The relation between dosage, serum concentrations, and clinical outcome in children and adolescents treated with sertraline: a naturalistic study

Serum Concentration of Antidepressant Drugs in Geriatric Day Care Patients With Renal Insufficiency and Multimorbidity

BACKGROUND

Geriatric depression is challenging to treat owing to age-related changes in pharmacokinetics and comorbidities. Although renal insufficiency and multimorbidity are typical geriatric complications that cannot be completely separated from each other, no study has examined the influence of these factors on the serum concentrations of antidepressants. For the first time, we evaluated the effects of these factors in combination on the dose-corrected serum concentration (C/D) of antidepressants in geriatric patients.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, data from 123 geriatric patients in a gerontopsychiatric day care unit at the University Hospital of Würzburg were analyzed. Multiple linear regression analysis and analysis of variance with confounders were used to examine the associations between glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and stages of renal impairment and the C/D of venlafaxine, mirtazapine, sertraline, and escitalopram corrected for multimorbidity, sex, lithium intake, and the number of triple whammy drugs.

RESULTS

GFR ( P < 0.001, ß = -0.070) was associated with the C/D of the active moiety of venlafaxine (N = 32). GFR, multimorbidity, and sex were not associated with the C/D of mirtazapine, escitalopram, or sertraline.

CONCLUSIONS

As the influence of sex may be less pronounced than that of decreasing GFR in terms of the C/D of the active moiety of venlafaxine in geriatric patients, we recommend considering the GFR for dose adjustment rather than sex. In conclusion, even in patients with mild renal impairment, serum venlafaxine concentration should be monitored to prevent overdosing. Mirtazapine, sertraline, and escitalopram may be well-suited antidepressants for geriatric patients with renal function impairment stage 2-3 as well as multimorbidity.

Electronically Monitored Antidepressant Adherence in Adolescents with Anxiety Disorders: A Pilot Study

Background: Antidepressant medication adherence patterns are inconsistent in adolescents with anxiety and related disorders, and the clinical and demographic features predicting adherence are poorly understood. Methods: In an ongoing single-site prospective trial involving adolescents (aged 12-17) with the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition anxiety disorders treated with escitalopram, adherence was measured for 12 weeks using electronic monitoring caps. Adherence patterns were examined using qualitative and unsupervised clustering approaches, and predictors of adherence were evaluated using logistic regression, with demographic (age, sex, and race) and clinical variables (e.g., anxiety severity [Pediatric Anxiety Rating Scale], irritability [Affective Reactivity Index], depressive symptoms [Children's Depression Rating Scale]). Results: Among adolescents (N = 33) aged 14.5 ± 1.8 years (64% female), four adherence patterns were identified: persistent adherence, intermittent adherence, early adherence-late nonadherence, and nonadherence. In a logistic model of a 5-day moving average measure of adherence, social anxiety disorder (β = -0.68 ± 0.19, p = 0.002) and separation anxiety disorder (β = -0.61 ± 0.18, p < 0.001) were associated with lower adherence. In contrast, panic disorder, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, and depressive symptoms were not associated with adherence. Baseline anxiety severity was linked to lower adherence (β = -0.199 ± 0.05, p < 0.001). Older age also reduced adherence (β = -0.342 ± 0.05, p < 0.001), with each additional year of age increasing time spent nonadherent by 5% (p < 0.001). Being female (β = 0.451 ± 0.17, p = 0.011) and expecting treatment to be efficacious (β = 0.092 ± 0.04, p = 0.011) increased adherence, while greater irritability was associated with nonadherence (β = -0.075 ± 0.03, p = 0.006). Conclusions: Antidepressant adherence is variable, with distinct patterns, and those with social and separation anxiety disorders were less likely to be adherent. Factors such as older age, severe anxiety, and greater irritability predicted lower adherence, while being female and expecting treatment efficacy were associated with better adherence. Interventions that address specific symptoms or enhance treatment expectations may improve adherence.

Smoking blunts sertraline response in depression: A prospective observational cohort study

Background

Smoking is common in patients of depression and is known to affect response to antidepressants. This study was undertaken to evaluate the effect of smoking on the antidepressant effect of sertraline.

Method

Patients with depression were divided into smoker and nonsmoker cohorts and followed up for 8 weeks. Serum sertraline levels were estimated using the high-performance liquid chromatography system. Response to treatment was evaluated with the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D).

Results

Serum sertraline levels did not differ between smokers and nonsmokers at 4 and 8 weeks. Nonsmokers responded better to sertraline than smokers after 8 weeks. Adverse drug reaction profile did not vary between the two groups and was not impacted by serum sertraline levels. Nonsmokers showed a greater fall in the HAM-D score than smokers.

Conclusion

This study found depression among smokers to be less responsive to sertraline. This was not explained by serum sertraline levels. Treatment of depression in smokers with sertraline might require higher doses and duration, with more frequent reviews.

Population pharmacokinetic approach to guide personalized sertraline treatment in Chinese patients

Object: Sertraline is a first-line SSRI for the treatment of depression and has the same effectiveness along with a superior safety profile compared to other medications. There are few population pharmacokinetic (PPK) studies of sertraline and a lack of studies in the Chinese population. Therefore, we performed a PPK analysis of Chinese patients treated with sertraline to identify factors that can influence drug exposure. In addition, the dosing and discontinuation regimen of sertraline when applied to adolescents was explored. Methods: Sertraline serum drug concentration data were collected from 140 hospitalized patients to generate a sertraline PPK dataset, and data evaluation and examination of the effects of covariates on drug exposure in the final model were performed using nonlinear mixed-effects models (NONMEM) and first-order conditional estimation with interaction (FOCE-I). Examining rational medication administration and rational withdrawal of sertraline based on significant covariates and final modeling. Results: A one-compartment model with first-order absorption and elimination of sertraline was developed for Chinese patients with psychiatric disorders. Analysis of covariates revealed that age was a covariate that significantly affected sertraline CL/F (P < 0.01) and that sertraline clearance decreased progressively with aging, whereas other factors had no effect on CL/F and V/F of sertraline. In the age range of 11-79, there were 54 adolescent patients (about 1/3) aged 13-18 years, and the safe and effective optimal daily dose for adolescent patients based on the final model simulations was 50-250 mg/d. For adolescent patients, serum concentration fluctuations were moderate for OD doses of 50 mg and 100 mg, using a fixed dose-descent regimen. For patients with OD doses of 150-200 mg and BID doses of 100-200 mg, a more gradual decrease in serum concentration was achieved with a fixed dose interval of 7 or 14 days for 25 mg as the regimen of descent. Conclusions: To our knowledge, this may be the first PPK study of sertraline in Chinese patients. We found that age was an important factor affecting clearance in Chinese patients taking sertraline. Patients taking sertraline may be exposed to increased amounts of sertraline due to decreased clearance with increasing age. The rational dosing and safe discontinuation of sertraline in adolescent patients can be appropriately referenced to the results of the model simulation, thus providing assistance for individualized dosing in adolescents.

Therapeutic drug monitoring of sertraline in children and adolescents: A naturalistic study with insights into the clinical response and treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder

BACKGROUND

Sertraline is a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor with specific indications in child and adolescent psychiatry. Notwithstanding its frequent use and clinical benefits, the relationship between pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, efficacy, and tolerability of sertraline across indications, particularly in non-adult patients, is not fully understood.

METHOD

This naturalistic therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) study was conducted in a transdiagnostic sample of children and adolescents treated with sertraline (n = 78; mean age, 14.22 ± 2.39; range, 7-18 years) within the prospective multicenter "TDM-VIGIL" project. Associations between dose, serum concentration, and medication-specific therapeutic and side effects based on the Clinical Global Impression scale were examined. Tolerability was measured qualitatively with the 56-item Pediatric Adverse Event Rating Scale.

RESULTS

A strong linear positive dose-serum concentration relationship (with dose explaining 45% of the variance in concentration) and significant effects of weight and co-medication were found. Neither dose nor serum concentration were associated with side effects. An overall mild-to-moderate tolerability profile of sertraline was observed. In contrast with the transdiagnostic analysis that did not indicate an effect of concentration, when split into depression (MDD) and obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) diagnoses, the probability of clinical improvement significantly increased as both dose and concentration increased for OCD, but not for MDD.

CONCLUSIONS

This TDM-flexible-dose study revealed a significant diagnosis-specific effect between sertraline serum concentration and clinical efficacy for pediatric OCD. While TDM already guides clinical decision-making regarding compliance, dose calibration, and drug-drug interactions, combining TDM with other methods, such as pharmacogenetics, may facilitate a personalized medicine approach in psychiatry.

Therapeutic drug monitoring of atomoxetine in children and adolescents with attention-deficit/ hyperactivity disorder: a naturalistic study

The selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor atomoxetine is potentially among the first-line pharmacotherapy options for ADHD. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) with the quantification and interpretation of atomoxetine serum concentrations is used to determine an individual dose followed by an optimal effectiveness and minimal side effects. The aim of this retrospective pharmacokinetic–pharmacodynamic analysis was to derive age-appropriate recommendations for the implementation of TDM to improve the efficacy and tolerability of atomoxetine in children and adolescents. Using the analytical method of high-performance liquid chromatography with UV detection, 94 serum concentrations of 74 patients between 6 and 21 years of age were determined. Therapeutic effectiveness and side effects were evaluated according to the categories “low”, “moderate”, and “significant”. As part of TDM, a time interval with maximum concentrations of 1–3 h after the administration of atomoxetine was determined for blood sampling. In this time interval, a significant correlation between the weight-normalized dose and the serum concentrations was found. The efficacy as well as the tolerability proved to be mainly moderate or significant. A preliminary therapeutic reference range was between 100 and 400 ng/ml. Naturalistic studies have limitations. Therefore, and due to a limited study population, the results have to be regarded as preliminary observations that must be confirmed in further studies. The preliminary therapeutic reference range for children and adolescents proved to be narrower than the reference range for adult patients. However, due to good efficacy and tolerability an exact reference range remained difficult to determine.

[Therapeutic drug monitoring to optimize psychopharmacotherapy in children and adolescents - Update and guidelines for practice]

Therapeutic drug monitoring to optimize psychopharmacotherapy in children and adolescents - Update and guidelines for practice Abstract. Despite the improved evidence base, many uncertainties remain in child and adolescent psychiatric pharmacotherapy about the efficacy and tolerability of drugs, which are often prescribed off-label or in combination therapy in this age group. Because medium- to long-term use is unavoidable in many cases, clinicians should minimize adverse drug reactions as far as possible and tailor an effective dosage to the individual characteristics of the patient. Not only are children and adolescents particularly vulnerable to certain adverse drug effects, they are also exposed to iatrogenic risks from dosing or application errors, which can lead to under- or overdosing with correspondingly negative effects on the success of the therapy. In addition to determining a strict indication, it is therefore essential to establish precise dosage and systematic monitoring of the safety of the psychopharmacotherapy. This article introduces therapeutic drug monitoring as a useful clinical tool and describes how its correct application in practice can improve the efficacy as well as the safety and tolerability of psychotropic therapy in children and adolescents for the immediate benefit of patients. Keywords: Psychopharmacotherapy, adverse drug reactions, pharmacovigilance, therapeutic drug monitoring, quality assurance.

Sertraline dosing trends in children and adolescents stratified by CYP2C19 genotype

Aim: Sertraline is a CYP2C19 substrate commonly prescribed to children with anxiety. Materials & methods: This medical record review examined dosing trends and treatment discontinuation in children prescribed sertraline with documented CYP2C19 genotypes. Variables collected included age, weight, diagnosis, concomitant medications, initial sertraline dose, dose changes and CYP2C19 genotypes. Results: A total of 90 individuals (average age: 10.5 years; 40% female) were included. Nearly 80% were prescribed sertraline for anxiety. Initial weight-adjusted doses were similar, but mean weight-adjusted doses of sertraline were 65% higher in increased metabolizers (1.5 mg/kg/day) compared with normal metabolizers (0.91 mg/kg/day; p = 0.067) at the second dose change. Conclusion: While all children started at a similar sertraline dose, different trends in prescribed doses were observed across CYP2C19 genotypes at subsequent dose changes.

Psychotropic drug concentrations and clinical outcomes in children and adolescents: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

The use of psychotropic drugs in children and adolescents is widespread but associated with suboptimal treatment effects. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) can improve safety of psychotropic drugs in children and adolescents but is not routinely performed. A major reason is that the relationship between drug concentrations and effects is not well known.

AREAS COVERED

This systematic review evaluated studies assessing the relationship between psychotropic drug concentrations and clinical outcomes in children and adolescents, including antipsychotics, psychostimulants, alpha-agonists, antidepressants, and mood-stabilizers. PRISMA guidelines were used and a quality assessment of the retrieved studies was performed. Sixty-seven eligible studies involving 24 psychotropic drugs were identified from 9,298 records. The findings were generally heterogeneous and the majority of all retrieved studies were not of sufficient quality. For 11 psychotropic drugs, a relationship between drug concentrations and side-effects and/or effectiveness was evidenced in reasonably reported and executed studies, but these findings were barely replicated.

EXPERT OPINION

In order to better support routine TDM in child- and adolescent psychiatry, future work must improve in aspects of study design, execution and reporting to demonstrate drug concentration-effect relationships. The quality criteria proposed in this work can guide future TDM research. Systematic review protocol and registration PROSPERO CRD42018084159.

Concentration-Effect Relationships of Psychoactive Drugs and the Problem to Calculate Therapeutic Reference Ranges

BACKGROUND

Despite the obvious potential of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring (TDM) as a tool to optimize psychopharmacotherapy, especially treatment with mood-stabilizing, antidepressant and antipsychotic drugs, acceptance of TDM as a routine tool is still limited. A serious scientific argument against the regular use of TDM is the lack of evidence for a concentration-dependent clinical effect. The aim of this review was to highlight methodological problems leading to poor or even negative concentration-effect relationships and to show how therapeutically effective concentrations of psychoactive drugs can be determined using routine TDM databases.

METHODS

Reports on concentration-effect relationships of psychoactive drugs were analyzed with regard to applied methods. From routine TDM databases of patients who had been treated with antidepressant or antipsychotic drugs and whose improvement was measured by the clinical global impressions scale, mean and median drug concentrations were calculated and compared with reference ranges recommended by TDM guidelines.

RESULTS

Few fixed-dose studies with adequate design and data analysis demonstrated a correlation between drug concentration and clinical effect for psychoactive drugs. Most studies, however, mostly retrospective analyses of TDM databases, failed to find significant concentration-effect relationships because of flexible dosing. They were not suitable for the determination of therapeutically effective drug concentrations. Using TDM databases of antidepressant and antipsychotic drug concentrations in blood of patients who were categorized as responders by the clinical global impressions score, the interquartile ranges of drug concentrations (25th-75th percent range) can be shown to be very close to the therapeutic reference ranges recommended in guidelines for TDM in psychiatry.

CONCLUSIONS

This review provides a discussion on why simple correlation analyses of psychoactive drug concentrations in blood and clinical effects are obsolete for flexible-dose studies or TDM databases. TDM databases, however, can and should be used to calculate drug concentrations in blood of patients who had responded to the drugs. Interquartile ranges can be regarded and used as preliminary therapeutic reference ranges.

CYP2C19-Guided Escitalopram and Sertraline Dosing in Pediatric Patients: A Pharmacokinetic Modeling Study

Objective: Cytochrome P4502C19 (CYP2C19) is a highly polymorphic gene that encodes an enzyme that metabolizes escitalopram and sertraline, two selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) that are FDA approved for pediatric use and commonly used to treat anxiety and depressive disorders in youth. Using pharmacokinetic (PK) models in adolescents, we sought to (1) model SSRI dosing across CYP2C19 phenotypes to compare SSRI exposure (area under curve, AUC) and maximum concentration (Cmax), (2) evaluate the impact of b.i.d. dosing (in rapid metabolizers [RM] and ultrarapid metabolizers [UM]) on SSRI exposure and Cmax, and (3) determine pharmacogenomically-informed dosing strategies to provide similar exposure across CYP2C19 phenotypes in adolescents. Methods: Using PK parameters in CYP2C19 phenotype groups and previously reported pediatric PK data for escitalopram and sertraline, we modeled exposure (AUC0-24) and Cmax and determined CYP2C19-guided dosing strategies. Results: Compared with normal CYP2C19 metabolizers treated with either escitalopram or sertraline, Cmax and AUC0-24 were higher in slower metabolizers and lower in patients with increased CYP2C19 activity, although the magnitude of these differences was more pronounced for escitalopram than for sertraline. For escitalopram, poor metabolizers (PMs) require 10 mg/day and UMs require 30 mg/day to achieve an exposure that is equivalent to 20 mg/day in a normal metabolizer (NM). For sertraline, to achieve AUC0-24 and Cmax similar to NMs receiving 150 mg/day, PMs require 100 mg/day, whereas a dose of 200 mg/day was required in rapid and UMs. For UMs, b.i.d. escitalopram dosing was necessary to achieve comparable trough levels and exposure to NMs. Conclusions: This simulation study raises the possibility that achieving similar escitalopram and sertraline plasma concentrations could require dose adjustments in CYP2C19 poor metabolizers and UMs, although the magnitude of these differences were more pronounced for escitalopram than for sertraline. However, prospective trials of pharmacogenomically guided dosing in the pediatric population are needed to extend the findings of these modeling studies.

Sertraline Pharmacokinetics in HIV-Infected and Uninfected Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults

Objective: Due to potential disease and drug interactions, the appropriate sertraline starting dose and titration range may require adjustment in pediatric patients living with HIV. This is the first report of sertraline pharmacokinetics in HIV-infected youth. Methods: IMPAACT P1080 was a multicenter pilot study describing psychiatric medication pharmacokinetics in HIV-infected and uninfected youth. Participants were stable on sertraline, >6 to <25 years old, and (1) HIV-uninfected (HIV(-)), (2) HIV-infected taking efavirenz (EFV), or (3) HIV-infected taking boosting ritonavir/protease inhibitor (PI/r). Sampling occurred at pre-dose, 2, 4, 6, 12, and 24-h post-dose. Analyses were performed for sertraline and N-desmethylsertraline, and CYP2D6 phenotyping was completed with dextromethorphan. Results: Thirty-one participants (16 HIV(-), 12 PI/r, and 3 EFV) had median (range) weight, age, and dose of 69.5 (31.5-118.2) kg, 21.8 (9.1-24.7) years, and 75.0 (12.5-150.0) mg once daily. Sertraline exposure was highest for HIV(-) and lowest for EFV cohorts; median dose-normalized AUC _0-24 was 1176 (HIV(-)), 791 (PI/r) and 473 (EFV) ng^*hr/mL, and C₂₄ was 32.7 (HIV(-)), 20.1 (PI/r), and 12.8 (EFV) ng/mL. The urinary dextromethorphan/dextrorphan (DXM/DXO) ratio was higher in HIV(-) vs. PI/r cohorts (p = 0.01). Four HIV(-) participants were CYP2D6 poor metabolizers (ln(DXM/DXO) of >-0.5). Conclusions: HIV(-) cohort had the highest sertraline exposure. Sertraline exposure was ~40% lower in the PI/r cohort than in HIV(-); the need to alter sertraline dose ranges for PI/r participants is not clear. The impact of efavirenz on sertraline needs further investigation due to limited numbers of EFV participants.

[Polypharmacy of psychotropic drugs in child and adolescent psychiatry in Germany - rather the rule than the exception]

Polypharmacy of psychotropic drugs in child and adolescent psychiatry in Germany - rather the rule than the exception Abstract. Background: Polypharmacy increases the risk of interactions and enhances the chance of adverse drug reactions (ADRs). Hence, child and adolescent psychiatrists generally try to avoid polypharmacy with psychotropic drugs. However, only little data regarding the frequency of polypharmacy in child and adolescent psychiatry are available. This study analyzes clinical data on polypharmacy and the possible association with a higher risk of ADRs in Germany, with a focus on antidepressants and antipsychotics. Methods: We investigated a total of 940 datasets from descriptive studies on therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of pediatric patients treated with different psychotropic drugs. Results: The frequency of polypharmacy ranged up to 45.6 % (escitalopram) and 72.1 % (olanzapine). In 17.4 % of the cases, polypharmacy consisted of four or more psycho-/neuropharmacological substances. No increased incidence of ADRs was reported with polypharmacy of antipsychotics compared to monotherapy. Polypharmacy with sertraline was associated with a higher number of ADRs. Discussion and Conclusion: There is a high prevalence of polypharmacy with psychotropic drugs in child and adolescent psychiatry in Germany. Conclusions concerning individual drugs should be drawn with care since the subsample sizes were relatively small. However, our results do provide an indication of the prevalence of polypharmacy, although the validity of the data is limited. There is an urgent need to analyze data from larger and more homogeneous groups under more controlled conditions.

Smoking and antidepressants pharmacokinetics: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Despite an increasingly recognized relationship between depression and smoking, little is known about how smoking influences antidepressant response and treatment outcomes. The aim of this study was to systematically review the evidence of the impact of smoking on new-generation antidepressants with an emphasis on the pharmacokinetic perspective.

METHODS

We present a systematic review of clinical trials comparing the serum levels of new-generation antidepressants in smokers and nonsmokers. Data were obtained from MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, and other sources. Risk of bias was assessed for selection, performance, detection, attrition, and reporting of individual studies.

RESULTS

Twenty-one studies met inclusion criteria; seven involved fluvoxamine, two evaluated fluoxetine, sertraline, venlafaxine, duloxetine or mirtazapine, and escitalopram, citalopram, trazodone and bupropion were the subject of a single study. No trials were found involving other common antidepressants such as paroxetine or agomelatine. Serum levels of fluvoxamine, duloxetine, mirtazapine and trazodone were significantly higher in nonsmokers compared with smokers.

CONCLUSIONS

There is evidence showing a reduction in the concentration of serum levels of fluvoxamine, duloxetine, mirtazapine and trazodone in smoking patients as compared to nonsmokers. The evidence regarding other commonly used antidepressants is scarce. Nonetheless, smoking status should be considered when choosing an antidepressant treatment, given the risk of pharmacokinetic interactions.

Therapeutic drug monitoring as a measure of proactive pharmacovigilance in child and adolescent psychiatry

INTRODUCTION

Off-label or unlicensed use of psychotropic drugs is common rather than the exception in child and adolescent psychiatry. This use exposes patients to an unknown additional risk of ineffective or even harmful treatment. In addition, treatment with psychotropic drugs during a period of life when the patient undergoes marked developmental hormonal and neurobiological changes often requires different dosing regimes in later life and may result in adverse drug reactions, which are either not seen in adults at all or not in the same frequency. Areas covered: Given these critical safety issues, efficient pharmacovigilance methods as part of routine practice are essential for the improvement of patient care. The purpose of this article is to introduce methods to increase the safety of psychotropic drug use in youngsters. In particular, therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) as a routine measure of proactive pharmacovigilance is discussed. Expert opinion: Given the special features of psychopharmacological therapy in children and adolescents in day-to-day clinical practise, proactive surveillance by using a close standardized 'patient monitoring' and long-term follow-up with TDM is very important. This approach could minimize the risk of exposing paediatric patients to ineffective treatments of uncertain or unknown risks.

[Pharmacovigilance in child and adolescent psychiatry]

Rational pharmacotherapy is a challenging task in child and adolescent psychiatry. Increasing prescription numbers contrast with the uncertainties of safety and efficacy issues. The lack of clinical (authorization) trials often implies a non- age-specific use of drugs. However, young patients show particular metabolic conditions and a higher vulnerability for adverse drug reactions. Thus it seems mandatory to create age-specific pharmacological data about efficacy and safety of psychotropic drug use in minors. Legislation authorities became aware of this situation and introduced European and national scientific pharmacovigilance regulations and programmes accordingly in order to continuously evaluate the benefit-risk-ratio, detect, collect, minimize, and prevent adverse effects of drugs by appropriate measures, e.g., therapeutic drug monitoring. In this paper the principles and needs of pharmacovigilance in child and adolescent psychiatry are discussed. Furthermore a large multicenter clinical trial («TDM-VIGIL»), funded by the German Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices, is presented, which appeals to collect epidemiological prescription and safety data of psychotropic drugs in children and adolescents using an internet-based data infrastructure (patient registry).