Development of a Sensitive Phospho-p70 S6 Kinase ELISA to Quantify mTOR Proliferation Signal Inhibition

Immunosuppression Monitoring-What Clinician Needs to Know?

The liver is well known for its immunotolerance, but rejection without immunosuppression is frequently encountered post liver transplantation, especially in humans.1 Indeed, the amount of immunosuppression required post liver transplant is less compared to other organ transplants like kidney, heart, and intestine.2 Reports of successful weaning of immunosuppression have been reported but are not practiced for fear of unwanted alloimmune response leading to rejection. Life-long immunosuppression is needed in most patients for graft survival but is associated with side effects like renal dysfunction, metabolic abnormalities, or risk of de novo malignancies. Also, the appropriate dose of immunosuppression to achieve adequate graft function and prevention of toxicities is very important. One shoe does not fit all. There are significant individual variations in response and side effect profile. Also, the level of immunosuppression varies with the underlying liver disease like autoimmune disease requires higher immunosuppression. Thus, monitoring the adequate immunosuppression with the minimization of drug toxicity is imperative post-transplant. Unfortunately, the current methods for immunosuppression monitoring rely on testing the immunosuppressive drug levels rather than the immune system activity. We have discussed the concept of alloreactivity, available methods of immunosuppression and drug monitoring and investigational methods in this review.

Pharmacodynamic Monitoring of mTOR Inhibitors

Pharmacodynamic (PD) monitoring may complement routine pharmacokinetic monitoring of mTOR inhibitors (mTORis) in an attempt to better guide individualized sirolimus (SRL) or everolimus (EVR) treatment after organ transplantation. This review focuses on current knowledge about PD biomarkers for personalized mTORi therapies. Different strategies have already been used in the evaluation of the pharmacodynamics of SRL and EVR as a proxy for their effects on the immune response after transplantation. These include measuring p70S6K (70 kDa ribosomal protein S6 kinase) activity, p70S6K phosphorylation (P-p70S6K), or P-S6 protein expression. Compared with Western blot and ELISA, phosphoflow cytometry can detect phosphorylated proteins and differentiate activation-induced changes of signaling molecules inside the cell from unstimulated populations of identical cells in the same sample. Alternatively, in patients receiving a combined therapy, the other PD approach is to consider biomarkers such as NFAT residual expression for calcineurin inhibitors or to evaluate nonspecific effects of the drugs such as lymphocyte proliferation, interleukin synthesis, specific peripheral blood T regulatory subsets, or lymphocyte surface antigens, which have the advantage to reflect the overall immunosuppressive status achieved. Although limited, the available data on mTOR pathway biomarkers seem promising. Before clinical implementation, the analytical methodologies must be standardized and cross-validated, and the selected biomarkers will have to demonstrate their clinical utility for SRL or EVR dose individualization in multicenter clinical trials.

Immunologic Monitoring to Personalize Immunosuppression After Liver Transplant

Although immunosuppressive drugs have enhanced patient outcomes in transplantation, the liver transplant community has made significant research efforts into the discovery of more accurate and precise methods of posttransplant monitoring and diagnosing. Current research in biomarkers reveals many promising approaches.

Barcelona Consensus on Biomarker-Based Immunosuppressive Drugs Management in Solid Organ Transplantation

With current treatment regimens, a relatively high proportion of transplant recipients experience underimmunosuppression or overimmunosuppression. Recently, several promising biomarkers have been identified for determining patient alloreactivity, which help in assessing the risk of rejection and personal response to the drug; others correlate with graft dysfunction and clinical outcome, offering a realistic opportunity for personalized immunosuppression. This consensus document aims to help tailor immunosuppression to the needs of the individual patient. It examines current knowledge on biomarkers associated with patient risk stratification and immunosuppression requirements that have been generally accepted as promising. It is based on a comprehensive review of the literature and the expert opinion of the Biomarker Working Group of the International Association of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Clinical Toxicology. The quality of evidence was systematically weighted, and the strength of recommendations was rated according to the GRADE system. Three types of biomarkers are discussed: (1) those associated with the risk of rejection (alloreactivity/tolerance), (2) those reflecting individual response to immunosuppressants, and (3) those associated with graft dysfunction. Analytical aspects of biomarker measurement and novel pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic models accessible to the transplant community are also addressed. Conventional pharmacokinetic biomarkers may be used in combination with those discussed in this article to achieve better outcomes and improve long-term graft survival. Our group of experts has made recommendations for the most appropriate analysis of a proposed panel of preliminary biomarkers, most of which are currently under clinical evaluation in ongoing multicentre clinical trials. A section of Next Steps was also included, in which the Expert Committee is committed to sharing this knowledge with the Transplant Community in the form of triennial updates.

Analytical Aspects of the Implementation of Biomarkers in Clinical Transplantation

In response to the urgent need for new reliable biomarkers to complement the guidance of the immunosuppressive therapy, a huge number of biomarker candidates to be implemented in clinical practice have been introduced to the transplant community. This includes a diverse range of molecules with very different molecular weights, chemical and physical properties, ex vivo stabilities, in vivo kinetic behaviors, and levels of similarity to other molecules, etc. In addition, a large body of different analytical techniques and assay protocols can be used to measure biomarkers. Sometimes, a complex software-based data evaluation is a prerequisite for appropriate interpretation of the results and for their reporting. Although some analytical procedures are of great value for research purposes, they may be too complex for implementation in a clinical setting. Whereas the proof of "fitness for purpose" is appropriate for validation of biomarker assays used in exploratory drug development studies, a higher level of analytical validation must be achieved and eventually advanced analytical performance might be necessary before diagnostic application in transplantation medicine. A high level of consistency of results between laboratories and between methods (if applicable) should be obtained and maintained to make biomarkers effective instruments in support of therapeutic decisions. This overview focuses on preanalytical and analytical aspects to be considered for the implementation of new biomarkers for adjusting immunosuppression in a clinical setting and highlights critical points to be addressed on the way to make them suitable as diagnostic tools. These include but are not limited to appropriate method validation, standardization, education, automation, and commercialization.

Rapamycin and WYE-354 suppress human gallbladder cancer xenografts in mice

Gallbladder cancer (GBC) is a highly malignant tumor characterized by a poor response to chemotherapy and radiotherapy. We evaluated the in vitro and in vivo antitumor efficacy of mTOR inhibitors, rapamycin and WYE-354. In vitro assays showed WYE-354 significantly reduced cell viability, migration and invasion and phospho-P70S6K expression in GBC cells. Mice harboring subcutaneous gallbladder tumors, treated with WYE-354 or rapamycin, exhibited a significant reduction in tumor mass. A short-term treatment with a higher dose of WYE-354 decreased the tumor size by 68.6% and 52.4%, in mice harboring G-415 or TGBC-2TKB tumors, respectively, compared to the control group. By contrast, treatment with a prolonged-low-dose regime of rapamycin almost abrogated tumor growth, exhibiting 92.7% and 97.1% reduction in tumor size, respectively, compared to control mice. These results were accompanied by a greater decrease in the phosphorylation status of P70S6K and a lower cell proliferation Ki67 index, compared to WYE-354 treated mice, suggesting a more effective mTOR pathway inhibition. These findings provide a proof of concept for the use of rapamycin or WYE-354 as potentially good candidates to be studied in clinical trials in GBC patients.

Performance of a phosphoflow assay to determine phosphorylation of S6 ribosomal protein as a pharmacodynamic read out for mTOR inhibition

OBJECTIVES

The S6 ribosomal protein (S6RP) is phosphorylated by the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR). The objective of this study was to assess the analytical suitability of a commercial kit-based phosphoflow cytometry protocol using whole blood (WBS) to measure the level of phosphorylated S6RP (p-S6RP) in T-cell subsets to study the pharmacodynamic effects of mTOR inhibitors (mTORi).

DESIGN AND METHODS

A kit was used for fixation and permeabilization of mitogen-stimulated cells, and p-S6RP was assessed separately in CD3+CD4+ and CD3+CD8+ cells by employing an anti-phospho-Ser235/236 antibody. Specificity, linearity, within-run precision and stability were investigated in either WBS spiked with everolimus and non-mTORi immunosuppressants or in WBS from patients on immunosuppressive therapy (n=56). In addition, healthy controls (n=10) and patients without immunosuppression (n=10) were included. A comparison (n=15) with an established western blot method based on anti-phospho p70S6 kinase (Thr389) was made by splitting WBS.

RESULTS

Everolimus decreased p-S6RP in vitro concentration dependently (0.00-27.4μg/L). This effect was also confirmed in vivo after a single dose of everolimus to healthy volunteers (n=3). However, spiking WBS with 500μg/L cyclosporine also decreased p-S6RP. The within-run coefficient of variation was <18% in transplant patients and <27% in healthy controls for both cell subsets. Sample stability for p-S6RP analysis was limited (<24h). p-S6RP was significantly decreased in CD3+CD8+ cells of patients treated with sirolimus (p=0.02) but not with everolimus. No significant correlation between the phosphoflow- and western blot method was noted.

CONCLUSION

The phosphoflow assay of p-S6RP performed well analytically, but sample stability, specificity, and method comparison results question its fitness for clinical purposes.

mTOR controls lysosome tubulation and antigen presentation in macrophages and dendritic cells

Macrophages and dendritic cells exposed to lipopolysaccharide (LPS) convert their lysosomes from small, punctate organelles into a network of tubules. Tubular lysosomes have been implicated in phagosome maturation, retention of fluid phase, and antigen presentation. There is a growing appreciation that lysosomes act as sensors of stress and the metabolic state of the cell through the kinase mTOR. Here we show that LPS stimulates mTOR and that mTOR is required for LPS-induced lysosome tubulation and secretion of major histocompatibility complex II in macrophages and dendritic cells. Specifically, we show that the canonical phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-Akt-mTOR signaling pathway regulates LPS-induced lysosome tubulation independently of IRAK1/4 and TBK. Of note, we find that LPS treatment augmented the levels of membrane-associated Arl8b, a lysosomal GTPase required for tubulation that promotes kinesin-dependent lysosome movement to the cell periphery, in an mTOR-dependent manner. This suggests that mTOR may interface with the Arl8b-kinesin machinery. To further support this notion, we show that mTOR antagonists can block outward movement of lysosomes in cells treated with acetate but have no effect in retrograde movement upon acetate removal. Overall our work provides tantalizing evidence that mTOR plays a role in controlling lysosome morphology and trafficking by modulating microtubule-based motor activity in leukocytes.

Drug target molecules to guide immunosuppression

The individual and interindividual variability of response to immunosuppressants combined with the prevailing concept of lifelong immunosuppression following any organ transplantation motivates the search for methods to further individualize such therapy. Traditional therapeutic drug monitoring, adapting dose according to concentrations in blood, targets the pharmacokinetic variability. It has been increasingly recognized, however, that there is also a considerable variability in the response to a given concentration. Attempts to overcome this variability in response include the efforts to identify relevant targets and methods for pharmacodynamic monitoring. For several of the currently used immunosuppressants there is experimental data suggesting markers that are relevant as indicators for individual monitoring of the effects of these drugs. There are also some clinical data to support these approaches; however what is generally missing, are studies that in a prospective manner demonstrates the benefits and effects on outcome. The monitoring of antithymocyte globulin by lymphocyte subset counts is actually the only well established example of pharmacodynamic monitoring. For drugs such as MPA and mTOR inhibitors, there are candidates such as IMPDH activity expression and p70SK6 phosphorylation status, respectively. The monitoring of CNIs using assays for NFAT RGE, either alone or combined with concentration measurements, is already well documented. Even here, some further investigations relating to the categories of organ transplant, combination of immunosuppressants etc. will be requested. Although some further standardization of the assay is warranted and there is a need for specific recommendations of target levels and how to adjust dose, the NFAT RGE approach to pharmacodynamic monitoring of CNIs may be close to implementation in clinical routine.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of immunosuppressive drugs in elderly kidney transplant recipients

Elderly patients are a fast growing population among transplant recipients over the past decades. Both the innate and adaptive immune reactivity decrease with age, which is believed to contribute to the decreased incidence of acute rejection and increased infectious death rate in elderly transplant recipients. In contrast to recipient age, donor age is associated with a higher incidence of acute rejection. Pharmacokinetic studies in renal transplant recipients show that CNI troughs are >5% higher in elderly compared to younger patients given the same dose normalized by body weight. This may impact the starting dose of tacrolimus and cyclosporine. Possibly in elderly patients the intracellular (in lymphocyte) concentrations are relatively high in relation to the whole blood concentration, resulting in a stronger pharmacodynamic effect at the same whole blood trough concentration. For cyclosporine this has been shown, but it is not clear if the same is true for other immunosuppressive drugs. Pharmacodynamic studies have compared the inhibition of target enzymes, or more downstream effects of immunosuppressive drugs, in younger and older patients. Measurement of nuclear factor of activated T-cell (NFAT)-regulated gene expression (RGE), a pharmacodynamic read-out of CNI, is a promising biomarker of immunosuppression. Low levels of NFAT RGE are associated with increased risk of infection and non-melanoma skin cancer in elderly patients. Clinical trials to evaluate the safety and efficacy of immunosuppression regimens in this specific patient population, which is underrepresented in published trials, are lacking. More studies in elderly patients are needed to investigate the impact of age on the pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics of immunosuppressive drugs, and to decide on the optimal regimen and target levels for elderly transplant recipients.