Percutaneous posterior tibial nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence: are we all reading from the same page?

Bilateral Posterior Tibial Nerve Stimulation in the Treatment of Rectal Evacuation Disorder: A Preliminary Report

BACKGROUND

Posterior tibial nerve stimulation influences both motor and sensory pathways, as well as the central nervous system. Stimulation of posterior tibial nerve roots (L4 to S3) could improve stool evacuation through S3 and/or S2 stimulation.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess the efficiency of bilateral posterior tibial nerve stimulation in the treatment of rectal evacuation disorder without anatomic obstruction.

DESIGN

This was a prospective case series studying the treatment of patients with obstructed defecation by posterior tibial nerve stimulation.

SETTING

The study was conducted at a tertiary referral academic medical center.

PATIENTS

Patients with rectal evacuation disorder without anatomic obstruction who were failing maximal conservative treatments were included.

INTERVENTION

Thirty minutes of bilateral transcutaneous posterior tibial nerve stimulation was applied 3 times weekly for each patient for 6 consecutive weeks.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary end point was the change in the modified obstructed defecation score. Secondary end points were changes in rectal sensitivity volumes (urge to defecate volume and maximal tolerable volume) and quality of life using the Patient Assessment of Constipation-Quality of Life questionnaire.

RESULTS

Thirty-six patients (25 women) completed the trial. The mean age of patients was 57.2 years (SD = 14.4 y). No adverse events were reported. Symptomatic successful outcome was reported in 17 patients (47%) and modified obstructed defecation score decreased over 6 weeks (mean decrease = 10 points (95% CI, 8.7-11.3 points); p < 0.0001). Patients with successful outcome (responders) had relatively lower preoperative modified obstructed defecation score compared with patients with unsuccessful outcome (nonresponders). In the successful group, there were significant improvement after 6 weeks in both Patient Assessment of Constipation-Quality of Life score (mean improvement = 43.0 points (95% CI, 35.2-50.7 points); p < 0.0001) and rectal sensitivity (significant reductions in urge to defecate volume (from 258.1 ± 21.2 to 239.6 ± 15.3; p < 0.0001) and maximal tolerable volume (from 304.5 ± 24.8 to 286.8 ± 19.7; p < 0.0001)). No significant change in Patient Assessment of Constipation-Quality of Life or rectal sensitivity was observed in the nonresponders.

LIMITATIONS

The study was designed just to proof the concept, but small sample size is a limitation. Another limitation is the short duration of study of only 6 weeks.

CONCLUSIONS

Current data showed that bilateral transcutaneous posterior tibial nerve stimulation can improve symptoms in a considerable percentage of patients with obstructed defecation without anatomic obstruction. The procedure is more effective in patients with a less-modified obstructed defecation score. Additional studies are needed to discover the predictive factors for success.

Percutaneous neuromodulation of the posterior tibial nerve for the treatment of faecal incontinence - mid-term results: is retreatment required?

AIM

Posterior tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) has emerged in recent years as a therapy for faecal incontinence. Its long-term effectiveness is yet to be established, along with what the form of retreatment should be in the event of loss of effectiveness. The present study aimed to establish the mid-term results to identify the proportion of patients who may need further treatment, and if so when.

METHOD

A prospective study including 30 patients was conducted at an academic hospital. The patients underwent 12 weekly outpatient treatment sessions, each lasting 30 min (first PTNS phase). Neuromodulation was discontinued in those patients who did not have a 40% decrease in their pretreatment Wexner score. Patients having a better than 40% response were offered another 12-week course of complete treatment (second PTNS phase), following which they received no further PTNS treatment (phase without PTNS) but were assessed at 6 months and 2 years.

RESULTS

All patients finished the first phase and 22/30 patients continued to the second phase. During this phase 11 patients showed an improved Wexner score (baseline/first phase/second phase: 14.3 ± 4.2 vs 9.9 ± 5.4 vs 6.8 ± 5.4). After a 6-month period without any treatment, the score was still improved in 11/30 patients (9.1 ± 6.2). At 2 years there was improvement in 16/30 patients (8.8 ± 7.1). There was a significant improvement in three variables of the quality of life questionnaire: lifestyle, coping behaviour and embarrassment.

CONCLUSION

The response to first and second phase PTNS was maintained for up to 2 years. Retreatment was not required in about half of patients, even when they had finished the treatment 6 months or 2 years previously.

Posterior tibial nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence: Where are we?

Neurostimulation remains the mainstay of treatment for patients with faecal incontinence who fails to respond to available conservative measures. Sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) is the main form of neurostimulation that is in use today. Posterior tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) - both the percutaneous and the transcutaneous routes - remains a relatively new entry in neurostimulation. Though in its infancy, PTNS holds promise to be an effective, patient friendly, safe and cheap treatment. However, presently PTNS only appears to have a minor role with SNS having the limelight in treating patients with faecal incontinence. This seems to have arisen as the strong, uniform and evidence based data on SNS remains to have been unchallenged yet by the weak, disjointed and unsupported evidence for both percutaneous and transcutaneous PTNS. The use of PTNS is slowly gaining acceptance. However, several questions remain unanswered in the delivery of PTNS. These have raised dilemmas which as long as they remain unsolved can considerably weaken the argument that PTNS could offer a viable alternative to SNS. This paper reviews available information on PTNS and focuses on these dilemmas in the light of existing evidence.

Transcutaneous electrical posterior tibial nerve stimulation for chronic anal fissure: a preliminary study

PURPOSE

Recent studies showed that sacral nerve stimulation might be an effective treatment option for chronic anal fissure. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation as a noninvasive alternative treatment for chronic anal fissure by stimulating the sacral nerve in the ankle via the posterior tibial nerve.

METHOD

In this prospective study, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation was applied for 10 days in addition to conventional medical treatment in ten patients. Wexner's constipation score, visual analog scale for pain, quality of life (Short Form-36), Hamilton anxiety and depression scores, symptom relief, compliance, fissure healing, and side effects were evaluated before and after treatment (days 0, 5, and 10).

RESULTS

Ten patients (eight females/two males) with a mean age of 50.7 ± 18.5 years were enrolled in the study. Pain and bleeding resolved in all patients 2 days after the treatment, and mucosal healing was observed in six patients 10 days after the treatment. Wexner's constipation and visual analog scale scores for pain decreased significantly (p = 0.001 and p = 0.002, respectively). Hamilton anxiety and depression scores decreased as well (p = 0.001 and p = 0.01, respectively). Among Short Form-36 subscales, only mental health score increased significantly (p = 0.003). One patient underwent surgery at follow-up due to recurrence of symptoms, and rubber band ligation was applied to another patient who had internal hemorrhoidal rectal bleeding at the end of 10 days.

CONCLUSIONS

Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation application to the posterior tibial nerve has the potential to be an alternative treatment option for chronic anal fissure patients who seek noninvasive treatment modality.