Effects of a tissue sealing-cutting device versus monopolar electrocautery on early pilonidal wound healing: a prospective randomized controlled trial

Management of pilonidal sinus and recurrences in 2025

Pilonidal sinus is a common pathology of the intergluteal cleft that can develop into abscess or suppuration. This lesion corresponds histologically to a granuloma that organizes around foreign bodies, most often hairs, and fistulizes to the skin through partially epithelialized orifices. If suppuration and abscess develop, treatment is based either on medical treatment combining analgesics, local antiseptics and sometimes antibiotics, or on emergency incision and drainage in the operating room. This is performed in more than 10,000 patients per year in France. Outside of emergencies, elective surgery for pilonidal sinus is indicated to treat bothersome symptoms or to avoid the risk of recurrent abscess. The surgical indication must take into account the patient's risk factors, particularly active smoking, that increase the risk of postoperative complications and recurrence. Elective intervention is performed on more than 30,000 patients per year in France. Radical excision followed by secondary healing is the most commonly performed option. This strategy carries a risk of failure or recurrence for at least 10% of patients. Primary closure after excision can reduce the time for healing and convalescence, but at the cost of more frequent infectious complications. Midline closure should be avoided, in favor of paramedian or flap closure. Minimally invasive techniques are being developed that combine the extraction of foreign bodies and mechanical debridement or thermal or chemical cautery of the granulomatous walls. They avoid complex and unpleasant nursing care of secondarily healing wounds, at the cost of a recurrence rate equivalent to that from excision techniques. They have the merit of avoiding difficult situations of failure to heal or recurrence after radical excision that are associated with a clear deterioration in the quality of life. The treatment of surgical failures is complex, and combines comprehensive patient care (smoking cessation, anti-infectious treatments, treatment of excess weight, avoidance of a sedentary lifestyle) and often a repeat operation. Minimally invasive treatments, particularly laser treatments, have their place in these difficult situations.

Surgical treatment of pilonidal disease - Short-term follow up results of minimally invasive pit-picking surgery versus radical excision without suturing: A prospective randomised trial

Background

In this study we compared the potential benefits of surgical treatments for chronic symptomatic pilonidal disease (PD) - minimally invasive pit-picking surgery and radical excision without wound suturing.

Materials and methods

A total of 100 adult patients with chronic symptomatic PD were enrolled in this study at the Kaunas Hospital of the Lithuanian University of Health Sciences. They were randomly divided into two groups: pit-picking surgery (n = 50) and radical excision with open healing (n = 50). Recurrent PD patients were not excluded. The comparison of the techniques was based on pain within the first postoperative week, failed surgery rates, and wound healing time. Additionally, pain levels at different time intervals following the treatment, analgesic consumption, and time off work, were assessed and compared.

Results

A total of 89 patients (89 %) were available for follow-up after 6 months. Pain levels the first postoperative week were significantly lower in the pit-picking group compared to the radical excision group, with median scores of 10.0 and 20.0, respectively (p = 0.002). The complete wound healing time was longer in the radical excision group (60 days) versus the pit-picking group (17 days), with a significant difference noted (p = 0.00). No significant difference was observed between the type of surgery and the rate of failed surgery, with 5 (11.9 %) cases in the pit-picking group and 4 (8.5 %) in the radical excision group.

Conclusion

Based on our short-term findings, minimally invasive pit-picking surgery is a better option regarding pain, wound healing time and failed surgery rate. In cases where this approach is not suitable, other alternatives should be contemplated, as radical surgery without wound suturing should not be employed as a treatment method for PD. Additionally, the relationship between PD and recurrence rates should be investigated further.

The Neurostimulation Appropriateness Consensus Committee (NACC) Recommendations for Infection Prevention and Management

INTRODUCTION

The use of neurostimulation for pain has been an established therapy for many decades and is a major tool in the arsenal to treat neuropathic pain syndromes. Level I evidence has recently been presented to substantiate the therapy, but this is balanced against the risk of complications of an interventional technique.

METHODS

The Neurostimulation Appropriateness Consensus Committee (NACC) of the International Neuromodulation Society convened an international panel of well published and diverse physicians to examine the best practices for infection mitigation and management in patients undergoing neurostimulation. The NACC recommendations are based on evidence scoring and peer-reviewed literature. Where evidence is lacking the panel added expert opinion to establish recommendations.

RESULTS

The NACC has made recommendations to improve care by reducing infection and managing this complication when it occurs. These evidence-based recommendations should be considered best practices in the clinical implantation of neurostimulation devices.

CONCLUSION

Adhering to established standards can improve patient care and reduce the morbidity and mortality of infectious complications in patients receiving neurostimulation.

Pilonidal sinus disease

Pilonidal disease is a frequent suppurative condition that occurs twice as often in men as in women, usually between the ages of 15 and 30. Pilonidal disease is located beneath the skin of the sacro-coccygeal region. It presents acutely as an abscess under tension while the chronic form gives rise to intermittent discharge from pilonidal sinus(es). Diagnosis is clinical and usually straightforward. In the large majority of cases, treatment is surgical but there is no consensus as to the 'ideal' technique. Acute abscess must be evacuated and an off-midline incision seems preferable. Excision is the standard definitive treatment but the choice of wide versus limited excision depends on the school of thought. The widespread practice in France is to leave the wound open, relying on postoperative healing by secondary intention. This technique has a low rate of recurrence but has the disadvantages of requiring local nursing care; the healing process is prolonged, usually associated with a temporary but prolonged cessation of activity. Primary wound closure techniques are less restrictive but their recurrence rate is probably higher. A direct midline suture is best after a small excision, but for a more extended wound, plastic reconstruction techniques are preferred; data in the literature favor asymmetric closure techniques such as those described by Karydakis and Bascom.