1
|
Gruendel MS, Brenneisen W, Wollborn J, Haaker G, Meersch M, Gurlit S, Goebel U. Perioperative point-of-care-testing of plasmacholinesterases identifies older patients at risk for postoperative delirium: an observational prospective cohort study. BMC Geriatr 2024; 24:136. [PMID: 38321383 PMCID: PMC10848373 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-023-04627-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2023] [Accepted: 12/20/2023] [Indexed: 02/08/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Postoperative delirium (POD) is a severe perioperative complication that may increase mortality and length-of-stay in older patients. Moreover, POD is a major economic burden to any healthcare system. An altered expression of Acetylcholine- and Butyrylcholinesterases (AChE, BuChE) due to an unbalanced neuroinflammatory response to trauma or an operative stimulus has been reported to play an essential role in the development of POD. We investigated if perioperative measurement of cholinesterases (ChEs) can help identifying patients at risk for the occurrence of POD in both, scheduled and emergency surgery patients. METHODS This monocentric prospective observational cohort study was performed in a tertiary hospital (departments of orthopaedic surgery and traumatology). One hundred and fifty-one patients aged above 75 years were enrolled for scheduled (n = 76) or trauma-related surgery (n = 75). Exclusion criteria were diagnosed dementia and anticholinergic medication. Plasma samples taken pre- and postoperatively were analysed regarding AChE and BuChE activity. Furthermore, perioperative assessment using different cognitive tests was performed. The type of anaesthesia (general vs. spinal anaesthesia) was analysed. Primary outcome was the incidence of POD assessed by the approved Confusion Assessment Method (CAM) in combination with the expression of AChE and BuChE. RESULTS Of 151 patients included, 38 (25.2%) suffered from POD; 11 (14%) in scheduled and 27 (36%) in emergency patients. AChE levels showed no difference throughout groups or time course. Trauma patients had lower BuChE levels prior to surgery than scheduled patients (p < 0.001). Decline in BuChE levels correlated positively with the incidence of POD (1669 vs. 1175 U/l; p < 0.001). Emergency patients with BuChE levels below 1556 U/L were at highest risk for POD. There were no differences regarding length of stay between groups or incidence of POD. The type of anaesthesia had no influence regarding the incidence of POD. Only Charlson Comorbidity Index and Mini Nutrition Assessment demonstrated reliable strength in respect of POD. CONCLUSIONS Perioperative measurement of BuChE activity can be used as a tool to identify patients at risk of POD. As a point-of-care test, quick results may alter the patients' course prior to the development of POD. TRIAL REGISTRATION https://drks.de/search/de/trial/DRKS00017178 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthias S Gruendel
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, St. Franziskus-Hospital GmbH, Hohenzollernring 70, Muenster, 48145, Germany
| | - Wibke Brenneisen
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, St. Franziskus-Hospital GmbH, Hohenzollernring 70, Muenster, 48145, Germany
| | - Jakob Wollborn
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, USA
| | - Gerrit Haaker
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, St. Franziskus-Hospital GmbH, Hohenzollernring 70, Muenster, 48145, Germany
| | - Melanie Meersch
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| | - Simone Gurlit
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, St. Franziskus-Hospital GmbH, Hohenzollernring 70, Muenster, 48145, Germany
- Department of Public Health, District Council, Muenster, Germany
| | - Ulrich Goebel
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, St. Franziskus-Hospital GmbH, Hohenzollernring 70, Muenster, 48145, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zarour S, Weiss Y, Kiselevich Y, Iacubovici L, Karol D, Shaylor R, Davydov T, Matot I, Cohen B. The association between midazolam premedication and postoperative delirium - a retrospective cohort study. J Clin Anesth 2024; 92:111113. [PMID: 37280146 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2023.111113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2022] [Revised: 02/17/2023] [Accepted: 03/17/2023] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE To evaluate the association between midazolam premedication and postoperative delirium in a large retrospective cohort of patients ≥70 years. DESIGN Retrospective cohort study. SETTING A single tertiary academic medical center. PATIENTS Patients ≥70 years having elective non-cardiac surgery under general anesthesia from 2020 to 2021. INTERVENTIONS Midazolam premedication, defined as intravenous midazolam administration prior to induction of general anesthesia. MEASUREMENTS The primary outcome, postoperative delirium, was a collapsed composite outcome including at least one of the following: a positive 4A's test during post-anesthesia care unit stay and/or the initial 2 postoperative days; physician or nursing records reporting new-onset confusion as captured by the CHART-DEL instrument; or a positive 3D-CAM test. The association between midazolam premedication and postoperative delirium was assessed using multivariable logistic regression, adjusting for potential confounding variables. As secondary analysis, we investigated the association between midazolam premedication and a composite of other postoperative complications. Several sensitivity analyses were performed using similar regression models. MAIN RESULTS In total, 1973 patients were analyzed (median age 75 years, 47% women, 50% ASA score ≥ 3, 32% high risk surgery). The overall incidence of postoperative delirium was 15.3% (302/1973). Midazolam premedication was administered to 782 (40%) patients (median [IQR] dose 2 [1,2] mg). After adjustment for potential confounding variables, midazolam premedication was not associated with increased odds of postoperative delirium, with adjusted odds ratio of 1.09 (95% confidence interval 0.82-1.45; P = 0.538). Midazolam premedication was also not associated with the composite of other postoperative complications. Furthermore, no association was found between midazolam premedication and postoperative delirium in any of the sensitivity analyses preformed. CONCLUSIONS Our results suggest that low doses of midazolam can be safely used to pre-medicate elective surgical patients 70 years or older before non-cardiac surgery, without significant effect on the risk of developing postoperative delirium.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shiri Zarour
- Division of Anesthesia, Intensive Care, and Pain Management, Tel-Aviv Medical Center, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
| | - Yotam Weiss
- Division of Anesthesia, Intensive Care, and Pain Management, Tel-Aviv Medical Center, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
| | - Yossef Kiselevich
- Division of Anesthesia, Intensive Care, and Pain Management, Tel-Aviv Medical Center, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
| | - Liat Iacubovici
- Division of Anesthesia, Intensive Care, and Pain Management, Tel-Aviv Medical Center, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
| | - Dana Karol
- Division of Anesthesia, Intensive Care, and Pain Management, Tel-Aviv Medical Center, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
| | - Ruth Shaylor
- Division of Anesthesia, Intensive Care, and Pain Management, Tel-Aviv Medical Center, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
| | - Tamara Davydov
- Division of Anesthesia, Intensive Care, and Pain Management, Tel-Aviv Medical Center, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
| | - Idit Matot
- Division of Anesthesia, Intensive Care, and Pain Management, Tel-Aviv Medical Center, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
| | - Barak Cohen
- Division of Anesthesia, Intensive Care, and Pain Management, Tel-Aviv Medical Center, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel; Outcomes Research Consortium, Cleveland, OH, United States of America.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kowark A, Keszei AP, Schneider G, Pilge S, Schneider F, Obert DP, Georgii MT, Heim M, Rossaint R, Ziemann S, van Waesberghe J, Czaplik M, Pühringer FK, Minarski C, May V, Malisi T, Drexler B, Ring CM, Engler P, Tilly R, Bischoff P, Frey U, Wittmann M, Soehle M, Saller T, Kienbaum P, Kretzschmar M, Coburn M. Preoperative Midazolam and Patient-Centered Outcomes of Older Patients: The I-PROMOTE Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Surg 2024; 159:129-138. [PMID: 38117527 PMCID: PMC10733850 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2023.6479] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2023] [Accepted: 09/13/2023] [Indexed: 12/21/2023]
Abstract
Importance The effect of oral midazolam premedication on patient satisfaction in older patients undergoing surgery is unclear, despite its widespread use. Objective To determine the differences in global perioperative satisfaction in patients with preoperative administration of oral midazolam compared with placebo. Design, Setting, and Participants This double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial was conducted in 9 German hospitals between October 2017 and May 2019 (last follow-up, June 24, 2019). Eligible patients aged 65 to 80 years who were scheduled for elective inpatient surgery for at least 30 minutes under general anesthesia and with planned extubation were enrolled. Data were analyzed from November 2019 to December 2020. Interventions Patients were randomized to receive oral midazolam, 3.75 mg (n = 309), or placebo (n = 307) 30 to 45 minutes prior to anesthesia induction. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was global patient satisfaction evaluated using the self-reported Evaluation du Vécu de l'Anesthésie Generale (EVAN-G) questionnaire on the first postoperative day. Key secondary outcomes included sensitivity and subgroup analyses of the primary outcome, perioperative patient vital data, adverse events, serious complications, and cognitive and functional recovery up to 30 days postoperatively. Results Among 616 randomized patients, 607 were included in the primary analysis. Of these, 377 (62.1%) were male, and the mean (SD) age was 71.9 (4.4) years. The mean (SD) global index of patient satisfaction did not differ between the midazolam and placebo groups (69.5 [10.7] vs 69.6 [10.8], respectively; mean difference, -0.2; 95% CI, -1.9 to 1.6; P = .85). Sensitivity (per-protocol population, multiple imputation) and subgroup analyses (anxiety, frailty, sex, and previous surgical experience) did not alter the primary results. Secondary outcomes did not differ, except for a higher proportion of patients with hypertension (systolic blood pressure ≥160 mm Hg) at anesthesia induction in the placebo group. Conclusion and Relevance A single low dose of oral midazolam premedication did not alter the global perioperative patient satisfaction of older patients undergoing surgery or that of patients with anxiety. These results may be affected by the low dose of oral midazolam. Further trials-including a wider population with commonplace low-dose intravenous midazolam and plasma level measurements-are needed. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03052660.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana Kowark
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
- Department of Anesthesiology, Medical Faculty University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - András P. Keszei
- Center for Translational & Clinical Research Aachen, Medical Faculty RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
| | - Gerhard Schneider
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Munich, Germany
| | - Stefanie Pilge
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Munich, Germany
| | - Frederick Schneider
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Munich, Germany
| | - David P. Obert
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Munich, Germany
| | - Marie-Therese Georgii
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Munich, Germany
| | - Markus Heim
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Munich, Germany
| | - Rolf Rossaint
- Department of Anesthesiology, Medical Faculty University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Sebastian Ziemann
- Department of Anesthesiology, Medical Faculty University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Julia van Waesberghe
- Department of Anesthesiology, Medical Faculty University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Michael Czaplik
- Department of Anesthesiology, Medical Faculty University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Friedrich K. Pühringer
- Department for Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care, Emergency Medicine, Pain Therapy and Palliative Care, Kreiskliniken Reutlingen, Reutlingen, Germany
| | - Christian Minarski
- Department for Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care, Emergency Medicine, Pain Therapy and Palliative Care, Kreiskliniken Reutlingen, Reutlingen, Germany
| | - Verena May
- Department for Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care, Emergency Medicine, Pain Therapy and Palliative Care, Kreiskliniken Reutlingen, Reutlingen, Germany
| | - Tobias Malisi
- Department for Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care, Emergency Medicine, Pain Therapy and Palliative Care, Kreiskliniken Reutlingen, Reutlingen, Germany
| | - Berthold Drexler
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Carmen Maria Ring
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Phillip Engler
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Roman Tilly
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Petra Bischoff
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Surgical Intensive Care, Pain and Palliative Care, Marien Hospital Herne, University Hospital of Ruhr University Bochum, Herne, Germany
| | - Ulrich Frey
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Surgical Intensive Care, Pain and Palliative Care, Marien Hospital Herne, University Hospital of Ruhr University Bochum, Herne, Germany
| | - Maria Wittmann
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Martin Soehle
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Thomas Saller
- Department of Anaesthesiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Peter Kienbaum
- Department of Anaesthesiology, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Moritz Kretzschmar
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Mark Coburn
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Takhti S, Pordel M, Bozorgmehr MR, Davoodnia A. New hybrids based on benzimidazole and diazepine moieties: design, synthesis, characterization, molecular docking studies and their in vitro interactions with benzodiazepine receptors. J Biomol Struct Dyn 2023; 41:8729-8737. [PMID: 36271637 DOI: 10.1080/07391102.2022.2136246] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2022] [Accepted: 10/10/2022] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
Benzodiazepines are one of the most widely prescribed pharmacologic agents in the world. They are employed for numerous indications, including anxiety, insomnia, muscle relaxation, relief from spasticity caused by central nervous system pathology and epilepsy. In this work, we have synthesized some new hybrids based on benzimidazole and diazepine scaffolds from the reaction of suitable benzimidazole derivatives with glycine. NMR spectra, IR and mass as well as elemental analyses approved the structure of the title compounds. In vitro interactions of the title compounds were also examined on recombinant benzodiazepine receptors (αxβ2/3γ2, x = 1-3, 5) expressed in HEK293 cells. The results indicated that the title compounds exhibited suitable affinity for α1β2 γ2 subtype (Ki = 16-29 nM). To achieve deeper insight into their interactions with benzodiazepine receptors, molecular dynamics simulation was employed. According to the results obtained from the molecular dynamics simulation, Pro85, Leu103, Pro101, Gln102, Ile79, Ser80, Pro17, Leu82 and Val84 interact with the most potent ligand by hydrophobic interactions and Asp86 and Leu87 interact with the ligand by hydrogen bond interactions.Communicated by Ramaswamy H. Sarma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samaneh Takhti
- Department of Chemistry, Mashhad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Mashhad, Iran
| | - Mehdi Pordel
- Department of Chemistry, Mashhad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Mashhad, Iran
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Klaschik S, Coburn M. [Special features of the perioperative course in patients with frailty syndrome]. DIE ANAESTHESIOLOGIE 2023; 72:685-694. [PMID: 37594509 DOI: 10.1007/s00101-023-01321-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/04/2023] [Indexed: 08/19/2023]
Abstract
The demographic change with an increase in the number of geriatric patients presents major challenges for perioperative medicine. Frailty is a multimorbidity complex that incorporates a combination of various factors, such as physical weakness, slower walking speed and unwanted weight loss. It is of great importance that these patients receive an individually adapted perioperative care. This includes, among others, a preoperative examination for frailty, a structured prehabilitation according to the concept of better in, better out, the compliance with the guidelines on prevention and timely treatment of postoperative delirium as well as the continuous maintenance of the body's homeostasis. By means of these measures the risk of complications in this patient group can be reduced and the best possible postoperative results can be achieved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sven Klaschik
- Klinik für Anästhesiologie und Operative Intensivmedizin, Universitätsklinik Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Deutschland
| | - Mark Coburn
- Klinik für Anästhesiologie und Operative Intensivmedizin, Universitätsklinik Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Deutschland.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Seki S, Candon M, Murthy S, Sahota G, Kelz RR, Neuman MD. Evaluation of a behavioural intervention to reduce perioperative midazolam administration to older adults. BJA OPEN 2023; 7:100206. [PMID: 37638081 PMCID: PMC10457488 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjao.2023.100206] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2023] [Accepted: 06/11/2023] [Indexed: 08/29/2023]
Abstract
Background Older patients commonly receive benzodiazepines during anaesthesia despite guidelines recommending avoidance. Interventions to reduce perioperative benzodiazepine use are not well studied. We hypothesized an automated electronic medical record alert targeting anaesthesia providers would reduce administration of benzodiazepines to older adults undergoing general anaesthesia. Methods We conducted a retrospective study of adults who underwent surgery at 5 hospitals within one US academic health system. One of the hospitals received an intervention consisting of provider education and an automated electronic medical record alert discouraging benzodiazepine administration to patients aged 70 years or older. We used difference-in-differences analysis to compare patterns of midazolam use 12-months before and after intervention at the intervention hospital, using the 4 non-intervention hospitals as contemporaneous comparators. Results The primary analysis sample included 20,347 cases among patients aged 70 and older. At the intervention hospital, midazolam was administered in 454/4,240 (10.7%) cases pre-alert versus 250/3,750 (6.7%) post-alert (p<0.001). At comparator hospitals, respective rates were 3,186/6,366 (50.0%) versus 2,935/5,991 (49.0%) (p=0.24). After adjustment, the intervention was associated with a 3.2 percentage point (p.p.) reduction in the percentage of cases with midazolam administration (95% CI: (-5.2, -1.1); p=0.002). Midazolam dose was unaffected (adjusted mean difference -0.01 mg, 95% CI: (-0.20, 0.18); p=0.90). In 76,735 cases among patients aged 18-69, the percentage of cases with midazolam administration decreased by 6.9 p. p. (95% CI: (-8.0, -5.7); p<0.001). Conclusion Provider-facing alerts in the intraoperative electronic medical record, coupled with education, can reduce midazolam administration to older patients presenting for surgery but may affect care of younger patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Scott Seki
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Centers for Perioperative Outcomes Research and Transformation, PA, USA
| | - Molly Candon
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, The University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Health Care Management, The Wharton School, The University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Sushila Murthy
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Gurmukh Sahota
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Rachel R. Kelz
- Department of Surgery, Center for Surgery and Health Economics, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Mark D. Neuman
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Centers for Perioperative Outcomes Research and Transformation, PA, USA
- Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Rhee J, Vazquez R, Ma H. Pro-Con Debate: Judicious Benzodiazepine Administration for Preoperative Anxiolysis in Older Patients. Anesth Analg 2023; 137:280-288. [PMID: 37450906 PMCID: PMC10358369 DOI: 10.1213/ane.0000000000006337] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/18/2023]
Abstract
In this Pro-Con commentary article, we discuss the risks and benefits of administering preoperative benzodiazepines to older patients to decrease preoperative anxiety. The Pro side first focuses on the critical importance of treating preoperative anxiety and that benzodiazepines are the best tool to achieve that goal. The competing argument presented by the Con side is that myriad options exist to treat preoperative anxiety without simultaneously increasing the risk for devastating complications such as postoperative delirium. Both sides call for more high-quality investigations to determine the most effective strategies for decreasing preoperative anxiety in older adults while improving outcomes and reducing morbidity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James Rhee
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Cardiovascular Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Rafael Vazquez
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Haobo Ma
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Jöhr M. A new view on old problems in paediatric anaesthesia: premedication, postoperative agitation and dosing. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2023; 36:311-317. [PMID: 36745083 DOI: 10.1097/aco.0000000000001236] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The aim of this review is to discuss recent developments in paediatric anaesthesia, which have evolved in an undulating fashion. RECENT FINDINGS The role and efficacy of pharmacological premedication is reevaluated. The anxiolytic and sedative properties of midazolam and α 2 -agonists have now been defined more precisely. Both classes of drugs have their unique profile, and there is no reason to condemn one or the other. Midazolam is an excellent anxiolytic, whereas dexmedetomidine is superior in the postoperative period and for sedation during diagnostic imaging.A total intravenous technique with propofol is often considered to be the standard for the prevention of emergence agitation; but alternatives do exist, such as a co-medication with dexmedetomidine or opioids. In clinical reality, a multimodal approach may often be advisable.The theoretical basis for propofol dosing has recently been adapted. In contrast to previous beliefs, the context-sensitive half-life of propofol seems to be quite short beyond the first year of life. SUMMARY Midazolam and dexmedetomidine are not interchangeable; each compound has its pros and cons. As an anxiolytic drug, midazolam indisputably deserves its place, whereas dexmedetomidine is a better sedative and particularly beneficial in the postoperative period. New data will allow more precise age-adapted dosing of propofol.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Jöhr
- Paediatric Anaesthesia, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Luzern Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Takhti S, Pordel M, Davoodnia A, Bozorgmehr MR. Imidazo[4′,5′:3,4]Benzo[1,2- e][1,4]Diazepins as New Heterocyclic Systems: Synthesis, Characterization and Their in Vitro Interactions with Benzodiazepine Receptors. Polycycl Aromat Compd 2022. [DOI: 10.1080/10406638.2022.2127800] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Samaneh Takhti
- Department of Chemistry, Mashhad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Mashhad, Iran
| | - Mehdi Pordel
- Department of Chemistry, Mashhad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Mashhad, Iran
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Strike a pose: The POSE study poses some questions! Eur J Anaesthesiol 2022; 39:193-195. [PMID: 35115452 DOI: 10.1097/eja.0000000000001658] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|