1
|
Pan P, Gu L, Zhao S, Wang S, Ma J, Fu H, Chen Y, He S, Tian Z, Xu L, Feng Z, Li Y, Yang Z, Yang L, Wang W, Hou Q, Liu T, Li C, Tian D, Wang X, Gao Y, Shi H, Bai Y, Li Z. Prepackaged formula low-residue diet vs. self-prepared low-residue diet before colonoscopy: A multicenter randomized controlled trial. Front Med (Lausanne) 2023; 10:1029493. [PMID: 37035340 PMCID: PMC10079983 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1029493] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2022] [Accepted: 02/28/2023] [Indexed: 04/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and aims Compared with self-prepared LRD, a prepackaged low-residue diet (LRD) can improve patient compliance, but whether it can further improve the quality of bowel preparation is uncertain. The study aimed to compare the application of the prepackaged formula LRD with self-prepared LRD in bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Methods A multicenter randomized controlled trial was conducted in 15 centers. The eligible subjects were randomly assigned to one of two groups: the formula LRD group and the self-prepared LRD group. On the day before the colonoscopy, subjects in the self-prepared LRD group were instructed to consume a restricted LRD prepared by themselves, while subjects in the formula LRD group were given six bags of prepackaged formula LRD and instructed to consume them according to their individual need. The primary outcome was an adequate bowel preparation rate. Secondary outcomes mainly included Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) scores, dietary restriction compliance rate, tolerance, satisfaction, adenoma detection rate (ADR), and adverse reactions. The trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under the identifier NCT03943758. Results A total of 550 subjects were recruited. Compared with the self-prepared LRD group, the formula LRD group showed a higher adequate bowel preparation rate (94.5 vs. 80.4%; P < 0.01), BBPS scores (7.87 ± 1.13 vs. 6.75 ± 1.47; P < 0.01), dietary compliance rate (92.4 vs. 78.9%; P < 0.01), tolerance (P < 0.01 in degree of hunger, intensity of physical strength, and negative influence on daily activities), satisfaction (8.56 ± 1.61 vs. 7.20 ± 2.02; P < 0.01), and ADR (25.6 vs. 16.0%; P < 0.01). There was no significant difference in adverse reactions. Conclusion Compared with self-prepared LRD, the formula LRD showed similar safety and higher bowel preparation quality, compliance, and tolerance in bowel preparation. More formula LRDs could be designed according to different dietary habits and ethnic populations, and further researches are warranted to confirm their effect. Clinical trial registration https://register.clinicaltrials.gov, identifier: NCT03943758.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peng Pan
- Department of Gastroenterology, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Naval Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Lun Gu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Naval Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Shengbing Zhao
- Department of Gastroenterology, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Naval Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Shuling Wang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Naval Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jiayi Ma
- Department of Gastroenterology, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Naval Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Hongyu Fu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Naval Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Youxiang Chen
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
| | - Shuixiang He
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China
| | - Zibin Tian
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Affiliated Hospital, Qingdao University, Qingdao, China
| | - Le Xu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Beijing Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Zhijie Feng
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Second Hospital, Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China
| | - Yanqing Li
- Department of Gastroenterology, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Zhuo Yang
- Digestive Endoscopy Center, Northern Theater General Hospital, Shenyang, China
| | - Lei Yang
- Digestive Endoscopy Center, Northern Theater General Hospital, Shenyang, China
| | - Wen Wang
- Department of Gastroenterology, The 900th Hospital of the Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA), Fuzhou, China
| | - Qian Hou
- Department of Nutrition, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Ting Liu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Chujun Li
- Department of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Dean Tian
- Department of Gastroenterology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Xiaodi Wang
- Department of Gastroenterology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Yongmei Gao
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Hebei North University, Zhangjiakou, China
| | - Hanping Shi
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Yu Bai
- Department of Gastroenterology, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Naval Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
- Yu Bai
| | - Zhaoshen Li
- Department of Gastroenterology, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Naval Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
- *Correspondence: Zhaoshen Li
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Impact of Prepackaged Low-Residue Diet on Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy: A Meta-analysis. Gastroenterol Nurs 2021; 44:E29-E37. [PMID: 33795626 DOI: 10.1097/sga.0000000000000588] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2020] [Accepted: 01/13/2021] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the impact of prepackaged low-residue diet (PLRD) on bowel preparation for colonoscopy. We searched PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases from inception to August 2020. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing PLRD with clear liquid diet (CLD) or self-prepared LRD were considered for inclusion. The analysis calculated the odds ratio (OR) for the rate of adequate bowel preparation, patient tolerance, willingness to repeat bowel preparation, tolerability of bowel preparation, and overall adverse effects. Five RCTs published between 2006 and 2019 (N = 561) were included in our meta-analysis. Compared with the traditional CLD or self-prepared LRD, PLRD showed significantly higher rates of adequate bowel preparation (OR, 2.16; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.18-3.98; p = .01), patient tolerance (OR, 1.99; 95% CI, 1.30-3.07; p = .002), and willingness to repeat the bowel preparation (OR, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.05-2.70; p = .03), with no differences in adverse events (OR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.59-1.46; p = .75). Prepackaged low-residue diet improved bowel preparation quality, patient tolerance, and willingness to repeat bowel preparations. Importantly, PLRD does not increase the incidence of adverse events. This suggests that it is effective and safe to use PLRD for bowel preparation before colonoscopy.
Collapse
|
3
|
Lee JW, Choi JY, Yoon H, Shin CM, Park YS, Kim N, Lee DH. Favorable outcomes of prepackaged low-residue diet on bowel preparation for colonoscopy: Endoscopist-blinded randomized controlled trial. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2019; 34:864-869. [PMID: 30278110 DOI: 10.1111/jgh.14499] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2018] [Revised: 09/15/2018] [Accepted: 09/19/2018] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM 2 L polyethylene glycol plus an ascorbic acid (PEGA) is known to be as effective. However, 2 L polyethylene glycol-based regimens are often still difficult for patients to tolerate. Therefore, we conducted this study to evaluate the potential of 1 L PEGA with prepackaged low-residue diet (PLD) as an alternative to 2 L PEGA before colonoscopy. METHODS The subjects were randomly assigned to either of the two groups. The 2 L PEGA group received 2 L PEGA split regimen. The 1 L PEGA with PLD group received PLD on the day preceding colonoscopy and 1 L PEGA. All endoscopic procedures were performed by one physician who did not know patients allocation. Bowel preparation status were graded using Boston Bowel Preparation Score (BBPS). A questionnaire regarding tolerability and safety was administered. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03329339). RESULTS A total of 173 patients completed the study (86 in the 2 L PEGA group and 87 in the 1 L PEGA with PLD group). Bowel preparation was adequate in 88.4% (76/86) of patients in the 2 L PEGA group and 93.1% of patients in the 1 L PEGA with PLD group (81/87, P = 0.28). The patients in the 1 L PEGA with PLD group had higher whole Boston Bowel Preparation Scale score (P = 0.02) and expressed more satisfaction and willingness to repeat the procedure (P < 0.01). There was no significant difference with respect to compliance or safety. CONCLUSION 1 L PEGA with PLD showed equivalent efficacy, greater satisfaction, and more willingness to repeat compared with 2 L PEGA for bowel preparation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jung Won Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, Samsung Changwon Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Changwon, Korea
| | - Joon Young Choi
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Gyeonggi-do, Korea
| | - Hyuk Yoon
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Gyeonggi-do, Korea
| | - Cheol Min Shin
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Gyeonggi-do, Korea
| | - Young Soo Park
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Gyeonggi-do, Korea
| | - Nayoung Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Gyeonggi-do, Korea.,Department of Internal Medicine and Liver Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Dong Ho Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Gyeonggi-do, Korea.,Department of Internal Medicine and Liver Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|