1
|
Kim JY, Ha JH, Jin US. Effect of Intercostal Nerve Coaptation on Postoperative Pain in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: A Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Pilot Study. J Breast Cancer 2025; 28:108-118. [PMID: 40133987 PMCID: PMC12046349 DOI: 10.4048/jbc.2024.0212] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2024] [Revised: 12/22/2024] [Accepted: 02/11/2025] [Indexed: 03/27/2025] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Patients undergoing breast surgery may experience chronic postoperative pain in the breasts, upper extremities, and axillary regions, and no established methods for preventing this pain are available at present. This study aimed to investigate whether coaptation of the transected intercostal nerve can prevent the development of neuropathic and chronic breast pain after mastectomy in implant-based breast reconstruction. METHODS A prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trial was conducted by dividing patients who underwent implant-based breast reconstruction after mastectomy into a control group without nerve coaptation and an experimental group with nerve coaptation. Patient clinical information was collected, and a survey using the pain and quality of life scale was conducted at 6 and 12 months after surgery. RESULTS Fifteen patients completed the study, including seven in the control group and eight in the experimental group. The two groups showed no significant differences in terms of clinical factors. The experimental group exhibited lower Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire scores than the control group at 6 and 12 months postoperatively, with a statistically significant difference at 6 months. Numerical Rating Scale and Present Pain Intensity scores for both groups were in the "no to mild" range throughout the study period, with no statistically significant differences between the groups. Although the difference in the BREAST-Q™ results did not reach statistical significance, the experimental group showed an improvement in the quality of life. CONCLUSION Intercostal nerve coaptation after mastectomy in implant-based breast reconstruction may facilitate initial nerve recovery. Although trial results are needed to fully determine the clinical impact, our findings support the ongoing scientific and clinical efforts to use this technique.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ji-Young Kim
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Hanyang University Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jeong Hyun Ha
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive surgery, CHA Gangnam Medical Center, CHA University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ung Sik Jin
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sgaramella LI, Pasculli A, Moschetta M, Puntillo F, Dicillo P, Clemente L, Maruccia M, Mastropasqua MG, Piombino M, Resta N, Rubini G, Prete FP, Serio G, Stucci LS, Giudice G, Testini M, Gurrado A. Randomized controlled trial of bromelain and alpha-lipoic acid in breast conservative surgery. Sci Rep 2025; 15:4899. [PMID: 39929877 PMCID: PMC11811023 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-86651-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2024] [Accepted: 01/13/2025] [Indexed: 02/13/2025] Open
Abstract
Aim of study is to analyze Bromelain' effects on the most common early complications after BCS (oedema and seroma). From January 2021 to December 2023 a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial was performed on 114 candidates for BCS at our Academic Unit. Group A received a supplement of Casperome™-Boswellia Phytosome® + Bromelain (CBB) in combination with alpha-lipoic acid + superoxide dismutase + B and D vitamins + centella asiatica. Group B received a supplement of CBB + placebo. Group C received placebo. The therapies were administrated for 30 days. On GEE logistic regression, drugs combination in A seems to be associated with statistical fewer oedema compared with C (P = 0.018 at 1 day and P = 0.002 after 1 month). Comparing B to C, B gained a significative value after 1 month (P = 0.007). On GEE logistic regression, the drugs combination in A has been associated with statistical fewer seroma compared with C (P = 0.009 at 15thpostoperative day and P < 0.001 after 1 month). B vs C reaches significant values 15 day and 1 month after surgery (P = 0.002 and P < 0.001, respectively). The current study is the first analyzing the employment of CBB association with/without neurotrophic agent on prevention of early complications after BCS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L I Sgaramella
- Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area (DiMePreJ), Aldo Moro University, Bari, Italy
| | - A Pasculli
- Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area (DiMePreJ), Aldo Moro University, Bari, Italy
| | - M Moschetta
- Breast Care Unit, Policlinico of Bari, University of Medical School of Bari, P.zza G. Cesare 11, 70124, Bari, Italy
- Department of Interdisciplinary Medicine (DIM), University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy
| | - F Puntillo
- Breast Care Unit, Policlinico of Bari, University of Medical School of Bari, P.zza G. Cesare 11, 70124, Bari, Italy
- Department of Interdisciplinary Medicine (DIM), University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy
| | - P Dicillo
- Rehabilitation Service, IRCCS Istituto Tumori "Giovanni Paolo II", Bari, Italy
| | - L Clemente
- Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area (DiMePreJ), Aldo Moro University, Bari, Italy
| | - M Maruccia
- Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area (DiMePreJ), Aldo Moro University, Bari, Italy
- Breast Care Unit, Policlinico of Bari, University of Medical School of Bari, P.zza G. Cesare 11, 70124, Bari, Italy
| | - M G Mastropasqua
- Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area (DiMePreJ), Aldo Moro University, Bari, Italy
- Breast Care Unit, Policlinico of Bari, University of Medical School of Bari, P.zza G. Cesare 11, 70124, Bari, Italy
| | - M Piombino
- Breast Care Unit, Policlinico of Bari, University of Medical School of Bari, P.zza G. Cesare 11, 70124, Bari, Italy
- Radiation Oncology Department, AUOC, Policlinico of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - N Resta
- Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area (DiMePreJ), Aldo Moro University, Bari, Italy
- Breast Care Unit, Policlinico of Bari, University of Medical School of Bari, P.zza G. Cesare 11, 70124, Bari, Italy
| | - G Rubini
- Breast Care Unit, Policlinico of Bari, University of Medical School of Bari, P.zza G. Cesare 11, 70124, Bari, Italy
- Department of Interdisciplinary Medicine (DIM), University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy
| | - F P Prete
- Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area (DiMePreJ), Aldo Moro University, Bari, Italy
| | - G Serio
- Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area (DiMePreJ), Aldo Moro University, Bari, Italy
- Breast Care Unit, Policlinico of Bari, University of Medical School of Bari, P.zza G. Cesare 11, 70124, Bari, Italy
| | - L S Stucci
- Breast Care Unit, Policlinico of Bari, University of Medical School of Bari, P.zza G. Cesare 11, 70124, Bari, Italy
- Medical Oncology Unit, AUOC, Policlinico of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - G Giudice
- Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area (DiMePreJ), Aldo Moro University, Bari, Italy
- Breast Care Unit, Policlinico of Bari, University of Medical School of Bari, P.zza G. Cesare 11, 70124, Bari, Italy
| | - M Testini
- Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area (DiMePreJ), Aldo Moro University, Bari, Italy
| | - Angela Gurrado
- Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area (DiMePreJ), Aldo Moro University, Bari, Italy.
- Breast Care Unit, Policlinico of Bari, University of Medical School of Bari, P.zza G. Cesare 11, 70124, Bari, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Dupoiron D, Bienfait F, Seegers V, Piloquet FX, Pluchon YM, Pechard M, Mezaib K, Chvetzoff G, Diaz J, Ahmeidi A, Mauriès-Saffon V, Lebrec N, Jubier-Hamon S. Evaluating Treatment Preferences and the Efficacy of Capsaicin 179 mg Patch vs. Pregabalin in a Randomized Trial for Postsurgical Neuropathic Pain in Breast Cancer: CAPTRANE. Cancers (Basel) 2025; 17:313. [PMID: 39858095 PMCID: PMC11763653 DOI: 10.3390/cancers17020313] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2024] [Revised: 01/13/2025] [Accepted: 01/17/2025] [Indexed: 01/27/2025] Open
Abstract
Background/Objectives: CAPTRANE evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of high-concentration capsaicin patch (HCCP) vs. oral pregabalin for the treatment of postsurgical neuropathic pain (PSNP) following breast cancer surgery. The study was designed with the aim of demonstrating noninferiority of one HCCP against daily pregabalin. Methods: This was a multicenter, randomized, parallel-arm, open-label study conducted across nine centers in France. The primary endpoint was a change from baseline in the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) score after 2 months. Results: Recruitment challenges resulted in the randomization of 140 patients (versus 644 planned); the per-protocol population comprised 107 patients (HCCP: n = 65; pregabalin: n = 42). Baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups. In the per-protocol analysis, the mean (standard deviation) change versus baseline in NPRS score was -1.926 (2.554) with HCCP and -1.634 (2.498) with pregabalin. The prespecified analysis showed that HCCP was not inferior to pregabalin: the lower bound of the 90% confidence interval for the between-arm difference was -0.889 and the upper bound was +0.260 (i.e., below the predefined clinical threshold of +0.4). Patient-reported outcomes showed no statistically significant differences between treatments. The painful area size decreased significantly more with HCCP. Tolerability profiles differed, with HCCP mostly causing application-site reactions. While >50% of patients switched from pregabalin to HCCP, none switched from HCCP to pregabalin. Conclusions: This comparative study in PSNP post breast cancer surgery, evaluating a single treatment of HCCP, shows a noninferior reduction in pain intensity, a superior reduction in painful area size, and a patient preference for HCCP compared with pregabalin. Despite limitations, it contributes valuable initial data for PSNP management in breast cancer care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Denis Dupoiron
- Anaesthesiology and Pain Department, Institut de Cancérologie de l’Ouest, 49055 Angers, France; (F.B.); (N.L.); (S.J.-H.)
| | - Florent Bienfait
- Anaesthesiology and Pain Department, Institut de Cancérologie de l’Ouest, 49055 Angers, France; (F.B.); (N.L.); (S.J.-H.)
| | - Valérie Seegers
- Biometrics Department, Institut de Cancérologie de l’Ouest, 49055 Angers, France;
| | - François-Xavier Piloquet
- Oncology and Medical Specialties Department, Institut de Cancérologie de l’Ouest, 44800 Saint-Herblain, France;
| | - Yves-Marie Pluchon
- Pain Management Consultation Center, Centre Hospitalier Départemental Vendée, 85000 La Roche-sur-Yon, France;
| | - Marie Pechard
- Institut Curie Hôpital de Saint-Cloud, 92210 Saint-Cloud, France;
| | - Karima Mezaib
- Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, 94805 Villejuif, France;
| | | | - Jésus Diaz
- Anaesthesiology and Pain Department, Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, 34090 Montpellier, France;
| | - Abesse Ahmeidi
- Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care, Centre Oscar Lambret, 59000 Lille, France;
| | | | - Nathalie Lebrec
- Anaesthesiology and Pain Department, Institut de Cancérologie de l’Ouest, 49055 Angers, France; (F.B.); (N.L.); (S.J.-H.)
| | - Sabrina Jubier-Hamon
- Anaesthesiology and Pain Department, Institut de Cancérologie de l’Ouest, 49055 Angers, France; (F.B.); (N.L.); (S.J.-H.)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kwee E, de Groot LG, Alonso PR, Krikour K, Duraku LS, Hundepool CA, Zuidam JM. Neuropathic Pain Following Breast-conserving Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. JPRAS Open 2024; 42:48-57. [PMID: 39290400 PMCID: PMC11405640 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpra.2024.07.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2024] [Accepted: 07/31/2024] [Indexed: 09/19/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Chronic pain after breast cancer surgery, affecting 25%-60% of patients, significantly impacts the survivors' quality of life. With improved survival rates, more individuals are experiencing this long-term complication. It is often overlooked that this chronic pain may stem from peripheral nerve injury, resulting in neuropathic pain characterized by burning sensations, electric shocks, and heightened sensitivity. Although neuropathic pain prevalence is reported at 24%-36% post-mastectomy, the data following breast-conserving surgery remain limited. This systematic review aimed to investigate the prevalence of neuropathic pain after breast-conserving surgery and its potential association with axillary procedures. Methods The electronic databases, Medline, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Central, were searched. Inclusion criteria were defined to include studies reporting on the prevalence of neuropathic pain following breast-conserving surgery and exploring associations with axillary procedures. A meta-analysis was performed to compute a pooled prevalence rate. Results Eight studies, covering 1,469 patients post-breast-conserving surgery, met the inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis revealed a pooled prevalence of 31% (95% confidence intervals [CI] 0.14-0.56) neuropathic pain among patients who underwent breast-conserving surgery. Six studies explored associations with axillary procedures; however, none suggested a correlation between axillary procedures and neuropathic pain after breast-conserving surgery. Conclusion This systematic review and meta-analysis indicated a pooled prevalence of 31% neuropathic pain following breast-conserving surgery of, with confidence interval ranging from 14% to 56%. The review did not provide conclusive evidence to suggest correlations between axillary procedures and neuropathic pain after breast-conserving surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Esmee Kwee
- Department of Plastic, Reconstructive Surgery and Hand surgery, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lucas G de Groot
- Department of Plastic, Reconstructive Surgery and Hand surgery, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Paula Rijs Alonso
- Department of Plastic, Reconstructive Surgery and Hand surgery, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Keghart Krikour
- Department of Plastic, Reconstructive Surgery and Hand surgery, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Liron S Duraku
- Department of Plastic, Reconstructive Surgery and Hand surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Caroline A Hundepool
- Department of Plastic, Reconstructive Surgery and Hand surgery, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J Michiel Zuidam
- Department of Plastic, Reconstructive Surgery and Hand surgery, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Marco E, Trépanier G, Chang E, Mauti E, Jones JM, Zhong T. Postmastectomy Functional Impairments. Curr Oncol Rep 2023; 25:1445-1453. [PMID: 37955831 PMCID: PMC10728246 DOI: 10.1007/s11912-023-01474-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/31/2023] [Indexed: 11/14/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This narrative review aims to offer a thorough summary of functional impairments commonly encountered by breast cancer survivors following mastectomy. Its objective is to discuss the factors influencing these impairments and explore diverse strategies for managing them. RECENT FINDINGS Postmastectomy functional impairments can be grouped into three categories: neuromuscular, musculoskeletal, and lymphovascular. Neuromuscular issues include postmastectomy pain syndrome (PMPS) and phantom breast syndrome (PBS). Musculoskeletal problems encompass myofascial pain syndrome and adhesive capsulitis. Lymphovascular dysfunctions include lymphedema and axillary web syndrome (AWS). Factors such as age, surgical techniques, and adjuvant therapies influence the development of these functional impairments. Managing functional impairments requires a comprehensive approach involving physical therapy, pharmacologic therapy, exercise, and surgical treatment when indicated. It is important to identify the risk factors associated with these conditions to tailor interventions accordingly. The impact of breast reconstruction on these impairments remains uncertain, with mixed results reported in the literature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eden Marco
- Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| | | | - Eugene Chang
- Department of Medicine, Division of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Supportive Care, Cancer Rehab & Survivorship Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Multisystem & Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation Program, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Emma Mauti
- Department of Medicine, Division of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Jennifer M Jones
- Cancer Rehabilitation and Survivorship Program, Department of Supportive Care, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Toni Zhong
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Salati SA, Alsulaim L, Alharbi MH, Alharbi NH, Alsenaid TM, Alaodah SA, Alsuhaibani AS, Albaqami KA. Postmastectomy Pain Syndrome: A Narrative Review. Cureus 2023; 15:e47384. [PMID: 38021812 PMCID: PMC10657609 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.47384] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/19/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Postmastectomy pain syndrome is a very common disorder in breast cancer survivors. The impact on the quality of patients' lives is significantly adverse. The precise pathophysiology has not been determined as yet though various risk factors have been identified that make the patient vulnerable. Required preoperative work includes the identification and possible elimination of risk factors. Treatment is multidisciplinary involving surgical and non-surgical modalities. There is a great scope of research in this field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sajad Ahmad Salati
- General Surgery, Unaizah College of Medicine & Medical Sciences, Qassim University, Qassim, SAU
| | - Lamees Alsulaim
- Surgery, Unaizah College of Medicine & Medical Sciences, Qassim University, Qassim, SAU
| | - Mariyyah H Alharbi
- College of Medicine, Unaizah College of Medicine & Medical Sciences, Qassim University, Qassim, SAU
| | - Norah H Alharbi
- College of Medicine, Unaizah College of Medicine & Medical Sciences, Qassim University, Qassim, SAU
| | - Thana M Alsenaid
- College of Medicine, Unaizah College of Medicine & Medical Sciences, Qassim University, Qassim, SAU
| | - Shoug A Alaodah
- College of Medicine, Unaizah College of Medicine & Medical Sciences, Qassim University, Qassim, SAU
| | - Abdulsalam S Alsuhaibani
- College of Medicine, Unaizah College of Medicine & Medical Sciences, Qassim University, Qassim, SAU
| | - Khalid A Albaqami
- College of Medicine, Unaizah College of Medicine & Medical Sciences, Qassim University, Qassim, SAU
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Galligan M. Exploring the prevalence, characteristics and nursing assessment of neuropathic pain. Nurs Stand 2023; 38:39-44. [PMID: 37641849 DOI: 10.7748/ns.2023.e12138] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/20/2023] [Indexed: 08/31/2023]
Abstract
Neuropathic pain results from damage to the nerves. It affects many in the general population, but its prevalence is higher in certain groups, for example those who have undergone certain procedures or systemic anti-cancer therapy and people with conditions such as diabetes mellitus, viral infections or central nervous system disorders. Regardless of the cause, neuropathic pain can have significant adverse effects on people's quality of life, so nurses need to be able to conduct a holistic pain assessment that incorporates physical, emotional, social and spiritual aspects. This article explores the prevalence, characteristics and nursing assessment of neuropathic pain with the aim of improving nurses' awareness, practice and care of people affected by this type of pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Galligan
- The Royal Marsden School, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, England
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Incidence, risk factors, prevention and treatment of postmastectomy pain syndrome in breast cancer: A multicenter study. Int J Surg 2022; 106:106937. [PMID: 36152923 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2022.106937] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2022] [Revised: 09/08/2022] [Accepted: 09/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Postmastectomy pain syndrome (PMPS) is a common postoperative condition after breast cancer surgery. PURPOSE The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence rate and risk factors of PMPS, and to propose prevention and treatment methods. METHODS The study included 1790 postoperative breast cancer patients from three hospitals from 2017 to 2021, of which 302 (13.0%) patients with PMPS were included in the study. RESULTS Age, breast surgery type, axillary surgery type and radiotherapy are the risk factors of PMPS. Age, radiotherapy and chemotherapy affect the pain degree of PMPS during movement. CONCLUSIONS For breast cancer patients with high risk factors, pain should be actively prevented during perioperative period. Oral pharmacological agents, multidisciplinary combination therapy, local anesthetics and regional anesthesia are the most common treatment of PMPS.
Collapse
|