Multiple Free Flap Reconstructions of Head and Neck Defects Due to Oral Cancer

Comprehensive analysis of risk factors for flap necrosis in free flap reconstruction of postoperative tissue defects in oral and maxillofacial tumors

Free flap reconstruction for postoperative tissue defects in oral and maxillofacial tumors is a critical component of reconstructive surgery. Identifying risk factors for flap necrosis is essential for improving surgical outcomes and patient quality of life. A retrospective study was conducted on patients who underwent free flap reconstruction between January 2020 and December 2023. Patients were included if they had comprehensive medical records and at least a six-month follow-up. We excluded those with a history of flap necrosis, uncontrolled systemic diseases, non-adherence to postoperative care, or concurrent malignancy treatments. Data on demographics, comorbidities, flap characteristics, and operative details were collected and analyzed using univariate analysis and logistic regression tests. Univariate analysis did not find a significant correlation between flap necrosis and factors such as hyperlipidemia, lymph node metastasis, or flap type. However, diabetes mellitus, oral infections, and albumin levels below 35 g/L were significantly associated with flap necrosis. Multivariate logistic regression showed diabetes mellitus increased the odds of flap necrosis by approximately ninefold, and oral infection increased it by over tenfold. Diabetes mellitus, oral infection, and low albumin levels are significant risk factors for flap necrosis in free flap reconstruction after oral and maxillofacial surgery. Prompt identification and management of these factors are crucial to mitigate the risk of flap necrosis.

Effect of comfort nursing in the perioperative period of free flap transplantation to repair the defects after surgery for malignant head and neck tumors

To explore the effect of comfort nursing in the perioperative period of free flap transplantation to repair defects of malignant head and neck tumors. This retrospective study included 242 patients with postoperative defects of malignant head and neck tumors repaired using free flap transplantation from December 2017 to December 2022. Among them, 113 patients received routine nursing and were included in the control group, and 129 patients received comfort nursing and were included in the observation group. The perioperative indexes of skin flap transplantation, skin flap necrosis, hospital stay, and cortisol levels were compared. Albumin and pre-albumin levels were compared 1 hour before and 24 hours after surgery. The nursing quality, Self-Rating Depression Scale and Self-Rating Anxiety Scale scores, and nursing satisfaction were compared between the 2 groups. The success rate of skin flap transplantation in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group, whereas the rates of skin flap necrosis, length of stay, and cortisol levels were significantly lower in the observation group than in the control group. The Albumin and pre-albumin levels in the observation group were significantly higher than those in the control group 24 hours after surgery. The complication rate was significantly lower in the observation group than in the control group. The Self-Rating Depression Scale and Self-Rating Anxiety Scale scores in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group 24 hours after surgery. The satisfaction with nursing was significantly higher in the observation group than in the control group. Comfort nursing improved the success rate of free flap transplantation, reduced complications, reduced stress, improved nutritional, and psychological status of patients during the perioperative period, and improved nursing quality and patient satisfaction with nursing.

Multiple Sequential Free Flap Reconstructions of the Head and Neck: A Single-Center Experience

BACKGROUND

Free flap reconstruction is the standard of care in extensive defects of the head and neck area, and although most patients may be treated sufficiently with one flap, recurrence of a malignant tumor or failure of a previous reconstruction may make the use of a second (or more) flap necessary. The aim of this study was to evaluate the indications and success rates of multiple consecutive reconstructive procedures in a large cohort of patients.

METHODS

Nine hundred ninety-six free flap reconstructions were retrospectively analyzed and cases of sequential reconstructions in the same patient were identified. Indications, success rates, perioperative procedures, and frequently used flaps were evaluated.

RESULTS

Two hundred twenty cases of sequential microvascular reconstructions were identified, ranging from two to six flaps per patient. The overall flap success rate was 89.1 percent. A history of diabetes was identified as a risk factor for flap failure (p = 0.029). There was no association of flap loss with the number of reconstructive procedures per patient.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of several free flaps in the same patient is a feasible option for patients suffering from recurrent tumors or to improve quality of life by a secondary reconstruction. A salvage free flap transfer to replace a lost transplant exhibits good success rates.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, IV.

Is sequential free flap safe in oral cancer reconstruction in the same patient? An outcome and complication analysis

BACKGROUND

Sequential free flap reconstruction in patient with head and neck cancer can provide reliable and effective wound coverage. Only a few studies have reported on the outcome and complications analysis but without consensus on the recipient vessels and flap chosen. Herein, we presented the outcome and analysed the risk factors for complications in sequential free flap reconstruction.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients who had sequential free tissue transfers due to cancer recurrence, second primary cancer, or secondary correction of the soft tissue contractures and volume deficits were all included. Variables extracted included demographics, comorbidities, free flap characteristics, infection, dehiscence and flap necrosis rates.

RESULTS

In total, 40 patients with 92 free flaps were analyzed; 42 initial and 50 sequential free flaps. The most common recipient vessels for sequential flap were contralateral superficial thyroid vessels (68%). The most common flap for both initial and sequential free flap was anterolateral thigh flap (64.3 and 62%). The success rate of sequential free flap was 92.0 compared to 92.9% for initial free flap, which showed no significant difference. Female was independently associated with delayed wound healing with an odds ratio of 90.91 (95% confidence interval 0.001-0.17, P = 0.001), as well as diabetes with an odds ratio of 31.14 (95% confidence interval 2.60-373.19, P = 0.007). Sequential free flap was not a risk factor for any complication.

CONCLUSIONS

Sequential free flap is a reliable method for head and neck surgery without more complication rate comparing to initial free flap reconstruction. More attentions should be paid on patients with preferential risk for certain complications.

Reconstruction for Complex Oromandibular Facial Defects: The Fibula Free Flap and Pectoralis Major Flap Combination

Background

Extensive through-and-through oromandibular defects after advanced oral carcinoma excision pose a reconstructive challenge for the head and neck surgeon. These complex oromandibular wounds often involve the mandible, oral and/or aerodigestive mucosa, and the external skin. As a result, these defects are often not amenable to reconstruction with a single flap due to the volume of soft tissue needed and the three-dimensional reconstructive requirement. The use of two free flaps has often been suggested to overcome this reconstructive challenge. A simpler and less technically demanding way to deal with this may involve the use of a free flap in combination with a pedicled regional flap. We present our experience of the use of a simultaneous microvascular fibula free flap (FFF) with a pectoralis major myocutaneous flap (PMMC) for addressing these defects.

Methods

A retrospective chart review was performed of patients treated with a FFF and PMMC combination for the reconstruction of oromandibular defects at the University of Mississippi Medical Center (Jackson, MS) between October 2013 and February 2016. A minimum follow-up of 12 months was required. Data collected included the extent and location of tumor involvement, size of the postablative defect, tumor histology, clinical and pathological staging, length of follow-up, functional outcomes, and associated complications.

Results

A total of three patients were identified to have been treated with the above technique. Defects repaired involved through-and-through mandibular defects with associated oral mucosa and external skin defects. In all cases, the FFF was used for restoring bony continuity with the skin paddle used to reconstruct the intraoral lining. The PMMC was used for reconstruction of the external skin defect and for providing soft tissue bulk. The average size of the fibula skin paddle used for intraoral reconstruction was 7.7 cm × 11.7 cm. The average size of the PMMC paddle was 7.3 × 9 cm. The mean follow-up was 21.7 months. Both the FFF and PMMC survived in all cases, although postoperative wound healing complications occurred in two of the three patients. There was one partial flap loss. Two patients regained good oral intake while one patient tolerated oral intake but was PEG tube-dependent.

Conclusions

The combination of pectoralis major myocutaneous flap and a vascularized free fibular flap is a viable option for the reconstruction of complex through-and-through oromandibular defects. This technique may be useful when a single microvascular free flap is not sufficient for reconstruction of such defects.