Racial disparities in early pregnancy: a narrative review

Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Sacrocolpopexy Approach

IMPORTANCE

Racial inequity elevates risk for certain diagnoses and health disparities. Current data show disparities for Black women when comparing open versus minimally invasive hysterectomy. It is unknown if a similar disparity exists in surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to determine whether racial or ethnic disparities exist for open abdominal versus minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy.

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional data of the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project National Inpatient Sample and the Nationwide Ambulatory Surgery Sample for the year 2019 was used. Bivariate analysis identified demographic and perioperative differences between abdominal versus minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy, which were compared in a multivariable logistic regression.

RESULTS

Forty-one thousand eight hundred thirty-seven patients underwent sacrocolpopexy: 35,820 (85.6%), minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy, and 6,016, (14.4%) abdominal sacrocolpopexy. In an unadjusted analysis, Black patients were more likely to undergo an abdominal sacrocolpopexy compared to non-Hispanic White patients (OR 2.14, 95% CI 1.16-3.92, P <0.01). Hispanic patients were more likely to undergo abdominal sacrocolpopexy compared to non-Hispanic White patients (OR 1.69, 95% CI 1.26-2.26, P <0.001). Other factors associated with abdominal sacrocolpopexy are zip code quartile, payer status, composite comorbidity score, hospital control, and hospital bed size. In the regression model, Black patients remained more likely to undergo abdominal sacrocolpopexy compared to those who identified as White (aOR 2, 95% CI 1.26-3.16, P < 0.003). Hispanic patients were more likely to undergo abdominal sacrocolpopexy compared to those who identified as White (aOR 1.73, 95% CI 1.31-2.28, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Abdominal sacrocolpopexy was more likely to occur in patients who identified as Black or Hispanic.

Diversity in Mission Statements and Among Students at US Medical Schools Accredited Since 2000

Importance

Diversity in the physician workforce improves patient care and decreases health disparities. Recent calls for social justice have highlighted the importance of medical school commitment to diversity and social justice, and newly established medical schools are uniquely positioned to actively fulfill the social mission of medicine.

Objective

To identify diversity language in the mission statements of all medical schools accredited since 2000 and to determine whether the presence of diversity language was associated with increased diversity in the student body.

Design, Setting, and Participants

Cross-sectional study of public websites conducted between January 6, 2023, and March 31, 2023. Qualitative content analysis of mission statements was conducted using a deductive approach. Eligible schools were identified from the 2021-2022 Medical School Admission Requirements and American Medical Colleges and American Association of Colleges of Osteopathic Medicine websites. Each school's publicly available website was also reviewed for its mission and student body demographics. All United States allopathic and osteopathic medical schools that have been accredited and have enrolled students since 2000.

Exposure

Content analysis of medical school mission statements.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Prevalence of diversity language in medical school mission statements and its association with student body racial diversity. Data were analyzed in 5-year groupings: 2001 to 2005, 2006 to 2010, 2011 to 2015, and 2016 to 2020).

Results

Among the 60 new medical schools (33 [55%] allopathic and 27 [45%] osteopathic; 6927 total students), 33 (55%) incorporated diversity language into their mission statements. In 2022, American Indian or Alaska Native individuals accounted for 0.26% of students (n = 18), Black or African American students constituted 5% (n = 368), and Hispanic or Latinx individuals made up 12% (n = 840). The percentage of schools with diversity language in their mission statements did not change significantly in schools accredited across time frames (60% in 2001: mean [SE], 0.60 [0.24] vs 50% in 2020: mean [SE], 0.50 [0.11]). The percentage of White students decreased significantly over the time period (26% vs 15% students in 2001-2005 and 2016-2020, respectively; P < .001). No significant differences were observed in student body racial or ethnic composition between schools with mission statements that included diversity language and those without.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this cross-sectional study of US medical schools accredited since 2000, diversity language was present in approximately half of the schools' mission statements and was not associated with student body diversity. Future studies are needed to identify the barriers to increasing diversity in all medical schools.