Can preventive hyperbaric oxygen therapy optimise surgical outcome?: A systematic review of randomised controlled trials

Bayesian Modeling of the Impact of HBOT on the Reduction in Cytokine Storms

Since the initial identification of SARS-CoV-2 infections, numerous clinical challenges have arisen, revealing both acute and long-term effects associated with COVID-19. These effects impact various systems within the body, including the respiratory, cardiovascular, and nervous systems. Background/Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the immunological and inflammatory parameters in patients with severe COVID-19 and evaluate the effects of hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) on these parameters. Methods: This study enrolled thirty patients from the Military Medical Institute-National Research Institute in Warsaw, who were hospitalized for SARS-CoV-2 infection. Patients were screened for eligibility based on pre-defined inclusion criteria. The subjects were randomly assigned to one of two groups: hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) or a control group. Immune profiling was performed, measuring cytokine concentrations and leukocyte subpopulations in serum samples. Outcomes were assessed using Bayesian modeling. Results: Bayesian regression analysis confirmed previous findings, indicating that HBOT may reduce inflammatory cytokine levels while improving oxygen saturation (SpO2) in patients with moderate and severe COVID-19. Moreover, the analysis suggested a higher probability of HBOT success in modulating the immune response and reducing inflammatory parameters, particularly in T lymphocyte subpopulations. Conclusions: Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) may serve as an effective adjunctive treatment for patients with COVID-19 by enhancing oxygen saturation and modulating the immune response. Further studies are needed to elucidate the underlying mechanisms of HBOT on inflammatory and immunological parameters in COVID-19 patients.

Hyperbaric oxygen therapy outcomes in post-irradiated patient undergoing microvascular breast reconstruction: A preliminary retrospective comparative study

Introduction

Radiotherapy is a challenge in autologous breast reconstruction because of its impact on cutaneous and vascular systems. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) is a recognized treatment of radiation-related complications. We aimed to assess the impact of perioperative HBOT on irradiated breast microvascular reconstructive outcomes.

Method

We reviewed the medical charts of patients who received radiotherapy and then underwent secondary free autologous breast reconstruction at our institution. Data on demographics, HBOT protocol, intervention characteristics and post-operative complications were collected. Outcomes of the irradiated patients were then compared between the HBOT and non-HBOT groups.

Results

Fourteen patients were included (11 unilateral and 2 bilateral deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flaps and 1 free transverse rectus abdominis muscle flap). Seven patients received HBOT and 7 did not. In the non-HBOT group, there were 1 Clavien-Dindo grade II, 1 Clavien-Dindo grade IIIa and 2 Clavien-Dindo grade IIIb post-operative complications. In the HBOT group, there were 3 Clavien-Dindo grade I, 1 Clavien-Dindo grade IIIa and 2 Clavien-Dindo grade IIIb post-operative complications. The mean operative time was 452.3 minutes (SD ±62.4 minutes) for unilateral cases without HBOT and 457.8 minutes (SD ±102.1 minutes) with HBOT (p=0.913). Mean ischaemia time per flap without HBOT was 109.4 minutes (SD ±51.8 minutes) versus 80.1 minutes (SD ±37.7 minutes) in the HBOT group (p=0.249).

Conclusion

This study provides insights into the potential of HBOT treatment in preparing patients with irradiated breast cancer for secondary autologous reconstruction.

Efficacy of searching in biomedical databases beyond MEDLINE in identifying randomised controlled trials on hyperbaric oxygen treatment

Introduction

Literature searches are routinely used by researchers for conducting systematic reviews as well as by healthcare providers, and sometimes patients, to quickly guide their clinical decisions. Using more than one database is generally recommended but may not always be necessary for some fields. This study aimed to determine the added value of searching additional databases beyond MEDLINE when conducting a literature search of hyperbaric oxygen treatment (HBOT) randomised controlled trials (RCTs).

Methods

This study consisted of two phases: a scoping review of all RCTs in the field of HBOT, followed by a a statistical analysis of sensitivity, precision, 'number needed to read' (NNR) and 'number unique' included by individual biomedical databases. MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Control Trials (CENTRAL), and Cumulated Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) were searched without date or language restrictions up to December 31, 2022. Screening and data extraction were conducted in duplicate by pairs of independent reviewers. RCTs were included if they involved human subjects and HBOT was offered either on its own or in combination with other treatments.

Results

Out of 5,840 different citations identified, 367 were included for analysis. CENTRAL was the most sensitive (87.2%) and had the most unique references (7.1%). MEDLINE had the highest precision (23.8%) and optimal NNR (four). Among included references, 14.2% were unique to a single database.

Conclusions

Systematic reviews of RCTs in HBOT should always utilise multiple databases, which at minimum include MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL and CINAHL.

Effect of Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy on Sleep Quality, Drug Dosage, and Nerve Function in Patients with Sleep Disorders after Ischemic Cerebral Stroke

Objective. To explore the effects of hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HOT) on sleep quality, drug dosage, and nerve function in patients with sleep disorders after ischemic cerebral stroke (ICS). Methods. A total of 120 patients with acute ICS and sleep disorders who came to our hospital for treatment from January 2019 to October 2021 were selected and divided into control and observation groups according to the random numbering method, with 60 cases in each group. Both groups were treated with sertraline and eszopiclone for treating insomnia. The control group was given routine treatment for ICS, and the observation group was additionally treated with HOT in addition to the control group. The sleep quality, the use of sleep medication, the neurological function score, and the levels of serum tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), endothelin (ET), and neuropeptide Y (NPY) before and after treatment were compared between the two groups. Results. The levels of TNF-α, ET and NPY were not significantly different between the two groups of patients before treatment ( $P>0.05$ ), and all of the above indicators decreased significantly in both groups after treatment, with the observation group being lower than the control group ( $P<0.05$ ). There was no significant difference in the sleep quality scores of PSQI, ESS, and SBQ between the two groups before treatment ( $P>0.05$ ), and the above indicators decreased significantly in both groups after treatment, with the observation group being lower than the control group ( $P<0.05$ ). There was no significant difference in the dose of sleep medication used in the first day of treatment between the two groups ( $P>0.05$ ), and the amount of sleep medication used in the observation group was significantly less than that in the control group after 14 d of treatment ( $P<0.05$ ). There was no significant difference in the NIHSS scores between the two groups before treatment ( $P>0.05$ ), and the scores of both groups decreased after treatment, and the scores of the observation group were significantly lower than those of the control group ( $P<0.05$ ). Conclusion. Compared with routine treatment, the addition of HOT to treat patients with sleep disorders after ICS can significantly improve their sleep quality, reduce dosage of sleep drugs, reduce inflammatory level of brain tissue and nerve function damage, and improve their prognosis. Trial Registration. This study was registered in the EA2019056

A Narrative Review on Means to Promote Oxygenation and Angiogenesis in Oral Wound Healing

Oral mucosa serves as the primary barrier against pathogen invasions, mechanical stresses, and physical trauma. Although it is generally composed of keratinocytes and held in place by desmosomes, it shows variation in tissue elasticity and surface keratinization at different sites of the oral cavity. Wound healing undergoes four stages of tissue change sequences, namely haemostasis, inflammation, proliferation, and remodelling. The wound healing of oral hard tissue and soft tissue is largely dependent on the inflammatory response and vascular response, which are the targets of many research. Because of a less-robust inflammatory response, favourable saliva properties, a unique oral environment, and the presence of mesenchymal stem cells, oral wounds are reported to demonstrate rapid healing, less scar formation, and fewer inflammatory reactions. However, delayed oral wound healing is a major concern in certain populations with autoimmune disorders or underlying medical issues, or those subjected to surgically inflicted injuries. Various means of approach have been adopted to improve wound tissue proliferation without causing excessive scarring. This narrative review reappraises the current literature on the use of light, sound, mechanical, biological, and chemical means to enhance oxygen delivery to wounds. The current literature includes the use of hyperbaric oxygen and topical oxygen therapy, ultrasounds, lasers, platelet-rich plasma (PRP)/platelet-rich fibrin (PRF), and various chemical agents such as hyaluronic acid, astaxanthin, and Centella asiatica to promote angiogenesis in oral wound healing during the proliferation process. The arrival of a proprietary oral gel that is reported to improve oxygenation is highlighted.

Results of hyperbaric oxygen treatment in an at-risk nasal flap following trauma

Hyperbaric oxygen treatment (HBOT) is widely used in otorhinolaryngology for various purposes. A 20-year-old male patient was admitted following a traumatic nasal wound which occurred several hours prior. He had a nasal glass cut from the radix to the supratip area which was primarily closed by non-absorbable suture. The following day, there was a haematoma and necrosis of the skin. The haematoma was drained under local anaesthesia. Blood supply to the nasal skin was severely compromised and only the columellar artery remaining intact, by definition designating this a difficult to heal wound with the risk of overall healing failure. Necrosis of the skin had developed within the first 24 hours. Accordingly, the patient underwent 30 HBOT sessions (two hours at 253.3 kPa) twice daily for four days and daily thereafter. Antibiotic cover and conservative wound management were also used. Complete healing was achieved without the need for additional surgical intervention. We conclude that timely use of HBOT may be a valuable adjunct to conservative wound management in a case of sharp nasal trauma.