The Value of an Orthoplastic Approach to Management of Lower Extremity Trauma: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Orthoplastic surgery research: Three decades of growth and future directions

Six clinical databases were analysed from inception through 2023 to assess the trajectory of orthoplastic surgery research and provide a scoping review of concentrations and gaps in the literature. The literature grew exponentially since 2010, with 66 % of identified studies published between 2020 and 2024. The United Kingdom emerged as the primary contributor, accounting for 47 % of publications following national guideline implementation that demonstrated improved patient outcomes. While meta-analyses support the clinical benefits of orthoplastic management for complex fractures, showing reduced surgical interventions and infection rates, the evidence base relies predominantly on retrospective studies, with no randomized controlled trials identified. Key opportunities to strengthen the field include conducting prospective studies, expanding research beyond lower extremity trauma to areas such as upper extremity reconstruction, oncologic applications, and paediatric care, addressing healthcare access disparities, evaluating cost-effectiveness across different healthcare systems, and developing standardized guidelines beyond the UK.

Availability and quality assessment of Clinical Practice Guidelines on orthoplastic surgery treatment of open fractures of the lower limb using AGREE II tool: A systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Orthoplastic surgery, which combines orthopedic and plastic surgery principles, plays a crucial role in the treatment of open fractures of the lower limb. Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs) are valuable tools for standardizing and improving patient care.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the availability and quality of international CPGs for orthoplastic treatment of open fractures of the lower limb. A secondary objective was to provide a detailed analysis of the specific recommendations by comparing them among different CPGs.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted in 2023 according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines across major medical databases and gray literature. Inclusion criteria focused on guidelines specific to orthoplastic surgery for lower limb open fractures. The Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II) tool, a widely accepted instrument for guideline assessment, was utilized to evaluate the methodological rigor and transparency of the selected guidelines.

RESULTS

Three orthoplasty CPGs have been identified, 2 of which were judged reliable according to the AGREE II methodology. Orthoplastic recommendations are no more than 7 per CPG. Consistent agreement was observed on the timing of debridement, the importance of early fixation, and definitive coverage.

CONCLUSION

CPGs are critical to set up clinical pathways that are safe and evidence-based. Only 3 international CPGs address orthoplastic treatment of open lower limb fractures, 2 of which are judged reliable according to methodology. Therefore, it becomes essential to develop and disseminate high-quality, evidence-based guidelines, which are critical to improving patient outcomes and standardizing clinical practice worldwide.

Proceedings of the United Kingdom Periprosthetic Joint Infection Meeting 2022: Fracture-Related Infection Session

Implant-related infections represent a relatively common and significant challenge in the surgical management of musculoskeletal trauma patients. The third United Kingdom Periprosthetic Joint Infection (UK PJI) Meeting convened in Glasgow on 1 April 2022, and brought together over 180 delegates, representing orthopaedics, infectious diseases, microbiology, plastic surgery, anaesthetics, and allied health professions, including pharmacy and specialist nurses. The meeting comprised a plenary session for all delegates, and separate breakout sessions for fracture-related infection (FRI) and arthroplasty. The UK PJI working group prepared consensus statements in advance of each session, based upon topics that were discussed at previous meetings, and delegates engaged in an anonymous electronic voting process. This article presents the findings of the FRI session, and examines each consensus topic within the context of the contemporary literature.

The Godina Principle in the 21st Century: Free Flap Timing after Isolated Lower Extremity Trauma in a Retrospective National Cohort

BACKGROUND

 The timing of free flap reconstruction after lower extremity trauma has been a controversial debate since Marko Godina's original 72-hour recommendation. Recent advances in microsurgery warrant an evaluation of the optimal time to reconstruction.

METHODS

 The Nationwide Readmission Database (2014-2019) was used to identify patients undergoing free flap reconstruction after lower extremity trauma. Risk-adjusted statistical methods were used to identify optimal time where risk of infectious and microsurgical complications increase and to quantify the risk associated with time delays.

RESULTS

 A total of 1,030 patients undergoing reconstruction were identified. The mean time to flap coverage was 24.3 days. Thirty-three percent were performed within 72 hours, 24% from 72 hours to 10 days, 18% from 10 to 30 days, and 24% after 30 days. Flaps performed after 10 days were associated with increased risk of surgical site infection, osteomyelitis, and other wound complications, compared with those performed within 72 hours. There was no increased risk in the period of 72 hours to 10 days. Revision amputation and microsurgical complications were not increased after 10 days. The predicted optimal cutoff was 9.5 days for microsurgical complications and 14.5 days for infectious complications.

CONCLUSION

 Advances in microsurgery may be responsible for extending the time in which definitive soft tissue coverage is required for wounds resulting from lower extremity trauma. Although it appears the original 72-hour time window can be safely extended, efforts should be made to refer patients to specialty limb salvage centers in a timely fashion.

Limb salvage versus amputation: Experience of a young patient at a university hospital

Decision-making regarding limb amputation represents a significant clinical challenge, especially when the initial evaluation does not coincide with the criteria established in scales used worldwide, as is the case of the MESS scale. This article presents the case of a 24-year-old female patient who was transferred to a university hospital after a road traffic accident with severe and large lesions in the left lower limb. Despite a poor initial prognosis and in-hospital complications, including multiple surgical procedures and foot drop, a favorable recovery was achieved with complete anatomical salvage of the limb at risk. The multidisciplinary approach and intensive rehabilitation were instrumental in achieving a satisfactory functional recovery. This case highlights the importance of considering factors beyond amputation scale scores, as well as the need for comprehensive care to improve outcomes in patients with complex extremity injuries.

Establishing a Collaborative Orthoplastic Approach for the Management of Primary Musculoskeletal Neoplasms: An 8-year Case Series

Orthoplastic surgery is a multidisciplinary approach that is well-studied for extremity trauma, but not for musculoskeletal oncologic reconstruction. Here, the authors describe the application of a collaborative orthoplastic approach for the management of primary musculoskeletal neoplasms and evaluate its impact. The collaboration protocol, implemented in July 2019, comprises specific checkpoints of interdisciplinary co-management, which span the pre-, intra-, and postoperative treatment period. This involves direct communication between attending surgeons and their respective clinical teams. Patients who underwent resection of a primary musculoskeletal neoplasm between March 2014 and April 2022 were retrospectively categorized into conventional or collaboration groups. Of the 136 total patients, there were 63.2% (n = 86) conventional and 36.8% (n = 50) collaboration; 31.6% (n = 43) had reconstruction and 68.4% (n = 93) did not. Compared with the conventional group, the collaboration group had significantly higher rates of diabetes (18% versus 7%, P = 0.048) and radiation treatment (68% versus 43%, P = 0.005). The collaboration group was significantly more likely to have plastic surgery involvement in their care than the conventional group (38% versus 14%, P = 0.001), and to undergo reconstruction (42% versus 26%, P = 0.047). The groups showed no difference in rates of hematoma, seroma, delayed healing, infection, 30- or 90-day reoperation, or partial or complete flap/graft failure. The collaborative approach described here is feasible and associated with increased plastic surgery involvement and reconstructive surgery. Complications were equivalent despite evidence suggesting increased case complexity in the collaboration group. These early results are promising and could inspire wider adoption of structured orthoplastic protocols for care of these patients.

The integration of ortho-plastic limb salvage teams in the humanitarian response to violence-related open tibial fractures: evaluating outcomes in the Gaza Strip

BACKGROUND

Limb salvage by ortho-plastic teams is the standard protocol for treating open tibial fractures in high-income countries, but there's limited research on this in conflict settings like the Gaza Strip. This study assessed the clinical impact of gunshot-related open tibial fractures, compared patient management by orthopedic and ortho-plastic teams, and identified the risk factors for bone non-union in this context.

METHODS

A retrospective review of medical records was conducted on Gaza Strip patients with gunshot-induced-open tibial fractures from March 2018 to October 2020. Data included patient demographics, treatments, and outcomes, with at least one year of follow-up. Primary outcomes were union, non-union, infection, and amputation.

RESULTS

The study included 244 injured individuals, predominantly young adult males (99.2%) with nearly half (48.9%) having Gustilo-Anderson type IIIB fractures and more than half (66.8%) with over 1 cm of bone loss. Most patients required surgery, including rotational flaps and bone grafts with a median of 3 admissions and 9 surgeries. Ortho-plastic teams managed more severe muscle and skin injuries, cases with bone loss > 1 cm, and performed less debridement compared to other groups, though these differences were not statistically significant. Non-union occurred in 53% of the cases, with the ortho-plastic team having the highest rate at 63.6%. Infection rates were high (92.5%), but no significant differences in bone or infection outcomes were observed among the different groups. Logistic regression analysis identified bone loss > 1 cm, vascular injury, and the use of a definitive fixator at the first application as predictors of non-union.

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights the severity and complexity of such injuries, emphasizing their significant impact on patients and the healthcare system. Ortho-plastic teams appeared to play a crucial role in managing severe cases. However, further research is still needed to enhance our understanding of how to effectively manage these injuries.

Current Management of Acute and Posttraumatic Critical Bone Defects

SUMMARY

Limb reconstruction in patients with critical-sized bone defects remains a challenge due to the availability of various technically demanding treatment options and a lack of standardized decision algorithms. Although no consensus exists, it is apparent from the literature that the combination of patient, surgeon, and institutional collaborations is effective in providing the most efficient care pathway for these patients. Success relies on choosing a particular surgical approach that manages infection, soft tissue defects, stability, and alignment. Recent systematic reviews demonstrate high success rates with the following management options: Ilizarov bone transport, Masquelet (induced membrane) technique, cancellous bone grafting, and vascularized bone grafts.

Unique Challenges in Diabetic Foot Science

In the past 30 years, there has been a rapid influx of information pertaining to the diabetic foot (DF) coming from numerous directions and sources. This article discusses the current state of the DF literature and challenges it presents to clinicians with its associated increase in knowledge on their derivations, complications, and interventions. Further, we attempt to provide tips on how to navigate and criticize the current literature to encourage and maximize positive outcomes in this challenging patient population.

Strength in Numbers: A SWOT Analysis of Plastic Surgery

Background

Plastic surgeons comprise the minority of practicing surgeons, with an even smaller minority practicing in an academic setting. As the practice of medicine and the systems in which we operate continue to evolve, it is essential that plastic surgeons have a say in the changing landscape. This study conducted a strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) analysis of plastic surgery to identify unifying strengths and common threats.

Methods

An electronic survey was distributed to American Council of Academic Plastic Surgeons' Winter Meeting attendees on three separate occasions preceding the meeting. Respondents were asked to provide demographic information and to identify the top three strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT analysis) for the specialty. Subgroup analyses were performed based on demographic characteristics.

Results

A total of 187 responses were received from meeting attendees, representing an 89.0% response rate. Most respondents were non-Hispanic (78.6%), White (66.8%), women (59.5%), and faculty/independent physicians (65.8%). The most identified strength in plastic surgery was our problem-solving abilities (62.0%). The most identified weakness was poor public perception of plastic surgery (54.0%). The most identified opportunity was demonstration of value to health systems (67.9%), and the most identified threat was scope of practice creep by other specialties (78.1%). The SWOT analysis identified lack of surgeon diversity as a key weakness, improvement of surgeon diversity as a key opportunity, and lack of diversity among plastic surgeons as a key threat to the specialty.

Conclusion

Only through a diverse but united front can we effectively use our strengths to face our threats and employ opportunities to overcome our weaknesses.

Outcomes of Free Muscle Flaps versus Free Fasciocutaneous Flaps for Lower Limb Reconstruction following Trauma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

 Free flap reconstruction of the lower limb following trauma often suffers higher complication rates than other areas of the body. The choice of muscle or fasciocutaneous free flap is an area of active debate.

METHODS

 A systematic review of EMBASE, MEDLINE, PubMed, and Cochrane Register from inception to April 1, 2022 was performed. Articles were assessed using the methodological index for non-randomized studies instrument. The primary outcome was to assess and compare the major surgical outcomes of partial or total flap failure, reoperation, and amputation rates.

RESULTS

 Seventeen studies were included. All studies were retrospective in nature, of level three evidence, and published between 1986 and 2021. The most common muscle and fasciocutaneous free flaps used were latissimus dorsi flap (38.1%) and anterolateral thigh (ALT) flap (64.8%), respectively. Meta-analysis found no significance difference in rates of total flap failure, takeback operations, or limb salvage, whereas partial flap failure rate was significantly lower for fasciocutaneous flaps. The majority of studies found no significant difference in complication rates, osteomyelitis, time to fracture union, or time to functional recovery. Most, 82.4% (14/17), of the included studies were of high methodological quality.

CONCLUSION

 The rate of total flap failure, reoperation, or limb salvage is not significantly different between muscle and fasciocutaneous free flaps after lower limb reconstruction following trauma. Partial flap failure rates appear to be lower with fasciocutaneous free flaps. Outcomes traditionally thought to be managed better with muscle free flaps, such as osteomyelitis and rates of fracture union, were comparable.

Hardware Salvage in the Lower Extremity after Flap Coverage: 10-Year Single Center Outcomes Analysis

An unanswered question with open tibial fractures is whether the type of flap used affects hardware retention. Flap survival may not equate hardware retention or limb salvage. In this study, we performed a 10-year single institution review and analysis of all patients who had placement of hardware for open tibial fractures followed by flap coverage.

Methods

Inclusion criteria consisted of patients who underwent pedicled or free flap coverage of Gustilo IIIB or IIIC tibial fractures requiring open reduction and internal fixation. Outcomes and complications were statistically analyzed based on flap type. Flap type was stratified into free versus pedicled flaps and muscle versus fasciocutaneous flaps. Primary outcome measures included hardware failure and infection requiring hardware removal. Secondary outcome measures included limb salvage, flap success, and fracture union.

Results

Overall primary outcome measures were better for pedicled flaps (n = 31), with lower rates of hardware failure and infection (25.8%; 9.7%) compared with free flaps (n = 27) (51.9%; 37.0%). Limb salvage and flap success was not different comparing pedicled and free flaps. There was no significant difference in outcomes between muscle and fasciocutaneous flaps. Multivariable analysis showed that patients who had free versus pedicled flaps or muscle versus fasciocutaneous flaps had a higher chance of hardware failure. A formal orthoplastic team was established in the period from 2017 to 2022, after which flap numbers were higher and hardware failure less for pedicled and fasciocutaneous flaps.

Conclusions

Pedicled flaps were associated with lower rates of hardware failure and infection requiring hardware removal. A formal orthoplastic team improves hardware-related outcomes.

Reconstruction Options for Lower Extremity Traumatic Wounds

The senior author first coined the "orthoplastic" approach to traumatic lower extremity reconstruction, by which multidisciplinary surgeons and specialists work together for optimal patient success. The goals of lower extremity salvage are to optimize limb appearance, restore unrestricted pain-free ambulation, and improve quality of life. Composite traumatic defects require an organized approach, and the reconstructive ladder is used for strategies of varying complexity for repair of soft-tissue wounds. The lower rungs of the ladder include simpler reconstructive options such as the use of skin grafts and local flaps, and the higher rungs represent complex techniques such as free tissue transfer. Although there is no notable difference between muscle and fasciocutaneous/perforator flaps in reconstructive outcomes, there has been a trend toward perforator flaps to minimize donor site morbidity.

Erratum to Two Articles by Klifto et al., March 2021

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000003495.][This corrects the article DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000003494.].