Clinical Presentations of Melanoma in African Americans, Hispanics, and Asians

Prognostic value of the number of biopsied sentinel lymph nodes for Chinese patients with melanoma: A single-center retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) helps to determine accurate pathological stages and facilitates strategies for regional disease control in melanoma. However, whether the number of biopsied sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) influences the patients' survival is rarely investigated.

METHODS

Acral or cutaneous melanoma patients with no history of nodal disease who received SLNB in Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center (FUSCC) from January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2021 were retrospectively enrolled. Clinicopathological variables including Breslow index, ulceration, number of positive SLNs, SLN/non-SLN status were analyzed. The pathologic nodal (pN) stage and pathological stage were defined.

RESULTS

A total of 381 eligible patients were enrolled in this study, of whom 132 (34.7%) patients were diagnosed with SLN-positive. The median number of biopsied SLNs was 2 (range: 1 to 20). Different numbers of biopsied SLNs did not influence the release-free survival (RFS) of the general patients. However, patients with >2 SLNs had a longer RFS than those with 1-2 SLNs in T4, N1a group and those who rejected complete lymph node dissection (CLND).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with T4 melanomas, N1a melanomas and those that did not undergo a CLND, the prognosis of those with three or more SLNs retrieved seemed to be improved.

Undereducation is afoot: Assessing the lack of acral lentiginous melanoma educational materials for skin of color

Acral lentiginous melanoma (ALM) is a subtype of cutaneous melanoma notorious for poor outcomes that disproportionately affect individuals with skin of color (e.g., African-, Hispanic-, Asian-descent) when compared to mortality rates among non-Hispanic White populations. There are several societal factors that contribute to racial disparities in ALM, including a lack of representative educational material in the context of patient education and medical instruction. This gap in representative information for the US population includes risk of disease, patterns of incidence, and differences in disease presentation in skin of color. The atypical presentation of ALM on acral volar skin sites makes early detection challenging and necessitates an increased index of suspicion on the part of physicians and patients alike. Studies underscoring the importance of early detection in reducing mortality risk make the availability of adequate representative educational materials indispensable.

Melanoma in skin of color: Part I. Epidemiology and clinical presentation

Although there is a higher incidence of melanoma among non-Hispanic White individuals, melanoma is diagnosed at more advanced stages and associated with worse survival rates among individuals with skin of color (SOC). The proportions of melanoma subtypes differ across racial groups, with acral lentiginous melanoma and mucosal melanoma representing higher proportions of melanoma diagnoses in individuals with SOC compared to White individuals. The recognition of distinct differences in anatomic locations and dermatoscopic patterns may facilitate the appropriate differentiation of physiologic from pathologic pigmentation. The first article of this continuing medical education series will focus on the epidemiology and clinical presentation of melanoma in individuals with SOC, with the aim of improving early diagnoses and clinical outcomes.

Melanoma in skin of color: Part II. Racial disparities, role of UV, and interventions for earlier detection

Despite a higher incidence of melanoma among White individuals, melanoma-specific survival is worse among individuals with skin of color. Racial disparities in survival are multifactorial. Decreased skin cancer education focused on people with skin of color, lower rates of screening, increased socioeconomic barriers, higher proportions of more aggressive subtypes, and underrepresentation in research and professional education contribute to delays in diagnosis and treatment. Although high, intermittent UV exposure during childhood has been established as a significant modifiable risk factor for melanoma in individuals with lighter skin phototypes, there are limited data on UV exposure and melanoma risk in people with darker skin phototypes. The second article of this continuing medical education series will examine factors contributing to racial disparities in melanoma-specific survival, discuss the role of UV radiation, and address the need for further research and targeted educational interventions for melanoma in individuals with skin of color.

Is obesity a risk factor for melanoma?

OBJECTIVES

Are twofold: 1) to estimate the relationship between obesity (BMI ≥30) and the prevalence of melanoma in different US states and 2) to examine the possibility of defining a new risk group. This might enhance the possibility of detection, which in turn, might increase the survival rates of patients.

STUDY DESIGN

A cohort Study, based on data at the US statewide level in 2011-2017, where the dependent variable (the annual new melanoma cases per 100,000 persons) is adjusted for age.

METHOD

Quadratic regression analysis. This model permits a non-monotonic variation of obesity with new melanoma cases adjusted for age, where the control variable is the level of UV radiation.

RESULTS

Demonstrate a negative correlation between obesity and incidence of melanoma. This outcome is further corroborated for Caucasians.

CONCLUSIONS

We should continue to establish primary prevention of melanoma by raising photo protection awareness and secondary prevention by promoting skin screening (by physician or self) among the entire population group in all BMI ranges. Advanced secondary melanoma prevention including noninvasive diagnosis strategies including total body photography, confocal microscopy, AI strategies should focus the high-risk sub group of Caucasians with BMI < 30.

Developing skin cancer education materials for darker skin populations: crowdsourced design, message targeting, and acral lentiginous melanoma

Despite decreased susceptibility, darker skin individuals who develop melanoma have worse survival. This disparity in melanoma mortality is the largest for any cancer, and partly driven by a lack of patient education materials targeted to darker skin populations in whom acral lentiginous melanoma (ALM) is the most common subtype. To address this communication disparity, the current study reports a multi-phase design process that leverages crowdsourcing and message testing to develop ALM-focused patient education materials for darker skin populations. Crowdsourced design was utilized to develop a pool of designs (phase 1), the pool was narrowed and thematically analyzed (phase 2), and select designs were evaluated via a message experiment (N = 1877). For darker skin populations, designs that depicted people enhanced knowledge of ALM through message memorability. The current study engages melanoma disparities by providing ALM patient education materials for darker skin populations vetted via a multi-phase process.

Different progression pattern between acral and nonacral melanoma: A retrospective, comparative, clinicoprognostic study of 492 cases of primary cutaneous melanoma according to tumor site

BACKGROUND

There are limited data regarding the difference in progression pattern between acral melanoma and nonacral melanoma.

AIMS

The objectives of this study were to compare the progression pattern between acral and nonacral melanoma and evaluate its impact on clinical outcomes.

METHODS

Clinical and histopathological features, survival outcomes and prognostic factors of 492 patients with acral melanoma or nonacral melanoma were retrospectively evaluated using the Asan Medical Center database.

RESULTS

The male-to-female ratio and the mean age was 1:0.92 and 60.2 years for acral melanoma (n = 249), and 1:0.85 and 58.4 years for nonacral melanoma (n = 243), respectively. The demographic difference was not significant. Although prediagnosis duration was longer and the advanced stage was more common in acral melanoma than that in nonacral melanoma, the vertical growth phase was more common in nonacral melanoma than that in acral melanoma, whereas, the horizontal diameter is longer in acral melanoma than that in nonacral melanoma. Dissemination to lymph nodes was more common in acral melanoma than that in nonacral melanoma. Lymph node involvement was associated with deeper Breslow thickness in nonacral melanoma but not in acral melanoma. The degree of correlation of prediagnosis duration with horizontal diameter was remarkable in acral melanoma, but with Breslow thickness in nonacral melanoma. Overall survival was worse in acral melanoma than that in nonacral melanoma. The prognostic value of Breslow thickness was more remarkable in nonacral melanoma than that in acral melanoma.

LIMITATIONS

This study is a retrospective, single-center design.

CONCLUSION

Acral melanoma has a longer radial growth phase compared with nonacral melanoma. However, acral melanoma is commonly associated with lymph node dissemination which contributed to worse survival in acral melanoma than nonacral melanoma.

Five-year survival with nivolumab in previously untreated Japanese patients with advanced or recurrent malignant melanoma

We report the 5‐year follow‐up results from a single‐arm, open‐label, multicenter phase II study (ONO‐4538‐08) conducted in Japan. Twenty‐four patients with treatment‐naïve, recurrent, or unresectable stage III/IV malignant melanoma received 3 mg/kg nivolumab every 2 weeks until progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity occurred. The 5‐year overall survival (OS) rate was 26.1%. Five years after the start of nivolumab treatment, there were six survivors. The 5‐year OS rate was 66.7% for patients with a superficial spreading type, 14.3% for acral lentiginous type, and 16.7% for mucosal type. The 5‐year progression‐free survival rate was 17.2%. No new cases of partial response or complete response were observed after 3 years, and overall response and disease control rates were similar to those reported at 3 years. The treatment‐related adverse events reported between the 3‐ and 5‐year follow‐up periods were anemia (grade 2), white blood cell count decrease (grade 2), and psoriasiform dermatitis (grade 2) in one patient each. No new grade 3 or higher treatment‐related adverse events occurred in this period. In conclusion, first‐line treatment with nivolumab in Japanese patients with unresectable or metastatic melanoma resulted in confirmed long‐term survival. No new safety signals were reported in the studied population.

The Importance of Incorporating Human Factors in the Design and Implementation of Artificial Intelligence for Skin Cancer Diagnosis in the Real World

Artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms have been shown to diagnose skin lesions with impressive accuracy in experimental settings. The majority of the literature to date has compared AI and dermatologists as opponents in skin cancer diagnosis. However, in the real-world clinical setting, the clinician will work in collaboration with AI. Existing evidence regarding the integration of such AI diagnostic tools into clinical practice is limited. Human factors, such as cognitive style, personality, experience, preferences, and attitudes may influence clinicians' use of AI. In this review, we consider these human factors and the potential cognitive errors, biases, and unintended consequences that could arise when using an AI skin cancer diagnostic tool in the real world. Integrating this knowledge in the design and implementation of AI technology will assist in ensuring that the end product can be used effectively. Dermatologist leadership in the development of these tools will further improve their clinical relevance and safety.

Skin cancer in women of color: Epidemiology, pathogenesis and clinical manifestations

Malignant melanoma and nonmelanoma skin cancers (NMSC), which include basal cell carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma, account for 40% of all neoplasms in white patients, making these cancers the most common malignancy in the United States. Given the large number of NMSC cases in white patients, there is a correspondingly large body of literature addressing various aspects of epidemiology, pathogenesis, and treatment. The incidence of both malignant melanoma and NMSC is well established and remains significantly lower in patients with skin of color (SoC) when compared with white patients. Although there is a lower incidence of skin cancer in SoC, there is often a poorer prognosis among this group. There is even more limited data focusing on women of color, making an accurate determination of incidence and mortality difficult. This gender disparity causes decreased skin cancer awareness and index of suspicion among patients and providers, hindering appropriate evaluation and care. Therefore, there is a need for an increased understanding of skin cancer in women of color. In the traditional sense, SoC refers to people of African, Asian, Native American, Middle Eastern, and Hispanic backgrounds. Patients in these ethnic groups have richly pigmented skin that is usually categorized as Fitzpatrick types III through VI and thus have notable differences in skin disease and presentation compared with fair-skinned individuals. We present this review of skin cancer in women of color to give a reasonably comprehensive representation of the literature to advance our understanding and knowledge in this unique population.

The prognostic significance of non-sentinel lymph node metastasis in cutaneous and acral melanoma patients-A multicenter retrospective study

Background

Whether non‐sentinel lymph node (SLN)‐positive melanoma patients can benefit from completion lymph node dissection (CLND) is still unclear. The current study was performed to identify the prognostic role of non‐SLN status in SLN‐positive melanoma and to investigate the predictive factors of non‐SLN metastasis in acral and cutaneous melanoma patients.

Methods

The records of 328 SLN‐positive melanoma patients who underwent radical surgery at four cancer centers from September 2009 to August 2017 were reviewed. Clinicopathological data including age, gender, Clark level, Breslow index, ulceration, the number of positive SLNs, non‐SLN status, and adjuvant therapy were included for survival analyses. Patients were followed up until death or June 30, 2019. Multivariable logistic regression modeling was performed to identify factors associated with non‐SLN positivity. Log‐rank analysis and Cox regression analysis were used to identify the prognostic factors for disease‐free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS).

Results

Among all enrolled patients, 220 (67.1%) had acral melanoma and 108 (32.9%) had cutaneous melanoma. The 5‐year DFS and OS rate of the entire cohort was 31.5% and 54.1%, respectively. More than 1 positive SLNs were found in 123 (37.5%) patients. Positive non‐SLNs were found in 99 (30.2%) patients. Patients with positive non‐SLNs had significantly worse DFS and OS (log‐rank P < 0.001). Non‐SLN status (P = 0.003), number of positive SLNs (P = 0.016), and adjuvant therapy (P = 0.025) were independent prognostic factors for DFS, while non‐SLN status (P = 0.002), the Breslow index (P = 0.027), Clark level (P = 0.006), ulceration (P = 0.004), number of positive SLNs (P = 0.001), and adjuvant therapy (P = 0.007) were independent prognostic factors for OS. The Breslow index (P = 0.020), Clark level (P = 0.012), and number of positive SLNs (P = 0.031) were independently related to positive non‐SLNs and could be used to develop more personalized surgical strategy.

Conclusions

Non‐SLN‐positive melanoma patients had worse DFS and OS even after immediate CLND than those with non‐SLN‐negative melanoma. The Breslow index, Clark level, and number of positive SLNs were independent predictive factors for non‐SLN status.

The ongoing racial disparities in melanoma: An analysis of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (1975-2016)

BACKGROUND

Although most patients with cutaneous melanoma are non-Hispanic whites (NHWs), minorities consistently suffer worse melanoma-specific survival (MSS). Much of the literature comes from analyses of registries from the 1990s and 2000s.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to evaluate whether and to what degree racial disparity in MSS persists since 2010.

METHODS

We analyzed 381,035 patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registry. Race categories included Hispanic, NHW, non-Hispanic black (NHB), non-Hispanic Asian or Pacific Islander (NHAPI), and non-Hispanic American Indian/Alaska Native (NHAIAN). We evaluated the association between MSS and race in 3 time periods: before the year 2000, 2000 to 2009, and 2010 or later. NHW was the reference group for all analyses.

RESULTS

Racial disparity worsened from before the year 2000 to 2010 or later for Hispanic (P < .001), NHB (P = .024), and NHAPI (P < .001) patients. Across all minority groups, patients with localized disease suffered increasing disparity (P = .010 for Hispanic, P < .001 for NHB, P = .023 for NHAPI, and P = .042 for NHAIAN patients). Among those with regional and distant disease, Hispanic patients were the only minority to experience worsening disparity (P = .001 and P = .019, respectively).

LIMITATIONS

Lack of immunotherapy and targeted treatment information.

CONCLUSIONS

Racial disparity in MSS is worsening. Improving postdiagnosis management for minorities with localized disease is imperative to mitigate disparity and improve survival.

Long-term follow up of nivolumab in previously untreated Japanese patients with advanced or recurrent malignant melanoma

The immune checkpoint inhibitor nivolumab inhibits the programmed death 1 receptor and suppresses the immune resistance of cancer cells. This is a long-term follow up of a single-arm, open-label, multicenter, phase II study of nivolumab in untreated Japanese patients with stage III/IV or recurrent melanoma. In addition, a post-hoc subgroup analysis stratified by melanoma types was performed. Nivolumab was administered intravenously at a dose of 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks. The primary endpoint was the overall response rate (ORR), and secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), best overall response, the disease control rate and change in tumor diameter. Safety was assessed by recording treatment-related adverse events (TRAE), including select immune-related adverse events. Of the 24 patients initially included in the primary phase II study, 10 survived for over 3 years (41.7%). The ORR was 34.8% (90% confidence interval [CI]: 20.8, 51.9) for all patients. When analyzing by melanoma type, the ORR was 66.7% (90% CI: 34.7, 88.3) for superficial spreading, 33.3% (90% CI: 11.7, 65.3) for mucosal, and 28.6% (90% CI: 10.0, 59.1) for acral lentiginous tumors. The median OS was 32.9 months, the 3-year OS rate was 43.5%, and the 3-year PFS rate was 17.2%. A long-term response was observed in all the tumor types. The most common TRAE included skin toxicity (45.8%) and endocrine disorders (29.2%). This study demonstrated the long-term efficacy and tolerability of nivolumab in patients with advanced or recurrent melanoma, irrespective of melanoma type.