Long-term follow-up of bulking agents for stress urinary incontinence in older patients

Evaluation and Management of Female Stress Urinary Incontinence

Female stress urinary incontinence, the loss of urine with transient increases in abdominal pressure, is a common condition that can profoundly impact a patient's quality of life. The diagnosis is most commonly made via clinical history, including the subjective degree of bother, and physical examination evidence of urinary leakage with cough or Valsalva maneuver. A variety of treatment options exist for stress incontinence, ranging from observation, pelvic floor physical therapy, vaginal inserts, or continence pessaries to procedural interventions. Observation and conservative measures (eg, pads) can be used if the patient is not bothered by their symptoms. Nonsurgical management options include pelvic floor physical therapy, vaginal inserts, or continence pessaries. Procedural interventions include urethral bulking agent injection, synthetic mesh midurethral sling placement, autologous fascial pubovaginal sling placement, or retropubic colposuspension. Each procedure has a unique set of risks and benefits, with the choice of operation depending on a variety of factors including severity of stress incontinence, anatomy, medical and surgical comorbidities, and patient preferences. Ultimately, shared decision-making between the patient and the physician is used to decide the management strategy. This collaborative approach facilitates alignment of the chosen intervention with the patient's unique circumstances and preferences. We review relevant clinical considerations in the evaluation and management of female stress incontinence.

Update on Urethral Bulking for Stress Urinary Incontinence in Women

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Urethral bulking agents are an effective treatment for stress urinary incontinence in select females. The material and techniques used for urethral bulking are constantly evolving. With the introduction of several new agents, there is an ongoing debate over which agent is the most effective, durable, and safe.

RECENT FINDINGS

Current available bulking agents include Bulkamid®, Macroplastiue®, Durasphere®, Coaptite®, or Urolastic®. Each of these agents has its own biophysical properties that affect its efficacy and safety. Evidence evaluating bulking agents has increased over time but there is no definitive data that suggest superiority of one agent over another. The ideal urethral bulking agent for female stress incontinence has yet been identified. Currently available agents have acceptable short-term and medium-term efficacy with few adverse events.

Mortality and Reoperation Following Midurethral Sling Versus Urethral Bulking in Older Women

OBJECTIVE

To examine differences in mortality, retreatment rates, and comorbidities that may be risk factors for retreatment among Medicare beneficiaries (age 65+) undergoing midurethral sling vs urethral bulking.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study using the 5% limited data set from the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services between 2010 and 2018. Beneficiaries age 65 or older who underwent sling or bulking without concomitant surgery from 2011 to 2014 were included and followed until reoperation or retreatment, loss of Medicare, death, or December 31, 2018. Repeat procedures for ongoing stress incontinence or complication were included. Associations between index treatment and need for a secondary procedure were evaluated using Cox proportional hazards models.

RESULTS

Median follow-up time was 5.7 years for 1,700 patients undergoing sling and 5.2 years for 875 patients undergoing bulking. Within 5 years, 10.2% of sling patients and 23.2% of bulking patients had died. When controlling for age, race, and comorbidities, bulking patients were 1.73 times more likely than sling patients to die during the study period. Bulking patients were significantly more likely to have 12 of the 16 of the medical comorbidities evaluated. By 5 years, 6.7% of sling patients had been retreated for stress urinary incontinence (SUI) compared with 24.6% of bulking patients. Apart from hypertension, none of the comorbidities evaluated was associated with a difference in the risk of a subsequent surgical procedure. Members of racial and ethnic minority groups were less likely to be retreated.

CONCLUSION

Older adults undergoing bulking are notably sicker and have shorter life expectancy as compared with those undergoing sling, suggesting these factors heavily guide patient selection. Comorbidities do not predispose patients to reoperation or retreatment.

2021 opinion from the CUROPF on THE efficacy and safety of mid-urethral slings used in women WITH urinary stress incontinence

OBJECTIVE

To determine the usefulness of mid-urethral slings (MUS) in the surgical management of women presenting with urinary stress incontinence (USI) METHOD: A consensus committee of multidisciplinary experts (CUROPF) was convened and focused on PICO questions concerning the efficacy and safety of MUS surgery compared to other procedures and concerning which approach (retropubic (RP) vs transobturator (TO)) should be proposed as a first-line MUS surgery for specific subpopulations (obese; intrinsic sphincteric deficiency (ISD); elderly) RESULTS: As compared to other procedures (urethral bulking agents, traditional slings and open colposuspension), the MUS procedure should be proposed as the first-line surgical therapy (strong agreement). MUS surgery can be associated with complications and proper pre-operative informed consent is mandatory (strong agreement). Mini-slings (SIS/SIMS) should only be proposed in clinical trials (strong agreement). Both RP and TO approaches may be proposed for the insertion of MUS (strong agreement). However, if the woman is willing to accept a moderate increase in per-operative risk, the RP approach should be preferred (strong agreement) since it is associated with higher very long-term cure rates and as it is possible to completely remove the sling surgically if a severe complication occurs. The RP approach should be used for the insertion of MUS in a woman presenting with ISD (strong agreement). Either the RP or TO approach should be used for the insertion of MUS in an obese woman presenting with USI (strong agreement). In very obese women (BMI ≥35-40kg/m2), weight loss should be preferred prior to MUS surgery and bariatric surgery should be discussed (strong agreement) CONCLUSION: The current Opinion provides an appropriate strategy for both the selection of patients and the best therapeutic approach in women presenting with USI.

Seven-year efficacy and safety outcomes of Bulkamid for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence

AIMS

Bulking agents are a minimally invasive treatment option for women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI) or stress-predominant mixed urinary incontinence (MUI). The aim of this study was to evaluate long-term efficacy and safety following treatment with Bulkamid as a primary procedure for SUI or stress-predominant MUI.

METHODS

This was an Institutional Review Board-approved single-center retrospective study of female patients with SUI or stress-predominant MUI who had undergone injection with Bulkamid since 2005 and had completed 7 years of follow up. The primary endpoint was patient satisfaction measured on a four-point scale as cured, improved, unchanged, or worse. Secondary outcomes included the number of incontinence pads used, International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form (ICIQ-UI SF) scores, Visual Analog Scale Quality of Life (VAS QoL), reinjection rates, and perioperative and postoperative complications.

RESULTS

A total of 1,200 patients were treated with Bulkamid since 2005 and of these, 388 (32.3%) had completed 7 years of follow-up. A total of 67.1% of the patients reported feeling cured or improved if Bulkamid was a primary procedure, 11.1% reported no change, and 2.3% reported worsening of incontinence. A total of 19.5% of patients received a subsequent other incontinence procedure. The ICIQ-UI SF was reduced by 8.6 points. VAS QoL improved by a mean of 4.3 points. Postoperative complications were transient. Prolonged bladder emptying time was reported in 15.3% of patients and urinary tract infection in 3.5%.

CONCLUSIONS

Bulkamid injections are an effective and safe first-line treatment option for women with SUI or stress-predominant MUI providing durable outcomes at 7 years.