1
|
Marchand GJ, Masoud AT, Galitsky A, Sainz K, Azadi A, Ware K, Vallejo J, Anderson S, King A, Ruther S, Brazil G, Cieminski K, Hopewell S, Syed M. Complications of Laparoscopic and Transabdominal Cerclage in Patients with Cervical Insufficiency: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2021; 28:759-768.e2. [PMID: 33249271 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2020.11.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2020] [Revised: 10/21/2020] [Accepted: 11/16/2020] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Cervical insufficiency is a defect of the cervix that leads to failure to preserve a full-term intrauterine pregnancy. Laparoscopic cerclage and open transabdominal cerclage (TAC) are effective ways to manage patients with cervical insufficiency. We performed this systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the complications of laparoscopic cerclage and open TAC in the management of cervical insufficiency. DATA SOURCES We searched PubMed, Cochrane, Scopus, and Web of Science using our search strategy and screened the results for our criteria. We extracted the results reported and analyzed them using Open Meta-Analyst (OpenMeta[Analyst], Brown School of Public Health, Providence, RI) and Review Manager (Cochrane Collaboration, London, United Kingdom) software. METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION We included all randomized controlled and observational trials performed on patients with cervical insufficiency undergoing open TAC or laparoscopic cerclage that matched our search strategy. We excluded letters to the editor, reviews, meetings/conference abstracts, non-English or nonhuman studies, and instances where the full text was not available. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS We included a total of 33 trials. Both interventions of laparoscopic cerclage and open TAC were associated with significantly less total fetal loss (laparoscopic cerclage, relative risk [RR] 0.03; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.01-0.08; p <.001, and open TAC, RR 0.19; 95% CI, 0.07-0.51; p <.009). The overall blood loss in open TAC was 110.589 mL (95% CI, 93.737-127.44; p <.001), and in laparoscopic cerclage, it was 24.549 mL (95% CI, 9.892-39.205; p = .001). In addition, open TAC had a positive effect regarding incidence of hemorrhage >400 mL (RR 0.077; 95% CI, 0.033-0.122; p <.001). Preterm premature rupture of membranes was significant in the open TAC (RR 0.037; 95% CI, 0.019-0.055; p <.001) and laparoscopic cerclage groups (RR 0.031; 95% CI, 0.009-0.053; p = .006). CONCLUSION Laparoscopic cerclage may be safer than open TAC in the management of cervical insufficiency because we found a statistically significant lower incidence of fetal loss, blood loss, and rate of hemorrhage in the laparoscopic cerclage group. Clinically, this evidence may help support favoring a laparoscopic approach over an open one in appropriate patients, although it is unclear whether this benefit is limited to cerclages placed either before pregnancy or placed in the first-trimester or both.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Greg J Marchand
- Marchand Institute for Minimally Invasive Surgery, Mesa (Drs. Marchand, Masoud, Galitsky, and Sainz, and Ms. Ware, Vallejo, Anderson, King, Ruther, Brazil, Cieminski, Hopewell, and Syed).
| | - Ahmed Taher Masoud
- Marchand Institute for Minimally Invasive Surgery, Mesa (Drs. Marchand, Masoud, Galitsky, and Sainz, and Ms. Ware, Vallejo, Anderson, King, Ruther, Brazil, Cieminski, Hopewell, and Syed); Arizona, and Faculty of Medicine, Fayoum University, Fayoum, Egypt (Dr. Masoud)
| | - Anthony Galitsky
- Marchand Institute for Minimally Invasive Surgery, Mesa (Drs. Marchand, Masoud, Galitsky, and Sainz, and Ms. Ware, Vallejo, Anderson, King, Ruther, Brazil, Cieminski, Hopewell, and Syed)
| | - Katelyn Sainz
- Marchand Institute for Minimally Invasive Surgery, Mesa (Drs. Marchand, Masoud, Galitsky, and Sainz, and Ms. Ware, Vallejo, Anderson, King, Ruther, Brazil, Cieminski, Hopewell, and Syed)
| | - Ali Azadi
- Department of Urogynecology, Star Urogynecology, Peoria (Dr. Azadi)
| | - Kelly Ware
- Marchand Institute for Minimally Invasive Surgery, Mesa (Drs. Marchand, Masoud, Galitsky, and Sainz, and Ms. Ware, Vallejo, Anderson, King, Ruther, Brazil, Cieminski, Hopewell, and Syed)
| | - Janelle Vallejo
- Marchand Institute for Minimally Invasive Surgery, Mesa (Drs. Marchand, Masoud, Galitsky, and Sainz, and Ms. Ware, Vallejo, Anderson, King, Ruther, Brazil, Cieminski, Hopewell, and Syed)
| | - Sienna Anderson
- Marchand Institute for Minimally Invasive Surgery, Mesa (Drs. Marchand, Masoud, Galitsky, and Sainz, and Ms. Ware, Vallejo, Anderson, King, Ruther, Brazil, Cieminski, Hopewell, and Syed)
| | - Alexa King
- Marchand Institute for Minimally Invasive Surgery, Mesa (Drs. Marchand, Masoud, Galitsky, and Sainz, and Ms. Ware, Vallejo, Anderson, King, Ruther, Brazil, Cieminski, Hopewell, and Syed)
| | - Stacy Ruther
- Marchand Institute for Minimally Invasive Surgery, Mesa (Drs. Marchand, Masoud, Galitsky, and Sainz, and Ms. Ware, Vallejo, Anderson, King, Ruther, Brazil, Cieminski, Hopewell, and Syed)
| | - Giovanna Brazil
- Marchand Institute for Minimally Invasive Surgery, Mesa (Drs. Marchand, Masoud, Galitsky, and Sainz, and Ms. Ware, Vallejo, Anderson, King, Ruther, Brazil, Cieminski, Hopewell, and Syed)
| | - Kaitlynne Cieminski
- Marchand Institute for Minimally Invasive Surgery, Mesa (Drs. Marchand, Masoud, Galitsky, and Sainz, and Ms. Ware, Vallejo, Anderson, King, Ruther, Brazil, Cieminski, Hopewell, and Syed)
| | - Sophia Hopewell
- Marchand Institute for Minimally Invasive Surgery, Mesa (Drs. Marchand, Masoud, Galitsky, and Sainz, and Ms. Ware, Vallejo, Anderson, King, Ruther, Brazil, Cieminski, Hopewell, and Syed)
| | - Mariha Syed
- Marchand Institute for Minimally Invasive Surgery, Mesa (Drs. Marchand, Masoud, Galitsky, and Sainz, and Ms. Ware, Vallejo, Anderson, King, Ruther, Brazil, Cieminski, Hopewell, and Syed); Department of Medicine, Midwestern University School of Osteopathic Medicine, Glendale (Ms. Syed)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Tian S, Zhao S, Hu Y. Comparison of laparoscopic abdominal cerclage and transvaginal cerclage for the treatment of cervical insufficiency: a retrospective study. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2020; 303:1017-1023. [PMID: 33226488 DOI: 10.1007/s00404-020-05893-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2020] [Accepted: 11/07/2020] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare the pregnancy outcome of patients with cervical insufficiency (CI) underwent prophylactic laparoscopic abdominal cervical cerclage (LAC) and transvaginal cervical cerclage (TVC). METHODS A retrospective trial was carried out in the Department of Gynecology, Qingdao Women and Children's Hospital, Shandong Province, China. A total of 217 women with cervical insufficiency underwent the prophylactic cerclage, and the surgical approach was decided by the patients or depended on doctors' advice. The primary outcome measure was the fetal outcome. Secondary outcome measures were delivery of an infant at ≥ 34th gestational weeks, newborn birth weight, neonatal intensive care center (NICU) occupancy, and postoperative complications. Nonparametric variables were analyzed with the Mann-Whitney (U) test, and categorical type outcomes were analyzed with the Chi-square test or the Fisher's exact test. A P value < 0.05 was considered significant. Data analysis was performed using SPSS Statistics Version 19. RESULTS As of follow-up date, 154 eligible patients were included in this study, with 74 (48.1%) women in the LAC group and 80 (51.9%) in the TVC group. The total fetal survival rate in the two groups was 90.3% (139/154), of which the rate significantly higher in the LAC group compared to the TVC group (97.3% vs. 83.8%, P < 0.01). The delivery of an infant at ≥ 34th gestational weeks was significantly higher in the LAC group compared to the TVC group (94.6% vs. 71.3%, P < 0.01). Compared to the TVC group, the mean newborn birth weight was higher, and the NICU occupancy rate was less in the LAC group (3293.4 ± 542.8 g vs. 2953.6 ± 704.4 g, P = 0.002; 2.8% vs. 17.9%, P = 0.003). COMPLICATIONS No fatal surgical complications occurred in both groups. CONCLUSION In patients with cervical insufficiency, the history-indicated conception of prophylactic LAC appears to have a better pregnancy outcome than TVC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shuxu Tian
- Department of Gynecology, Qingdao Women and Children's Hospital, Qingdao University, Qingdao, 266000, Shandong, China
| | - Shuping Zhao
- Department of Gynecology, Qingdao Women and Children's Hospital, Qingdao University, Qingdao, 266000, Shandong, China
| | - Youbin Hu
- Department of Gynecology, Qingdao Women and Children's Hospital, Qingdao University, Qingdao, 266000, Shandong, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Liu Y, Ke Z, Liao W, Chen H, Wei S, Lai X, Chen X. Pregnancy outcomes and superiorities of prophylactic cervical cerclage and therapeutic cervical cerclage in cervical insufficiency pregnant women. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2018; 297:1503-1508. [PMID: 29627847 DOI: 10.1007/s00404-018-4766-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2017] [Accepted: 03/04/2018] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare the clinical effect of prophylactic cervical cerclage and therapeutic cervical cerclage on pregnancy outcome and operative factors in cervical insufficiency pregnant women. METHODS A retrospective study was conducted between June 2014 and September 2016 in a maternity ward, which included women who have had a single pregnancy and have been carried out a McDonald cerclage. All maternal medical records were reviewed. The efficacy of cerclage for preventing late foetal loss was assessed using multivariable logistic regression analysis. RESULTS The results showed that there were significant associations between cerclage operations and pregnancy outcomes in the duration of pregnancy prolongation in terms of live births, gestation age, live birth and cesarean section rate. In prophylactic cervical cerclage, compared with therapeutic cervical cerclage, cervical length before surgery was significantly longer (32.7 ± 5.8 vs 19.9 ± 7.3 mm, p < 0.0001). Mean operative duration and postoperative length of hospital stay in prophylactic cervical cerclage were shorter than those in therapeutic cervical cerclage (22.1 ± 10.3 vs 28.9 ± 13.0 min, p = 0.0241 and 5.6 ± 1.8 vs 7.0 ± 2.8 days, p = 0.0354), respectively. Compared with therapeutic cerclage, prophylactic cerclage had more advantages in gestational age at delivery (35.2 ± 5.5 and 31.7 ± 6.5 weeks, p = 0.0061), deliveries < 37 gestational weeks (40 vs 69.2%, p = 0.0159), live births (93.3 vs 69.2%, p = 0.0143) and the duration of pregnancy prolongation in terms of live births (19.5 ± 5.0 vs 12.0 ± 8.2 weeks, p = 0.0002). There was a higher cesarean section rate in prophylactic group than that in therapeutic group (50 vs 25.6%, p = 0.0383). The logistic analysis showed that the cervical length before surgery was the only independent prognostic factor [OR 2.860 (1.425, 5.742) p = 0.0031] for pregnancy outcome, and that is the cervical length before surgery affected late foetal loss. CONCLUSIONS Our study suggests that, both prophylactic cervical cerclage and therapeutic cervical cerclage reduce the incidence of recurrent abortion or preterm birth and efficiently extend the length of the pregnancy with live births. The prophylactic cervical cerclage has more advantages in operative time, length of hospital stay after surgery, gestational age at delivery, live births and preterm birth. The length of the cervical before surgery is an independent risk factor for pregnancy outcomes when pregnant women appear in the cervical shortening is less than normal. Cervical cerclage is an effective surgical technique to prevent recurrent abortion or late foetal loss.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yanyan Liu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, People's Republic of China
| | - Zikan Ke
- School of Foreign Languages, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430074, People's Republic of China
| | - Wanmin Liao
- Department of Anesthesia, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, People's Republic of China
| | - Hanping Chen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, People's Republic of China
| | - Shiqing Wei
- Department of Hospital Infection Control, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, People's Republic of China
| | - Xiaoquan Lai
- Department of Hospital Infection Control, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, People's Republic of China
| | - Xi Chen
- Department of Hospital Infection Control, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kokolios M, Lamprou F, Stylianidou D, Sotiriadis D, Patsatsi A. New onset pemphigus foliaceus during pregnancy: A rare case. Int J Womens Dermatol 2017; 4:109-112. [PMID: 29872686 PMCID: PMC5986257 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijwd.2017.10.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2017] [Revised: 10/18/2017] [Accepted: 10/19/2017] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Pemphigus is a rare autoimmune disease during pregnancy. Among the different pemphigus types, pemphigus foliaceus (PF) is even rarer than pemphigus vulgaris. We present a case of PF in a 36-year-old female patient who presented with PF onset during pregnancy in the form of a disseminated, erythematosquamous rash. A diagnosis was made on the basis of histologic, immunofluorescence, and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay results. A complete remission was recorded a month after steroid treatment initiation. The patient delivered a premature (33 weeks) but otherwise healthy baby girl. Only three cases of PF have been reported in two retrospective studies found in the English-language bibliography. Although pemphigus during pregnancy is a rare disease and treatment guidelines have not yet been elucidated, the management of these cases is individually evaluated. In all cases, the primary goal should be the control of the maternal disease along with the safety of the fetus.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Kokolios
- Second Department of Dermatology, Aristotle University School of Medicine, Papageorgiou General Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - F Lamprou
- Second Department of Dermatology, Aristotle University School of Medicine, Papageorgiou General Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - D Stylianidou
- Second Department of Dermatology, Aristotle University School of Medicine, Papageorgiou General Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - D Sotiriadis
- Second Department of Dermatology, Aristotle University School of Medicine, Papageorgiou General Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - A Patsatsi
- Second Department of Dermatology, Aristotle University School of Medicine, Papageorgiou General Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece
| |
Collapse
|