Development and preliminary validation of the Menopause Symptoms Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (MS-TSQ)

Recommended measurement instruments for menopausal vasomotor symptoms: the COMMA (Core Outcomes in Menopause) consortium

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study is to identify suitable definitions and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to assess each of the six core outcomes previously identified through the COMMA (Core Outcomes in Menopause) global consensus process relating to vasomotor symptoms: frequency, severity, distress/bother/interference, impact on sleep, satisfaction with treatment, and side effects.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted to identify relevant definitions for the outcome of side-effects and PROMs with acceptable measurement properties for the remaining five core outcomes. The consensus process, involving 36 participants from 16 countries, was conducted to review definitions and PROMs and make final recommendations for the measurement of each core outcome.

RESULTS

A total of 21,207 publications were screened from which 119 reporting on 40 PROMs were identified. Of these 40 PROMs, 36 either did not adequately map onto the core outcomes or lacked sufficient measurement properties. Therefore, only four PROMs corresponding to two of the six core outcomes were considered for recommendation. We recommend the Hot Flash Related Daily Interference Scale to measure the domain of distress, bother, or interference of vasomotor symptoms and to capture impact on sleep (one item in the Hot Flash Related Daily Interference Scale captures interference with sleep). Six definitions of "side effects" were identified and considered. We recommend that all trials report adverse events, which is a requirement of Good Clinical Practice.

CONCLUSIONS

We identified suitable definitions and PROMs for only three of the six core outcomes. No suitable PROMs were found for the remaining three outcomes (frequency and severity of vasomotor symptoms and satisfaction with treatment). Future studies should develop and validate PROMs for these outcomes.

Acupuncture for comorbid depression and insomnia in perimenopause: A feasibility patient-assessor-blinded, randomized, and sham-controlled clinical trial

Background and objective

Whilst acupuncture is widely used for treating psychosomatic diseases, there is little high-quality evidence supporting its application in comorbid perimenopausal depression (PMD) and insomnia (PMI) which are common complaints during climacteric. This feasibility, patient-assessor-blinded, randomized, sham-controlled clinical trial addresses this gap by investigating the efficacy and safety of acupuncture on depressed mood and poor sleep in women with comorbid PMD and PMI.

Methods

Seventy eligible participants were randomly assigned to either real-acupuncture (RA) or sham-acupuncture (SA) groups. Either RA or SA treatment were delivered in 17 sessions over 8 weeks. The primary outcomes for mood and sleep were changes on 17-items Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D₁₇) and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) scores, from baseline to 16-week follow-up. Secondary outcome measures involved anxiety symptoms, perimenopausal symptoms, quality of life, participants' experience of and satisfaction with the acupuncture treatment. Blood samples were taken to measure reproductive hormone levels. Intention-To-Treat and Per-Protocol analyses were conducted with linear mixed-effects models. The James' and Bang's blinding indices were used to assess the adequacy of blinding.

Results

Sixty-five participants completed all treatment sessions, and 54 and 41 participants completed the eight- and 16-week follow-ups, respectively. At post-treatment and 8-week follow-up, the RA group showed a significantly greater reduction in PSQI scores than the SA group did; although the reduction of HAM-D₁₇ scores in RA group was significant, the change was not statistically different from that of SA. There were no significant mean differences between baseline and 16-week follow-up in either HAM-D₁₇ or PSQI in either group. There were no significant between-group differences in serum reproductive hormone levels. All treatments were tolerable and no serious adverse events were reported, and the blinding was successful.

Conclusion

Acupuncture is safe and can contribute to clinically relevant improvements in comorbid PMD and PMI, with satisfactory short-and medium-term effects. Whether the anti-depressive benefit of acupuncture is specific or non-specific remains to be determined. No evidence was found for any longer-term benefit of acupuncture compared to sham at 16 weeks. Further research is required to elucidate mechanisms underlying the short to medium term effects of acupuncture.

Structured review of the use of the Arizona sexual experiences scale in clinical settings

BACKGROUND

Approximately 40% of women and 30% of men describe sexual dysfunction, although recognition in medical settings is suboptimal, due to problems in reporting and eliciting concerns relating to sexual function and satisfaction. Screening questionnaires may help to support this aspect of clinical practice. The Arizona sexual experiences scale (ASEX) includes items that quantify sex drive, arousal, vaginal lubrication or penile erection, ability to reach orgasm, and satisfaction from orgasm.

METHOD

We investigated the validity and other psychometric properties of the ASEX, and the findings from the populations in which it has been employed, by searching MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Google Scholar using the terms, Arizona sexual experiences scale, Arizona Sexual Experience Questionnaire, and ASEX. We eliminated duplications, letters, and papers not available in English, and grouped the remaining papers into the categories of psychometric, epidemiological, and outcome-based studies.

RESULTS

After elimination of letters and duplicates, papers not in English, and preclinical and irrelevant studies, 104 papers were analyzed. The ASEX has excellent internal consistency, scale reliability and strong test-retest reliability. Analyses of variance reveal significant differences in total ASEX scores between patients and controls and between females and males. ASEX appears to be useful in a range of clinical situations including patients with primary sexual dysfunction, specific psychiatric disorders, specific physical illnesses, and treatment emergent sexual dysfunction.

DISCUSSION

The ASEX appears to be a reliable instrument for identifying and quantifying sexual dysfunction across a range of populations in various clinical settings. Little is known about its utility in patients with anxiety disorders or relationships between ASEX scores and biological parameters.

Conjugated estrogens combined with bazedoxifene: the first approved tissue selective estrogen complex therapy

Menopausal therapy with a tissue selective estrogen complex combines estrogens with a selective estrogen receptor modulator, with the goal of blending the desirable effects of estrogens on menopausal symptoms and bone with the tissue selective properties of a selective estrogen receptor modulator. The first tissue selective estrogen complex to receive regulatory approval is a combination of conjugated estrogens (CE) with bazedoxifene (BZA). Clinical trials with CE/BZA in postmenopausal women have shown improvement in vasomotor symptoms, vulvo-vaginal atrophy, and bone mineral density, without stimulation of the endometrium or breast tissue, with a generally favorable safety and tolerability profile. CE/BZA represents a new approach to the management of menopausal symptoms in women with a uterus.

Tissue-selective estrogen complexes for postmenopausal women

Although hormone therapy using estrogens plus progestogens (EPT) is effective for the management of menopausal symptoms (e.g., vasomotor symptoms and vulvar/vaginal atrophy) and prevention/treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis, EPT is associated with safety and tolerability concerns. A new alternative to EPT is the tissue selective estrogen complex (TSEC), which partners a selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM) with one or more estrogens and is designed to treat menopausal symptoms and prevent postmenopausal osteoporosis without the tolerability concerns associated with EPT. The first TSEC to reach advanced clinical development is a combination of the SERM bazedoxifene (BZA) with conjugated estrogens (CE). BZA has been shown to inhibit the stimulatory activity of CE on uterine tissue and breast in vitro and in vivo. In clinical studies, BZA/CE treatment has been associated with significant improvements in menopausal symptoms including hot flushes and vulvar/vaginal atrophy and significant increases in bone mineral density, coupled with reductions in bone turnover marker levels and improvements in sleep and health-related quality of life. Additionally, BZA/CE has been shown to have a neutral effect on endometrial and breast tissue because BZA inhibits the stimulatory effects of estrogens in tissue-selective fashion in these 2 organs. Taken together, results of these preclinical and clinical studies indicate that the benefits of estrogens for treating menopausal symptoms are maintained with BZA/CE without endometrial or breast stimulation, resulting in a safe and effective treatment for symptomatic postmenopausal women.

Validation of the first treatment-specific questionnaire for the assessment of patient satisfaction with allergen-specific immunotherapy in allergic patients: the ESPIA questionnaire

BACKGROUND

Satisfaction with treatment is a patient-reported outcome shown to be associated with the patient's health-related decisions and treatment-related behavior, thereby influencing the chances of successful treatment, and is especially relevant in long-term treatment, such as allergen-specific immunotherapy (AIT).

OBJECTIVE

We sought to assess the psychometric properties of the Satisfaction Scale for Patients Receiving Allergen Immunotherapy (ESPIA) questionnaire so as to determine the satisfaction of patients receiving AIT treatment.

METHODS

An observational, longitudinal, multicenter study was performed on patients with allergic rhinitis (AR) undergoing AIT treatment. Sociodemographic, clinical, and patient-centered health outcomes data were gathered at the study visits. Feasibility, reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change of the prevalidated version of the ESPIA questionnaire were assessed.

RESULTS

Four hundred twenty-nine patients were included (52.2% women, 33.6 years of age, 54.5% of the cases with intermittent AR and 62.5% with moderate AR). Low levels of missing items and ceiling/floor effects were found for the overall score of the ESPIA questionnaire. The overall Cronbach α value and intraclass correlation coefficient were 0.90 and 0.92, respectively. The overall score for the ESPIA questionnaire was strongly associated with months receiving AIT, AR type and intensity, presence of conjunctivitis, self-perceived health status, effect of AR on daily life, and expectations about the AIT treatment. The pattern of correlations obtained with other patient-centered health outcomes was consistent with expectations. The ESPIA questionnaire also showed good sensitivity to change for improved health status.

CONCLUSION

The ESPIA questionnaire to assess patient satisfaction with respect to AIT treatment presented satisfactory psychometric properties for its use in clinical practice.

Treatment satisfaction instruments for different purposes during a product's lifecycle: keeping the end in mind

This review investigates whether the development and implementation of treatment satisfaction instruments during a product's lifecycle are informed by their purpose. A basic literature review was performed between 2000 and 2010 using electronic databases (PubMed, PsycINFO®, and EMBASE) and the keywords 'satisfaction' and 'questionnaire' and 'medication' or 'drug'. Relevant articles were reviewed to extract the following information: type of study; study objectives; treatment satisfaction instrument used; clinical condition/indication; purpose of instrument; development of instrument; association of satisfaction with other endpoint measures; and main results and conclusions. Of 875 abstracts, 80 articles were further considered. Treatment satisfaction instruments were most commonly used in observational studies and interventional clinical trials. The review indicated similarities regarding the development and validation of satisfaction instruments, such as using patient input to derive the items and exploring classical measurement properties specific to the target population. Although some differences were apparent between instruments intended for use in clinical trials and clinical practice (e.g. the approaches used to enable the interpretation of satisfaction scores), the specificities of the implementation of treatment satisfaction during a product's lifecycle were rarely considered. By 'keeping the end in mind', data from treatment satisfaction instruments can help at three key stages: (i) product access to market: generating evidence as part of an overall value proposition to facilitate product reimbursement at a national level; (ii) market access to product: making the product available at a local level (e.g. local hospital formularies); and (iii) clinical practice: enhancing market penetration and product expansion after launch, and demonstrating value for prescribers. Furthermore, the development, validation, and interpretation of scores from treatment satisfaction instruments should be sensitive to the intended purpose. By considering the stage in the product lifecycle when an instrument is to be used, treatment satisfaction instruments can be developed with the specific research purpose and target audience in mind - whether it be patients, payers, or prescribers. In the future, treatment satisfaction instruments will become increasingly important for informing decisions at the individual level, giving patients a voice towards their overall management and care, and enhancing the relationship between doctor and patient.

The effect of dose titration and dose tapering on the tolerability of desvenlafaxine in women with vasomotor symptoms associated with menopause

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether titrating up and tapering down of desvenlafaxine (administered as desvenlafaxine succinate) improves its tolerability in postmenopausal women with vasomotor symptoms (VMS).

METHODS

In the 1-week titration phase, participants received desvenlafaxine 100 mg/d (no titration), desvenlafaxine 50 mg/d, desvenlafaxine 25 mg/d (4 days) then 50 mg/d (3 days), or desvenlafaxine 25 mg/d. Participants then received open-label desvenlafaxine 100 mg/d for 15 weeks. In the 2-week taper phase, participants received placebo, desvenlafaxine 50 mg/d then placebo (7 days each), desvenlafaxine 50 mg/d then 25 mg/d (7 days each), or desvenlafaxine 50 mg/d every other day. Primary endpoints included nausea incidence during the first 2 weeks of treatment and Discontinuation-Emergent Signs and Symptoms (DESS) Checklist total scores after taper weeks 1 and 2.

RESULTS

Nausea incidence was significantly lower for the desvenlafaxine 25 mg/d (19%) and 50 mg/d (22.6%) titration regimens vs. no titration (35.2%; p=0.004 and p=0.035, respectively). At taper week 1, mean DESS scores were significantly lower for desvenlafaxine 50 mg every other day (2.26, p<0.001), 50/25 mg/d (2.28, p<0.001), and 50 mg/d-placebo (1.84, p<0.001) taper regimens vs. no taper (7.07). At week 2, the mean DESS total score was significantly higher for the desvenlafaxine 50 mg/d-placebo regimen vs. no taper (4.46 vs. 2.44, respectively; p=0.009). Desvenlafaxine 50 mg every other day was the least tolerated of the taper regimens.

CONCLUSIONS

Titration regimens may improve tolerability of desvenlafaxine 100 mg/d in postmenopausal women with VMS. Taper regimens of desvenlafaxine 50 mg/d-placebo or 50/25-mg/d, were better tolerated than abrupt discontinuation or desvenlafaxine 50 mg given every other day taper regimen.

Development of a questionnaire to assess patient satisfaction with allergen-specific immunotherapy in adults: item generation, item reduction, and preliminary validation

BACKGROUND

Allergen-specific immunotherapy (SIT) is a treatment capable of modifying the natural course of allergy, so ensuring good adherence to SIT is fundamental. Up until now there has not existed an instrument specifically developed to measure patient satisfaction with SIT, although its assessment could help us to comprehend better and improve treatment adherence and effectiveness. The aim of this study was to develop an instrument to measure adult patient satisfaction with SIT.

METHODS

Items were generated from a literature review, focus groups with allergic adult patients undergoing SIT, and a meeting with experts. Potential items were administered to allergic patients undergoing SIT in an observational, cross-sectional, multicenter study. Item reduction was based on quantitative and qualitative criteria. A preliminary assessment of feasibility, reliability, and validity of the retained items was performed.

RESULTS

An initial pool of 70 items was administered to 257 patients undergoing SIT. Fifty-four items were eliminated resulting in a provisional instrument with 16 items. Factor analysis yielded four factors that were identified as perceived efficacy, activities and environment, cost-benefit balance, and overall satisfaction, explaining 74.8% of variance. Ceiling and floor effects were negligible for overall score. Overall score was associated with the type and intensity of symptoms.

CONCLUSION

This is the first attempt to develop a satisfaction with SIT measure from the perspective of the allergic patient, and evidence has been found in favor of its reliability and validity.

Effects of bazedoxifene/conjugated estrogens on quality of life in postmenopausal women with symptoms of vulvar/vaginal atrophy

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effects of the tissue selective estrogen complex (TSEC) pairing bazedoxifene (BZA) with conjugated estrogens (CE) on sexual function and quality of life in postmenopausal women.

METHODS

In this 12-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, postmenopausal, non-hysterectomized women (n = 652) with symptoms of moderate to severe vulvar/vaginal atrophy were randomized to once-daily treatment with BZA 20 mg/CE 0.45 or 0.625 mg, BZA 20 mg, or placebo. The Arizona Sexual Experiences (ASEX) Scale, Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQOL) questionnaire, and Menopause Symptoms Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (MS-TSQ) were secondary measures used to assess the effects of BZA/CE on sexual function, menopausal symptoms, and satisfaction with treatment, respectively.

RESULTS

At week 12, both BZA/CE doses were associated with significant improvement in ease of lubrication score from baseline compared with placebo (p < 0.05) on the ASEX scale, although there was no difference in the change in total score. The MENQOL questionnaire results at week 12 showed significant improvements in vasomotor function, sexual function and total scores with both BZA/CE doses vs. placebo or BZA 20 mg (p < 0.001). The MS-TSQ results showed that BZA/CE-treated subjects reported significantly greater overall satisfaction with treatment, as well as satisfaction with control of hot flushes during the day and night, effect on quality of sleep, and effect on mood or emotions, compared with subjects treated with placebo or BZA 20 mg (all p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Treatment with BZA/CE for 12 weeks was shown to significantly improve sexual function and quality-of-life measures in symptomatic postmenopausal women.

Bazedoxifene/conjugated estrogens and quality of life in postmenopausal women

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effects of bazedoxifene/conjugated estrogens (BZA/CE) on sleep parameters and health-related quality of life (HR-QOL).

METHODS

This was a 12-week, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 study. Postmenopausal women with an intact uterus and experiencing >or=7 moderate-to-severe hot flushes daily were randomized to BZA 20 mg/CE 0.45 mg, BZA 20 mg/CE 0.625 mg, or placebo. In these secondary efficacy analyses, the Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) sleep scale and Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQOL) questionnaires and the Menopause Symptoms Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (MS-TSQ) evaluated measures of sleep, menopausal symptoms, and satisfaction with treatment, respectively.

RESULTS

A total of 318 subjects (mean age, 53.4 years) received >or=1 dose of study drug. At Week 12, BZA 20 mg/CE 0.45 and 0.625 mg showed significant improvements over placebo in the MOS sleep scale for time to fall asleep, sleep adequacy, sleep disturbance, and sleep problems indexes I and II (P<0.001). A reduction in hot flush frequency was significantly associated with improvement in sleep parameters (P<0.05) based on linear regression and responder analyses. Both BZA/CE doses showed significantly greater improvements over placebo in vasomotor function and total MENQOL score (P<0.001). Results of the MS-TSQ showed that subjects treated with BZA/CE versus placebo reported significantly greater overall satisfaction with treatment (P<0.05), as well as greater satisfaction with sleep quality, ability to control hot flushes during the day and night, effect on mood/emotions, and tolerability.

CONCLUSION

Symptomatic postmenopausal women treated with BZA/CE experienced significant improvements in sleep parameters and overall HR-QOL.

A double-blind, randomly assigned, placebo-controlled study of desvenlafaxine efficacy and safety for the treatment of vasomotor symptoms associated with menopause

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the study was to assess the efficacy and safety of desvenlafaxine (administered as desvenlafaxine succinate) for menopausal vasomotor symptoms.

STUDY DESIGN

Postmenopausal women (n = 458) experiencing 50 or more moderate to severe hot flushes per week received desvenlafaxine 100 or 150 mg/d, with titration at therapy initiation, or placebo. Hot flush number and severity were assessed at weeks 4 and 12. Safety data were collected throughout the trial.

RESULTS

Desvenlafaxine 100 and 150 mg/d significantly reduced the number of hot flushes compared with placebo at weeks 4 and 12 (all P < or = .012), achieving 65.4% and 66.6% reductions from baseline at week 12, respectively (placebo, 50.8%). Hot flush severity and number of nighttime awakenings were significantly reduced at both time points (all P < or = .048). Desvenlafaxine groups reported significantly more adverse events compared with placebo during week 1 only. No difference in discontinuations because of adverse events was observed.

CONCLUSION

Desvenlafaxine is an effective nonhormonal treatment for menopausal hot flushes. Dose titration improves initial tolerability.