Characteristics of Iatrogenic Nerve Injury from Orthopedic Surgery Correlate with Time to Subspecialty Presentation

Increasing Awareness of Complications of Nerve Injury Following Shoulder Surgery: Preventing Delays in Referral and Treatment

BACKGROUND

Nerve injuries remain a challenging complication after shoulder surgery. While most resolve spontaneously, some require surgical intervention. This study describes the characteristics of patients sustaining nerve injuries following shoulder surgery, evaluates referral patterns to nerve surgeons, and characterizes nerve surgeries performed and their outcomes. Increased awareness of these injuries allows patients and providers to be better informed regarding the appropriate management when these complications occur.

METHODS

A retrospective review of referrals with nerve injuries following shoulder surgery between 2007 and 2015 was performed. The final analysis included 65 patients. Data reviewed included demographics, procedure and anesthesia type, and diagnosis of nerve injury. Time to referral to nerve surgeon and proportional changes in the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) scores were determined. Outcomes were categorized as failed, partially successful, and successful based on final follow-up.

RESULTS

Patients were referred following arthroscopic shoulder surgeries (35.4%), shoulder arthroplasties (24.6%), open shoulder procedures (21.5%), and combined open and arthroscopic procedures (18.5%). The mean time to referral was 7.6 months. Nerve injuries involved brachial plexus (33) and individual and multiple peripheral nerve branches (23 and 7, respectively). Twenty-five (38%) nerve injuries demonstrated spontaneous recovery. Thirty-five patients underwent surgical intervention, of which 27 were successful, 3 were partially successful, and 3 failed.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the largest series of patients with iatrogenic nerve injury following shoulder surgeries to date. Our data demonstrate a lack of timely referral to nerve surgeons, especially after arthroscopy. There continues to be a variable injury pattern even among similar surgeries. Despite this, timely surgical intervention, when indicated, can lead to favorable outcomes.

Mechanisms, interventions at risk and clinical presentation of iatrogenic nerve lesions in trauma patients

BACKGROUND

Iatrogenic nerve lesions during surgical interventions are avoidable complications that may cause severe functional impairment. Hereby, awareness of physicians and knowledge of structures and interventions at risk is of utmost importance for prevention. As current literature is scarce, we evaluated all patients treated surgically due to peripheral nerve injuries in our specialized nerve center for the presence of iatrogenic nerve lesions.

METHODS

We evaluated a total of 5026 patients with peripheral nerve injuries treated over a time period of 8 years in our facility for the prevalence of iatrogenic nerve injuries, their clinical presentations, time to treatment, mechanisms and intraoperative findings on nerve continuity.

RESULTS

A total of 360 (6.1%) patients had an iatrogenic cause resulting in 380 injured nerves. 76.6% of these lesions affected the main branch of the injured nerve, which were mainly the radial (30.5%), peroneal (13.7%) and median nerve (10.3%). After a mean delay of 237 ± 344 days, patients presented 23.2% with a motor and 27.9% with a mixed sensory and motor deficit. 72.6% of lesions were in-continuity lesions. Main interventions at risk are displayed for every nerve, frequently concerning osteosyntheses but also patient positioning and anesthesiologic interventions.

DISCUSSION

Awareness of major surgical complications such as iatrogenic nerve injuries is important for surgeons. An often-seen trivialization or "watch and wait" strategy results in a huge delay for starting an adequate therapy. The high number of in-continuity lesions mainly in close proximity to osteosyntheses makes diagnosis and treatment planning a delicate challenge, especially due to the varying clinical presentations we found. Diagnostics and therapy should therefore be performed as early as possible in specialized centers capable of performing nerve repair as well as salvage therapies.

Peripheral neuropathies after shoulder arthroscopy: a systematic review

Purpose

Peripheral neuropathies after shoulder arthroscopy are rare, though likely under-reported. Many resolve spontaneously, but some patients are left with permanent neurological deficits. The purpose of this study was to review the literature to better characterize this patient population, diagnostic tests performed, the timing and type of surgical intervention, and report clinical outcomes.

Methods

A systematic literature review was performed. Articles in English were identified from PubMed, EMBASE, and CINAHL in August 2021. Article titles and abstracts were screened for relevance by two authors and discordant abstracts were resolved by the senior author. Data were subsequently extracted from the included articles.

Results

Seventeen articles were identified yielding a total of 91 patients. The average age was 53 ± 12 years, and most patients were male (72%). Rotator cuff repair (62%) was the most common procedure performed. A peripheral neuropathy was identified an average of 80 ± 81 days from the index procedure (range, 0-240 days). Most commonly, peripheral nerve injury presented as a mononeuropathy, with the median nerve (39%) and ulnar nerve (17%) affected predominantly. Seventeen percent of patients underwent a secondary surgery at an average of 232 ± 157 days after the index procedure. At the final follow-up, 55% of neuropathies had resolved, 14% partially improved, and 22% showed no clinical improvement. The most proposed etiologies were postoperative immobilization (29%) and intraoperative positioning (20%), but several possible etiologies have been suggested.

Conclusions

Peripheral neuropathies after arthroscopic shoulder procedures are rare. While most spontaneously resolve, up to 1 in 5 patients may have persistent neuropathic symptoms. A high index of suspicion should be maintained throughout the postoperative period. When neurologic deficits are identified, patients should undergo a thorough diagnostic workup and be referred to a subspecialist in a timely manner.

Iatrogenic Nerve Injuries of the Upper Extremity: A Critical Analysis Review

»

Iatrogenic nerve injuries may occur after any intervention of the upper extremity.

»

Causes of iatrogenic nerve lesions include direct sharp or thermal injury, retraction, compression from implants or compartment syndrome, injection, patient positioning, radiation, and cast/splint application, among others.

»

Optimal treatment of iatrogenic peripheral nerve lesions relies on early and accurate diagnosis.

»

Advanced imaging modalities (e.g., ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging) and electrodiagnostic studies aid and assist in preoperative planning.

»

Optimal treatment of iatrogenic injuries is situation-dependent and depends on the feasibility of direct repair, grafting, and functional transfers.

Iatrogenic peripheral nerve injury: a guide to management for the orthopaedic limb surgeon

Nerves may be inadvertently injured during trauma surgery due to distorted anatomy, traction applied to a limb, soft tissue retraction, by power tools, instrumentation and from compartment syndrome. Elective orthopaedic surgery has additional risks of joint dislocation for arthroplasty surgery, limb lengthening, thermal injury from cement and direct injury from peripheral nerve blocks.The true incidence is unknown, and many cases are diagnosed as neurapraxia with the expectation of a full and timely recovery without the need for intervention. The incorrect assignation of a neurapraxia diagnosis may delay treatment for a higher grade of injury and in addition fails to recognize that a diagnosis of neurapraxia should be made with caution and a commitment to regular clinical review. Untreated, a neurapraxia can deteriorate and result in axonopathy. The failure to promptly diagnose such a nerve injury and instigate treatment may result in further deterioration and expose the clinician to medicolegal challenge.The focus of this review is to raise awareness of iatrogenic peripheral nerve injuries in orthopaedic limb surgery, the importance of regular clinical examination, the role of investigations, timing and nature of interventions and also to provide a guide to when onward referral to a specialist peripheral nerve injury unit is recommended. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2021;6:607-617. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.200123.