What to do after a mid-urethral sling fails

Bulking agents for the treatment of recurrent stress urinary incontinence: a suitable option?

BACKGROUND

The management of recurrent female stress urinary incontinence (SUI) still needs worldwide standardization. Few data on the role of urethral bulking agents (UBA) for the treatment of recurrent stress urinary incontinence exist. The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of urethral bulking agents for the treatment of recurrent SUI.

METHODS

A multicenter, prospective study was conducted in four tertiary referral centers in two countries. All consecutive women with urodynamically-proven recurrent SUI, and with a history of previous failed anti-incontinence surgical procedure (mid-urethral sling or single incision sling), treated by UBAs were included. We evaluated only patients who completed at least a 3-year follow-up. Data regarding subjective outcomes (International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form, Patient Global Impression of Improvement, Urogenital Distress Inventory score and patient satisfaction score), objective cure (stress test) rates, and adverse events were collected during follow-up. Univariable and multivariable analyses was performed to investigate outcomes.

RESULTS

Forty-seven consecutive patients were enrolled. At 3-year follow-up, all women were available for the evaluation. At 3 years after surgery, 38 of 47 patients (81%) declared themselves cured. Similarly, at 3-year evaluation, 39 of 47 patients (83%) were objectively cured. Only five patients (10.6%) required re-operation for UBA failure. The urodynamic diagnosis of preoperative detrusor overactivity and the PDet Max filling phase ≥15 cmH2O (hazard ratio: 2.74; 95% CI, 1.64-10.7; P=0.009 and 1.62; 95% CI, 1.11-3.42; P=0.04, respectively) were the only predictors of failure. Only four complications were reported (8.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

The 3-year results of this study showed that bulking agents is an appropriately effective and safe option for the treatment of recurrent SUI. The presence of preoperative concomitant detrusor overactivity is associated with a significant decrease of the efficacy of this procedure.

Urethral bulking agents for the treatment of recurrent stress urinary incontinence: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Recurrent stress urinary incontinence (rSUI) represents a major challenge for most clinicians as there is little evidence in the literature on the best option after sling failure. The objective of this study is to summarise the findings on the use of urethral bulking agents (UBAs) in the management of rSUI after the failure of a mid-urethral sling (MUSs). We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis, according to PRISMA 2020 guidelines, and selected eleven publications for inclusion in the analysis. We found that the overall cure and improvement rate ranged from 64% to 85% in the included studies, with a pooled value of 75%, compared with pooled failure and re-operation rates of 32% (95% CI: 22%-43%) and 25% (95% CI: 17%-34%), respectively. The I2 test indicated significant statistical heterogeneity among the studies in relation to all the outcome measures; however, no risk of publication bias was found. To explore this heterogeneity in more depth, we performed a sub-group analysis of the two most commonly used bulking agents (Bulkamid and Macroplastique). The pooled values of the cure and improvement rate were 84% (95% CI: 77.0%-90.0%) and 80% (95% CI: 74.0%-85.0%) for Macroplastique and Bulkamid, respectively. We did not find significant heterogeneity or significant differences in the outcome measures in either group. For the first time in literature, our study provides an insight into the use of UBAs after failed MUSs. Although the results seem very promising, future studies with shared protocols are needed in order to recommend the use of UBAs in the treatment of recurrent cases.