Indinavir Trough Concentration as a Determinant of Early Nephrolithiasis in HIV-1-Infected Adults

[Nephrotoxicity of antiretrovirals other than tenofovir]

The remarkable improvement of the outcome of HIV infection came with the price of substantial toxicity of some antiretrovirals. The first molecules used to treat HIV included an important nephrotoxicity. Zalcitabine, stavudine and didanosine can induce severe lactic acidosis. Lactate production is enhanced and the renal capacity to regulate pH is overwhelmed. However, this side effect is not due to a direct dysfunction of the kidneys. Zalcitabine was withdrawn from the market because of this risk. Indinavir, a protease inhibitor, is soluble only in very acidic solutions. Consequently, the small fraction that is excreted in the urine precipitates and can be responsible for uro-nephrolithiasis, leukocyturia, cristalluria, obstructive acute kidney failure, and acute or chronic interstitial nephritis. This is the reason why indinavir is almost not prescribed nowadays, even if it is still marketed. In addition to the direct nephrotoxicity of some antiretrovirals, anti-HIV treatment also includes a toxicity which pathophysiology is not completely elucidated. This nephrotoxicity is the consequence of organ accelerated ageing and of an increased vascular risk. Kidney vascularization (from renal arteries to capillaries) is essential to kidney function and all cardiovascular risks are also renal risks. It is now clearly established that combined antiretroviral treatment increases the vascular risk. A better comprehension of the links between HIV infection, its treatment and very long-term kidney risk is needed to improve the complex management of patients who have now cumulated several decades of HIV infection and treatment with various toxicities.

Evaluating the association of single-nucleotide polymorphisms with tenofovir exposure in a diverse prospective cohort of women living with HIV

Higher exposure to tenofovir (TFV) increases the risk for kidney function decline, but the impact of genetic factors on TFV exposure is largely unknown. We investigated whether single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs, n=211) in 12 genes are potentially involved in TFV exposure. Participants (n=91) from the Women's Interagency HIV Study, underwent a 24 h intensive pharmacokinetic sampling of TFV after witnessed dose and TFV area under the time-concentration curves (AUCs) were calculated for each participant. SNPs were assayed using a combination of array genotyping and Sanger sequencing. Linear regression models were applied to logarithmically transformed AUC. Those SNPs that met an a priori threshold of P<0.001 were considered statistically associated with TFV AUC. ABCG2 SNP rs2231142 was associated with TFV AUC with rare allele carriers displaying 1.51-fold increase in TFV AUC (95% confidence interval: 1.26, 1.81; P=1.7 × 10^-5). We present evidence of a moderately strong effect of the rs2231142 SNP in ABCG2 on a 24 h TFV AUC.

Special considerations concerning the use of antiretroviral drugs in children

INTRODUCTION

Antiretroviral therapy is extremely effective in both children and adults infected with HIV. Treatment indications have rapidly expanded; ideally, with rare exceptions, all infected children should now be treated. Areas covered: The use of antiretroviral drugs in children is based largely on extrapolations from experience with adult patients. Pharmacokinetic studies are required in addition to formal studies, which are difficult to conduct in pediatric situations, extending from birth to adolescence. However, despite often inadequate galenic formulation, treatment of children is easier than generally thought. No major or irreversible toxicity has been observed with the latest generation of molecules. Several observations suggest that very early treatment, beginning shortly after birth, provides better long-term immunological control of infection. Expert commentary: All HIV-infected children should be treated with antiretroviral drugs. Manufacturers should propose appropriate dosage forms, including combined forms in particular, and should support pharmacological and tolerance studies in pediatric patients of various ages. Very early treatment maximizes the chances of long-term immunological control.

Cholelithiasis and Nephrolithiasis in HIV-Positive Patients in the Era of Combination Antiretroviral Therapy

Objectives

This study aimed to describe the epidemiology and risk factors of cholelithiasis and nephrolithiasis among HIV-positive patients in the era of combination antiretroviral therapy.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of HIV-positive patients who underwent routine abdominal sonography for chronic viral hepatitis, fatty liver, or elevated aminotransferases between January 2004 and January 2015. Therapeutic drug monitoring of plasma concentrations of atazanavir was performed and genetic polymorphisms, including UDP-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) 1A1*28 and multidrug resistance gene 1 (MDR1) G2677T/A, were determined in a subgroup of patients who received ritonavir-boosted or unboosted atazanavir-containing combination antiretroviral therapy. Information on demographics, clinical characteristics, and laboratory testing were collected and analyzed.

Results

During the 11-year study period, 910 patients who underwent routine abdominal sonography were included for analysis. The patients were mostly male (96.9%) with a mean age of 42.2 years and mean body-mass index of 22.9 kg/m² and 85.8% being on antiretroviral therapy. The anchor antiretroviral agents included non-nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors (49.3%), unboosted atazanavir (34.4%), ritonavir-boosted lopinavir (20.4%), and ritonavir-boosted atazanavir (5.5%). The overall prevalence of cholelithiasis and nephrolithiasis was 12.5% and 8.2%, respectively. Among 680 antiretroviral-experienced patients with both baseline and follow-up sonography, the crude incidence of cholelithiasis and nephrolithiasis was 4.3% and 3.7%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, the independent factors associated with incident cholelithiasis were exposure to ritonavir-boosted atazanavir for >2 years (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 6.29; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.12–35.16) and older age (AOR, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.00–1.09). The positive association between duration of exposure to ritonavir-boosted atazanavir and incident cholelithiasis was also found (AOR, per 1-year exposure, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.05–2.10). The associated factors with incident nephrolithiasis were hyperlipidemia (AOR, 3.97; 95% CI, 1.32–11.93), hepatitis B or C coinfection (AOR, 3.41; 95% CI, 1.09–10.62), and exposure to abacavir (AOR, 12.01; 95% CI, 1.54–93.54). Of 180 patients who underwent therapeutic drug monitoring of plasma atazanavir concentrations and pharmacogenetic investigations, we found that the atazanavir concentrations and UGT 1A1*28 and MDR1 G2677T/A polymorphisms were not statistically significantly associated with incident cholelithiasis and nephrolithiasis.

Conclusions

In HIV-positive patients in the era of combination antiretroviral therapy, a high prevalence of cholelithiasis and nephrolithiasis was observed, and exposure to ritonavir-boosted atazanavir for >2 years was associated with incident cholelithiasis.

Nephrocalcinosis and urolithiasis in children

The incidence of adult urolithiasis has increased significantly in industrialized countries over the past decades. Sound incidence rates are not available for children, nor are they known for nephrocalcinosis, which can appear as a single entity or together with urolithiasis. In contrast to the adult kidney stone patient, where environmental factors are the main cause, genetic and/or metabolic disorders are the main reason for childhood nephrocalcinosis and urolithiasis. While hypercalciuria is considered to be the most frequent risk factor, several other metabolic disorders such as hypocitraturia or hyperoxaluria, as well as a variety of renal tubular diseases, e.g., Dent's disease or renal tubular acidosis, have to be ruled out by urine and/or blood analysis. Associated symptoms such as growth retardation, intestinal absorption, or bone demineralization should be evaluated for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes. Preterm infants are a special risk population with a high incidence of nephrocalcinosis arising from immature kidney, medication, and hypocitraturia. In children, concise evaluation will reveal an underlying pathomechanism in >75% of patients. Early treatment reducing urinary saturation of the soluble by increasing fluid intake and by providing crystallization inhibitors, as well as disease-specific medication, are mandatory to prevent recurrent kidney stones and/or progressive nephrocalcinosis, and consequently deterioration of renal function.

[Evidence-based therapeutic drug monitoring for indinavir]

The HIV protease inhibitor indinavir presents a wide inter-individual variability related to an intense hepatic metabolism. Published studies were analyzed to establish whether there is evidence that therapeutic drug monitoring of indinavir could improve patient care. It was reported that indinavir virological efficacy in HIV-infected patients with wild-type virus was significantly associated with trough concentrations > 100-150 ng/mL. Concerning the exposure-toxicity relationship, the risk of occurrence of nephrotoxicity was more frequently associated with trough concentrations > 500-1 000 ng/mL. Studies with concentration-controlled indinavir therapy suggest that therapeutic drug monitoring allows to achieve safe and effective concentrations, therefore, the level of evidence of the interest of indinavir therapeutic drug monitoring is highly recommended when indinavir is not associated with ritonavir and recommended when ritonavir is combined with ritonavir.

Urologic aspects of HIV infection

Although lifespan has dramatically improved in the human immunodeficiency virus-positive (HIV+) population, HIV and its treatment continue to be a source of substantial morbidity in many organ systems, including the genitourinary tract. As the number of long-term survivors increases with advances in antiretroviral therapy, age-associated urologic symptoms are also becoming increasingly relevant considerations for people living with HIV. Primary care physicians have a major role to play in maintaining the genitourinary health of their HIV+ patients. This role is of great importance not just for the well-being of the individual patient but for the public health, as the genitourinary tract is a common vector for HIV transmission. In this article the authors review the management of the genitourinary system in patients with HIV infection. Particular consideration is given to urinary tract infections, lower urinary tract symptoms, renal insufficiency, sexual and fertility problems, and cancers of the genitourinary tract. Management algorithms are outlined and indications for referral to a urologist are emphasized.

Benefit of therapeutic drug monitoring of protease inhibitors in HIV-infected patients depends on PI used in HAART regimen--ANRS 111 trial

As a result of high inter-patient variability, and efficacy-concentration and toxicity-concentration relationships, optimization of HIV-protease inhibitor (PI) doses based on plasma concentrations could be beneficial. During a 48-week open prospective non-randomized interventional study of 115 protease inhibitor-naïve patients initiating an indinavir/ritonavir- or lopinavir/ritonavir-, or nelfinavir-containing therapy, protease inhibitor dose was modified when plasma trough concentrations (C(trough)) at weeks 2, 8, 16 and 24 were outside predefined optimal concentration ranges. Failure of the strategy was defined as the proportions of patients with HIV-RNA above 200 copies/mL from weeks 24 to 48 and/or experiencing grades 2, 3 or 4 PI-related adverse events during the study; proportion of patients with last C(trough) measurement outside the concentration range was determined at each visit. Virological failure and/or occurrence of adverse event were observed in 37/94 assessable patients (39%; 95% CI: 29.4-50.0). In the on-treatment analysis, failure of the strategy was noted in 16% of indinavir/r- or lopinavir/r-treated patients (8/51; 95% CI: 7.0-28.6; virological failure: 2; adverse event: 6) but in 44% of nelfinavir-treated patients (11/25; 95% CI: 24.4-65.1; virological failure: 10; adverse event: 1); C(trough) concentrations outside the range were less frequent at the last measurement than at W2 (41% vs. 66%; P < 0.05), with proportions of 35% for indinavir/r- or lopinavir/r-treated patients, but 57% for nelfinavir-treated patients. The proposed strategy of therapeutic drug monitoring may be beneficial to indinavir/r- and lopinavir/r-treated patients, but failed to move concentrations into the predefined range and to produce the expected virological success for nelfinavir-treated patients.

Relationship between P-glycoprotein activity measured in peripheral blood mononuclear cells and indinavir bioavailability in healthy volunteers

Indinavir, a HIV-1 protease inhibitor, showed large inter-individual pharmacokinetic variability. It has been proposed as a substrate of P-glycoprotein (P-gp), an efflux transporter, that may contribute to limit indinavir bioavailability. A liquid formulation of indinavir was developed from indinavir capsules in order to study indinavir pharmacokinetics in healthy volunteers. Compartmental and noncompartmental analysis of indinavir plasma concentrations showed high inter-individual variability in terms of area under the curve (AUC) and maximal plasma concentration (C(max)). A significant negative association between AUC normalized to body weight (AUC x weight) and lymphocyte P-gp activity, using Rh123 efflux assay, was observed (p = 0.008; r = -0.75). AUC normalized to elimination rate constant (AUC x beta) also showed a significant negative relationship with lymphocyte P-gp activity (p = 0.03, r = -0.64). Apparent clearance (CL/[F x weight]) and volume of distribution (VD/[F x weight]) showed a positive correlation with P-gp activity. Conversely, elimination rate constant did not correlate with P-gp activity. Although there is not enough evidence of a correlation between lymphocitary and intestinal function of P-gp, our results suggest a relationship between a P-gp phenotype marker, Rh123 efflux assay in lymphocytes, and indinavir bioavailability.

Influence of pharmacogenetics on indinavir disposition and short-term response in HIV patients initiating HAART

AIMS

To assess the relationship between genetic polymorphisms and indinavir pharmacokinetic variability and to study the link between concentrations and short-term response or metabolic safety.

METHODS

Forty protease inhibitor-naive patients initiating highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) including indinavir/ritonavir and enrolled in the COPHAR 2-ANRS 111 trial were studied. At week 2, four blood samples were taken before and up to 6 h following drug intake. A population pharmacokinetic analysis was performed using the stochastic approximation expectation maximization (SAEM) algorithm implemented in MONOLIX software. The area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) and maximum (C(max)) and trough concentrations (C(trough)) of indinavir were derived from the population model and tested for their correlation with short-term viral response and safety measurements, while for ritonavir, these same three parameters were tested for their correlation with short-term biochemical safety

RESULTS

A one-compartment model with first-order absorption and elimination best described both indinavir and ritonavir concentrations. For indinavir, the estimated clearance and volume of distribution were 22.2 L/h and 97.3 L, respectively. The eight patients with the *1B/*1B genotype for the CYP3A4 gene showed a 70% decrease in absorption compared to those with the *1A/*1B or *1A/*1A genotypes (0.5 vs. 2.1, P = 0.04, likelihood ratio test by permutation). The indinavir AUC and C(trough) were positively correlated with the decrease in human immunodeficiency virus RNA between week 0 and week 2 (r = 0.4, P = 0.03 and r = -0.4, P = 0.03, respectively). Patients with the *1B/*1B genotype also had a significantly lower indinavir C(max) (median 3.6, range 2.1-5.2 ng/mL) than those with the *1A/*1B or *1A/*1A genotypes (median 4.4, range 2.2-8.3 ng/mL) (P = 0.04) and a lower increase in triglycerides during the first 4 weeks of treatment (median 0.1, range -0.7 to 1.4 vs. median 0.6, range -0.5 to 1.7 mmol/L, respectively; P = 0.02). For ritonavir, the estimated clearance and volume of distribution were 8.3 L/h and 60.7 L, respectively, and concentrations were not found to be correlated to biochemical safety. Indinavir and ritonavir absorption rate constants were found to be correlated, as well as their apparent volumes of distribution and clearances, indicating correlated bioavailability of the two drugs.

CONCLUSION

The CYP3A4*1B polymorphism was found to influence the pharmacokinetics of indinavir and, to some extent, the biochemical safety of indinavir.

HIV-AIDS: urologic considerations

The prevalence of HIV continues to grow in the United States and worldwide. HIV-positive patients experience many genitourinary disease processes. With improvements in HIV therapy, patients have questions and concerns pertaining to their quality of life. This article reviews conditions such as HIV-related urinary tract infections, urolithiasis, voiding dysfunction, fertility, sexual dysfunction, HIV-related nephropathy, malignancies, and occupational exposure and prophylaxis. Knowledge of the various HIV manifestations of genitourinary conditions and their treatment options benefits clinicians and improves patient outcomes.