Tranexamic Acid for Lower GI Hemorrhage: A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial

Tranexamic acid as treatment for acute gastrointestinal bleeding: A comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding is a common and potentially life-threatening medical emergency. Despite advancements in therapy, mortality rates associated with GI bleeding remain high (2.4% to 11%). Tranexamic acid (TXA) has been proposed as a treatment. However, the HALT-IT trial questioned its efficacy and safety, showing no significant reduction in death and potential thrombotic complications. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of TXA in treating acute GI bleeding.

METHODS

This systematic review and meta-analysis followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines. In October 2024 a comprehensive literature search was conducted using relevant MeSh terms and keywords in 11 databases. We included patients with acute GI bleeding treated with TXA and compared it with either a placebo or standard treatment. Outcomes such as mortality, need for blood transfusion, surgery and thrombotic events were studied.

RESULTS

The search identified 6810 articles. After screening, 23 studies were included, encompassing 2,061,231 participants. Our meta-analysis demonstrated that TXA significantly reduced rebleeding rates overall (RR: 0.81, 95% CI: 0.87-0.97). This effect was even more pronounced in studies with a lower risk of bias. Additionally, TXA use was associated with a mortality reduction when administered through both oral and intravenous routes (RR: 0.56, 95% CI: 0.35-0.89) and in cases of upper GI bleeding (RR: 0.72, 95% CI: 0.59-0.87). However, TXA was linked to a significant increase in mortality in patients with lower GI bleeding (RR: 1.67, 95% CI: 1.44-1.93) and overall reduction when only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included (RR:0.83, 95% CI; 0.70 to 0,97, I2=0%). Other variables, such as the overall need for blood transfusions (RR: 1.03, 95% CI: 0.80-1.32), thrombotic events (RR: 1.30, 95% CI: 0.75-2.23) and the need for surgical intervention (RR: 0.78, 95% CI: 0.57-1.09), did not reach statistical significance. However, when considering only low risk of bias studies the need for surgical interventions was significantly reduced (RR: 0.85, 95% CI: 0.75 to 0.97, I2=0%).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that TXA significantly reduces rebleeding in patients, particularly in upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) and reduces need for surgical intervention when excluding high risk of bias studies. The findings also demonstrated a significant reduction in mortality, particularly in certain sub-groups. There was no definitive evidence that its use is associated with thromboembolictic events. These results highlight the potential benefit of TXA without dismissing the need for cautious interpretation and individualized patient management when considering TXA for GI bleeding.

Tranexamic acid to prevent bleeding after endoscopic resection of large colorectal polyps: a pilot project

Background and aims

Delayed post-polypectomy bleeding (DPPB) can occur up to a month following the procedure but is typically seen within the first week. Tranexamic acid (TXA) is a member of a class of drugs called antifibrinolytic agents. It reduces fibrinolysis by slowing down the conversion of plasminogen to plasmin, which may prevent bleeding. The goal of this pilot study is to assess the feasibility of using tranexamic acid after endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) of large (≥2 cm) non-pedunculated colorectal polyps (LNPCPs) to prevent DPPB.

Methods

This was a single centre feasibility study conducted at the Kingston Health Sciences Centre in 2021. After the polypectomy was completed, IV tranexamic acid was given [1 gram of TXA in 100 mL of normal saline] and infused over a 10-min interval. The participants received tranexamic acid 1 gram PO TID to be taken for 5 days.

Results

A total of 25 patients were enrolled with a mean polyp size of 3 cm. Intraprocedural bleeding occurred in 7 patients (28%) and all of these were treated with soft coagulation. Two patients had clipping for suspected muscle injury. All 25 patients received IV TXA post-procedure. Sixteen patients (64%) took every dose of the prescribed pills. One patient presented with post-polypectomy bleeding. All patients completed the day 30 follow-up phone call. There were no major adverse events.

Conclusions

TXA to prevent delayed post-polypectomy bleeding (DPPB) was feasible to use with no major adverse events reported. A randomized controlled study will be needed to see if TXA can significantly reduce DPPB.

The efficacy and application of tranexamic acid in emergency medicine: Emergency Medicine Association of Türkiye clinical policy- 2024

The clinical policy of the Emergency Medicine Association of Türkiye (EMAT) provides guidance on the use of tranexamic acid (TXA) in emergency settings. TXA, an antifibrinolytic drug, is used to control bleeding by inhibiting plasminogen. Its applications have expanded from hemophilia and severe menstrual bleeding to include various forms of trauma and surgery-related bleeding. Despite its potential benefits, the use of TXA in emergency settings must be carefully evaluated due to its associated risks, including venous thromboembolism. This policy aimed to offer evidence-based recommendations on the indications and contraindications of TXA in different clinical scenarios encountered in the emergency departments. The guidelines were developed using the "Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations" approach, incorporating systematic literature reviews, and expert consensus from the EMAT Research Committee. This document focuses on critical clinical questions regarding the efficacy and safety of TXA in situations such as gastrointestinal bleeding, multitrauma, traumatic brain injury, nontraumatic intracranial hemorrhage, hemoptysis, and epistaxis. By addressing these issues, the policy seeks to assist emergency physicians in making informed decisions about the use of TXA, ultimately aiming to improve the patient outcomes.

The effect of tranexamic acid on blood transfusion in lower gastrointestinal bleeding-A double blind prospective randomised controlled trial

PURPOSE

Acute gastrointestinal bleeding is a common emergency. Tranexamic acid (TXA) reduces clot breakdown by inhibiting the action of plasmin and has been shown to reduce the need for blood transfusion in trauma, surgical procedures, and upper gastrointestinal bleeding. This study examined the efficiency of intravenous TXA in patients with acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding.

METHODS

Eighty-one patients aged >18 years with lower GI hemorrhage, presenting as active rectal bleeding and anemia (hemoglobin lower than 11 g/dL or a decrease of 2 gr/dl from the patient's base level), were enrolled in this single center, double blind prospective research. Patients were randomly assigned to receive intravenous TXA or placebo from admission until colonoscopy took place. The need for transfusion of packed red blood cells (PRBC) and number of units was recorded and compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

Eighty-one patients were randomized in this study, thirty-nine in the TXA arm, and forty-two in the placebo arm. Patient characteristics did not differ between the groups. Forty-three out of the 81 patients received blood transfusion; twenty-two were on the placebo arm and twenty-one on the TXA arm (p = 0.89). Twenty-nine patients required 2 or more units, 14 in the TXA arm and 15 in the placebo arm (p = 0.98).

CONCLUSIONS

Intravenous TXA has no significant effect on blood requirement in patients with lower GI bleeding. There was no difference in the consumption of PRBC units among the patients in the placebo and TXA groups. It seems that tranexamic acid has no significant effect on transfusion of PRBC units in lower GI bleeding.

Emergency medicine updates: Lower gastrointestinal bleeding

INTRODUCTION

Lower gastrointestinal bleeding (LGIB) is a condition commonly seen in the emergency department. Therefore, it is important for emergency medicine clinicians to be aware of the current evidence regarding the diagnosis and management of this disease.

OBJECTIVE

This paper evaluates key evidence-based updates concerning LGIB for the emergency clinician.

DISCUSSION

LGIB is most commonly due to diverticulosis or anorectal disease, though there are a variety of etiologies. The majority of cases resolve spontaneously, but patients can have severe bleeding resulting in hemodynamic instability. Initial evaluation should focus on patient hemodynamics, the severity of bleeding, and differentiating upper gastrointestinal bleeding from LGIB. Factors associated with LGIB include prior history of LGIB, age over 50 years, and presence of blood clots per rectum. Computed tomography angiography is the imaging modality of choice in those with severe bleeding to diagnose the source of bleeding and guide management when embolization is indicated. Among stable patients without severe bleeding, colonoscopy is the recommended modality for diagnosis and management. A transfusion threshold of 7 g/dL hemoglobin is recommended based on recent data and guidelines (8 g/dL in those with myocardial ischemia), though patients with severe bleeding and hemodynamic instability should undergo emergent transfusion. Anticoagulation reversal may be necessary. If bleeding does not resolve, embolization or endoscopic therapies are necessary. There are several risk scores that can predict the risk of adverse outcomes; however, these scores should not replace clinical judgment in determining patient disposition.

CONCLUSIONS

An understanding of literature updates can improve the care of patients with LGIB.

A systematic review and meta-analysis assessing the use of tranexamic acid (TXA) in acute gastrointestinal bleeding

INTRODUCTION

Gastrointestinal bleeding results in significant morbidity, cost and mortality. TXA, an antifibrinolytic agent, has been proposed to reduce mortality; however, many studies report conflicting results.

METHODS

The aim of the study was to perform the first systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs to evaluate the efficacy TXA for both upper and lower gastrointestinal bleeding. This was performed per PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane and Scopus databases were searched for RCTs. Dichotomous variables were pooled as risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) using the MH method with random effects modelling.

RESULTS

Fourteen RCTs were identified with 14,338 patients and mean age of 58.4 years. 34.9% (n = 5008) were female and 65.1% (n = 9330) male. There was no significant difference in mortality between TXA and placebo (RR 0.86 95% CI (0.74 to 1.00), P: 0.05). The secondary outcomes, similarly, did not yield significant results. These included rebleeding, need for surgical intervention (RR: 0.75 95% CI (0.53, 1.07)), endoscopic intervention (RR: 0.92 95% CI (0.70, 1.22)), transfusion requirement (RR: 1.01 95% CI (0.94, 10.7)) and length of stay (RR: 0.03 95% CI (- 0.03, 0.08)). There was no increased risk of VTE, RR: 1.29 95% CI (0.53, 3.16). One trial (n = 12,009) reported an increased risk of seizure in the TXA group, RR: 1.73 95% CI (1.03-2.93).

CONCLUSION

TXA does not reduce mortality in patients with acute upper or lower gastrointestinal bleeding and may confer an increased risk of seizures. The authors do not recommend the use of TXA in acute gastrointestinal bleeding.

Fifteen-minute consultation: Rectal bleeding in children

Bleeding per rectum in children is an infrequent presentation associated with a wide range of differential diagnoses, from benign to life-threatening. Irrespective of the underlying aetiology, it is typically a worrisome symptom for caregivers. Published data are limited, particularly for the UK population, from which to provide clear evidence-based guidance for assessment and management of infants, children and young people presenting with bleeding per rectum. In this Fifteen-Minute Consultation, we therefore explore the common aetiologies and combine opinions from acute paediatrics, paediatric gastroenterology and paediatric surgery to offer a structure for a diagnostic approach and initial management of lower gastrointestinal bleeding in infants, children and young people.

Management of Patients With Acute Lower Gastrointestinal Bleeding: An Updated ACG Guideline

Acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding (LGIB) is a common reason for hospitalization in the United States and is associated with significant utilization of hospital resources, as well as considerable morbidity and mortality. These revised guidelines implement the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodology to propose recommendations for the use of risk stratification tools, thresholds for red blood cell transfusion, reversal agents for patients on anticoagulants, diagnostic testing including colonoscopy and computed tomography angiography (CTA), endoscopic therapeutic options, and management of antithrombotic medications after hospital discharge. Important changes since the previous iteration of this guideline include recommendations for the use of risk stratification tools to identify patients with LGIB at low risk of a hospital-based intervention, the role for reversal agents in patients with life-threatening LGIB on vitamin K antagonists and direct oral anticoagulants, the increasing role for CTA in patients with severe LGIB, and the management of patients who have a positive CTA. We recommend that most patients requiring inpatient colonoscopy undergo a nonurgent colonoscopy because performing an urgent colonoscopy within 24 hours of presentation has not been shown to improve important clinical outcomes such as rebleeding. Finally, we provide updated recommendations regarding resumption of antiplatelet and anticoagulant medications after cessation of LGIB.

Risk of Mortality among Patients with Gastrointestinal Bleeding with Early and Late Treatment with Tranexamic Acid: A Population-Based Cohort Study

Tranexamic acid (TXA) is an antifibrinolytic pharmacological agent, but its use in gastrointestinal bleeding remains contentious. Moreover, studies on the timing of TXA administration are limited. We examined whether early TXA administration reduced the risk of mortality in patients with gastrointestinal bleeding in a Taiwanese population. We used the National Health Insurance Research Database to identify patients diagnosed with gastrointestinal bleeding with early and late TXA treatment. We defined early treatment as initial TXA treatment in an emergency department and late treatment as initial TXA treatment after hospitalization. Mortality within 52 weeks was the primary outcome. A multivariable analysis using a multiple Cox regression model was applied for data analysis. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to reduce the potential for bias caused by measured confounding variables. Of the 52,949 selected patients with gastrointestinal bleeding, 5127 were assigned to either an early or late TXA treatment group after PSM. The incidence of mortality was significantly decreased during the first and fourth weeks (adjusted HR (aHR): 0.65, 95% CI: 0.56−0.75). A Kaplan−Meier curve revealed a significant decrease in cumulative incidence of mortality in the early TXA treatment group (log-rank test: p < 0.0001). Multiple Cox regression analysis revealed significantly lower mortality in the early TXA treatment group compared with the late treatment group (aHR: 0.64, 95% CI: 0.57−0.73). Thromboembolic events were not significantly associated with early or late TXA treatment (aHR: 1.03, 95% CI: 0.94−1.12). A Kaplan−Meier curve also revealed no significant difference in either venous or arterial events (log-rank test: p = 0.3654 and 0.0975, respectively). In conclusion, early TXA treatment was associated with a reduced risk of mortality in patients with gastrointestinal bleeding compared with late treatment, without an increase in thromboembolic events. The risk of rebleeding and need for urgent endoscopic intervention require further randomized clinical trials.

Tranexamic Acid for the Treatment of Acute Gastrointestinal Bleeding in a Jehovah's Witness Patient on Apixaban and Dual Antiplatelet Therapy: A Case Report

Life-threatening bleeding can be challenging to manage, especially in patients who reject allogeneic transfusions for religious or personal reasons. Tranexamic acid (TXA) has been successfully used to treat acute bleeding in multiple settings with varying severity, including trauma, women with postpartum hemorrhage, hemoptysis, and epistaxis, with minimal adverse effects. The purpose of this case report is to describe the use of TXA to aid in achieving hemostasis in a Jehovah's Witness patient on apixaban with a life-threatening gastrointestinal (GI) bleed. An 80-year-old female Jehovah's Witness patient on apixaban for lower extremity deep vein thrombosis presented to the emergency department with 8 hr of GI bleeding. On presentation, she was hemodynamically unstable, requiring a norepinephrine infusion. She refused any blood-derived products or anticoagulant reversal agents derived from human or animal products. One 1-g dose of intravenous TXA was given as a bolus for more than 10 min, followed by another 1-g dose for more than 8 hr. The patient achieved successful hemostasis allowing for further inpatient management and eventually was discharged from the hospital. This case describes a life-threatening GI bleed in a Jehovah's Witness patient who was successfully treated using TXA.

Direct (New) Oral Anticoagulants (DOACs): Drawbacks, Bleeding and Reversal

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Direct (new) Oral Anticoagulants (DOACs) have emerged as a contemporary and promising option in the treatment of thromboses and VTE, while protecting the coagulation cascade against untoward bleeding events. They are used in the management and prophylaxis of Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) and other thrombotic diseases. The most prominent complication of these agents is bleeding. These agents have similar or lower rates of major intracranial hemorrhages, while they had a higher risk of major gastrointestinal bleeding when compared to warfarin. This manuscript is aimed to revise and update the literature findings to outline the side effects of DOACs in various clinical scenarios.

METHODS

A narrative review of currently published studies was performed. Online database searches were performed for clinical trials published before July 2021, on the efficacy and adverse effects attributed to the anticoagulant treatment, especially DOACs. A literature search via electronic databases was carried out, beginning with the usage of the agents in the Western Languages papers. The search terms initially included direct (new) oral anticoagulants, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban, idarucizumab, andexanet, prothrombin complex concentrates, and fresh frozen plasma. Papers were examined for methodological soundness before being included.

RESULTS

Severe bleeding episodes require aggressive interventions for successful management. Therefore, bleeding should be evaluated in special regard to the location and rate of hemorrhage, and total volume of blood loss. Patient's age, weight and organ dysfunctions (e.g., kidney/liver failure or chronic respiratory diseases) directly affect the clinical course of overdose.

CONCLUSION

Management recommendations for hemorrhage associated with DOAC use vary, depending on the class of the culprit agent (direct thrombin inhibitor vs. FXa inhibitor), the clinical status of the patient (mild/ moderate vs. severe/life-threatening), and capabilities of the institution. Specific reversal agents (i.e., idarucizumab and andexanet alfa) can be used if available, while prothrombin complex concentrates, fresh frozen plasma and/ or tranexamic acid can also be employed as nonspecific replacement agents in the management of DOAC-related bleeding diathesis.

Transfusion strategies in bleeding critically ill adults: a clinical practice guideline from the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine

PURPOSE

To develop evidence-based clinical practice recommendations regarding transfusion practices and transfusion in bleeding critically ill adults.

METHODS

A taskforce involving 15 international experts and 2 methodologists used the GRADE approach to guideline development. The taskforce addressed three main topics: transfusion support in massively and non-massively bleeding critically ill patients (transfusion ratios, blood products, and point of care testing) and the use of tranexamic acid. The panel developed and answered structured guideline questions using population, intervention, comparison, and outcomes (PICO) format.

RESULTS

The taskforce generated 26 clinical practice recommendations (2 strong recommendations, 13 conditional recommendations, 11 no recommendation), and identified 10 PICOs with insufficient evidence to make a recommendation.

CONCLUSIONS

This clinical practice guideline provides evidence-based recommendations for the management of massively and non-massively bleeding critically ill adult patients and identifies areas where further research is needed.

Tranexamic acid for the prevention and treatment of bleeding in surgery, trauma and bleeding disorders: a narrative review

OBJECTIVES

We review the evidence for tranexamic acid (TXA) for the treatment and prevention of bleeding caused by surgery, trauma and bleeding disorders. We highlight therapeutic areas where evidence is lacking and discuss safety issues, particularly the concern regarding thrombotic complications.

METHODS

An electronic search was performed in PubMed and the Cochrane Library to identify clinical trials, safety reports and review articles.

FINDINGS

TXA reduces bleeding in patients with menorrhagia, and in patients undergoing caesarian section, myomectomy, hysterectomy, orthopedic surgery, cardiac surgery, orthognathic surgery, rhinoplasty, and prostate surgery. For dental extractions in patients with bleeding disorders or taking antithrombotic drugs, as well as in cases of idiopathic epistaxis, tonsillectomy, liver transplantation and resection, nephrolithotomy, skin cancer surgery, burn wounds and skin grafting, there is moderate evidence that TXA is effective for reducing bleeding. TXA was not effective in reducing bleeding in traumatic brain injury and upper and lower gastrointestinal bleeding. TXA reduces mortality in patients suffering from trauma and postpartum hemorrhage. For many of these indications, there is no consensus about the optimal TXA dose. With certain dosages and with certain indications TXA can cause harm, such as an increased risk of seizures after high TXA doses with brain injury and cardiac surgery, and an increased mortality after delayed administration of TXA for trauma events or postpartum hemorrhage. Whereas most trials did not signal an increased risk for thrombotic events, some trials reported an increased rate of thrombotic complications with the use of TXA for gastro-intestinal bleeding and trauma.

CONCLUSIONS

TXA has well-documented beneficial effects in many clinical indications. Identifying these indications and the optimal dose and timing to minimize risk of seizures or thromboembolic events is work in progress.

Effect of tranexamic acid in patients with colonic diverticular bleeding: A nationwide inpatient database study

BACKGROUND AND AIM

The effect of tranexamic acid (TXA) remains unknown in patients with colonic diverticular bleeding, which is one of the most common causes of lower gastrointestinal bleeding. We investigated the efficacy of TXA for patients with colonic diverticular bleeding.

METHODS

We performed a nationwide observational study using the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination database and identified patients who were admitted for diverticular bleeding from 2010 to 2018. Patients who received TXA on the day of admission comprised the TXA group, and the remaining patients comprised the control group. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included severe bleeding, blood transfusion within 7 days of admission, length of stay, and hospitalization costs. Propensity score matching was performed to compare outcomes between the two groups.

RESULTS

Overall, 78 291 patients met our eligibility criteria, and 30 526 matched pairs were created by one-to-one propensity score matching. After matching, there was no significant difference in in-hospital mortality between the two groups (odds ratio [OR], 1.07; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.88-1.30); however, TXA administration was associated with significantly lower proportions of severe bleeding events (OR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.89-0.99), blood transfusions (OR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.84-0.92), shorter length of stay (difference, -0.23 days; 95% CI, -0.01 to -0.44 days), and lower total hospitalization costs (difference, -$233; 95% CI, -$153 to -$314).

CONCLUSIONS

Although TXA was not significantly associated with lower in-hospital mortality, it may reduce severe bleeding, blood transfusions, length of stay, and hospitalization costs.

Tranexamic acid for gastrointestinal bleeding: A systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

BACKGROUND

Acute gastrointestinal bleeding is a common life-threatening emergent condition. Immediate tranexamic acid is useful for reducing hemorrhage following operation and bleeding trauma, but evidence on the effects of tranexamic acid in patients with gastrointestinal bleeding is limited or highly heterogeneous. It is still unclear about using tranexamic acid in the emergent condition of gastrointestinal bleeding. This study, therefore, aimed to determine whether or not tranexamic acid should be used in gastrointestinal bleeding management through systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

We searched three biomedical databases for relevant randomized controlled trials on this topic. Two authors independently selected studies and extracted data for bias assessment and meta-analysis of bleeding, further intervention, mortality, transfusion, and intensive care unit admission. Available data were pooled using a random-effects model, and the results were presented as risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Heterogeneity and small study effects were also assessed.

RESULTS

Thirteen randomized controlled trials (n = 2271) were included in the present synthesis. Our meta-analysis revealed that tranexamic acid significantly reduced the rates of continued bleeding (RR = 0.60; 95%CI, 0.43-0.84), urgent endoscopic intervention (RR = 0.35; 95%CI, 0.24-0.50), and mortality (RR = 0.60; 95%CI, 0.45-0.80) compared with the placebo.

CONCLUSION

According to the available evidence, the present synthesis confirms that tranexamic acid is an effective medication for patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Early administration of tranexamic acid may be worth to be recommended for treating upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the emergency department. However, the effects of tranexamic acid on lower gastrointestinal bleeding warrant further clarification.

[Risk factors for nausea and vomiting after adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery]

OBJECTIVE

To explore risk factors for postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) that requires intervention with medications during adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) surgery.

METHODS

We analyzed the data of 986 patients with AIS (including 156 male and 830 female patients) undergoing scoliosis surgery through a posterior approach between December, 2012 and January, 2016 in Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital. The data were collected from the patients including ASA grade, body mass index (BMI), Cobb angle, preoperative respiratory and cardiovascular diseases, operation time, type of anesthesia, quantity of intraoperative liquid infusion, blood loss, urine volume, the lowest MAP and CVP, intraoperative fentanyl consumption, and intraoperative administration of dexmedetomidine, dexamethasone, ondansetran and droperidol. The incidence of PONV in 48 h following the surgery, hemoglobin variation after operation (ΔHb), postoperative analgesia, times of use and types of antiemetic drugs, and postoperative hospital stay were recorded for all the patients. The potential risk factors of PONV within 48 h were analyzed using univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression.

RESULTS

Of the 986 patients analyzed, 151 (15.3%) experienced PONV within 48 h following surgeries for AIS. Multivariate logistic regression analysis suggested that an high intraoperative fentanyl dose (> 0.65 mg; OR=9.303, 95% CI: 2.373-8.622, P < 0.001), an obvious ΔHb (> 28.5 g/L; OR=1.107, 95% CI: 1.060-1.157, P < 0.001), and postoperative analgesia with fentanyl (OR=11.671, 95% CI: 2.381-11.284, P < 0.001) were risk factors for PONV. Intraoperative administration of dexmedetomidine (OR=0.027, 95% CI: 0.006-0.123, P=0.002) and dexamethasone combined with ondansetron (OR=0.241, 95%CI: 0.066-0.886, P=0.032) were protective factors against PONV.

CONCLUSIONS

A high-dose intraoperative fentanyl consumption, a marked ΔHb, and postoperative analgesia with fentanyl are risk factors for PONV while intraoperative administration of dexmedetomidine and dexamethasone combined with ondansetron are protective factors against PONV following surgeries for AIS.

The Role of Tranexamic Acid in the Management of an Acutely Hemorrhaging Patient

Background: Acute hemorrhage, both traumatic and nontraumatic, leads to significant morbidity and mortality, both in the United States and globally. Traditional treatment of acute hemorrhage is focused on hemostasis and blood product replacement. Tranexamic acid is an antifibrinolytic agent that may reduce acute hemorrhage through inhibition of plasminogen. Newer research suggests that coagulopathy, specifically fibrinolysis, may contribute significantly to the pathology of acute hemorrhage. Methods: We searched the PubMed database for relevant articles from 2000 to 2018 for the terms "tranexamic acid," "TXA," "antifibrinolytic," "hyperfibrinolysis," and "coagulopathy." Our search was limited to studies published in the English language. Results: A total of 53 studies were included in this review. These articles suggest a potential role for tranexamic acid in the management of acute intracranial hemorrhage, epistaxis, hematuria, postpartum hemorrhage, gastrointestinal hemorrhage, and trauma-related hemorrhage. A theoretical risk of thrombotic events following tranexamic acid use exists, though large clinical trials suggest this risk remains exceedingly small. Conclusions: Recent studies suggest a mortality benefit with tranexamic acid following acute hemorrhage. First responders such as emergency medical technicians and emergency department clinicians should consider tranexamic acid as an adjunct therapy in the management of acute, severe traumatic and nontraumatic hemorrhage.

The effects of tranexamic acid on blood loss and transfusion rate in colorectal surgery

BACKGROUND

The present study aimed to evaluate safety of tranexamic acid (TA) administration and to assess bleeding risk in colorectal surgery (CRS).

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study including consecutive patients undergoing elective CRS by a single surgeon between August 2014 and May 2015. All patients received 1 g of TA intravenously at induction and at closure. Demographics, operative and postoperative details were prospectively assessed and compared to a historical control cohort.

RESULTS

213 patients were evaluated. TA did not increase complications, readmissions, or reoperation rates. Significant postoperative hemoglobin (Hgb) drop (≥3 g/dL) (TA: n = 6, 7.4%, Control: n = 22, 16.6%; p = 0.193) and transfusion rates (intraoperative: TA: n = 2, 2.5%, Control: n = 2, 1.5%; p = 0.586, postoperative: TA: n = 1, 1.2%, Control: 9, 6.8%; p = 0.065) were not statistically different.

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative hemoglobin drop and transfusion rates were not decreased statistically. Further study is warranted given the large clinical differences in favor of TA.

Lower Gastrointestinal Bleeding

Lower gastrointestinal bleeding entails a range of severity and a multitude of options for localization and control of bleeding. With experience in trauma, critical care, endoscopy, and definitive surgical interventions, general surgeons are equipped to manage this condition in various clinical settings. This article examines traditional and emerging options for bleeding localization and control available to general surgeons.

Is topical tranexamic acid a better alternative for selected cases of anterior epistaxis management in the ED?

Epistaxis is a well-known problem that is mostly self-limited. In certain cases it requires packing or cauterization. Tranexamic acid has been tried and has shown promising results. Here we report a case of prolonged epistaxis in a patient on dual anti-platelet agent therapy.