set to 42° (°) and 22°, respectively.

Results

THA with AR patients had decreased intraoperative radiation exposure (mean 2.0 versus 3.2 mGy, p < 0.001) and radiation time (mean 0.2 versus 0.4 min, p < 0.001). Deviation from the preoperative plan was similar between AR and FA for both radiographic inclination and anteversion. There was no difference in the operative time, estimated blood loss, or reoperations, all of which were for infection (1.7 versus 0.0 %, p = 0.5).

Conclusion

AR surgical navigation in primary THA has similar radiographic, operative and clinical results as THA with intraoperative FA. However, AR surgical navigation is associated with decreased intraoperative fluoroscopic radiation and time. Further research is needed to evaluate accuracy of acetabular component positioning and complications.

How Much Does a Computed Tomography-Based Mixed-Reality Navigation System Change Freehand Acetabular Component Position?

Background

This study evaluates how a computed tomography-based mixed-reality (MR) navigation system impacts acetabular component orientation compared to freehand positioning in total hip arthroplasty.

Methods

A series of 79 patients who underwent total hip arthroplasty utilizing a computed tomography-based MR navigation system were reviewed. The surgeon initially placed the acetabular cup freehand, attempting to achieve the preoperative plan, and this initial intraoperative orientation was recorded. The cup was then adjusted to the planned position. The difference between freehand and planned tilt-adjusted operative anteversion (OA) and inclination (OI) determined the navigation tool's impact.

Results

The mean preoperative planned OA was 30.1 ± 2.0 (range: 25, 35) degrees, and the mean freehand intraoperative OA was 30.2 ± 9.1 (range: 4, 57) degrees (P = .885), requiring a mean adjustment of 6.8 ± 5.1 (range: 0, 23) degrees. Freehand OA was corrected at least 5 degrees in 54.4% (43/79) of cases. The mean preoperative planned OI was 40.8 ± 0.6 (range: 39, 42) degrees, and the mean freehand intraoperative OI was 37.8 ± 6.6 (range: 18, 53) degrees (P < .001), requiring a mean adjustment of 5.7 ± 4.5 (range: 0, 22) degrees to achieve. Freehand OI was corrected at least 5 degrees in 43.0% (34/79) of cases.

Conclusions

Freehand acetabular component positioning in the lateral position is variable when attempting to execute patient-specific numerical cup orientation targets. Use of this navigation tool led the surgeon to correct more than 5 degrees in both OA and OI in roughly half of the hips.

Simulation to Scalpel: A Systematic Review of True Evidence of Skills Transfer as Seen Through the Lens of Patient Outcomes

INTRODUCTION

Simulation-based training (SBT) has become an essential component of surgical education. However, the definitive evidence for dissrect patient outcomes remains inconsistent. This prompted us to conduct this systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate Kirkpatrick Level 4 evidence on whether SBT translates into clinical benefits and improves patient outcomes.

METHODS

We designed a search protocol a priori and followed PRISMA guidelines for systematic reviews. Medline (via PubMed), Cochrane Library, online clinical trial registers, and websites were reviewed from their inception until 31st October 2024. Included studies were randomized controlled trials with patients undergoing any invasive intervention involving manual skills after SBT compared to the same intervention involving manual skills without SBT and comparing Clavien-Dindo complication grades. The methodological quality of included studies was assessed using the Cochrane's revised tool to assess the risk of bias in randomized trials. The Cochrane Collaboration's Review Manager software version 5.3 was utilized for data analysis. The grading of recommendation, assessment, development, and evaluation (GRADE) instrument was used for recommendation strength in the included studies in the meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Ten studies were included in the final meta-analysis; all were rated as low risk of bias. The results favored simulation, but no statistically significant difference was observed between simulation and conventional training. The GRADE assessment reflected moderate certainty.

DISCUSSION

We evaluated the effectiveness of simulation-based training (SBT) in improving patient-centric outcomes, classified by Clavien-Dindo complication grades using Kirkpatrick Level 4 evidence from randomized controlled trials, and discovered that results were comparable to traditional training. Future studies are needed to address this limitation in the current evidence base for simulation-based training to confirm and maximize its patient-centered benefits.

Enhancing the accuracy of cup placement in total hip arthroplasty using CT-based navigation by a trainee surgeon: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

The learning curve of total hip arthroplasty (THA) using the anterior approach in the supine position is considered to be long owing to limited surgical field visualization. This study aimed to investigate the learning curve of a trainee's cup placement using computed tomography (CT)-based navigation, focusing on identifying the number of cases required to achieve proficiency.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included 112 hips that underwent total hip arthroplasty using CT-based navigation via anterolateral approach in the supine position by a trainee surgeon who had performed fewer than 20 prior THA cases. The absolute differences in cup alignment between postoperative measurements and intraoperative records, and differences in three-dimensional position between postoperative measurements and preoperative plan were assessed using the Mann-Whitney U test. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to determine the cutoff point for achieving accuracy.

RESULTS

The absolute differences were 2.4°±2.5° (inclination) and 2.4°±2.0° (anteversion), and 1.5 mm ± 1.3 mm (coronal plane) and 1.4 mm ± 1.2 mm (axial plane). The ROC curve identified 20 cases as the cutoff point for proficiency, with significant improvement in cup inclination accuracy. Multivariate analysis revealed that the first 20 cases (odds ratio, 10.4; 95% confidence interval, 3.1-34.5) were a predictive risk factor for inaccurate cup alignment. No cup revisions or dislocations occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study to identify the learning curve of cup placement using CT-based navigation via an anterior approach by an inexperienced trainee surgeon. Proficiency in cup placement was achieved after 20 cases using CT-based navigation.

Evaluating the Accuracy of a Computed Tomography-Based Mixed-Reality Navigation Tool for Acetabular Component Positioning in Total Hip Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Robotics and navigation systems have improved the accuracy and precision of acetabular component placement in total hip arthroplasty (THA). The purpose of this study was to determine if the intraoperative use of a novel mixed-reality (MR) navigation system resulted in accurate acetabular component placement with minimal outliers.

METHODS

A series of 79 patients who underwent THA performed by a single surgeon using a novel MR navigation system were retrospectively reviewed. The preoperative planned acetabular component operative inclination (OI) and tilt-adjusted operative anteversion (OA) were collected for each case. At the six-week follow-up, each patient underwent three-dimensional EOS imaging, which was used to measure the acetabular component placement via validated measuring software. Patients who had bilateral THAs or three-dimensional images that did not have critical bony landmarks visible for measurement were excluded from the study. Absolute error was calculated for both inclination and anteversion. Outliers were defined as any cup position that was outside a range of ± 10 degrees from the preoperatively planned target. A total of 39 patients met the inclusion criteria.

RESULTS

The mean planned OI for each patient was 40.8 (range, 40 to 41) degrees, and the mean measured postoperative OI was 40.4 (range, 37 to 46) degrees (P = 0.40), resulting in a mean absolute error of 1.8 (range, zero to five) degrees. The mean planned OA was 30.2 (range, 25 to 35) degrees, and the mean measured postoperative OA was 31.1 (range, 27 to 42) degrees (P = 0.11), resulting in a mean absolute error of 2.0 (range, zero to six) degrees. There were no outliers in either OI or OA.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study suggest that the use of MR navigation during THA results in accurate postoperative acetabular component inclination and anteversion relative to the preoperative plan without outliers.

Accuracy of Acetabular Component Positioning Using a Mixed Reality-Guided Navigation System During Total Hip Arthroplasty

Background

Surgeons increasingly recognize the importance of patient-specific considerations in determining ideal cup alignments. In addition, various surgical navigation systems have been reported to improve cup placement accuracy during total hip arthroplasty (THA). Recently, a novel computed tomography (CT)-based planning and mixed-reality (MR) guidance system was developed to enable patient-specific 3-dimensional planning of the ideal cup position and further improve intraoperative achievement of the planned orientation.

Methods

This is retrospective, observational study of 40 patients (40 hips) who underwent MR-guided THA. Patient-specific CT-based surgical planning with definition of target operative anteversion and inclination of the acetabular cup in relation to the anterior pelvic plane was performed. 3D holograms of the cup and cup impactor in the selected target position were created and exported. Intraoperatively, automatic holographic registration was performed using a smart tool-based linked-paired-point matching method. Patient-specific content was displayed on a head-mounted display, and the acetabular component was inserted by matching the spatial position of the cup impactor with the hologram of the cup impactor in the target position. Postoperatively, patients underwent biplane simultaneous imaging for measurement of achieved cup alignment using a validated measurement method.

Results

Mean planned operative anteversion and inclination angles were 28.4° ± 1.6° (95% confidence interval [CI], 27.9°-28.8°) and 39.9° ± 0.3° (95% CI, 39.8°-40.0°), respectively. The mean absolute target error between preoperative target operative anteversion and the achieved operative anteversion was 0.7° ± 1.1° (95% CI, 0.3°-1.0°; range, 0°-4°). The mean absolute target error between preoperative target operative inclination and the achieved operative inclination was 1.1° ± 1.2° (95% CI, 0.7°-1.4°; range, 0°-4°).

Conclusion

Acetabular component positioning using a mixed reality guidance system during THA was highly accurate and well within the accuracy reported for other navigation systems.

Level of Evidence

Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Impact of the difference between preoperative planning and intraoperative femoral neck osteotomy level on stem alignment

BACKGROUND

The combined anteversion theory is used for implant placement in total hip arthroplasty (THA). While majority of the research emphasizes the precise placement of the acetabular cup, there's less focus on stem alignment. This study aimed to investigate the impact of the discrepancy between the preoperatively planned femoral neck osteotomy level and the actual osteotomy level during surgery on stem alignment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study involved 232 patients (258 joints) who had a total hip arthroplasty (THA) between April 2018 and December 2022 at our hospital. They were implanted with either the ACTIS stem (Depuy Synthes) or Taperloc Complete XR 123° (Zimmer Biomet)-147 joints with ACTIS stem and 111 with Taperloc stem. Three-dimensional templating software was used to evaluate preoperative planning and postoperative stem placement angles. The difference between the actual and preoperatively planned osteotomy levels was also measured. The impact of this difference in femoral neck osteotomy level on stem alignment was evaluated.

RESULTS

In the ACTIS stem group, the femoral neck osteotomy level was - 0.3 ± 3.7 mm. The stem alignment had a varus of 1.8 ± 1.9°, extension of 0.1 ± 1.5°, and anteversion of 2.4 ± 5.9°, compared to preoperative plans. A positive correlation was identified between osteotomy level and varus/valgus alignment (r = 0.607, p < 0.01), with a weak correlation for anteversion (r = 0.236, p < 0.01). No correlation existed with flexion/extension. In the Taperloc stem group, osteotomy level was 2.2 ± 3.1 mm. The postoperative stem showed a varus of 1.6 ± 1.5°, extension of 0.5 ± 1.7°, and anteversion of 4.9 ± 6.5°. A correlation was observed between osteotomy level and varus/valgus alignment (r = 0.476, p < 0.01), but not with flexion/extension or anteversion.

CONCLUSIONS

The study examined how differences in planned vs. actual femoral neck osteotomy affect stem alignment in THA using ACTIS stem and Taperloc stem. We found that osteotomy level influenced varus/valgus alignment; mildly affected flexion/extension; and had no effect on anteversion.

Accelerometer-based portable navigation system shows no superior accuracy over pelvic alignment guide for acetabular cup placement in total hip arthroplasty in lateral decubitus position

BACKGROUND

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) using a portable navigation system (PNS) incurs costs per procedure. However, it does not require a large console. This study aimed to compare the accuracy of acetabular cup placement using a pelvic alignment guide (PAG) attached to the pelvis and an accelerometer-based PNS in THA performed in the lateral decubitus position.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 100 hips that underwent primary THA in the lateral decubitus position between July 2018 and January 2021. The PAG was used in 50 hips, whereas the PNS was used in the other 50. Cup placement accuracy was measured using postoperative computed tomography scans, comparing errors in inclination and anteversion angles. The surgical time, blood loss, and complications were recorded. The follow-up period was at least 2 years in all cases.

RESULTS

The mean absolute error of the inclination angle was similar between the groups (the PAG group: 3.7° ± 2.3° [range, 0.0-9.0]; the PNS group: 3.7° ± 2.3° [range, 0.2-10.5], p = 0.705). The mean absolute error of the anteversion angle was significantly smaller in the PAG group than in the PNS group (3.0° ± 2.4° [range, 0.0-9.7] vs. 6.5° ± 4.8° [range, 0.3-17.3], p < 0.001). The PAG group had a higher proportion of hips within 5° and 10° of the target angle (64 vs. 42%, P = 0.028, and 100 vs. 74%, p < 0.001, respectively). The PNS group had six hips with anteversion errors of 15° or more. Surgical time and blood loss were lower in the PAG group. The PNS group had one dislocation, whereas the PAG group did not.

CONCLUSION

The accelerometer-based PNS did not demonstrate superior cup alignment accuracy compared to the PAG in THA performed in the lateral decubitus position. This finding informs surgeons that computer-assisted surgery is not necessarily superior to conventional THA using a PAG.

Comparison of Implant Placement Accuracy Between Manual, Robot-Assisted, Computer-Navigated, Augmented Reality Navigated, Patient-Specific Instrumentation, and Accelerometer Navigated Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Malpositioning of the acetabular cup during total hip arthroplasty (THA) can lead to complications. Robotic surgery and navigation techniques aim to address this issue, but there is limited evidence regarding which method can achieve better clinical outcomes. Therefore, this network meta-analysis (NMA) aimed to compare the efficacy of various navigation methods.

METHODS

This NMA of prospective randomized controlled trials compared robot-assisted systems (RAS), computer-assisted navigation systems (CAS), augmented reality-based portable navigation (AR), patient-specific instrumentation (PSI), portable accelerometer-based navigation (PN), and conventional methods (C) for THA procedures. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, Central Register of Controlled Trials, International Clinical Trials Platform Search Portal, and ClinicalTrials.gov. databases. The primary outcomes included revision surgery and postoperative clinical scores, and the secondary outcomes encompassed cup placement accuracy, acetabular cup placement outliers from the Lewinnek safe zone, surgical time, and complications. We used a Bayesian random-effects NMA, and confidence of evidence was assessed using confidence in NMA.

RESULTS

We identified 45 studies including 2,122 patients. We did not find large differences in revision surgery, clinical outcome scores, cup inclination, or anteversion angle accuracy among the modalities. AR, CAS, and PSI exhibited a lower risk of outliers from safe zones than C. In addition, RAS and CAS had a longer surgical time than C.

CONCLUSIONS

Robotic and navigation tools did not reduce the revision risk or enhance clinical outcomes. AR, CAS, PSI, and PN may decrease the risk of cup placement outliers in safe zones. However, the cup placement accuracy was equivalent, and the surgical time may be longer in RAS and CAS than in C.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Augmented reality guidance improves accuracy of orthopedic drilling procedures

In several orthopedic procedures, the accurate use of surgical power tools is critical to avoid damage to surrounding tissues. As such, various guidance techniques and safety measures were developed. Augmented reality (AR) guidance shows promise but requires validation. We evaluated a new approach using an inside-out infrared tracking solution for the HoloLens to compensate for its limited tracking performance. Eighteen participants with varying levels of experience (student, trainee, expert) each drilled twelve trajectories (six perpendicular, six oblique) in equidimensional wooden logs. Three different techniques were evaluated: freehand drilling; proprioception-guided drilling towards the contralateral index finger; and AR-guided drilling using a tracked drill and a virtual overlay of the log with predefined guidance vectors. The angular errors between planned and performed trajectories were compared using a mixed-design ANOVA. The results demonstrated that guidance technique (p < 0.001) and drilling direction (p < 0.001) significantly affected drilling accuracy, while experience (p = 0.75) did not. AR outperformed both other techniques, particularly for oblique trajectories (p < 0.001). For perpendicular trajectories, it only outperformed proprioception guidance (p = 0.04). Target plots revealed an important scatter perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of the log during freehand and proprioception-guided drilling, especially for oblique trajectories. This inaccuracy disappeared during AR-guided drilling. As such, we were able to conclude that AR guidance using inside-out infrared tracking reduced angular uncertainty during directional drilling, resulting in improved drilling accuracy. This improvement was particularly noticeable for complex trajectories and angles. The benefits of AR guidance were observed across all experience levels, highlighting its potential for orthopedic applications. We believe this study opens the way for the methodical evaluation of AR guidance in specific orthopedic use cases.

Accuracy of Cup Placement Angle, Leg Lengthening, and Offset Measurement Using an AR-Based Portable Navigation System: Validation in Supine and Lateral Decubitus Positions for Total Hip Arthroplasty

Background and Objectives: Total hip arthroplasty (THA) requires accurate implant placement to ensure optimal outcomes. In this study, the AR Hip navigation system, an imageless portable navigation tool using augmented reality (AR), was evaluated for measuring radiographic inclination (RI), anteversion (RA), leg lengthening (LL), and offset (OS) changes in supine and lateral decubitus THA. Notably, this is the first report to assess the accuracy of LL and OS measurements using AR technology. Methods: We analyzed 48 hips from primary THA patients: 17 in the supine (S) group and 31 in the lateral (L) group. RI, RA, LL, and OS were measured intraoperatively using AR Hip and postoperatively using Zed Hip 3D software (Version 18.0.0.0). The absolute errors and outlier rates (≥5° for RI/RA and ≥5 mm for LL/OS) were compared between groups. Results: The mean intraoperative RI values with AR Hip were 40.1 ± 0.6° (S), 40.2 ± 1.2° (L), and 40.1 ± 1.0° (total), while the postoperative RI values with Zed Hip were 39.7 ± 2.9° (S), 39.5 ± 2.5° (L), and 39.6 ± 2.6° (total). The absolute errors were 1.8 ± 1.7° (total), with no significant group differences (p = 0.957). For RA, the errors were 2.0 ± 1.2° (total) (p = 0.771). The LL errors were 2.3 ± 2.2 mm (total) (p = 0.271), and the OS errors were 3.5 ± 2.8 mm (total) (p = 0.620). The outlier rates for RI were 11.8% (S) and 3.2% (L); for RA, 0% (S) and 3.2% (L); for LL, 29.4% (S) and 6.5% (L) with a significant difference (p = 0.031); and for OS, 23.5% (S) and 25.8% (L). No significant differences were observed for RI, RA, or OS. Conclusions: AR Hip provided accurate measurements of cup orientation, LL, and OS in both supine and lateral THA. Importantly, this study is the first to report the accuracy of LL and OS measurements using AR technology, demonstrating the potential of AR Hip for improving THA precision.

Determination of rotation center and diameter of femoral heads using off-the-shelf augmented reality hardware for navigation

In total hip arthroplasty (THA), determining the center of rotation (COR) and diameter of the hip joint (acetabulum and femoral head) is essential to restore patient biomechanics. This study investigates on-the-fly determination of hip COR and size, using off-the-shelf augmented reality (AR) hardware. An AR head-mounted device (HMD) was configured with inside-out infrared tracking enabling the determination of surface coordinates using a handheld stylus. Two investigators examined 10 prosthetic femoral heads and cups, and 10 human femurs. The HMD calculated the diameter and COR through sphere fitting. Results were compared to data obtained from either verified prosthetic geometry or post-hoc CT analysis. Repeated single-observer measurements showed a mean diameter error of 0.63 mm ± 0.48 mm for the prosthetic heads and 0.54 mm ± 0.39 mm for the cups. Inter-observer comparison yielded mean diameter errors of 0.28 mm ± 0.71 mm and 1.82 mm ± 1.42 mm for the heads and cups, respectively. Cadaver testing found a mean COR error of 3.09 mm ± 1.18 mm and a diameter error of 1.10 mm ± 0.90 mm. Intra- and inter-observer reliability averaged below 2 mm. AR-based surface mapping using HMD proved accurate and reliable in determining the diameter of THA components with promise in identifying COR and diameter of osteoarthritic femoral heads.

Techniques and Technologies for the Intraoperative Assessment of Component Positioning, Leg Lengths, and Offset in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review

Background

Many techniques and technologies exist for the intraoperative assessment of component positioning, leg lengths, and offset in total hip arthroplasty, but with limited comparative data. We conducted a systematic review of the available literature to evaluate the range of techniques and technologies for the intraoperative assessment of component position as well as leg lengths and offset in terms of accuracy, precision, surgical time, cost, and relationship to clinical outcomes.

Methods

A comprehensive search of the Embase and Medline databases from 1974 to 2023 was performed. We included controlled or comparative prospective clinical studies. Cochrane's risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials and Risk of Bias in Non-Randomized Studies - of Interventions tools were used by 2 independent reviewers to evaluate each study for risk of bias. We conducted both qualitative and quantitative analyses of the studies included. However, a meta-analysis was deemed not to be feasible due to heterogeneity.

Results

Our review included 25 studies with 52 intraoperative techniques and technologies. Mechanical guides and computerized navigation were most frequently evaluated in the included studies. Computerized navigation systems consistently showed the greatest accuracy and precision across all measures, at the cost of longer mean operative time. In contrast, freehand techniques demonstrated the poorest accuracy and precision. Insufficient data were found to reach any meaningful conclusions in terms of differences in overall surgical cost or clinical outcomes.

Conclusions

Evidence shows that computerized navigation systems are most accurate and precise in positioning components during total hip arthroplasty. Further research is needed to determine their health and economic impact and whether the accuracy and precision of navigated techniques are justified in terms of clinical outcomes.

Retrospective study comparing the accuracies of handheld infrared stereo camera and augmented reality-based navigation systems for total hip arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

The use of portable navigation systems (PNS) in total hip arthroplasty (THA) has become increasingly prevalent, with second-generation PNS (sPNS) demonstrating superior accuracy in the lateral decubitus position compared to first-generation PNS. However, few studies have compared different types of sPNS. This study retrospectively compares the accuracy and clinical outcomes of two different types of sPNS instruments in patients undergoing THA.

METHODS

A total of 158 eligible patients who underwent THA at a single institution between 2019 and 2022 were enrolled in the study, including 89 who used an accelerometer-based PNS with handheld infrared stereo cameras in the Naviswiss group (group N) and 69 who used an augmented reality (AR)-based PNS in the AR-Hip group (group A). Accuracy error, navigation error, clinical outcomes, and preparation time were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

Accuracy errors for Inclination were comparable between group N (3.5° ± 3.0°) and group A (3.5° ± 3.1°) (p = 0.92). Accuracy errors for anteversion were comparable between group N (4.1° ± 3.1°) and group A (4.5° ± 4.0°) (p = 0.57). The navigation errors for inclination (group N: 2.9° ± 2.7°, group A: 3.0° ± 3.2°) and anteversion (group N: 4.3° ± 3.5°, group A: 4.3° ± 4.1°) were comparable between the groups (p = 0.86 and 0.94, respectively). The preparation time was shorter in group A than in group N (p = 0.036). There were no significant differences in operative time (p = 0.255), intraoperative blood loss (p = 0.387), or complications (p = 0.248) between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

An Accelerometer-based PNS using handheld infrared stereo cameras and AR-based PNS provide similar accuracy during THA in the lateral decubitus position, with a mean error of 3°-4° for both inclination and anteversion, though the AR-based PNS required a shorter preparation time.

Comparison between accuracy of augmented reality computed tomography-based and portable augmented reality-based navigation systems for cup insertion in total hip arthroplasty

Augmented reality (AR) has been used for navigation during total hip arthroplasty (THA). AR computed tomography (CT)-based navigation systems and AR-based portable navigation systems that use smartphones can also be used. This study compared the accuracy of cup insertion during THA using AR-CT-based and portable AR-based navigation systems. Patients with symptomatic hip disease who underwent primary THA in the supine position using both AR CT-based and portable AR-based navigation systems simultaneously between October 2021 and July 2023 were included. The primary outcome of this study was the absolute difference between cup angles in the intraoperative navigation record and those measured on postoperative CT. The secondary outcome was to determine the factors affecting the absolute value of the navigation error in radiographic inclination (RI) and radiographic anteversion (RA) of the cup, including sex, age, body mass index, left or right side, approach, and preoperative pelvic tilt. This study included 94 consecutive patients. There were 11 men and 83 women, with a mean age of 68 years. The mean absolute errors of RI were 2.7° ± 2.0° in the AR CT-based and 3.3° ± 2.4° in the portable AR-based navigation system. The mean absolute errors of RA were 2.5° ± 2.1° in the AR CT-based navigation system and 2.3° ± 2.2° in the portable AR-based navigation system. No significant differences were observed in RI or RA of the cup between the two navigation systems (RI: p = 0.706; RA: p = 0.329). No significant factors affected the absolute value of the navigation errors in RI and RA. In conclusion, there were no differences in the accuracy of cup insertion between the AR CT-based and portable AR-based navigation systems.

Mixed Reality Navigation in Hip Fusion Conversion: A Novel Utilization of Advanced Technology: A Case Report

CASE

A 32-year-old woman with a history of hip fusion presented with significant lower back, hip, and knee pain as well as severely limited hip mobility and function. Single-stage fusion takedown and conversion to total hip arthroplasty (THA) was performed using augmented reality navigation. At 1 year, the patient was pain free with improved function. This study is the first to report the technique and outcomes of surgical fusion conversion to THA, using mixed reality navigation.

CONCLUSION

Mixed reality navigation in complex conversion THA can be useful for identifying the patient's true acetabulum and for patient-specific acetabular component placement to maximize outcomes.

Does a Commercially Available Augmented Reality-based Portable Hip Navigation System Improve Cup Positioning During THA Compared With the Conventional Technique? A Randomized Controlled Study

BACKGROUND

Portable hip navigation systems have been developed to combine the accuracy of cup positioning by large console navigation systems with the ease of use and convenience of conventional surgical techniques. Although a novel augmented reality-based portable hip navigation system using a smartphone (AR navigation) has become available recently, no studies, to our knowledge, have compared commercially available AR navigation with the conventional technique. Additionally, no studies, except for those from designer-surgeon series, have demonstrated the results of AR navigation.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) Does intraoperative use of commercially available AR navigation improve cup positioning compared with the conventional technique? (2) Are operative factors, clinical scores, and postoperative course different between the two groups?

METHODS

In this randomized trial, 72 patients undergoing THA were randomly assigned to undergo either commercially available AR navigation or a conventional technique for cup placement. All patients received the same cementless acetabular cups through a posterior approach in the lateral decubitus position. The primary outcome of the present study was cup positioning, including the absolute differences between the intended target and angle achieved, as well as the number of cups inside the Lewinnek safe zone. Our target cup position was 40° abduction and 20° anteversion. Secondary outcomes were operative factors, between-group difference in improvement in the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS), and the postoperative course, including the operative time (between the start of the surgical approach and skin closure), procedure time (between the first incision and skin closure, including the time to insert pins, registration, and transfer and redrape patients in the navigation group), time taken to insert pins and complete registration in the navigation group, intraoperative and postoperative complications, and reoperations. The minimum follow-up period was 6 months, because data regarding the primary outcome-cup positioning-were collected within 1 week after surgery. The between-group difference in improvement in HOOS, which was the secondary outcome, was much lower than the minimum clinically important difference for the HOOS. No patients in either group were lost to follow-up, and there was no crossover (the randomized treatment was performed in all patients, so there was no difference between an intention-to-treat and a per-protocol analysis).

RESULTS

The use of the commercially available AR navigation slightly improved cup positioning compared with the conventional technique in terms of the absolute difference between the desired and achieved amounts of cup abduction and anteversion (which we defined as "absolute differences"; median 1° [IQR 0° to 4.0°] versus median 5° [IQR 3.0° to 7.5°], difference of medians 4°; p < 0.001 and median 2° [IQR 1.9° to 3.7°] versus median 5° [IQR 3.2° to 9.7°], difference of medians 2°; p = 0.001). A higher proportion of cups were placed inside the Lewinnek safe zone in the navigation group than in the control group (94% [34 of 36] compared with 64% [23 of 36]; p < 0.001). Median operative times were not different between the two groups (58 minutes [IQR 49 to 72 minutes] versus 57 minutes [IQR 49 to 69 minutes], difference of medians 1 minute; p = 0.99). The median procedure time was longer in the navigation group (95 minutes [IQR 84 to 109 minutes] versus 57 minutes [IQR 49 to 69 minutes], difference of medians 38 minutes; p < 0.001). There were no differences between the two groups in improvement in HOOS (27 ± 17 versus 28 ± 19, mean difference -1 [95% CI -9.5 to 7.4]; p = 0.81). In the navigation group, no complications occurred in the pin sites; however, one anterior dislocation occurred. In the conventional group, one hip underwent reoperation because of a deep infection.

CONCLUSION

Although the use of commercially available AR navigation improved cup positioning in THA, the improvement in clinical scores and postoperative complication rates were not different between the two groups, and the overall magnitude of the difference in accuracy was small. Future studies will need to determine whether the improvement in the percentage of hips inside the Lewinnek safe zone results in differences in late dislocation or polyethylene wear, and whether such benefits-if any-justify the added costs and surgical time. Until or unless more compelling evidence in favor of the new system emerges, we recommend against widespread use of the system in clinical practice.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level Ⅱ, therapeutic study.

Measurement accuracy of the acetabular cup position using an inertial portable hip navigation system with patients in the lateral decubitus position

Accurate cup placement is critical to ensure satisfactory outcomes after total hip arthroplasty. Portable hip navigation systems are novel intraoperative guidance tools that achieve accurate cup placement in the supine position; however, accuracy in the lateral decubitus position is under debate. A new inertial portable navigation system has recently become available. The present study investigated the accuracy of measurements of the cup position in 54 patients in the lateral decubitus position using this system and compared it with that by a goniometer. After cup placement, cup abduction and anteversion were measured using the system and by the goniometer, and were then compared with postoperatively measured angles. Absolute measurement errors with the system were 2.8° ± 2.6° for cup abduction and 3.9° ± 2.9° for anteversion. The system achieved 98 and 96% measurement accuracies within 10° for cup abduction and anteversion, respectively. The system was more accurate than the goniometer for cup anteversion (p < 0.001), but not for abduction (p = 0.537). The system uses a new registration method of the pelvic reference plane and corrects intraoperative pelvic motion errors, which may affect measurement accuracy. In the present study, reliable and reproducible intraoperative measurements of the cup position were obtained using the inertial portable navigation system.

Augmented reality-assisted versus conventional total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Extended reality (XR), including virtual reality, augmented reality (AR), and mixed reality, has been used to help achieve accurate acetabular cup placement in total hip arthroplasty (THA). This study aimed to compare the differences between XR-assisted and conventional THA.

METHODS

In this systematic review and meta-analysis, electronic databases including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and clinicaltrials.gov were searched for studies from inception to September 10, 2023. The outcomes were accuracy of inclination and anteversion, duration of surgery, and intraoperative blood loss. Meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.4 software.

RESULTS

A total of five studies with 396 patients were included in our study. The pooled results indicated AR-assisted THA had better accuracy of inclination and anteversion than conventional THA (SMD = - 0.51, 95% CI [- 0.96 to - 0.07], P = 0.02; SMD = - 0.96, 95% CI [- 1.19 to - 0.72], P < 0.00001), but duration of surgery and intraoperative blood loss were similar in the two groups.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review and meta-analysis found that AR-assisted THA had better accuracy of inclination and anteversion than conventional THA, but the duration of surgery and intraoperative blood loss were similar in the two groups. Based on the pooled results, we suggested that AR can provide more precise acetabular cup placement than conventional methods in THA.