Surgical Therapy of Temporal Triggered Migraine Headache

Minimally invasive nerve and artery sparing surgical approach for temporal migraines

Background

Temporal migraines (TM) present with throbbing, pulsating headaches in the temporal area. Different surgical techniques ranging from resecting the auriculotemporal nerve (ATN) and or ligating the superficial temporal artery (STA) have shown similar good results to decrease TM symptoms. No conclusive data supports a specific disease of the STA in TM patients. A minimally invasive technique is proposed to preserve both vascular and nerve structures.

Methods

Patients with drug resistant TM were selected and treated with two techniques: nerve sparing and nerve and artery sparing. The study included 57 patients with TM, with an average age of 47.5 years. TM improvement was quantified after at least one year of follow up time. STA biopsies were sent for histological analysis.

Results

Forty-two patients underwent nerve-sparing decompression, with a therapeutic success rate of 78.6%, corresponding to 22.1 days with migraine per month decreasing to 6.2. Histological analysis of the STA showed varying degrees of endofibrosis in 75% of the samples. Histological results do not correlate with the intensity of symptoms before or after surgery. Fifteen patients underwent nerve and artery sparing arteriolysis, with an overall therapeutic success rate of 86.6% of which 80% had >90% improvement. The average migraine days dropped from 24 to 2.5 days per month in this group.

Conclusion

Minimally invasive nerve sparing approaches are an effective and safe treatment to improve drug resistant TM symptoms. Endofibrosis of the STA was present in 75% of the cases, but it was found to be unrelated to pre-operative symptoms and outcome. Results are promising, but the limited numbers of patients treated with artery and nerve sparing technique needs further investigations.

Frontal site surgery for chronic migraine therapy

BACKGROUND

According to the most current theories, chronic inflammation of some cranial nerves give rise to an inflammatory chain that would result in migraines. As for frontally located attacks, the nerves involved are two (on each side): the supraorbital and the supratrochlear. Surgical treatment includes complete neurolysis of both of these nerves.

METHODS

In this work, we describe our experience with this type of surgery. From 2011 to 2022, we treated 98 cases suffering from chronic migraine not responsive to drugs with frontal localization. The results were evaluated through a specific questionnaire three months and one year after surgery.

RESULTS

After three months post-surgery, we observed a success rate (reduction of monthly attacks equivalent to or greater than 50%) in 87% of patients (32% complete recovery). These results were essentially confirmed one year after surgery. The rare complications (mainly paresthesias and dysesthesias of the frontal area) have always resolved spontaneously within a few months.

CONCLUSION

The surgical approach allowed to obtain good therapeutic results with a low rate of complications.

Surgical therapy of occipital (Arnold) neuralgia: A case series

Objective

The idea to treat occipital neuralgia patients with a surgical procedure is relatively recent. The aim of this paper was to describe the surgical techniques and our 12-year experience in this field.

Materials and methods

From June 2011 till February 2022 we have performed surgery over 232 patients with occipital neuralgia.

Results

The surgical procedure elicited a positive response in 86% of the patients.

Conclusions

The described techniques allowed to obtain an high rate of positive results with a minimum percentage of complications.

•

The idea to treat occipital (Arnold) neuralgia patients with a surgical procedure is relatively recent.

•

The aim of this paper was to describe the surgical techniques and our 12-year experience in this field.

•

The described techniques allowed to obtain an high rate of positive results with a minimum percentage of complications.

Current Evidence in Migraine Surgery: A Systematic Review

INTRODUCTION

Migraine headache is a widespread neurovascular disorder with an enormous social and economic impact. A subgroup of patients cannot be managed with pharmacological therapy. Although surgical decompression of extracranial sensory nerves has been proposed as a valid alternative treatment option, the medical community remains reluctant to accept it.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This systematic review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. An electronic search was performed in September 2020 on PubMed, ScienceDirect, CENTRAL, and Google Scholar databases for original articles reporting outcomes on migraine surgery.

RESULTS

The search strategy revealed a total of 922 studies, of which 52 were included in the review. Significant improvement was reported in 58.3% to 100% and complete elimination in 8.3% to 86.8% of patients across studies. No major complications were reported.

DISCUSSION

This systematic review demonstrates that migraine surgery is an effective and safe procedure, with a positive impact in patients' quality of life and a reduction in long-term costs.

CONCLUSION

There is considerable scientific evidence suggesting extracranial migraine surgery is an effective and safe procedure. This surgery should be considered in properly selected migraineurs refractory to medical treatment.

An easy and reliable way to preoperatively identify the auriculo-temporal nerve in migraine surgery

In this paper, we describe a simple and reliable way to preoperatively localize the auriculotemporal nerve in migraine surgery. We measured the correspondence of this cutaneous landmark and the ATN in twelve migraine patients operated at Site V. Our findings demonstrated a very high concordance between the described point and the underlying auriculotemporal nerve. This method might be of some utility in the preoperative planning of Site V Migraine surgery, in the strive of reducing the length of cutaneous incision and the invasiveness of the procedure.

Comparison of Peripheral Neurectomy vs. Medical Treatment for Migraine: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Background

Migraine is a common form of primary neurologic headache. Many patients are chronic migraineurs and suffer from a significant disability and adverse effects of drugs. There are various surgical options available to treat migraines, including peripheral neurectomies.

Objective

To study the surgical and functional outcomes of migraine surgeries using peripheral neurectomies and compare them with conservatively treated patients.

Materials and Methods

Migraine patients who had a unilateral onset pain were given local bupivacaine block at the suspected trigger site, and those who were relieved were given the option for surgery. In the operative group, the peripheral nerve of the trigger site was lysed under local anesthesia. The conservative group was continued with the standard treatment. Evaluations with a baseline and 6 months visual analog score (VAS), migraine headache index (MHI), migraine disability assessment test (MIDAS), and pain self-efficacy questionnaire (PSEQ) scores were done.

Results

A total of 26 patients got benefitted with the local bupivacaine block, out of which 13 underwent surgery. At baseline, the VAS, MHI, MIDAS, and PSEQ scores were similar in both the groups. The operative group had significant (P < 0.001) improvement in all these parameters 6 months after the surgery. All patients of the operative group got free from prophylactic migraine treatment; however, 11 out of 13 patients still needed occasional  use of analgesics. There was one complication of transient temporal numbness.

Conclusion

Migraine surgery using peripheral neurectomies was more effective than chronic drug treatment in appropriately selected patients.

Trigger-Site Deactivation Surgery for Nerve Compression Headaches

LEARNING OBJECTIVES

After studying this article, the participant should be able to: 1. Identify patients who are candidates for headache surgery. 2. Counsel the patient preoperatively with regard to success rates, recovery, and complications. 3. Develop a surgical plan for primary and secondary nerve decompression. 4. Understand the surgical anatomy at all trigger sites. 5. Select appropriate International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, and CPT codes.

SUMMARY

Headache surgery encompasses release of extracranial peripheral sensory nerves at seven sites. Keys to successful surgery include correct patient selection, detailed patient counseling, and meticulous surgical technique. This article is a practical step-by-step guide, from preoperative assessment to surgery and postoperative recovery. International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, and CPT codes, in addition to complications and salvage procedures, are discussed. Intraoperative photographs, videos, and screening questionnaires are provided.

Risk of Subsequent Migraines in Facial Fracture Patients: A Population-Based Cohort Study

Background: Limited studies have discussed the association between facial fractures and subsequent migraines. In this study, we examined this association and the effect of facial fracture and surgery on the development of migraines. Methods: We selected 5034 patients with facial fractures and a matched cohort of 20,136 patients without facial fractures or facial-associated surgery with a history of migraine from the National Health Insurance database. Risk factors included age, gender, occupation (white-collar, blue-collar, and others), and comorbidities. Patients were frequency matched by age, gender, and index year. The incidence of migraine and the association between migraine development and facial surgery were identified by facial fracture location stratification. Results: The incidence of migraines in the facial fracture cohort was 1.37-fold higher when compared with the comparison cohort (6.47 vs. 4.73 per 1000 person-years). There was a 1.31-fold risk of migraines in the adjusted hazard model and a 1.30-fold risk of migraines in the subdistribution hazard model (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.12-1.52 and 1.12-1.51, respectively). Malar/maxillary and nasal fractures showed 1.48- and 1.29-fold risks of migraines in the adjusted hazard model and subdistribution hazard model (95% CI, 1.16-1.89 and 1.05-1.59, respectively). There were no significant differences in migraine occurrence among patients who underwent surgery. Conclusions: Our findings indicated that malar/maxillary and nasal fractures were associated with a subsequent risk of migraines. There were no significant differences in migraine occurrence among patients who underwent surgery. Because of the retrospective nature of this study, further studies are warranted.

Decompression Surgery for Frontal Migraine Headache

INTRODUCTION

Migraine headache (MH) is one of the most common diseases worldwide and pharmaceutical treatment is considered the gold standard. Nevertheless, one-third of patients suffering from migraine headaches are unresponsive to medical management and meet the criteria for "refractory migraines" classification. Surgical treatment of MH might represent a supplementary alternative for this category of patients when pharmaceutical treatment does not allow for satisfactory results. The goal of this article is to provide a comprehensive review of the literature regarding surgical treatment for site I migraine management.

METHODS

A literature search using PubMed, Medline, Cochrane and Google Scholar database according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines was conducted using the following MeSH terms: "frontal neuralgia," "frontal trigger site treatment," "frontal migraine surgery" and "frontal headache surgery" (period: 2000 -2020; last search on 12 March 2020).

RESULTS

Eighteen studies published between 2000 and 2019, with a total of 628 patients, were considered eligible. Between 68% and 93% of patients obtained satisfactory postoperative results. Complete migraine elimination rate ranged from 28.3% to 59%, and significant improvement (>50% reduction) rates varied from 26.5% to 60%.

CONCLUSIONS

Our systematic review of the literature suggests that frontal trigger site nerve decompression could possibly be an effective strategy to treat migraine refractory patients, providing significant improvement of symptoms in a considerable percentage of patients.

Site V Surgery for Temporal Migraine Headaches

Background:

Auriculotemporal nerve is demonstrated to contribute to migraine pain in temporal area. In particular, its relationship with the superficial temporal artery in the soft tissues superficial to the temporal parietal fascia has attracted researchers’ attention for many decades. The objective of this review was to explore whether site V nerve surgical decompression is effective for pain relief in temporal area.

Methods:

A literature search, according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines, was conducted to evaluate the surgical treatment of auriculotemporal migraine. Inclusion was based on studies written in English, published between 2000 and February 2020, containing a diagnosis of migraine in compliance with the classification of the International Headache Society. The treatment must consist of surgical procedures involving the auriculotemporal nerve and/or arteries in site V, with outcome data available for at least 3 months.

Results:

Three hundred twenty-four records were identified after duplicates were removed, 31 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility, and 2 records were selected for inclusion. A total of 77 patients were included in the review. A direct approach at the anatomical site identified with careful physical examination and confirmed with a handheld Doppler probe is generally performed under local anesthesia. Blunt dissection to the superficial temporal fascia to expose the auriculotemporal nerve and the superficial temporal artery is followed by artery cauterization/ligament and eventual nerve transection/avulsion. Site V surgery results in a success rate from 79% to 97%.

Conclusions:

Despite the recent advances in extracranial trigger site surgery and a success rate (>50% improvement) from 79% to 97%, site V decompression is still poorly described. Elaborate randomized trials are needed with accurate reporting of patient selection, surgical procedure, adverse events, recurrencies or appearance of new trigger points, quality of life outcome, and longer follow-up times.

Nummular Headache and Its Surgical Treatment

Nummular headache (NH) is an uncommon primary headache characterized by pain limited to a precise small area of the scalp. There is no global consensus on its pathogenesis, but its extracranial origin is the most accepted theory. Moreover, peripheral mechanism is supported by the overlapping symptomatology of secondary forms of NH and is well described in the literature. However, a standard effective treatment is still lacking.

METHODS

A literature search according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines was conducted to evaluate surgical strategies for NH. Inclusion criteria were English language, diagnosis of primary NH according to International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd Edition, or of secondary NH, and follow-up at a minimum of 3 months. The treatment had to consist of peripheral surgery.

RESULTS

One hundred eighty-seven records were identified after duplicates were removed, 15 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility, and 4 records were selected for inclusion. A total of 53 patients were included in this review, 50 of whom were diagnosed with primary NH. The general positive response after surgery (>50% reduction in occipital migraine headaches) was about 70.0% for primary NH, while secondary NH always showed complete pain relief. However, many variations in patient selection and type of surgery were described.

CONCLUSIONS

Neurovascular relationship in the extracranial tissues seems to be involved in the onset of NH. However, only limited data from meager literature and from few patients are currently available. Shared multicentric research protocols are badly required.

Frontal Trigger Site Deactivation for Migraine Surgical Therapy

BACKGROUND

The World Health Organization ranked migraine as the 19th worldwide disease causing disability. Recent insights into the pathogenesis of migraine headache substantiate a neuronal hyperexcitability and inflammation involving compressed peripheral craniofacial nerves, and these trigger points can be eliminated by surgery. In this study, we report our experience with minimally invasive surgical procedures for frontal migraine headache treatment.

METHODS

From June 2011 to May 2019, we performed 70 frontal migraine decompression surgeries of both supratrochlear and supraorbital nerves (65 bilateral and 5 unilateral) by an endoscopic or transpalpebral approach. In 24 patients (34.2%), frontal migraine emerges as a secondary trigger point following primary occipital and/or temporal migraine surgery.

RESULTS

After a mean follow-up of 24 months (range, 3-97 months), patients with frontal trigger site migraine reported a 94% positive response to surgery (32% complete relief and 62% significant improvement); 6% had no change in their symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on our experience, the operation has not caused any serious complication or side effects, and surgical decompression of supraorbital and supratrochlear nerves might be recommended to patients who suffer from a moderate to severe chronic frontal migraine not responding to conventional therapy.

Long-term efficacy of superficial temporal artery ligation and auriculotemporal nerve transection for temporal cluster headache in adolescent

OBJECTIVES

Cluster headache is a primary headache disorder, which has affected up to 0.1% population. Superficial temporal artery ligation combined with auriculotemporal nerve transection (SLAT) is one of the surgical alternatives to treat the drug-resistant temporal cluster headache (TCH). The current work aimed to assess the effect of SLAT on TCH patients based on the very long-term clinical follow-up.

METHODS

The current retrospective study had enrolled 20 adolescent TCH patients undergoing SLAT between December 2016 and January 2018. The headache diaries as well as the pain severity questionnaire of the visual analog scale (VAS) had been collected to measure the pain severity before and after surgery.

RESULTS

The pain-free rates 3 days, as well as 1, 6, and 12 months, after SLAT surgery were 2.00%, 10.00%, 25.00%, and 70.00%, respectively. The frequency of TCH attack daily was found to be markedly reduced on the whole; besides, the pain degree was also remarkably decreased.

CONCLUSIONS

Results in this study indicate that the sustained headache can be relieved after SLAT in adolescent patients with intractable TCH.