Protective effect of sevoflurane on hepatic ischaemia/reperfusion injury in the rat: A dose-response study. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2013;30:612-617. [PMID: 23702600 DOI: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e3283614023]

Comparison of total intravenous anesthesia and inhalational anesthesia in patients undergoing liver surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The impact of choosing between inhalational anesthetics and propofol for maintenance anesthesia in liver transplantation or liver resections remains uncertain.

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted on PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library on September 5, 2023, adhering to the Cochrane Handbook and PRISMA guidelines.

RESULTS

Fifteen randomized controlled trials and five observational studies, comprising 1,602 patients, were included. The statistical analysis was categorized into three groups: liver transplantation (four studies), living donor hepatectomy (four studies), and liver mass hepatectomy (twelve studies). The liver mass hepatectomy group was further subdivided based on the performance of the Pringle maneuver and the use of pharmacological preconditioning. Statistically significant results are described below. In liver transplant recipients, propofol anesthesia was associated with lower AST levels on the first postoperative day. Hepatic donors anesthetized with propofol had higher total infusion volumes and intraoperative urine output. Patients undergoing liver mass resection with the Pringle maneuver and propofol anesthesia had higher peak AST and ALT levels compared to those who received pharmacological preconditioning. Patients undergoing liver mass resection with the Pringle maneuver and propofol anesthesia had higher AST and ALT levels on both the first and third postoperative days, increased total infusion volumes, and shorter hospital stays, when compared to pharmacological conditioning.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings do not offer sufficient evidence to inform clinical practice. The choice between propofol-based and inhalational anesthesia should be tailored to the individual patient's condition and the nature of the procedure being performed.

REGISTRATION

PROSPERO ID: CRD42023460715.

Sevoflurane preconditioning in living liver donation is associated with better initial graft function after pediatric transplantation: a retrospective study

INTRODUCTION

Initial allograft function determines the patient's immediate prognosis in pediatric liver transplantation. Ischemia-reperfusion injuries play a role in initial poor graft function (IPGF). In animal studies, preconditioning with inhaled anesthetic agents has demonstrated a protective effect on the liver. In humans, the few available studies are conflicting. This study assesses the association between the hypnotic agent used to maintain anesthesia during hepatectomy in living donors and the occurrence of IPGF after pediatric transplantation.

METHODS

We conducted a single-center retrospective analysis of children who received a living donor liver transplant (LDLT) between 2010 and 2019. We analyzed the incidence of EAD according to the hypnotic agent used to maintain general anesthesia during donor hepatectomy.

RESULTS

We included 183 pairs of patients (living donors-recipients). The anesthetics used in the donor were propofol (n = 85), sevoflurane (n = 69), or propofol with sevoflurane started 30 min before clamping (n = 29). Forty-two children (23%) developed IPGF. After multivariate logistic regression analysis, factors significantly associated with the occurrence of IPGF were the anesthesia maintenance agent used in the donor (p = 0.004), age of the donor (p = 0.03), duration of transplant surgery (p = 0.009), preoperative receiver neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (p = 0.02), and albumin (p = 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Significantly fewer children who received a graft from a donor in whom only sevoflurane was used to maintain anesthesia developed IPGF. Although additional research is needed, this preconditioning strategy may provide an option to prevent IPGF after living liver donation.

Sevoflurane exerts protection against myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury and pyroptosis through the circular RNA PAN3/microRNA-29b-3p/stromal cell-derived factor 4 axis

OBJECTIVE

Sevoflurane is suggested to exert protective functions against myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury (MIRI). However, the particular mechanism remains elusive. Therefore, this research explored the mechanism of sevoflurane in MIRI-induced damage and pyroptosis.

METHODS

Subsequent to gain-or loss-of-function assays or/and sevoflurane treatment, the MIRI model was developed in rats. Cardiac function and body and heart weight of rats were evaluated, followed by measurement of apoptosis and creatine kinase MB (CK-MB), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and pyroptosis-related protein levels. After loss-of-function assays or/and sevoflurane treatment in human cardiomyocytes (HCMs), the hypoxia/reoxygenation (H/R) model was constructed. In HCMs, cell viability, apoptosis, and pyroptosis-related proteins were detected. Circular RNA PAN3 (circPAN3), microRNA (miR)-29b-3p, and stromal cell-derived factor 4 (SDF4) expression was determined in rat myocardial tissues and HCMs. Mechanistically, interactions among circPAN3, miR-29b-3p, and SDF4 were analyzed.

RESULTS

MIRI modeling increased miR-29b-3p expression and diminished circPAN3 and SDF4 expression in H/R-treated HCMs and MIRI rats, which was nullified by sevoflurane preconditioning. Mechanistically, circPAN3 negatively targeted miR-29b-3p to upregulate SDF4. Moreover, sevoflurane preconditioning reduced heart weight/body weight ratio, LDH, CK-MB, myocardial infarct size, left ventricular end-diastolic pressure, apoptosis, and pyroptosis, while elevating the increase and decrease of left ventricular pressure (±dp/dt _max) and left ventricular systolic pressure in MIRI rats. In addition, sevoflurane preconditioning augmented viability while diminishing apoptosis and pyroptosis in H/R-treated HCMs. Moreover, circPAN3 silencing or miR-29b-3p overexpression abrogated alleviatory effects of sevoflurane on myocardial injury and pyroptosis in vitro.

CONCLUSION

Sevoflurane treatment ameliorated myocardial injury and pyroptosis in MIRI via circPAN3/miR-29b-3p/SDF4 axis.

Experimental and Clinical Aspects of Sevoflurane Preconditioning and Postconditioning to Alleviate Hepatic Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury: A Scoping Review

Ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) is an inflammatory process inherent in organ transplantation procedures. It is associated with tissue damage and, depending on its intensity, can impact early graft function. In liver transplantation (LT), strategies to alleviate IRI are essential in order to increase the use of extended criteria donor (ECD) grafts, which are more susceptible to IRI, as well as to improve postoperative graft and patient outcomes. Sevoflurane, a commonly used volatile anesthetic, has been shown to reduce IRI. This scoping review aims to give a comprehensive overview of the existing experimental and clinical data regarding the potential benefits of sevoflurane for hepatic IRI (HIRI) and to identify any gaps in knowledge to guide further research. We searched Medline and Embase for relevant articles. A total of 380 articles were identified, 45 of which were included in this review. In most experimental studies, the use of sevoflurane was associated with a significant decrease in biomarkers of acute liver damage and oxidative stress. Administration of sevoflurane before hepatic ischemia (preconditioning) or after reperfusion (postconditioning) appears to be protective. However, in the clinical setting, results are conflicting. While some studies showed a reduction of postoperative markers of liver injury, the benefit of sevoflurane on clinical outcomes and graft survival remains unclear. Further prospective clinical trials remain necessary to assess the clinical relevance of the use of sevoflurane as a protective factor against HIRI.

Sevoflurane alleviates hepatic ischaemia/reperfusion injury by up-regulating miR-96 and down-regulating FOXO4

Hepatic ischaemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury represents an event characterized by anoxic cell death and an inflammatory response, that can limit the treatment efficacy of liver surgery. Ischaemic preconditioning agents such as sevoflurane (Sevo) have been highlighted to play protective roles in hepatic I/R injury. The current study aimed to investigate the molecular mechanism underlying the effects associated with Sevo in hepatic I/R injury. Initially, mouse hepatic I/R injury models were established via occlusion of the hepatic portal vein and subsequent reperfusion. The expression of forkhead box protein O4 (FOXO4) was detected using reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction and Western blot analysis from clinical liver tissue samples obtained from patients who had previously undergone liver transplantation, mouse I/R models and oxygen-deprived hepatocytes. The morphology of the liver tissues was analysed using haematoxylin-eosin (HE) staining, with apoptosis detected via TUNEL staining. Immunohistochemistry methods were employed to identify the FOXO4-positive cells. Mice with knocked out FOXO4 (FOXO4-KO mice) were subjected to I/R. In this study, we found FOXO4 was highly expressed following hepatic I/R injury. After treatment with Sevo, I/R modelled mice exhibited an alleviated degree of liver injury, fewer apoptotic cells and FOXO4-positive cells. FOXO4 was a target gene of miR-96. Knockdown of FOXO4 could alleviate hepatic I/R injury and decrease cell apoptosis. Taken together, the key observations of our study suggest that Sevo alleviates hepatic I/R injury by means of promoting the expression of miR-96 while inhibiting FOXO4 expression. This study highlights the molecular mechanism mediated by Sevo in hepatic I/R injury.

Molecular Aspects of Volatile Anesthetic-Induced Organ Protection and Its Potential in Kidney Transplantation

Ischemia reperfusion injury (IRI) is inevitable in kidney transplantation and negatively impacts graft and patient outcome. Reperfusion takes place in the recipient and most of the injury following ischemia and reperfusion occurs during this reperfusion phase; therefore, the intra-operative period seems an attractive window of opportunity to modulate IRI and improve short- and potentially long-term graft outcome. Commonly used volatile anesthetics such as sevoflurane and isoflurane have been shown to interfere with many of the pathophysiological processes involved in the injurious cascade of IRI. Therefore, volatile anesthetic (VA) agents might be the preferred anesthetics used during the transplantation procedure. This review highlights the molecular and cellular protective points of engagement of VA shown in in vitro studies and in vivo animal experiments, and the potential translation of these results to the clinical setting of kidney transplantation.

Sevoflurane preconditioning activates HGF/Met-mediated autophagy to attenuate hepatic ischemia-reperfusion injury in mice

Sevoflurane (SEV) preconditioning plays a protective effect against liver ischemia reperfusion (IR) injury, while the role of autophagy in SEV-mediated hepatoprotection and the precise mechanism is unclear. In the current study, mice were pretreated with SEV or autophagy inhibitor before liver IR injury. In vitro, primary rat hepatocytes were pretreated with SEV and then exposed to hypoxia/reoxygenation (H/R). Liver function was measured by biochemical and histopathological examinations, and markers associated with inflammation, oxidation, apoptosis and autophagy were subsequently measured. We found that SEV preconditioning dramatically reduced hepatic damage, alleviated cell inflammatory response, oxidative stress and apoptosis in mice suffering hepatic IR injury, whereas these protective effects were abolished by the autophagy inhibitor 3-MA. In addition, pretreatment with SEV markedly activated HGF/Met signaling pathway regulation. Besides, pretreatment with an hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) inhibitor or knocking down HGF expression significantly downregulated phosphorylated met (p-met) and autophagy levels, and abolished the protective effects of SEV against hepatic IR or hepatocyte H/R injury. Conversely, HGF overexpression efficiently increased the p-met and autophagy levels and strengthened the protective effects of SEV. These results indicated that sevoflurane preconditioning ameliorates hepatic IR injury by activating HGF/Met-mediated autophagy.

The Effects of Volatile Anesthetics on Lung Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury: Basic to Clinical Studies

Case reports from as early as the 1970s have shown that intravenous injection of even a small dose of volatile anesthetics result in fatal lung injury. Direct contact between volatile anesthetics and pulmonary vasculature triggers chemical damage in the vessel walls. A wide variety of factors are involved in lung ischemia-reperfusion injury (LIRI), such as pulmonary endothelial cells, alveolar epithelial cells, alveolar macrophages, neutrophils, mast cells, platelets, proinflammatory cytokines, and surfactant. With a constellation of factors involved, the assessment of the protective effect of volatile anesthetics in LIRI is difficult. Multiple animal studies have reported that with regards to LIRI, sevoflurane demonstrates an anti-inflammatory effect in immunocompetent cells and an anti-apoptotic effect on lung tissue. Scattered studies have dismissed a protective effect of desflurane against LIRI. While a single-center randomized controlled trial (RCT) found that volatile anesthetics including desflurane demonstrated a lung-protective effect in thoracic surgery, a multicenter RCT did not demonstrate a lung-protective effect of desflurane. LIRI is common in lung transplantation. One study, although limited due to its small sample size, found that the use of volatile anesthetics in organ procurement surgery involving "death by neurologic criteria" donors did not improve lung graft survival. Future studies on the protective effect of volatile anesthetics against LIRI must examine not only the mechanism of the protective effect but also differences in the effects of different types of volatile anesthetics, their optimal dosage, and the appropriateness of their use in the event of marked alveolar capillary barrier damage.

Effect of pharmacological preconditioning with sevoflurane during hepatectomy with intermittent portal triad clamping

BACKGROUND

During hepatectomy, intermittent portal triad clamping (IPC) reduces ischemia-reperfusion injuries. Pharmacological preconditioning with sevoflurane revealed similar properties. The aim of the study was to evaluate the combination of a sevoflurane preconditioning regimen with IPC on ischemia-reperfusion injuries.

METHODS

Three regimens of anesthesia were applied: group SEV with continuous application of sevoflurane, group PRO with continuous propofol infusion and group PC where continuous propofol was substituted by sevoflurane (adjusted to reach MAC∗1.5) for 15 min before IPC. Endpoints were the values of AST and ALT, factor V, prothrombin time, bilirubinemia over the 5-postoperative days (POD), morbidity and mortality at POD30 and POD90.

RESULTS

The ALT values at POD5 were lower in the PC group (n = 27) 74 (48 -98) IU/L compared to PRO (n = 26) and SEV (n = 67) respectively 110 (75 -152) and 100 (64 -168) IU/L (p = 0.038). The variation of factor V compared to preoperative values was less important in the PC and SEV groups respectively -14% and -16% vs -30% (PRO) (p = 0.047).

CONCLUSION

Our study suggests that sevoflurane attenuates ischemia-reperfusion injuries on liver function, compared to propofol, without benefit for a specific regimen of pharmacological preconditioning when IPC is applied.

Comparison of Inflammatory Markers Between the Sevoflurane and Isoflurane Anesthesia in a Rat Model of Liver Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury

BACKGROUND

Sevoflurane and isoflurane had been reported to improve ischemia/reperfusion injury (I/R) through amelioration of the inflammatory response. We aimed to explore and compare the molecular mechanisms involved in sevoflurane and isoflurane anesthesia in liver ischemia-reperfusion of rat model.

METHODS

Forty male Wistar rats were randomly divided into 4 groups: sham group, I/R group, sevoflurane group, and isoflurane group. The liver I/R injury model was established to investigate the effect of sevoflurane and isoflurane anesthesia on liver ischemia/reperfusion. The inflammatory markers and complement C3, C5a, and C6 were detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Oxidative stress was detected by measuring the levels of malondialdehyde (MDA), superoxide dismutase (SOD), and nitric oxide (NO).

RESULTS

Our results showed that sevoflurane anesthesia significantly decreased alanine transaminase, aspartate transaminase, and lactate dehydrogenase levels compared with isoflurane and controls. Sevoflurane inhibited I/R injury induced production of tumor necrosis factor α, interleukin 1, interleukin 6, and intercellular cell adhesion molecule-1 and promoted interleukin 10 production more significantly compared with isoflurane. Reduced MDA and NO and elevated SOD release suggested that oxidative stress was attenuated by sevoflurane and isoflurane anesthesia. Both sevoflurane and isoflurane anesthesia significantly decreased plasma C3 levels compared with the I/R injury group without differences.

CONCLUSION

Sevoflurane anesthesia produced a more significant inhibitive effect on inflammatory cytokines and oxidative stress in liver I/R injury model than isoflurane, suggesting that sevoflurane is more suitable in surgery.

Sevoflurane has postconditioning as well as preconditioning properties against hepatic warm ischemia-reperfusion injury in rats

PURPOSE

Ischemia-reperfusion (IR) injury is inevitable after liver transplantation and liver resection with inflow occlusion. Sevoflurane has been widely used during hepatobiliary surgery and was reported to exhibit preconditioning (PreC) properties against hepatic IR injury; however, its postconditioning (PostC) properties remain unknown. This study examined whether a clinically applicable dose of sevoflurane has PostC and PreC properties against hepatic IR injury and roles of heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1).

METHODS

Warm ischemia was induced in male Wistar rats, excluding the sham group, for 1 h, followed by 3 h of reperfusion. Group C received propofol from 60 min before ischemia until the end of the experimental procedure. In the SPreC and SPostC groups, propofol was replaced by 2.5% sevoflurane for 30 min from 35 min before ischemia in the SPreC group and for 30 min from 5 min before reperfusion in the SPostC group. The SPreC+Z and SPostC+Z groups received a HO-1 inhibitor, zinc protoporphyrin (Znpp), 60 min before ischemia, and sevoflurane PreC and PostC were induced.

RESULTS

Serum aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, and lactic dehydrogenase levels, and histological damage scores in the SPreC and SPostC groups were significantly lower than those in group C. Inhibiting HO-1 with Znpp partially blocked these protective effects of sevoflurane. Sevoflurane PreC and PostC significantly increased the number of HO-1-positive Kupffer cells in comparison with group C, and Znpp prevented sevoflurane-induced HO-1 expression.

CONCLUSION

PostC and PreC by sevoflurane at a clinically applicable dose have equally protective effects against hepatic IR injury by increasing HO-1 expression.

Effect of sevoflurane preconditioning on the digestive system of patients with primary liver cancer undergoing surgery

AIM: To explore the effect of sevoflurane preconditioning on the digestive system of patients with primary liver cancer undergoing surgery.

METHODS: Eighty patients who underwent right liver resection for primary liver cancer from January 2012 to January 2015 at Zhejiang Armed Police Hospital were randomly divided into an observation group and a control group, with 40 cases in each group. The observation group was given sevoflurane pretreatment. Serum levels of tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), intestinal fatty acid binding protein (I-FABP), and D-lactate at different time points were compared between the two groups, and adverse reactions of the digestive system were recorded.

RESULTS: Serum TNF-α and D-lactate concentrations in both groups rose from before induction of anesthesia, peaked at 6 h after the release of the porta hepatis, and then declined. Serum TNF-α and D-lactate concentrations from the occlusion of the porta hepatis to 24 h after the release of the porta hepatis were significantly lower in the observation group than in the control group (P < 0.05). Serum I-FABP concentrations in both groups increased from the occlusion of the porta hepatis, peaked at 36 h after the release of the porta hepatis, and declined from 6 h. Serum I-FABP concentrations from the occlusion of the porta hepatis to 24 h after the release of the porta hepatis were significantly lower in the observation group than in the control group (P < 0.05).The incidence of adverse reactions of the digestive system was significantly lower in the observation group than in the control group (12.5% vs 27.5%, P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION: Sevoflurane preconditioning can suppress the body's inflammatory response, reduce the incidence of postoperative digestive system adverse reactions, and mitigate digestive system damage in patients with primary liver cancer undergoing surgery.

Molecular pathways in protecting the liver from ischaemia/reperfusion injury: a 2015 update

Ischaemia/reperfusion injury is an important cause of liver damage during surgical procedures such as hepatic resection and liver transplantation, and represents the main cause of graft dysfunction post-transplantation. Molecular processes occurring during hepatic ischaemia/reperfusion are diverse, and continuously include new and complex mechanisms. The present review aims to summarize the newest concepts and hypotheses regarding the pathophysiology of liver ischaemia/reperfusion, making clear distinction between situations of cold and warm ischaemia. Moreover, the most updated therapeutic strategies including pharmacological, genetic and surgical interventions, as well as some of the scientific controversies in the field are described.

The role of inhalational anesthetic drugs in patients with hepatic dysfunction: a review article

Context:

Anesthetic drugs including halogenated anesthetics have been common for many years. Consequent hepatic injury has been reported in the literature. The mechanism of injury is immunoallergic. The first generation drug was halothane; it had the most toxicity when compared to other drugs. The issue becomes more important when the patient has an underlying hepatic dysfunction.

Evidence Acquisition:

In this paper, reputable internet databases from 1957–2014 were analyzed and 43 original articles, 3 case reports, and 3 books were studied. A search was performed based on the following keywords: inhalational anesthesia, hepatic dysfunction, halogenated anesthetics, general anesthesia in patients with hepatic diseases, and side effects of halogenated anesthetics from reliable databases. Reputable websites like PubMed and Cochrane were used for the searches.

Results:

In patients with hepatic dysfunction in addition to hepatic system and dramatic hemostatic dysfunction, dysfunction of cardiovascular, renal, respiratory, gastrointestinal, and central nervous systems may occur. On the other hand, exposure to inhalational halogenated anesthetics may have a negative impact (similar to hepatitis) on all aforementioned systems in addition to direct effects on liver function as well as the effects are more pronounced in halothane.

Conclusions:

Despite the adverse effects of inhalational halogenated anesthetics (especially halothane) on hepatic patients when necessary. The effects on all systems must be considered and the necessary preparations must be provided. These drugs are still used, if necessary, due to the presence of positive effects and advantages mentioned in other studies as well as the adverse effects of other drugs.

Hepatotoxicity of halogenated inhalational anesthetics

Context:

Halogenated inhalational anesthetics are currently the most common drugs used for the induction and maintenance of general anesthesia. Postoperative hepatic injury has been reported after exposure to these agents. Based on much evidence, mechanism of liver toxicity is more likely to be immunoallergic. The objective of this review study was to assess available studies on hepatotoxicity of these anesthetics.

Evidence Acquisition:

We searched PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus, Index Copernicus, EBSCO and the Cochrane Database using the following keywords: “inhalational Anesthetics” and “liver injury”; “inhalational anesthetics” and “hepatotoxicity”; “volatile anesthetics” and “liver injury”; “volatile anesthetics” and hepatotoxicity for the period of 1966 to 2013. Fifty two studies were included in this work.

Results:

All halogenated inhalational anesthetics are associated with liver injury. Halothane, enflurane, isoflurane and desflurane are metabolized through the metabolic pathway involving cytochrome P-450 2E1 (CYP2E1) and produce trifluoroacetylated components; some of which may be immunogenic. The severity of hepatotoxicity is associated with the degree by which they undergo hepatic metabolism by this cytochrome. However, liver toxicity is highly unlikely from sevoflurane as is not metabolized to trifluoroacetyl compounds.

Conclusions:

Hepatotoxicity of halogenated inhalational anesthetics has been well documented in available literature. Halothane-induced liver injury was extensively acknowledged; however, the next generation halogenated anesthetics have different molecular structures and associated with less hepatotoxicity. Although anesthesia-induced hepatitis is not a common occurrence, we must consider the association between this disorder and the use of halogenated anesthetics.