The "Phillips" Ileostomy Correction Technique for Prolapsed Stoma

Small-bowel plication prevents ileostomy prolapse in young children with inflammatory bowel disease

PURPOSE

Young children with medically refractory very early-onset inflammatory bowel disease (VEO-IBD) sometimes benefit from ileostomy diversion alone or may be offered subtotal colectomy with ileostomy. Though generally well-tolerated, ileostomy complications are frequent. Prolapse is particularly frustrating as it can be difficult and painful to reduce, becomes a recurring problem is some patients, and often requires ostomy revision or bowel resection.

METHODS

Over the course of the past 6 months, eight consecutive children with VEO-IBD underwent 10 creation or revision of a diverting ileostomy (two underwent subsequent colectomy with ileostomy revision). In each of these 10 cases, we plicated the ileum just proximal to the ileostomy for a distance of approximately 3 cm using a running permanent monofilament suture.

RESULTS

No patient who underwent plication of bowel has developed ileostomy prolapse. There were no cases of ileostomy retraction, parastomal hernia or ostomy-level obstruction. One patient required a lysis of a single band adhesion for a more proximal small bowel obstruction. The stomas have functioned well and there have been no complications.

CONCLUSION

Simple bowel plication appears to be a quick and effective way to prevent ileostomy prolapse in young children with VEO-IBD with an ileostomy who are at high risk for prolapse.

Mid-term Efficacy of Local Repair Using Modified Altemeier Technique for Stomal Prolapse: A Case Series

INTRODUCTION

 Stomal prolapse (SP) is characterized by full-thickness protrusion of the bowel through the stoma site. The surgical procedures for SP include local repair, abdominal wall fixation, and stoma relocation. However, previous reports were mostly case reports or case series with a small number of patients and lacked long-term results. A modified Altemeier technique (MAT) has been used for the local repair of SP in our institution, and this study aimed to evaluate its mid-term efficacy.

METHODS

 We reviewed patients who underwent MAT for SP between August 2013 and December 2020. The variables included patient characteristics, type of stoma, indications of stoma creation, the time interval from stoma creation to prolapse, site of prolapse, reasons for SP surgery, perioperative variables, complications during SP surgery, and length of follow-up. Recurrence of SP was defined as the need for change in stoma care or re-protrusion of the stoma by more than 5 cm in length.

RESULTS

 Ten patients were included in this study. The median age at the time of SP surgery was 71.5 years. The indications of stoma creation included unresectable or recurrent intra-abdominal malignancies in four patients, diverting ileostomy with rectal cancer surgery in two, transverse colon cancer in one, gastric and rectal cancer in one, rectovaginal fistula in one, and non-occlusive mesenteric ischemia in one. The median interval from stoma creation to prolapse was 2.5 months. Six patients underwent elective SP surgery, and four patients underwent emergency surgery for incarcerated prolapse. The median operative time was 75.5 min. Postoperative complications that included transient mucosal ischemia and subcutaneous abscess occurred in one patient. There were four recurrences (40%), and the median time interval from surgery to recurrence was 4.5 months. Two patients underwent repeated MAT, one of whom underwent stomal reversal with laparotomy for re-recurrence. The median follow-up duration was 19 months.

CONCLUSION

 MAT for SP is associated with a high recurrence rate in mid-term follow-up.