Significance of Radial Margin in Patients Undergoing Complete Mesocolic Excision for Colon Cancer

Surgical quality assessment for the prospective study of oncologic outcomes after laparoscopic modified complete mesocolic excision for nonmetastatic right colon cancer (PIONEER study)

BACKGROUND

The modified complete mesocolic excision (mCME) procedure for right-sided colon cancer is a tailored approach based on the original complete mesocolic excision (CME) methodology. Limited studies evaluated the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic mCME using objective surgical quality assessments in patients with right colon cancer. The objectives of the PIONEER study were to evaluate oncologic outcomes after laparoscopic mCME and to identify optimal clinically relevant endpoints and values for standardizing laparoscopic right colon cancer surgery based on short-term outcomes of procedures performed by expert laparoscopic surgeons.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is an ongoing prospective, multi-institutional, single-arm study conducted at five tertiary colorectal cancer centers in South Korea. Study registrants included 250 patients scheduled for laparoscopic mCME with right-sided colon adenocarcinoma (from the appendix to the proximal half of the transverse colon). The primary endpoint was 3-year disease-free survival. Secondary outcomes included 3-year overall survival, incidence of morbidity in the first 4 weeks postoperatively, completeness of mCME, central radicality, and distribution of metastatic lymph nodes. Survival data will be available after the final follow-up date (June 2024).

RESULTS

The postoperative complication rate was 12.9%, with a major complication rate of 2.7%. In 87% of patients, central radicality was achieved with dissection at or beyond the level of complete exposure of the superior mesenteric vein. Mesocolic plane resection with an intact mesocolon was achieved in 75.9% of patients, as assessed through photographs. Metastatic lymph node distribution varied by tumor location and extent. Seven optimal clinically relevant endpoints and values were identified based on the analysis of complications in low-risk patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic mCME for right-sided colon cancer produced favorable short-term postoperative outcomes. The identified optimal clinically relevant endpoints and values can serve as a reference for evaluating surgical performance of this procedure.

Radial resection margin distinguishes between superficial versus deep resection in colorectal cancer: a retrospective study

Randomized studies showed that robotic surgery was short-term useful and safe for cancer patients. We investigated whether robots improve deep resection margins or superficial resection margins for radial resection margins in terms of short-term results. From an institutional database, we selected all superficial groups (≤ 3 mm) and deeper groups (≥ 4 mm) with rectal cancer treated with resection for a year. We evaluated the short-term post-operative 90-day outcomes on a radial resection size-based margin differentiation, including the first bowel movement, length of hospital stay, sepsis, and harvested lymph node. The main results were grades III-IV on the Clavien-Dindo scale and complications. We found 120 patients who had oncologic resection of rectal cancer; 42 patients with a superficial radial resection margin of ≤ 3 mm, all the following outcomes improved: the harvested lymph node, proximal resection margin, TME, flatus time, liquid diet duration, anastomotic leakage, and sepsis. Among these advantages were a reduced risk of metastasis and an overall reduction in local recurrence.

Preoperative computed tomography assessment of circumferential resection margin in retroperitonealized colon cancer predicts disease-free survival

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this retrospective study was to predict circumferential resection margin (CRM) involvement on preoperative CT, and prognostic impact of CRM assessment by CT (ctCRM) in patients with retroperitonealized colon cancer.

METHODS

This study included patients who underwent resection for ascending or descending colon cancer between July 2010 and February 2013. Positive ctCRM was defined as tumor distance to the retromesenteric plane of ≤ 1 mm. The origin of positive CRM was divided into primary tumor or other tumor components including lymph nodes, tumor deposits, or extramural venous invasions. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify preoperative factors to predict pathologic CRM (pCRM). A Cox proportional hazards model was used in multivariable analysis to determine the preoperative factors affecting disease-free survival (DFS).

RESULTS

A total of 274 patients (mean age, 64.0 years ± 11.0 [standard deviation]; 157 men) with retroperitonealized colon cancer were evaluated. Of 274 patients, 67 patients (24.5%) had positive CRM on surgical pathology. The accuracy of preoperative CT in predicting pCRM was 79.6% (218/274). Among preoperative factors, only CRM assessment on CT was independently associated with pCRM (p < 0.001). Positive ctCRM by primary tumor was an independent factor for DFS (HR, 3.362 [1.714-6.593]) and systemic recurrence (HR, 3.715 [1.787-7.724], but not for local recurrence on multivariable analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative CT can accurately predict pCRM, and positive ctCRM by primary tumor is an independent risk factor for DFS and systemic recurrence, but not for local recurrence in retroperitonealized colon cancer.

KEY POINTS

• Preoperative CT can predict pathologic circumferential resection margin (CRM) with approximately 80% of accuracy in patients with retroperitonealized colon cancer. • Positive CRM by a primary tumor on preoperative CT is a poor prognostic factor for disease-free survival and systemic recurrence in patients with retroperitonealized colon cancer. • CRM involvement on CT was not associated with local recurrence in patients with retroperitonealized colon cancer.

Definition and reporting of lymphadenectomy and complete mesocolic excision for radical right colectomy: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Several procedures have been proposed to reduce the rates of recurrence in patients with right-sided colon cancer. Different procedures for a radical right colectomy (RRC), including extended D3 lymphadenectomy, complete mesocolic excision and central vascular ligation have been associated with survival benefits by some authors, but results are inconsistent. The aim of this study was to assess the variability in definition and reporting of RRC, which might be responsible for significant differences in outcome evaluation.

METHODS

PRISMA-compliant systematic literature review to identify the definitions of RRC. Primary aims were to identify surgical steps and different nomenclature for RRC. Secondary aims were description of heterogeneity and overlap among different RRC techniques.

RESULTS

Ninety-nine articles satisfied inclusion criteria. Eight surgical steps were identified and recorded as specific to RRC: Central arterial ligation was described in 100% of the included studies; preservation of mesocolic integrity in 73% and dissection along the SMV plane in 67%. Other surgical steps were inconstantly reported. Six differently named techniques for RRC have been identified. There were 35 definitions for the 6 techniques and 40% of these were used to identify more than one technique.

CONCLUSIONS

The only universally adopted surgical step for RRC is central arterial ligation. There is great heterogeneity and consistent overlap among definitions of all RRC techniques. This is likely to jeopardise the interpretation of the outcomes of studies on the topic. Consistent use of definitions and reporting of procedures are needed to obtain reliable conclusions in future trials. PROSPERO CRD42021241650.

Nonmicroradical Resection Margin as a Predictor of Recurrence in Patients With Stage III Colon Cancer Undergoing Complete Mesocolic Excision: A Prospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

The prognostic value of the present definition of microradicality in colon cancer is poorly understood, especially considering the vast influence it has in rectal cancer prognosis.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate whether the risk of recurrence after complete mesocolic excision for stage III colon cancer is associated with the distance from tumor tissue to resection margin and whether the location of the involved margin is of any significance.

DESIGN

A prospective cohort of patients was stratified into 2 groups to distinguish between direct margin invasion (0-mm resection margin) and a ≤1-mm resection margin without direct invasion or 3 groups to distinguish between the location of margin involvement (lateral tumor resection margin, central vascular ligation margin, and nonperitonealized mesocolic resection margin). Patients with microradical resections were used as a control group.

SETTINGS

We included all patients undergoing elective complete mesocolic excision for International Union Against Cancer stage III colon cancer at Nordsjællands Hospital between January 1, 2008, and December 31, 2016.

PATIENTS

A total of 276 patients met all inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Primary outcome was risk of recurrence after 3.2 years.

RESULTS

A total of 41 patients (15%) had a nonmicroradical resection. The 3.2-year cumulative incidence of recurrence for a 0-mm margin was 43% and 24% for a ≤1-mm margin without direct invasion, corresponding with an HR of 4.3 (p = 0.0146) and 1.3 (p = 0.474). The location of the involved margin showed no significant differences.

LIMITATIONS

This was a single-center study containing a limited number of patients with a nonmicroradical resection with a risk of type II error.

CONCLUSIONS

We found no increased risk of recurrence for a ≤1-mm margin without direct invasion, indicating that the present classification of microradicality might not be justified if an intact posterior mesocolic fascia without invasion of tumor tissue is present. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B625.

MARGEN DE RESECCIN NO MICRORRADICAL COMO PREDICTOR DE RECURRENCIA EN PACIENTES CON CNCER DE COLON EN ESTADIO III SOMETIDOS A ESCISIN MESOCLICA COMPLETA UN ESTUDIO DE COHORTE PROSPECTIVO

ANTECEDENTES:El valor pronóstico de la definición actual de microrradicalidad en el cáncer de colon es poco conocido, especialmente considerando la gran influencia que tiene en el pronóstico del cáncer de recto.OBJETIVO:Este estudio tiene como objetivo investigar si el riesgo de recurrencia después de la escisión mesocólica completa (CME) para el cáncer de colon en estadio III está asociado con la distancia desde el tejido tumoral hasta el margen de resección y si la localización del margen afectado tiene alguna importancia.DISEÑO:Una cohorte prospectiva de pacientes se estratificó en dos grupos para distinguir entre la invasión del margen directo (margen de resección de 0 mm) y un margen de resección ≤1 mm sin invasión directa, o tres grupos para distinguir entre la localización de la afectación del margen (resección lateral del margen del tumor, margen de ligadura vascular central y margen de resección mesocólica no peritonizada). Los pacientes con resecciones microrradicales se utilizaron como grupo control.ENTORNO CLÍNICO:Incluimos a todos los pacientes sometidos a CME electiva por cáncer de colon en estadio III de la UICC en el Hospital Nordsjællands, Dinamarca, entre el 1 de enero de 2008 y el 31 de diciembre de 2016.PACIENTES:Un total de 276 pacientes cumplieron todos los criterios de inclusión y ninguno de los criterios de exclusión.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:El resultado primario fue el riesgo de recurrencia después de 3 · 2 años.RESULTADOS:Un total de 41 (15%) pacientes tuvieron una resección no microrradical. La incidencia acumulada de recurrencia a los 3,2 años para un margen de 0 mm fue del 43% y del 24% para un margen ≤1 mm sin invasión directa, lo que corresponde a un cociente de riesgo de 4,3 (p = 0,0146) y 1,3 (p = 0,474) respectivamente. La localización del margen afectado no mostró diferencias significativas.LIMITACIONES:Estudio unicéntrico con un número limitado de pacientes con resección no microrradical con riesgo de error tipo II.CONCLUSIONES:No encontramos un mayor riesgo de recurrencia para un margen ≤1 mm sin invasión directa, lo que indica que la clasificación actual de microrradicalidad podría no estar justificada si está presente una fascia mesocólica posterior intacta sin invasión del tejido tumoral. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B625. (Traducción-Dr Yazmin Berrones-Medina).

Machine Learning Model for Predicting Postoperative Survival of Patients with Colorectal Cancer

Purpose

Machine learning (ML) is a strong candidate for making accurate predictions, as we can use large amount of data with powerful computational algorithms. We developed a ML based model to predict survival of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) using data from two independent datasets.

Materials and Methods

A total of 364,316 and 1,572 CRC patients were included from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) and a Korean dataset, respectively. As SEER combines data from 18 cancer registries, internal validation was done using 18-Fold-Cross-Validation then external validation was performed by testing the trained model on the Korean dataset. Performance was evaluated using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), sensitivity and positive predictive values.

Results

Clinicopathological characteristics were significantly different between the two datasets and the SEER showed a significant lower 5-year survival rate compared to the Korean dataset (60.1% vs. 75.3%, p < 0.001). The ML-based model using the Light gradient boosting algorithm achieved a better performance in predicting 5-year-survival compared to American Joint Committee on Cancer stage (AUROC, 0.804 vs. 0.736; p < 0.001). The most important features which influenced model performance were age, number of examined lymph nodes, and tumor size. Sensitivity and positive predictive values of predicting 5-year-survival for classes including dead or alive were reported as 68.14%, 77.51% and 49.88%, 88.1% respectively in the validation set. Survival probability can be checked using the web-based survival predictor (http://colorectalcancer.pythonanywhere.com).

Conclusion

ML-based model achieved a much better performance compared to staging in individualized estimation of survival of patients with CRC.