Does ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract raise the bar in fistula surgery?

The novel BioHealx®assisted fistula treatment (BAFT): effective primary fistula healing with continence preservation

BACKGROUND

This is the first in human assessment of the BioHealx® assisted fistula treatment (BAFT) procedure for the primary healing rate of non-branching transsphincteric fistula in ano. The BAFT procedure consists of compression apposition closure of the lumen of the fistula tract from the internal opening across the transsphincteric length of the fistula tract with a bioabsorbable implant (BioHealx device) and distal fistulectomy. This medium-term follow-up study assesses the healing and functional outcome at the last follow-up (12-40 months; average 23.4 months) following this procedure.

METHODS

The study was a multi-center, prospective, single-arm (non-randomized), non-blinded, clinical study for elective compression closure of non-branching transsphincteric anal fistula of cryptoglandular origin. Participants were recruited from three sites (two hospitals in Budapest, Hungary and one hospital in Szeged, Hungary). The primary outcome was combined fistula and fistulectomy wound healing, and fecal incontinence quality of life scores (FIQL) were a secondary outcome. Fistula healing was assessed independently in cases where the fistulectomy wound had not fully healed.

RESULTS

Thirty-two adults, (18-75 years; M- 27 vs F- 5) were included in the study. The 30-day complication rate was 4/32 (12.5%) and was restricted to the fistulectomy wound with no device-related complications. All patients were assessed in person at 12 months, and patients with unhealed fistulectomy wounds were reassessed after 12 months to confirm fistula healing status. The data demonstrated that 27/32 (84.4%) of transsphincteric fistulas were healed with no recurrences. There were 3(9.4%) persistent transsphincteric fistulas and 2 (6.3%) with undocumented fistula healing with healing fistulectomy wound at last follow-up. Assessment of available baseline and last follow-up FIQL scores demonstrated stable or improved scores for 30/31 (96.8%). Surgeon assessment reflected ease of adoption.

CONCLUSIONS

This first in human assessment of the BAFT procedure for transsphincteric cryptoglandular fistula in ano demonstrated an 84.4% rate of primary healing without recurrence of transsphincteric fistulas with preservation of fecal continence quality of life in 96.8% of patients. Successful compression apposition closure of the fistula tract lumen within the anal sphincter complex delivered the healing rate by primary intention of the fistula tract without any device-related complications or migration. Surgeon mastery of the procedure is straightforward. These outcome data support both a high rate of initial healing and durability of the BAFT procedure for transsphincteric cryptoglandular fistula in ano that are favorable when compared to LIFT, endoanal flap, cutting seton, or fistulotomy/sphincteroplasty surgical options.

Is the ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT) procedure truly a sphincter preserving procedure for anal fistula? A scoping review of the literature

INTRODUCTION

The ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT) procedure has garnered popularity with its success rates and purported sphincter-continence preservation. However, there remains a paucity in the literature on the objective evaluation of sphincter integrity and fecal continence after the LIFT procedure.

OBJECTIVES

The present study undertakes a scoping review to systematically explore and map the published literature, to evaluate the sufficiency of data on the impact on continence in patients after the LIFT procedure.

DESIGN

A systematic search of MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASe, CINAHL was performed from January 2007 to April 2020 and 597 publications were identified. Forty-two satisfied the inclusion and exclusion criteria. We performed a scoping review in accordance to the PRISMA-ScR guidelines.

RESULTS

Only 3 (7.1%) of publications were randomized controlled trials, of which just 1 (2.4%) measured incontinence as a primary outcome. Continence was measured both pre- and post-LIFT in 30 (71.4%), of which 19 (45.2%) had a fixed protocol for continence assessment, which was heterogeneous between the studies. Continence was assessed using subjective scoring systems in 27 (64.3%) and objective measurement was performed in just 6 (14.3%). No studies performed post-operative anatomical assessment of the anal sphincter complex.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term continence in post-LIFT patients is not supported with adequately powered prospective longitudinal trials using rigorously protocoled pre- and post-operative assessment of continence. Future research that focuses on a combination of objective assessment using anal manometry as well as anatomical assessment of the sphincter complex on top of subjective evaluation is needed before we can be certain if LIFT is indeed a sphincter and continence preserving technique.

Ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT) for high transsphincteric fistulas: a double-center retrospective study with long-term follow-up

PURPOSE

This study aimed to evaluate the long-term efficacy of the ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT) procedure in treating high transsphincteric fistulas.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study to evaluate the success rate of LIFT treatment in 82 patients with high transsphincteric fistulas involving at least one-third of the external sphincter. This study was carried out across 2 centers from November 2009 to February 2023.

RESULTS

All patients underwent successful surgery with a median operative time of 48.9 minutes (range, 20-80 minutes), and no intraoperative or postoperative complications were reported. The median follow-up duration was 85.5 months (range, 4-120 months), with 5 patients (6.1%) lost to follow-up. Treatment was successful in 62 patients, whose symptoms disappeared and both the external opening and the intersphincteric incision completely healed, yielding an overall efficiency rate of 80.5%. There were 15 cases (19.5%) of treatment failure, including 6 (7.8%) that converted to intersphincteric anal fistula and 9 (11.7%) that experienced persistent or recurrent fistulas. Only 1 patient reported minor overflow during the postoperative follow-up, but no other patients reported any significant discomfort. There were no statistically significant differences between patients with surgical success and those with treatment failure in terms of fistula length, history of previous abscess or anal fistula surgery, number of external orifices or fistulas, and location of fistulas (all P>0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

LIFT is a safe and effective sphincter-preserving procedure that yields satisfactory healing outcomes and has minimal impact on anal function.

Ligation of the Intersphincteric Fistula Tract as an Emergency Treatment for Cryptoglandular Anal Fistula

Introduction

Ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT) is a sphincter-preserving procedure for treating anal fistula of cryptoglandular origin. Our prospective study aimed to determine the postoperative outcomes of patients undergoing LIFT in emergency and elective settings.

Methods

This was a single-centre prospective observational study of the LIFT procedure for the treatment of anal fistulas. The differences in the 6-month postoperative outcomes between the emergency and elective procedures were analysed, including the healing rate, healing time, recurrence rate, recurrence time, postoperative complications and length of hospital stay.

Results

Twenty-two patients were recruited for this study: 11 patients underwent LIFT as an emergency procedure (EM-LIFT), while the others underwent LIFT as an elective procedure (EL-LIFT). The healing rate for the EM-LIFT group was 90.9% (n = 10), with a median healing time of 2 months (range 0.5-4). For the EL-LIFT group, the healing rate was 100% (n = 11), with the same median healing time of 2 months (range 0.5-4). Two of the patients in the EM-LIFT group developed recurrence, with a median recurrence time of 5 months (range 4-6) and three developed recurrence in the EL-LIFT group, with the same median recurrence time of 5 months (range 4-6). There were minor postoperative complications of pain and subcutaneous infection, with no faecal incontinence. There was no statistically significant difference in postoperative outcomes between the groups.

Conclusion

EM-LIFT is a feasible and safe primary procedure for active cryptoglandular-type anal fistulas.

Surgical management of complex perianal fistula revisited in a systematic review: a critical view of available scientific evidence

BACKGROUND

Treating complex perianal fistulas in Crohn's disease patients remains a challenge. Classical surgical treatments for Crohn's disease fistulas have been extrapolated from cryptoglandular fistulas treatment, which have different etiology, and this might interfere with its effectiveness, in addition, they increase fecal incontinence risk. Recently, new surgical techniques with support from biological approaches, like stem cells, have been developed to preserve the function of the sphincter. We have performed a systematic literature review to compare the results of these different techniques in the treatment of Crohn's or Cryptoglandular fistula.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effectiveness, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched systematically for relevant articles. We included randomized controlled trials and observational studies that referred to humans, were written in English, included adults 18+ years old, and were published during the 10-year period from 2/01/2010 to 2/29/2020. Evidence level was assigned as designated by the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network.

RESULTS

Of the 577 citations screened, a total of 79 were ultimately included in our review. In Crohn's disease patients, classical techniques such as primarily seton, Ligation of Intersphincteric Fistula Tracks, or lay open, healing rates were approximately 50-60%, while in cryptoglandular fistula were around, 70-80% for setons or flaps. In Crohn's disease patients, new surgical techniques using derivatives of adipose tissue reported healing rates exceeding 70%, stem cells-treated patients achieved higher combined remission versus controls (56.3% vs 38.6%, p = 0.010), mesenchymal cells reported a healing rate of 80% at week 12. In patients with cryptoglandular fistulas, a healing rate of 70% using derivatives of adipose tissue or platelets was achieved, and a healing rate of 80% was achieved using laser technology. Fecal incontinence was improved after the use of autologous platelet growth factors and Nitinol Clips.

CONCLUSION

New surgical techniques showed better healing rates in Crohn's disease patients than classical techniques, which have better results in cryptoglandular fistula than in Crohn's disease. Healing rates for complex cryptoglandular fistulas were similar between the classic and new techniques, being the new techniques less invasive; the incontinence rate improved with the current techniques.

Subcutaneous incision of the fistula tract and internal sphincterotomy (SIFT-IS): a novel surgical procedure for transsphincteric anal fistula

AIM

The aetiology of anal fistula has not been fully clarified. One of the causes of anal fistulas may be the markedly deep crypts that characterize the primary openings. We developed subcutaneous incision of the fistula tract and internal sphincterotomy (SIFT-IS) to eradicate these deep crypts. The aim of this study was to evaluate outcomes in patients with anal fistula treated with SIFT-IS.

METHOD

A retrospective study was performed over a 2-year period. Patients with transsphincteric anal fistula who underwent SIFT-IS were enrolled. The primary endpoint was the anal fistula healing rate at 16 weeks postoperatively. The secondary endpoints were healing time, postoperative complications and clinical continence status.

RESULTS

One hundred and fifty one patients were enrolled. Primary healing was accomplished in 129 patients (85%). There were 17 patients (11%) with a remnant fistula and five (3%) with a recurrence. The remnant fistulas healed spontaneously at more than 16 weeks postoperatively in seven patients. The median healing time was 6 (3-96) weeks. Surgical intervention was required in seven patients with a remnant fistula and four with recurrence. At the final follow-up, the wounds had healed in 148 patients (98%). No significant postoperative complications or incontinence were observed.

CONCLUSION

Subcutaneous incision of the fistula tract and internal sphincterotomy is a promising surgical option for transsphincteric anal fistulas, with a satisfactory healing rate.

Ligation of Intersphincteric Fistula Tract (LIFT) with or Without Injection of Bone Marrow Mononuclear Cells in the Treatment of Trans-sphincteric Anal Fistula: a Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT) is a sphincter-saving procedure used for treatment of complex anal fistula. The current study aimed to assess the outcome of local injection of bone marrow mononuclear cells (BM-MNCs) in conjunction with LIFT as compared to LIFT alone in regards to healing rate, time to healing, and ultimate success rate.

METHODS

This was a prospective randomized trial on patients with trans-sphincteric anal fistula. Patients were randomly allocated to one of two equal groups: LIFT and LIFT with BM-MNC injection. The main outcome measures were healing at 10 weeks of follow-up, recurrence after healing, and complications.

RESULTS

Seventy patients (48 male and 22 female) of a mean age of 37.9 ± 10.4 years were included. The mean time to complete healing after LIFT + BM-MNCs was significantly shorter than after LIFT alone (20.5 ± 5.2 vs 28.04 ± 5.8 days; P < 0.0001). The ultimate success rates of both groups were similar (LIFT = 60% vs LIFT with BM-MNCs = 68.6%, P = 0.62). There was no significant difference in the mean operation time or complication rate between the two groups. Secondary extension and previous anal surgery were significant independent predictors of failure of healing.

CONCLUSION

LIFT combined with BM-MNC injection was associated with a shorter time to complete healing than LIFT alone. However, BM-MNC injection did not have a significant impact on the overall healing and ultimate success rate.

A Retrospective Critique of the Various Sphincter-preserving Surgical Procedures for Ischiorectal Fistula

In the 1950s, the cause of anal fistulas was identified as an infection of the anal gland (cryptoglandular infection theory). Thereafter, treatment for this disorder began in the 1960s with the lay-open procedure, which involved incising the sphincter and the fistula tract. However, it was found that too much invasion into the sphincter could result in postoperative fecal incontinence. Thus, to reduce such risk, sphincter-preserving surgery was applied for superficial anal fistula in 1961 and for deep anal fistula (ischiorectal fistula) in 1965. Over the years, more effective sphincter-preserving procedures for ischiorectal fistula have been developed to improve the quality of life of the patient. In this review article, we aim to first introduce the basic surgical techniques for ischiorectal fistula. We will discuss the anatomy of the anus and the pathogenesis of ischiorectal fistula and will provide some diagnostic methods. Representative sphincter-preserving procedures that have been performed for ischiorectal fistula since 1965 will also be categorized and outlined chronologically. The discussion will look at the following techniques for ischiorectal fistula and outline the advantages and disadvantages of each procedure so that they can be used as a reference for ischiorectal fistula surgery in the future: the lay-open procedure (fistulotomy and fistulectomy), the Hanley procedure (first partial sphincter-preserving procedure), the muscle-filling procedure, the Moriya method and Ui method (modified partial sphincter-preserving procedure), the Takano method and the sphincter-preserving lateral procedure (complete sphincter-preserving procedure), the seton method (a cross between the lay-open procedure and sphincter-preserving procedure), and the overseas sphincter-preserving procedure.

External sphincter-sparing anal fistulotomy (ESSAF): a simplified technique for the treatment of fistula-in-ano

BACKGROUND

Fistula-in-ano due to cryptoglandular disease is a common condition. While a simple anal fistula can be treated successfully by a fistulotomy, the risk of potential damage to the anal sphincters and subsequent poor functional outcomes persist in a large portion of patients with complex fistulae. Several sphincter-preserving treatment procedures have been described for complex fistulae over the past 3 decades, with variable results and complication rates, and no procedure is proven to be superior to the others. We developed external sphincter-sparing anal fistulotomy (ESSAF), a reproducible simple modification of the ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT) technique for the treatment of complex fistula-in-ano.. The aim of the present study was to describe the technique and our outcomes.

METHODS

This was a retrospective review of all patients who underwent ESSAF for a complex anal fistula at our institution from January 2014 to December 2019. The primary outcome measure of this study was the primary fistula healing rate. Secondary outcome measures included fecal and/or gas incontinence and postoperative complications. During the ESSAF procedure, the mucosa and skin overlying the fistula tract are incised to allow complete exposure of the sphincter complex. Then the internal sphincter muscle fibers overlying the tract are divided and the tract is meticulously curetted and debrided. Next, the internal opening of the tract traversing the external sphincter muscle is suture-ligated with absorbable sutures. Then, a minimal amount of mucosa is advanced and the incision is partially closed with absorbable sutures, while its external portion is left open for drainage.

RESULTS

Fifty-nine patients [43 males, median age was 50 years (range 36-63 years)] underwent ESSAF for complex anal fistula during the study period. Mean follow-up was 12 ± 14.7 months. Of the 59 patients, 42 (71.2%) experienced fistula closure, with a median healing time of 8 weeks (IQR 4-16 weeks). None of the patients developed significant anal incontinence following the procedure. One patient (1.7%) suffered from soiling and another patient (1.7%) developed postoperative bleeding. There were no infectious complications. Of the 17 patients (28.8%) who failed to heal successfully, 9 (15.2%) did not heal primarily and 8 (16%) experienced recurrence after complete healing. Thirteen (76%) of these patients underwent reoperation with complete recovery after ESSAF (n = 4), fistulotomy (n = 8) or endorectal advancement flap (ERAF) (n = 1). Overall ESSAF initiated recovery in 93.2% of the patients.

CONCLUSIONS

ESSAF is a feasible, safe, reproducible and effective sphincter-sparing procedure for the treatment of complex anal fistulae.

FISSIT (Fistula Surgery in Italy) study: A retrospective survey on the surgical management of anal fistulas in Italy over the last 15 years

BACKGROUND

Surgical treatment of anal fistulas is still a challenge. The aims of this study were to evaluate the adoption and healing rates for the different surgical techniques used in Italy over the past 15 years.

METHODS

This was a multicenter retrospective observational study of patients affected by simple and complex anal fistulas of cryptoglandular origin who were surgically treated in the period 2003-2017. Surgical techniques were grouped as sphincter-cutting or sphincter-sparing and as technology-assisted or techno-free. All patients included in the study were followed for at least 12 months.

RESULTS

A total of 9,536 patients (5,520 simple; 4,016 complex fistulas) entered the study. For simple fistulas, fistulotomy was the most frequently used procedure, although its adoption significantly decreased over the years (P < .0005), with an increase in sphincter-sparing approaches; the overall healing rate in simple fistulas was 81.1%, with a significant difference between sphincter-cutting (91.9%) and sphincter-sparing (65.1%) techniques (P = .001). For complex fistulas, the adoption of sphincter-cutting approaches decreased, while sphincter-sparing techniques were mildly preferred (P < .0005). Moreover, there was a significant trend toward the use of technology-assisted procedures. The overall healing rate for complex fistulas was 69.0%, with a measurable difference between sphincter-cutting (81.1%) and sphincter-sparing (61.4%; P = .001) techniques and between techno-free and technology-assisted techniques (72.5% and 55.0%, respectively; P = .001).

CONCLUSION

Surgical treatment of anal fistulas has changed, with a trend toward the use of sphincter-sparing techniques. The overall cure rate has remained stable, even if the most innovative procedures have achieved a lower success rate.

Risk factors for postoperative recurrence of anal fistula identified by an international, evidence-based Delphi consultation survey of surgical specialists

BACKGROUND

Despite the emerging knowledge about postoperative anal fistula recurrence (AFR) and the increasing number of clinical studies, there is no better understanding or consensus regarding the risk factors for AFR. The aim of this study was to generate international consensus guidance statements focusing on AFR.

METHODS

A two-round modified Delphi process was conducted among international surgical specialists via an online survey delivered by email with a secure link created with Google Forms. Surgeons were asked to use a 9-point Likert scale to rate the importance of patient-, fistula-, and surgery-related statements developed based on our previous systematic review. Consensus was reached when at least 70% of panel members rated a statement as being of critical importance (ratings of 7-9).

RESULTS

Of a total of 60 experts invited, 38 experts representing 13 countries from four continents agreed to participate in the first round of the Delphi process and 31 in the second round. In total, consensus was reached on 14 statements on the risk factors for AFR in three domains: patient-related risk factors included comorbid colitis, inflammatory bowel disease and use of immunosuppressants; fistula-related factors included transsphincteric fistula, number of fistula, horseshoe extension, undetected internal opening, location of anal fistula, recurrent fistula, suprasphincteric fistula, and height of the internal opening; and surgery-related factors included type of surgery, previous fistula surgery and surgeon.

CONCLUSION

This Delphi study provides an evidence-based profile of risk factors for AFR in the patient-, surgery- and fistula-related domains from a global perspective. Clinically, these indicators can be incorporated to develop risk calculation tools for the early detection of AFR in high-risk patients, allowing early prevention and intervention.

Ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract procedure and its modifications

Purpose Treatment of anal fistulae is regarded as a challenge due to the diverse nature of this disease and its countless complications. Ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract procedure and its modifications have been popularized among many surgeons worldwide due to their simplicity and promising outcomes. The main purpose of this article was to conduct a comprehensives review of the published literature on ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract procedure and its modifications.

Method PubMed, the Cochrane database and Ovid were searched from January 2007 to June 2017. Fully published peer-reviewed studies which applied ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract procedure and its modifications for the treatment of anal fistulae of cryptogenic origin with follow-up of median 12 months were eligible. Uncompleted studies, case reports, reviews, abstracts, letters, short communication, comments, and studies which did not fulfill inclusion criteria were excluded. The primary outcome was to measure primary healing, overall healing, failure, and recurrence of ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract procedure and its modifications.

Results Twenty-two studies were identified with only ten studies meeting criteria of inclusion. Original ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract was performed in five studies with a population of 199 patients while the remaining five studies showed four different modifications of the ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract with a total number of 147 patients. Both original LIFT and its modifications have promising as well as potentially similar outcomes; primary healing in the original ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract (73.95%) (95% CI 60.3–85.6) performed less than the modifications (82.3%) (95% CI 64.8–94.7). Overall healing in the original ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract (78.9%) (95% CI 58.5–93.7) performed relatively less than in the modifications (93.6%) (95% CI 81.4–99.6). Failure in the original ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract (17.9%) (95% CI 4.9–36.5) performed almost the same as the modifications (17.7%) (95% CI 5.3–35.2). Recurrence in the original ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract was 9.7% (95% CI 1.7–23.2). However, there was no recurrence in the modifications.

Conclusion Ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract and its modifications are effective and simple procedures in treating simple anal fistulae, especially high transsphincteric ones. However, more trials should be performed to evaluate its effectiveness regarding complex fistulae.

Systematic review of efficacy of LIFT procedure in crpytoglandular fistula-in-ano

Background fistula-in-ano is a common problem. Ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT) is a new addition to the list of operations available to deal with complex fistula-in-ano.

Objective we sought to qualitatively analyze studies describing LIFT for crpytoglandular fistula-in-ano and determine its efficacy.

Data sources MEDLINE (Pubmed, Ovid), Embase, Scopus and Cochrane Library were searched.

Study selection all clinical trials which studied LIFT or compared LIFT with other methods of treatment for anal fistulae, prospective observational studies, clinical registry data and retrospective case series which reported clinical healing of the fistula as the outcome were included. Case reports, studies reporting a combination with other technique, modified technique, abstracts, letters and comments were excluded.

Intervention the intervention was ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract in crpytoglandular fistula-in-ano.

Main outcome measure primary outcome measured was success rate (fistula healing rate) and length of follow-up.

Efficacy and safety of an innovatively modified cutting seton technique for the treatment of high anal fistula: A protocol for a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Anal fistula is a common anorectal disease. So far, operation is still the optimal method to cure anal fistula. High anal fistula (HAF) is an even more clinically difficult disease to treat. Evidence suggested that seton placement can be a definitive treatment for HAF. However, tightening the seton brings great pain to patients, which affects the clinical application of the therapy. Also, this may lead to difficulty in controlling anal fluids and gas because of the larger scar left and the local defect in the anal after the operation. We propose an innovative seton technique for the treatment of HAF, after long term attempts, the operation of the modified seton cutting technique. The aim of our present study is to compare the difference of anal function, healing time, pain severity, recurrence, and complications between the procedure of the modified seton cutting technique and the conventional cutting seton operation against HAF with a randomized, controlled, prospective study.

METHODS

204 participants in this trial will be randomly divided into treatment group (procedure of the modified seton cutting technique) and control group (cutting seton technique) in a 1:1 ratio. The outcomes of continence state, pain severity after tightening, complete healing of fistula, duration to healing, operation time, recurrence rates, and postoperative complications will be recorded at 1, 2, 3, 4 weeks, then every month in the outpatient clinic. Data will be analyzed by SPSS version 22.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of the study will help to explore the efficacy and safety of the procedure of the modified seton cutting technique against AF.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/V6G2S.

Significance and Impact of the Intersphincteric Plane Sepsis in the Management of the Perianal Sepsis: Ultrasound Study

Background The intersphincteric plane (ISP) is a potential space between the external and the internal anal sphincters. About 90% of the perianal sepsis is caused by an obstruction of the ducts of anal glands with subsequent secondary bacterial infection. The imaging modalities used to diagnose perianal sepsis are the ultrasound via endoanal and transperineal routes and magnetic resonance imaging.

Objective  The study aimed to identify the various patterns of the ISP sepsis and their incidence among our study group and to clarify the significance of ISP in the pathogenesis of anorectal abscesses and various types of perianal fistula tracts, to optimize the surgical management.

Methods Retrospective descriptive study in which 57 patients with an ISP sepsis were evaluated with full medical history, clinical exam, and ultrasound; the final diagnosis was based on combining the results of ultrasound, digital rectal examination under anesthesia, and the operative results.

Results The current study showed many patterns of the ISP sepsis and estimated the incidence of each pattern among our study group; such patterns could be fistula tracts, sinus tracts, abscesses, intersphincteric abscess with supralevator extension, sinus with abscess formation, fistula with abscess formation, distension of the ISP with free pus, and other complex patterns like horse abscess, abscess with transsphincteric sinus, and ISP fistula/sinus with transsphincteric branches.

Conclusion Understanding the role of the ISP in the pathogenesis of anorectal abscesses and perianal fistula tracts can help in reaching the optimum way of management.

LIFT procedure for posterior fistula-in-ano. Are outcomes good enough? A systematic review and meta-analysisis of observational studies

INTRODUCTION

Efficacy of the ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT) procedure for posterior fistula-in-ano remains under debate. However, there is scarcity of quality evidence analysing this issue. Thus, the aim of this study is to evaluate outcomes of LIFT surgery in patients with posterior anal fistula.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate efficacy of LIFT procedure for posterior anal fistula. MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library and Google Scholar data sources were searched for key-words (MeSH terms): "LIFT" OR "Ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract" AND "posterior anal fistula" OR "posterior fistula-in-ano". Original, observational and experimental, non-language restriction studies published from January 2000 to March 2020 and reporting outcomes on LIFT procedure for posterior anal fistula were reviewed. Quality and potential biases were assessed using Newcastle-Ottawa scale, following AHRQ recommendations. Additional sensitivity analysis and publication bias evaluation (Beg and Egger's tets) were performed.

RESULTS

No significant differences were found in recurrence rate among patients undergoing LIFT procedure for posterior fistula-in-ano in contrast to other locations (OR 1.36 [IC 95% 0.60-3.07]; p=.46). I² test value was 77%, expressing a fair heterogeneity among included studies. The weighed median for overall recurrence was 37.8% (RI 18.3-47.7%); with a weighed median of 47.1% (RI 30.7 - 63.7%) and 36.3% (RI 15.8-51.3%) (p=.436) respectively for recurrence after LIFT for posterior fistula and fistula in other locations. There was not clear evidence about the sample size ("n") of included studies nor the disparities in quality assessment of those, could justify the observed heterogeneity. No significant publication bias was found.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review and meta-analysis suggests that there are no clear data in the literature for not performing the LIFT procedure in posteriorly located fistulas.

Video-Assisted Ligation of Intersphincteric Fistula Tract for Complex Anal Fistula: Technique and Preliminary Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Sphincter-preserving operations have been increasingly used for treating anal fistula. However, their success rates remain modest in complex anal fistulas.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to report outcomes of video-assisted ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract (a procedure combining video-assisted anal fistula treatment and ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract) for treating complex anal fistulas and to compare its results with conventional ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract.

DESIGN

A review of prospectively collected data from October 2014 to December 2017 was performed.

SETTINGS

The study was conducted at a large tertiary hospital in Thailand.

PATIENTS

All patients with primary or recurrent complex anal fistulas undergoing video-assisted ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract were included. Patients with anal fistula related to malignancy, Crohn's disease, tuberculosis, or acute abscess were excluded.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Healing as defined by an absence of fistula or drainage from an external opening and complete epithelialization of the external opening were measured.

RESULTS

This study included 103 patients with a median age of 47 years. The primary healing rate was 84.5% at a median follow-up of 28 months (range, 15-38 mo). Primary healing rates of anterior high transsphincteric fistula, semi-horseshoe fistula, and horseshoe fistula were 88% (44 of 50 cases), 77% (30 of 39 cases), and 93% (13 of 14 cases). Median time to healing was 4 weeks (range, 4-8 wk). Accordingly, the overall failure rate was 15.5%. None reported worse fecal incontinence postoperatively. Video-assisted ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract had a higher rate of primary healing for complex anal fistula than ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract (84.5% vs 63.4%; p < 0.001).

LIMITATIONS

This study is limited by its small sample size.

CONCLUSIONS

The outcomes of video-assisted ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract for complex anal fistulas are quite good. This technique has the potential to become another viable option of sphincter-preserving operation for complex anal fistulas. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B373. LIGADURA ASISTIDA POR VIDEO DEL TRACTO DE LA FÍSTULA INTERESFINTÉRICA PARA LA FÍSTULA ANAL COMPLEJA: TÉCNICA Y RESULTADOS PRELIMINARIES: Las operaciones de preservación del esfínter se han utilizado cada vez más para tratar la fístula anal. Sin embargo, sus tasas de éxito siguen siendo modestas en las fístulas anales complejas.Este estudio tuvo como objetivo informar los resultados de la ligadura asistida por video del tracto de la fístula interesfintérica (un procedimiento que combina el tratamiento de la fístula anal asistida por video y la ligadura del tracto de la fístula interesfintérica) para el tratamiento de las fístulas anales complejas y comparar sus resultados con la ligadura convencional de la fístula interesfintérica tracto.Se realizó una revisión de los datos recolectados prospectivamente desde Octubre de 2014 hasta Diciembre de 2017.El estudio se realizó en un gran hospital terciario en Tailandia.Se incluyeron todos los pacientes con fístulas anales complejas primarias o recurrentes sometidas a ligadura asistida por video del tracto de la fístula interesfintérica. Se excluyeron los pacientes con fístula anal relacionada con malignidad, enfermedad de Crohn, tuberculosis o absceso agudo.Curación definida por la ausencia de fístula o drenaje de la abertura externa y la epitelización completa de la abertura externa.Este estudio incluyó 103 pacientes con una mediana de edad de 47 años. La tasa de curación primaria fue del 84,5% con una mediana de seguimiento de 28 meses (rango 15-38). La tasa de curación primaria de la fístula transesfintérica alta anterior, la fístula semi-herradura y la fístula de herradura fue del 88% (44 de 50 casos), 77% (30 de 39 casos) y 93% (13 de 14 casos), respectivamente. El tiempo mediano hasta la curación fue de 4 semanas (rango 4-8). En consecuencia, la tasa de fracaso general fue del 15,5%. Ninguno informó peor incontinencia fecal después de la operación. La ligadura asistida por video del tracto de la fístula interesfintérica tuvo una mayor tasa de curación primaria para la fístula anal compleja que la ligadura del tracto de la fístula interesfintérica (84.5% vs 63.4%; p <0.001).Este estudio está limitado por su pequeño tamaño de muestra.Los resultados de la ligadura asistida por video del tracto de la fístula interesfintérica para fístulas anales complejas son bastante buenos. Esta técnica tiene el potencial de convertirse en otra opción viable de operación de preservación del esfínter para fístulas anales complejas. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B373. (Traducción-Dr Yesenia Rojas-Khalil).

Effect of intersphincteric fistula tract ligation versus anal fistulectomy on pain scores and serum levels of vascular endothelial growth factor and interleukin-2 in patients with simple anal fistulas

OBJECTIVE

This study was performed to explore the effects of ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT) on pain scores and serum levels of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and interleukin (IL)-2 in patients with simple anal fistulas.

METHODS

Ninety patients with simple anal fistulas were evenly randomized into a study group (treated with LIFT) and a control group (treated with traditional anal fistulectomy) according to a random number table. The surgical outcomes, basic operation conditions (operation time, hospital stay, and anal continence), and postoperative wound healing rates were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

The study group had significantly better operation conditions (better anal continence and shorter length of hospital stay), a higher postoperative wound healing rate, lower pain scores, higher VEGF and IL-2 levels, and higher overall efficacy rate than the control group. However, the incidence of postoperative complications was not significantly different between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who underwent LIFT had better surgical outcomes, higher wound healing rates, better anal continence, a shorter length of hospital stay, and less severe postoperative pain than those who underwent simple anal fistulectomy. Increased levels of VEGF and IL-2 after surgery may promote wound healing.

Treatment of Refractory Perianal Fistulas with Ligation of the Intersphincteric Fistula Tract: Preliminary Results

Several surgical options exist for management of fistula in ano. The goal of treatment is to achieve closure of the fistula while maintaining continence. Sphincter-sparing operations to close perianal fistulas include advancement flap, anal fistula plug, fibrin glue, and fistulectomy. Variable success rates from 30 to 80 per cent have been reported. Ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT), first described in 2007, has a reported success rate from 40 to 94 per cent. The objective of this study was to study our results of the LIFT procedure for refractory perianal fistulas. We conducted a retrospective 18-month review of consecutive patients with refractory perianal disease treated with the LIFT procedure at an academic, tertiary, colorectal practice. All patients undergoing a LIFT procedure for anal fistula from August 2010 to August 2012 were included in the study. The primary end points were success rates at 1 month and 3 months. Secondary end points were postoperative complications and maintenance of continence. Twenty patients underwent LIFT procedures of whom nine had previously failed treatments. Mean age was 45 years and included 12 male and eight female patients. Success rate at 1 month was 70 per cent (14 patients) and at 3 months was 80 per cent (16 patients). Success rates for patients with previously failed attempts were 67 per cent at 1 month and 89 per cent at 3 months. Continence was maintained in 100 per cent of patients. Our data support the use of the LIFT procedure for refractory perirectal fistulas.

Lift and VAAFT for high trans-sphincteric anal fistula: a single center retrospective analysis

PURPOSE

The management of complex anal fistulas remains a challenge, mainly due to the considerable risk of incontinence. We compared LIFT and VAAFT in the treatment of complex anal fistulas in terms of healing time, recurrence, continence, morbidity, and postoperative pain, focusing also on patients with local abscess at the time of surgery.

METHODS

We include all patients with high trans-sphincteric anal fistula even with abscess at the time of surgery. Anorectal manometry, endoanal ultrasound, Cleveland Clinic fecal incontinence score, VAS score, and number of previous fistula treatment were recorded. The clinical examination defined healing, insufficiency or recurrence of the fistula.

RESULTS

Fifty-four consecutive patients are undergoing surgery: 26 patients underwent LIFT and 28 underwent VAAFT. During the 18 months of follow-up there were no differences in terms of AM, CCFIS and VAS scores. Days of healing, failure, and recurrence rate were comparable in both groups. The subgroup of patients with local abscess undergoing LIFT showed worse results in terms of failure and recurrence rate (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Both techniques are safe and effective and can offer long-term benefits. LIFT should not be used as a first treatment in high trans-sphincteric fistula with perianal abscess.

LIFT and BioLIFT: a 10-Year Single-Centre Experience of Treating Complex Fistula-In-Ano With Ligation of Intersphincteric Fistula Tract Procedure With or Without Bio-prosthetic Reinforcement (BioLIFT)

PURPOSE

To assess the outcome of ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT) and bioprosthetic graft (BioLIFT) in the management of transsphincteric perianal fistula.

METHODS

A single-institution retrospective analysis of all patients undergoing LIFT and BioLIFT from January 2009 to June 2018 was performed. Only patients who had LIFTs and BioLIFT performed as their primary sphincter-preserving procedure was included. Primary outcome measured was primary healing. Secondary outcomes measured were secondary healing, morbidity, time to recurrence, and pre- and post-operative anorectal manometry. Chi-square analysis was used to determine predictive factors.

RESULTS

A total of 116 patients were identified. One hundred five had LIFT and 11 had BioLIFT. The total primary healing rate was 60.3% (62.9% and 34.9% for LIFT and BioLIFT respectively). The overall secondary healing rate was 80.2% (80.0% and 81.9% for LIFT and BioLIFT respectively). There was no inpatient morbidity or post-procedural faecal incontinence reported. There was no significant change in the pre- and post-operative manometries in either group (P = 0.417 and P = 0.834 for LIFT and BioLIFT respectively). The only predictor for primary failure identified was anteriorly located fistula.

CONCLUSION

LIFT and BioLIFT compare favourably with other sphincter-preserving procedures. LIFT and BioLIFT can be performed safely, with minimal morbidity and with no reported loss of sphincteric function.

Ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT) in treatment of anal fistula: An updated systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression of the predictors of failure

BACKGROUND

Ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract has gained increasing popularity as a sphincter-sparing technique for complex anal fistula. The present review aimed to investigate the pooled success and complication rates of ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract in the published literature and to explore the risk factors for failure after ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract.

METHODS

A Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses-compliant literature search was conducted. Electronic databases were searched in the period of January 2007 through April 2019 for studies that assessed the outcome of the ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract procedure. The main outcomes of the review were the pooled success and complication rates of ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract, predictors of failure after ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract, operation time, hospital stay, and how failures were managed.

RESULTS

Twenty-six studies comprising 1,378 patients (996 male) were included in this review. The mean age of patients was 42.3 ± 4.2 years. The weighted mean rate of success was 76.5%. The median follow-up duration was 16.5 months. The weighted mean complication rate was 13.9%. The most common complication was wound dehiscence. Fecal incontinence was recorded in 1.4% of patients. Factors that were statistically significantly associated with failure after the ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract procedure were horseshoe fistulas, fistulas associated with Crohn's disease, and those with a history of previous fistula surgery.

CONCLUSION

The pooled success and complication rates of the ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract procedure were about 76% and 14%, respectively. Horseshoe fistulas, Crohn's disease, and previous fistula surgery were identified as predictors for failure after ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract procedure.

Drained mucosal advancement flap versus rerouting Seton around the internal anal sphincter in treatment of high trans-sphincteric anal fistula: A randomized trial

BACKGROUND

Several sphincter saving techniques have been described for complex anal fistula (CAF) with variable outcomes. The present trial aimed to compare two techniques for CAF; the drained mucosal flap technique and rerouting Seton around the internal anal sphincter (IAS).

METHODS

Adult patients with high trans-sphincteric anal fistula were randomly assigned to one of two groups: group I underwent mucosal advancement flap with drainage Seton rerouted around the external anal sphincter, and group II underwent rerouting Seton around the IAS. The two groups were compared in terms of the incidence of postoperative fecal incontinence (FI), healing of fistula, complications, and changes in anal pressures.

RESULTS

97 patients (80 male) of a mean age of 39.5 years were included. One patient developed FI in group I versus 7 in group II (p = 0.03). Failure of healing occurred in 2 patients in group I and 4 in group II (p = 0.43). In group II, the average time for spontaneous fall of Seton was 14 ± 2.8 days whereas in group I the average time for removal of Seton was 40 ± 14.9 days (p < 0.0001). There were no significant differences between the two groups in complication rate. Postoperatively, the decrease in resting anal pressure was significant in Group II but not group I.

CONCLUSION

The drained mucosal flap technique was associated with significantly lower incidence of FI, yet longer operative time and longer time to complete healing compared to rerouting Seton around the IAS. The success rates of both techniques was comparable.

The Ligation of Intersphincteric Fistula Tract Technique: A Preliminary Experience

PURPOSE

Surgery is the only treatment for anal fistula. Many surgical techniques have been described. The aim of this study was to communicate the authors' preliminary experience in the use of a recently proposed, simplified technique.

METHODS

This was a prospective study of 28 patients admitted from January 13, 2016 through July 20, 2017. Patients were managed with the ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT) technique and results were observed and documented, including recurrence rate, incontinence rate, and other postoperative complications.

RESULTS

A total of 28 patients were studied. The mean operation time was 31 minutes (range, 23-44 minutes), and there were no intra- and postoperative complications. The overall complete healing rate was 85.7%, and the recurrence rate was 14.2%. Follow-up was conducted at 1, 3, and 6 months.

CONCLUSION

Many surgical techniques have been described for the treatment of anal fistula. The correct choice of surgical technique out of available procedures is the most important factor for proper treatment and reducing the risk of recurrence or incontinence. In the authors' experience, the LIFT technique is simple and easy to learn, and is a good choice for the treatment of simple anal fistula; however, a tailored surgery remains the gold standard for this condition.

Fistulotomy and primary sphincteroplasty for anal fistula: long-term data on continence and patient satisfaction

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and long-term efficacy of fistulotomy and primary sphincteroplasty (FIPS). Secondary endpoints were its impact on postoperative continence status and patients' satisfaction.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted on patients with cryptoglandular anal fistula (AF) who had FIPS between June 2006 and May 2017. Patients were evaluated with standardized telephone interviews and clinical/instrumental assessment. Main outcome measures included fistula healing rate, continence status, and patient satisfaction. Incontinence was defined as an inability to hold either gas, liquid, or solid stools, as well as postdefecation soiling, and was measured by the Cleveland Clinic fecal incontinence score. Patient satisfaction was evaluated by an 11-point numeric rating scale.

RESULTS

There were 203 patients (139 males; mean age: 48.7 years) who had FIPS. The overall healing rate was 93% (188 patients) with a mean follow-up period of 56 ± 31 months. Half of the total cohort (51%) had a complex fistula. Preoperatively, 8 (4%) patients complained of postdefecation soiling and 2 (1%) of gas incontinence. Postoperatively, 26 (13%) patients had continence impairment (de novo n = 24), mainly consisting of postdefecation soiling (10%). In univariate analysis, patients with recurrent (RR 6.153 95% CI 2.097-18.048; p = 0.002) or complex (RR 3.005 95% CI 1.203-7.506; p = 0.012) AF and those with secondary tracts (RR 8.190 95% CI 2.188-30.654; p = 0.004) or previous set on drainage (RR 5.286 95% CI 2.235-12.503; p = 0.0001) were at higher risk of incontinence. In multivariate analysis, no significant predictors were found, although fistula complexity approached statistical significance (RR 5.464 95% CI 0.944-31.623; p = 0.050). The mean patient satisfaction numeric rating scale was 9.3 ± 1.6. Lower satisfaction rates were found in patients with transphincteric (p = 0.011) or complex (p = 0.0001) AF, with secondary tracts (p = 0.041) or previous seton drainage (p = 0.008), and in those with postoperative continence impairment (p = 0.0001). Postoperative onset of incontinence was the only significant factor in multivariate analysis (p = 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

FIPS should be considered a valid therapeutic option for selected AF. However, the risk of postoperative minor fecal incontinence exists, and should be discussed during preoperative patient counselling.

Perianal fistulas and the lift procedure: results, predictive factors for success, and long-term results with subsequent treatment

Background

Treatment of a perianal fistula is difficult due to the risk of fecal incontinence and recurrence. The ligation of intersphincteric tract (LIFT) procedure is a sphincter-saving procedure associated with success rates ranging from 57 to 94%. The aim of our study was to find predictors for a favorable outcome of the LIFT procedure, evaluation of postoperative fecal incontinence, quality of life, and subsequent treatment with long-term follow-up.

Methods

This study was performed in patients who underwent LIFT between 2013 and 2015 at our institution. Their medical data were retrieved from the electronic patient files. The fistula characteristics were described by physical examination, three-dimensional endoanal ultrasound, and perioperative evaluation. Recurrence rate, postoperative fecal incontinence, and quality of life were assessed with the Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement (PROM). Thirty-two months later, long-term follow-up including subsequent procedures was evaluated.

Results

Forty-five patients [17 men, mean age 40 years (range 24–67 years)] were included. In 41 (84%) patients, the fistula was classified as complex; 32 (71%) were referrals with a history of previous fistula surgery. The initial success rate was 18 (40%). Only the height of the internal fistula opening (≥ 15 mm p < 0.03) was associated with recurrence. The LIFT procedure did not affect the occurrence of fecal incontinence or soiling. Recurrence showed a trend with a lower PROM (p = 0.07). Twenty-four months later, further surgery leads to cure in 34 (75%), asymptomatic fistulas in 7 (16%), and persisting active fistulas in 4 (9%) patients.

Conclusions

Initial LIFT had a success rate of 40% and with subsequent surgical treatment 75%. Recurrence after LIFT is related to the height of the internal fistula opening and is associated with diminished quality of life. Continence was not affected by initial LIFT.

Outcome of Modified Park's Technique for Treatment of Complex Anal Fistula

BACKGROUND

Treatment of complex anal fistula (CAF) can be associated with high rates of recurrence and fecal incontinence (FI). Park suggested drainage of the affected intersphincteric anal gland for treatment of cryptoglandular anal fistula; however, recurrence after this technique was high. We modified the original Park's technique by extending the internal sphincterotomy to ensure adequate drainage of the intersphincteric space. The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence of recurrence and FI after modified Park's technique in treatment of CAF.

METHODS

Adult patients of both genders with CAF were evaluated before undergoing modified Park's technique with Wexner continence score, clinical examination, and endoanal ultrasonography or MRI. Postoperatively, patients were examined every 2 wk until complete wound healing. The continence state was evaluated with Wexner continence score, and quality of life was assessed before surgery and at 6 mo postoperatively by Short Form-36 questionnaire.

RESULTS

Thirty-two patients (27 male) of a mean age of 38 y were included. Median follow-up was 12 mo. Two patients (6.25%) experienced recurrence and 5 (15.6%) developed complications. One patient (3.1%) developed new-onset FI postoperatively. Twenty-eight (87.5%) patients were completely satisfied with the procedure. Quality of life showed significant improvement at 6 mo postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

The modified Park's technique is a promising procedure for the treatment of CAF with low recurrence and FI rates, and improved quality of life.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of endorectal advancement flap and ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract for cryptoglandular and Crohn's high perianal fistulas

Background

High perianal fistulas require sphincter‐preserving surgery because of the risk of faecal incontinence. The ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT) procedure preserves anal sphincter function and is an alternative to the endorectal advancement flap (AF). The aim of this study was to evaluate outcomes of these procedures in patients with cryptoglandular and Crohn's perianal fistulas.

Methods

A systematic literature search was performed using MEDLINE, Embase and the Cochrane Library. All RCTs, cohort studies and case series (more than 5 patients) describing one or both techniques were included. Main outcomes were overall success rate, recurrence and incontinence following either technique. A proportional meta‐analysis was performed using a random‐effects model.

Results

Some 30 studies comprising 1295 patients were included (AF, 797; LIFT, 498). For cryptoglandular fistula (1098 patients), there was no significant difference between AF and LIFT for weighted overall success (74·6 (95 per cent c.i. 65·6 to 83·7) versus 69·1 (53·9 to 84·3) per cent respectively) and recurrence (25·6 (4·7 to 46·4) versus 21·9 (14·8 to 29·0) per cent) rates. For Crohn's perianal fistula (64 patients), no significant differences were observed between AF and LIFT for overall success rate (61 (45 to 76) versus 53 per cent respectively), but data on recurrence were limited. Incontinence rates were significantly higher after AF compared with LIFT (7·8 (3·3 to 12·4) versus 1·6 (0·4 to 2·8) per cent).

Conclusion

Overall success and recurrence rates were not significantly different between the AF and LIFT procedure, but continence was better preserved after LIFT.

Long-term outcomes and quality of life following ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract for high transsphincteric fistulas

AIM

Published outcomes following ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT) for high transsphincteric fistulas (HTFs) are equivocal probably because most trials are small and comprise mixed patient populations. The aim of this study was to highlight the long-term efficacy of LIFT for HTFs in a large homogeneous sample and to determine the risk factors that contribute to non-healing resulting in failure and recurrence.

METHOD

A retrospective study was performed which assessed patients with HTFs treated by LIFT without prior loose setons from September 2012 to December 2017. Continence function was evaluated by the Wexner incontinence scale and anal manometry. Quality of life was assessed by using the faecal incontinence quality of life (FIQL) scale with four domains: lifestyle, coping, depression and embarrassment.

RESULTS

Seventy patients with HTFs underwent 71 LIFT procedures. The primary healing rate was 81.7% with a median follow-up duration of 16.5 (range 4.5-68) months. The healing rates of mature and immature fistulas were 83.7% and 77.3%, respectively. Two patients suffered failure with an unhealed intersphincteric wound. Recurrence occurred in 11 patients. Incontinence of flatus, present in four patients before surgery, improved postoperatively. Two patients undergoing LIFT combined with fistulotomy complained of flatus incontinence after surgery. No significant differences between preoperative and postoperative Wexner score, maximum resting pressure and maximum squeeze pressure were detected. The FIQL was improved in lifestyle, coping and depression. No risk factor for non-healing was found.

CONCLUSION

LIFT has a promising long-term outcome for HTFs, with negligible impairment on continence and improved quality of life.

LONG-TERM OUTCOMES OF LIGATION OF INTERSPHINCTERIC FISTULA TRACT FOR COMPLEX FISTULA-IN-ANO: MODIFIED OPERATIVE PROCEDURE EXPERIENCE

Background:

It is important but difficult to treat complex fistula-in-ano due to the high recurrent rate and following incontinence. Ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT), a novel surgical procedure with the advantage of avoiding anal incontinence, has a variable success rate of 57-94.4 %.

Aim:

To evaluate the long-term outcomes of modified LIFT operative procedure - ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract - to treat complex fistula-in-ano.

Methods:

Retrospective analysis of 62 cases of complex fistula-in-ano. The group was treated with the modified approach of LIFT (curved incision was made in the anal canal skin; purse-string suture was performed around the fistula; the residual fistulas were removed in a tunnel-based way) and had a follow-up time of more than one year. Patient´s preoperative general condition, postoperative efficacy and their anal function were compared.

Results:

The median age of the participants was 34, and 43 (69.4%) cases were male. Forty-one (66.1%) cases were of high transsphincteric fistula, four (6.5%) cases of high intrasphincter fistula, and 17 (27.4%) cases of anterior anal fistula in female. The median follow-up duration was 24.5 (range, 12-51) months. The success rate in the end of follow-up was 83.9% (52/62). The anorectal pressure and Cleveland Clinic Florida Fecal Incontinence (CCF-FI) evaluated three months before and after the operation did not find apparent changes.

Conclusions:

Compared with LIFT, the modified LIFT remarkably reduces postoperative failure and the recurrence rate of complex fistula with acceptable long-term outcomes.

Management of retrorectal supralevator abscess-results of a large cohort

PURPOSE

Proximal intersphincteric fistulas with proximal extension causing supralevatoric, retrorectal abscesses are a rare disease. There is only very limited experience, with small groups, and the limited published literature confirms the complexity of diagnostics and treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate transrectal internal abscess drainage as planned definitive treatment.

METHODS

We retrospectively studied medical records of all patients with the diagnosis of retrorectal abscesses that underwent transrectal internal abscess drainage in the Department of Colo-proctology of the University Medical Centre Mannheim (2003-2012).

RESULTS

One hundred nine patients were operated on retrorectal abscesses, 70 (64.2%) men and 39 (35.8%) women. Mean age was 45.3 years (18-81). In 96 cases (88.1%), only a transrectal internal abscess drainage was performed as planned definitive treatment. Primary healing occurred in 60 patients (62.5%). A second transrectal internal drainage procedure was necessary in 27 cases (28.1%) to assure complete internal drainage. All secondary procedures led to subsequent healing. A combined surgical treatment due to coexisting fistula tracts to the perianal skin or additional ischioanal abscesses was required in 13 patients (11.9%), and an additional seton placement was performed. Nine patients (9.4%) underwent one or more reoperations due to previously unidentified complex coexisting fistulas. Most of these patients were immunosuppressed due to Crohn's disease. Internal drainage alone was successful in 90.6% with an overall healing rate of 94.5% for the entire population of complex fistulas.

CONCLUSIONS

Transrectal internal abscess drainage is a safe and highly successful procedure for treatment of retrorectal abscess, with very low risk of postoperative fecal incontinence. Inflammatory bowel disease and immunosuppressives have a negative impact on the healing process.

INTERESFINCTERIAL LIGATION OF FISTULA TRACT (LIFT) FOR PATIENTS WITH ANAL FISTULAS: A BRAZILIAN BI-INSTITUTIONAL EXPERIENCE

Background:

The best treatment for anal fistula should extirpate infection and promote healing of the tract, whilst preserving the anal sphincter complex and full continence.

Aim:

To analyze the success rate after a modified technique for ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT) for patients with anal fistulas.

Methods:

A prospective (observational cohort study) Brazilian bi-institutional experience with a modified (ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract without excision) LIFT technique was undertaken. A clinical database was settled for the following variables: age, gender, BMI, comorbidities, distance between external orifice and the anus, previous fistula surgery, type of fistula, operative time, intra- and postoperative complications, duration of follow-up, and success rate.

Results:

Between November 2015 and January 2017, 38 patients with transsphincteric fistulas were operated on using the modified LIFT procedure. Seventeen (44.7%) were men. Median age was 41 (18-67) years. Median BMI was 26.4 (22-38) kg/m². Five (13.2%) had undergone previous surgery. The fistula was transsphincteric in all cases. Median follow-up was 32 (range, 14-56) weeks. Success was observed in 30 (79%) patients.

Conclusions:

The LIFT technique without excision of the fistula tract proved to be safe and effective for transsphincteric anal fistulas.

[Seton drainage in sphincter-sparing treatment of rectal fistulas]

Sphincter-sparing procedures for rectal fistulas are becoming more popular among coloproctologists. However, the outcomes are not optimal that forces surgeons to seek new approaches in order to improve results. Seton drainage prior to radical stage is one of these methods. The effect of seton drainage on the outcomes is reviewed in the article. Elibrary, Pubmed and Google Scholar databases were analyzed. We have assessed 14 out of 151 trials for the period 1984 - 2017. There were no significant advantages of seton drainage compared with single-stage approach (χ² = 3.84, p> 0.05, RR = 0.95, CI 95% 0.84 - 1.08). The same situation is observed for mucomuscular flap bringing down to close internal fistula. Fistula healing was more common after seton drainage deployment within 4 - 8 weeks. Bringing down of the flap to anal canal should be preferred after drainage due to less incidence of recurrences. Further trials are necessary to determine advisability of seton drainage and optimal surgical approach.

What happens after a failed LIFT for anal fistula?

BACKGROUND

Ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT) was developed to treat transsphincteric anal fistulas. The aftermath of a failed LIFT has not been well documented.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review of LIFT procedure for transsphincteric anal fistula between March 2012 and September 2016.

RESULTS

53 patients with LIFT procedure were identified, 20 (37.7%) had persistent fistula with median followup of 4 months. Following LIFT, recurrence of fistula was transsphincteric (75%) or intersphincteric (25%) (p = NS). Persistent transsphincteric fistulas after LIFT were treated with seton (71.4%) followed by advancement flap (20%) or fistulotomy (50%). Of the recurrent intersphincteric fistulas, 50% underwent seton placement followed by fistulotomy, or advancement flap. Of the patients who underwent surgery after failed LIFT, 50% have had resolution of the fistula; 31.7% are still undergoing treatment.

CONCLUSION

Patients who underwent surgery after failed LIFT had 50% healing with placement of seton followed by fistulotomy or rectal advancement flap.

Video-Assisted Anal Fistula Treatment: Pros and Cons of This Minimally Invasive Method for Treatment of Perianal Fistulas

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to present results of a single-center, nonrandomized, prospective study of the video-assisted anal fistula treatment (VAAFT).

Methods

68 consecutive patients with perianal fistulas were operated on using the VAAFT technique. 30 of the patients had simple fistulas, and 38 had complex fistulas. The mean follow-up time was 31 months.

Results

The overall healing rate was 54.41% (37 of the 68 patients healed with no recurrence during the follow-up period). The results varied depending on the type of fistula. The success rate for the group with simple fistulas was 73.3%, whereas it was only 39.47% for the group with complex fistulas. Female patients achieved higher healing rates for both simple (81.82% versus 68.42%) and complex fistulas (77.78% versus 27.59%). There were no major complications.

Conclusions

The results of VAAFT vary greatly depending on the type of fistula. The procedure has some drawbacks due to the rigid construction of the fistuloscope and the diameter of the shaft. The electrocautery of the fistula tract from the inside can be insufficient to close wide tracts. However, low risk of complications permits repetition of the treatment until success is achieved. Careful selection of patients is advised.

Ligation of Intersphincteric Fistula Tract Is Suitable for Recurrent Anal Fistulas from Follow-Up of 16 Months

Since 2007, ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT) for the management of anal fistula was all introduced with initial success and excitement. It remains controversial which surgical procedure is suitable for transsphincteric fistula, especially to complex anal fistula. This retrospective study was designed to evaluate the results in patients with recurrent anal fistula by LIFT. A retrospective study of 55 complex fistula patients who underwent LIFT procedure in a single medical center was analyzed. Patients and fistula characteristics, complications, and recurrences were reviewed. All 55 patients underwent the procedure with a median follow-up of 16 months. Median operative time was 44 (range 23–88) minutes. Of the 55 patients, 33 (60%) healed completely and did not require any further surgical treatment at end of follow-up. Twenty-two (40%) recurrences and six complications were observed. Compared with patients who had undergone more than two surgical procedures, LIFT was more suitable for patients who had undergone one to two surgical procedures, and significant difference was observed in number of operations before LIFT (p = 0.002). Clinicians can consider the use of LIFT for the treatment of recurrent anal fistulas. A larger number of patients and prospective study are needed to be performed.

Prospective evaluation of a new device for the treatment of anal fistulas

AIM

To evaluate the safety of the implantation of a new device for the treatment of anal fistulas. The short-term clinical efficacy was also assessed.

METHODS

This study took place at a tertiary care university hospital. Patients with a complex anal fistula of cryptoglandular origin were enrolled in the study and were treated with insertion of the new device. All patients were evaluated by clinical and physical examination, including an endoanal ultrasound at the baseline, and then at the 2 wk and 1, 2, 3 and 6-mo follow-up visits.

RESULTS

Morbidity, continence status, and success rate were the main outcome measures. Ten patients underwent the placement of the new device. The fistulas were transphincteric in eight patients and extrasphincteric in the remaining two. The median duration of the surgical procedure was 34.5 (range, 27-42) min. Neither intra- nor postoperative complications occurred, and all patients were discharged the day after the procedure. At the 6-mo follow-up evaluation, the final success rate was 70%. Three failures were registered: a device expulsion (on the 10(th) postoperative day), the persistence of inflammatory tissue around the fistula tract (at the 2-mo follow up), and the persistence of serum discharge (at the 6-mo follow up). No patient experienced any change incontinence, as assessed by the Cleveland Clinic Fecal Incontinence score.

CONCLUSION

The technical procedure is simple and has low risk of perioperative morbidity. The pre- and post-operative continence status did not change in any of the patients. The initial results at the 6-mo follow up seem to be promising. However, a longer follow-up period and a larger sample size are needed to confirm these preliminary results.

Management of Complex Perineal Fistula Disease

Management of complex perineal fistulas such as high perianal, rectovaginal, pouch-vaginal, rectourethral, or pouch-urethral fistulas requires a systematic approach. The first step is to control any sepsis with drainage of abscess and/or seton placement. Patients with large, recurrent, irradiated fistulas benefit from stoma diversion. In patients with Crohn's disease, it is essential to induce remission prior to any repair. There are different approaches to repair complex fistulas, from local repairs to transperineal and transabdominal approaches. Simpler fistulas are amenable to local repair. More complex fistulas, such as those secondary to irradiation, require interposition of healthy, well-vascularized tissue. The most common flap used for this treatment is the gracilis muscle with good outcomes reported. Once healing is confirmed by imaging and endoscopy, the stoma is reversed.

[Management of complications of fissure and fistula surgery]

BACKGROUND

Fistula-in-ano and anal fissures are common proctological diseases. In most cases of anal fissures conservative treatment provides good clinical results, whereas for fistula-in-ano operative treatment is the only option.

OBJECTIVE

The most important and for the patient most stressful long-term complication is postoperative incontinence, especially as the deliberate severance of the anal sphincter musculature is part of the treatment for many patients. In this article the causes and treatment options are discussed.

RESULTS

The therapy of choice for patients with persisting symptoms caused by an anal fissure is fissurectomy. Incontinence disorders develop due to severance of parts of the internal sphincter or resection of the anoderm. In patients with anal fistulas the occurrence of incontinence disorders depends on the anatomical relationship of the fistula to the sphincter, the surgical procedure and also on pre-existing damage, e.g. from childbirth or other sphincter trauma and scar formation, notably in patients with multiple surgical interventions. Severance of the sphincter muscles in proximal transsphincteric and suprasphincteric fistulas in particular bears a high risk of postoperative incontinence. Data from the literature regarding postoperative fecal incontinence vary enormously due to different follow-up intervals and also variable definitions of the term fecal incontinence.

CONCLUSION

Options for the treatment of postoperative fecal incontinence are limited. Treatment of postoperative incontinence should first be conservative. Surgical repair of damaged sphincter muscles is often of limited success and sacral nerve stimulation might be an option in selected patients. Especially in patients with fissure-in-ano the indications for surgery should be strictly adhered to. For fistula-in-ano the least invasive and most sphincter-preserving procedure should be selected.

Definitive seton management for transsphincteric fistula-in-ano: harm or charm?

AIM

The treatment of transsphincteric anal fistula requires a balance between eradication of the disease and preservation of faecal control. A cutting seton is an old tool that is now out of vogue for many surgeons. We hypothesized that the concept remains reliable and safe with results that exceed those reported for many of the more recently described methods.

METHOD

A retrospective review was conducted of real-time electronic health records (single institution, single surgeon) of patients presenting during the 14 years between 2001 and 2014 with a transsphincteric anal fistula who were treated with a cutting seton. Excluded were patients with Crohn's disease, fistulae related to malignancy or a previous anastomosis and patients whose fistula was treated by another method including a loose draining seton. Data collection included demographics, duration of the disease, duration of the treatment, outcome and continence.

RESULTS

In all, 121 patients (80 men) of mean age 40.2 ± 12.2 years (range 18-76) with a mean follow-up of 5.1 ± 3.3 (1-24) months were included in the analysis. The median duration of symptoms was 6 (1-84) months; 36% had failed other fistula surgery, 12% had a complex fistula with more than one track and 35% had some form of comorbidity. The median time to healing was 3 (1-18) months; 7.4% required further surgery, but eventually 98% had complete fistula healing. The incontinence rate decreased postoperatively to 11.6% from 19% before treatment with 17/121 with pre-existing incontinence resolved and 8/107 new cases developing.

CONCLUSION

Despite its retrospective non-comparative design, the study has demonstrated that a cutting seton is a safe, well tolerated and highly successful treatment for transsphincteric anal fistula and is followed overall by improved continence. The results compare very favourably with other techniques.

Ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract for the treatment of fistula-in-ano: experience of a tertiary care centre in South India

AIM

Ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT) is a new sphincter-sparing surgical technique increasingly used to treat fistulae-in-ano yielding good results. The aim of this study was to evaluate its effectiveness in the treatment of complex fistulae-in-ano and to determine factors associated with recurrence and its subsequent management.

METHOD

A prospective observational study was performed of 167 patients with complex fistula-in-ano treated by LIFT from June 2013 to January 2014. In all patients a LIFT with partial core-out of the fistula tract was performed.

RESULTS

There were 167 patients of mean age 43.6 ± 12.8 years. Thirty-three fistulae were recurrent. 150 were trans-sphincteric, 16 were intersphincteric and one was a suprasphincteric fistula. The median postoperative stay was 2 (range: 1-14) days (mean = 2.4 days). At follow up there was no change in continence. The median healing time was 4 (range: 1-8) weeks. Two patients developed an intersphincteric abscess needing surgical drainage healing uneventfully. The mean follow up was 12.8 [median = 12 (range: 4-22)] months. The healing rate was 94.1%. Ten (5.9%) patients developed a recurrent fistula that was managed by a second LIFT procedure in seven, a sinus tract excision with curettage in two and seton placement in one. Recurrence was significantly associated with diabetes mellitus and perianal collections and showed an increased incidence with tract abscesses and multiple tracts.

CONCLUSION

LIFT has a high success rate in complex fistulae-in-ano. Recurrence is related to diabetes mellitus, perianal collections, tract abscesses and multiple tracts and a second LIFT procedure may be feasible and efficient.

PERFACT procedure to treat supralevator fistula-in-ano: A novel single stage sphincter sparing procedure

AIM

To prospectively perform the PERFACT procedure in supralevator anal fistula/abscess.

METHODS

Magnetic resonance imaging was done preoperatively in all the patients. Proximal cauterization around the internal opening, emptying regularly of fistula tracts and curettage of tracts (PERFACT) was done in all patients with supralevator fistula or abscess. All types of anal fistula and/or abscess with supralevator extension, whether intersphincteric or transsphincteric, were included in the study. The internal opening along with the adjacent mucosa was electrocauterized. The resulting wound was left open to heal by secondary intention so as to heal (close) the internal opening by granulation tissue. The supralevator tract/abscess was drained and thoroughly curetted. It was regularly cleaned and kept empty in the postoperative period. The primary outcome parameter was complete fistula healing. The secondary outcome parameters were return to work and change in incontinence scores (Vaizey objective scoring system) assessed preoperatively and at 3 mo after surgery.

RESULTS

Seventeen patients were prospectively enrolled and followed for a median of 13 mo (range 5-21 mo). Mean age was 41.1 ± 13.4 years, M:F - 15:2. Fourteen (82.4%) had a recurrent fistula, 8 (47.1%) had an associated abscess, 14 (82.4%) had multiple tracts and 5 (29.4%) had horseshoe fistulae. Infralevator part of fistula was intersphincteric in 4 and transsphincteric in 13 patients. Two patients were excluded. Eleven out of fifteen (73.3%) were cured and 26.7% (4/15) had a recurrence. Two patients with recurrence were reoperated on with the same procedure and one was cured. Thus, the overall healing rate was 80% (12/15). All the patients could resume normal work within 48 h of surgery. There was no deterioration in incontinence scores (Vaizey objective scoring system). This is the largest series of supralevator fistula-in-ano (SLF) published to date.

CONCLUSION

PERFACT procedure is an effective single step sphincter saving procedure to treat SLF with minimal risk of incontinence.

Management of Complex Anal Fistulas

Complex anal fistulas require careful evaluation. Prior to any attempts at definitive repair, the anatomy must be well defined and the sepsis resolved. Several muscle-sparing approaches to anal fistula are appropriate, and are often catered to the patient based on their presentation and previous repairs. Emerging technologies show promise for fistula repair, but lack long-term data.

Fistula tract curettage and the use of biological dermal plugs improve high transsphincteric fistula healing in an animal model

PURPOSE

The treatment of high transsphincteric fistula is a complex procedure, which may be associated with the risk of recurrence and fecal incontinence. In this study, we used an animal model to compare different types of sphincter-preserving treatments for transsphincteric fistula.

METHODS

Sixteen female New Zealand rabbits, weighing 2.8-4.8 kg underwent a surgical creation of high transsphincteric fistula. After 6 weeks, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed in order to confirm fistula formation and measure the fistula diameter. The rabbits were divided into three groups. Group 1 received no plug treatment (control). Autologous dermal graft and acellular dermal matrix were used as a plug in groups 2 and 3, respectively. Five weeks after treatment, fistula tract healing was determined by measuring the largest fistula diameter with MRI. All rabbits were euthanized and the anorectum excised en bloc for histopathological examination.

RESULTS

According to the MRI findings, all groups showed significant healing after the treatment (p < 0.05). The healing rate of fistula diameters after treatment was 40, 66, and 29% in the control, dermal graft, and acellular dermal matrix groups, respectively. In terms of negative healing parameters such as neutrophil, eosinophil, lymphocyte, and plasmocyte accumulation, dermal graft and acellular dermal matrix groups showed significantly lower results than those in the control group (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

According to MRI and histopathological results, fistula tract curettage and fistula orifice closure improved transsphincteric anal fistula healing. Additionally, in this study, plug treatment favoring autologous dermal graft resulted in better healing.

Ligation of Intersphincteric Fistula Tract: a Sphincter-Sparing Option for Complex Fistula-in-Ano

Fistulae-in-ano represent one of the more challenging anorectal diseases faced by surgeons, as appropriate management requires careful balance between the need for local sepsis control and patients' desire to maintain fecal continence. The ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT) procedure, first described by Rojanasakul and colleagues in 2007, represents a sphincter-sparing technique for fistula management which has become our method of choice for transsphincteric fistulas. With this technique, patients frequently enjoy successful fistula healing., or, at worst, conversion to a less complex fistula tract. Here, we describe and illustrate our surgical approach and review success and recurrence rates presented in the published literature.

Current management of fistula-in-ano

Anal fistulae management is a balance of effective healing and the risk of incontinence from sphincter division. This review examines the heterogeneity in the literature of treatment options and the difficulties this presents for surgical training and decision making.