CT scans in diagnosing diverticulitis in the emergency department: is the radiation exposure warranted?

Diagnostic accuracy of acute diverticulitis with unenhanced low-dose CT

Background

The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of unenhanced low‐dose CT (LDCT) in acute colonic diverticulitis in comparison with contrast‐enhanced standard‐dose CT (SDCT).

Methods

All patients with clinically suspected diverticulitis who underwent LDCT followed by SDCT between January and October 2017 were evaluated prospectively. CT examinations were assessed for signs of diverticulitis, complications and other differential diagnoses by three independent radiologists (two consultants and one fourth‐year resident) using SDCT as the reference method. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated and Cohen's κ coefficient was used for agreement analyses.

Results

Of the 149 patients included (mean age 66·7 years, M : F ratio 0·4), 107 (71·8 per cent) had imaging consistent with diverticulitis on standard CT. Sensitivity and specificity values for a diverticulitis diagnosis using LDCT were 95–99 and 86–100 per cent respectively, and respective values for identification of complications were 58–73 and 78–100 per cent. The corresponding κ values among the three readers for diagnosis were 0·984, 0·934 and 0·816, whereas κ values for complications were 0·680, 0·703 and 0·354. Of the 26 patients who presented with other causes of abdominal symptoms identified on standard CT, 23 were diagnosed correctly on LDCT. Missed cases included splenic infarction (1) and segmental colitis (2).

Conclusion

The diagnostic accuracy of LDCT was high for the presence of acute diverticulitis. However, as signs of complicated disease can be missed using the low‐dose protocol, use of LDCT as a primary examination method should not preclude SDCT when complications may be suspected.

Diverticular disease epidemiology: acute hospitalisations are growing fastest in young men

BACKGROUND

Older age has long been linked to risk of diverticulitis, but the epidemiology is seldom described for a national population. The aim of this study was to investigate age- and gender differences in incidence, temporal trends, lifetime risk and prevalence related to acute diverticulitis hospitalisations in New Zealand.

METHODS

Records of all hospitalisations with diverticulitis the primary diagnosis were obtained from the Ministry of Health for the period 2000-2015. The first acute diverticulitis admission recorded for an individual was taken as an incident event; all others were classified as recurrent. Trends in age- and sex-specific and age-standardised incidence rates are described, and lifetime risk and prevalence estimated.

RESULTS

Over the 16 years from 2000 to 2015, 37,234 acute hospitalisations for diverticulitis were recorded in 28,329 people aged 30 + years (median = 66 years). Rates of incident hospitalisations rose with age, from 5/10,000 person-years at age 50-54 years to 19/10,000py by age 80-84 years. Rates for women were lower than men before age 55 years, but higher thereafter. Age-standardised rates rose 0.2/10,000py annually, but approximately doubled among men aged < 50 years. Lifetime risk was estimated at over 5%, with the prevalence pool rising to over 1.5% of the population aged 30+ in 2030.

CONCLUSIONS

Rapid increases in diverticulitis admissions among young men since 2000 correspond with increases reported elsewhere but remain unexplained; notably young women follow similar trends 5-10 years later. Increasing incidence, combined with population ageing, adds urgency to explain diverticular formation, to understand factors that trigger or provoke their inflammation/infection, and to clarify treatment and (self-)management pathways.