Discrepancy between Radiographic and Arthroscopic Findings of Thumb Basilar Joint Arthritis: A Preliminary Clinical Report

Preservation Arthroplasty for Basal Joint Arthritis Using Arthroscopy and Autologous Fat Grafting With Platelet-rich Plasma

Background

Prior studies have shown that intra-articular injection of autologous fat may be a viable, less invasive approach for the treatment of carpometacarpal (CMC) joint arthritis, compared with trapeziecetomy. Small joint arthroscopy has also been found to be a useful tool in evaluation and treatment of arthritis. The authors present a treatment for CMC arthritis combining a minimally invasive approach for arthroscopic debridement with autologous fat grafting and platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injection.

Methods

Patients with Eaton stage II-IV CMC osteoarthritis underwent arthroscopic debridement and injection of autologous fat and PRP into the joint. Pre- and postoperative pain scores, functional outcomes, radiographic improvement in joint subluxation, patient satisfaction, and complications were evaluated.

Results

Forty-eight thumb CMC joint arthroscopies with fat grafting and PRP were performed. No intraoperative or immediate postoperative complications were experienced. No patients required revision surgery. Average preoperative pain scores with activity improved from 8.9 ± 0.9 to 3.3 ± 2.2 (P < 0.0001) and at rest improved from 5.0 ± 2.5 to 1.0 ± 1.3 (P < 0.0001). M1M2 overlap was used to measure radiographic subsidence. This improved from 4.4 ± 2.8 mm preoperatively to 6.8 ± 2.3 mm postoperatively, reflecting a relative improvement of 70% (P < 0.0042). High patient satisfaction was noted.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment of the CMC joint using arthroscopic technique combined with autologous fat and PRP is effective in treating pain and joint subluxation. Additional prospective studies are underway for comparison to traditional arthroplasty techniques and to evaluate this technique's potential for other small joint pathology.

Assessing the Predictive Accuracy of the Eaton-Littler Classification in Thumb Carpometacarpal Osteoarthritis: A Comparative Analysis with the Outerbridge Classification in a Cohort of 51 Cases

(1) Background: The objective of this study is to evaluate the predictive value of the Eaton-Littler radiologic classification for thumb carpometacarpal osteoarthritis (CMC OA) relating to intra-articular cartilage damage assessed by the Outerbridge arthroscopic classification. (2) Methods: A total of 51 thumb CMC OA arthroscopies were performed on patients classified as Eaton stages 1, 2, or 3. Post-arthroscopic evaluations of cartilage damage were categorized using the Outerbridge classification. Comparative analyses were conducted between the radiological Eaton stages and the arthroscopic Outerbridge stages. (3) Results: Arthroscopic examination revealed Outerbridge stage 3 and 4 cartilage damage in 26 cases classified as Eaton stage 2 and in 18 cases classified as Eaton stage 3. The detection of severe cartilage damage in patients classified as Eaton stage 2 was unexpected. (4) Conclusions: Arthroscopy demonstrated that many patients with mild radiological degenerative signs exhibited significant cartilage destruction. Although the Eaton classification is widely used for staging thumb CMC OA, it may not accurately reflect the severity of intra-articular damage. The Eaton classification does not reliably predict intra-articular damage in Eaton stage 2 cases.

Effectiveness of Arthroscopic Debridement, Trapeziectomy, and Joint Replacement for Trapeziometacarpal Joint Osteoarthritis: A Meta-Analysis of Pre and Postoperative Pain Scores

Trapeziometacarpal joint osteoarthritis (TMJO) affects up to 33% of postmenopausal women, leading to pain, reduced mobility, and grip strength, with initial treatments focusing on non-surgical options like injections, orthoses, and exercises before considering surgery. A major challenge in managing TMJO involves selecting the optimal surgical strategy that is customized to individual clinical conditions. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of three common surgical interventions for TMJO in relieving pain, including arthroscopic debridement (AD), trapeziectomy (TRAP), and joint replacement (JR). PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, and MEDLINE databases were queried according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines for studies that presented pain outcomes following intervention for TMJO. Pain scores were reported preoperatively and postoperatively using the visual analog scale (VAS). Inclusion criteria included studies published in Q1 and Q2 journals and those with a follow-up of > six months. The final selection comprised 18 studies with 763 patients treated with AD (n = 102, 13%), TRAP (n = 428, 56%), and JR (n = 233, 31%) between 2010 and 2023, with a mean follow-up period of 38 ± 28 months. The studies included a total of 24 groups, five of which received AD, 13 of which received TRAP, and six of which received JR. The mean preoperative VAS was 6.7 ± 1.7, and the mean postoperative VAS was 1.7 ± 1.3 for all groups (P < 0.001). The meta-analysis demonstrated a mean preoperative pain score of 5.8 (95% CI, 4.1-7.5) for AD, 6.6 (95% CI, 5.7-7.5) for TRAP, and 7.8 (95% CI, 7.0-8.7) for JR. Postoperatively, there was a mean pain score of 2.2 (95% CI, 0.1-4.2) for AD, 1.4 (95% CI, 1.1-1.7) for TRAP, and 0.9 (95% CI, 0.6-1.2) for JR. This study showed that, if appropriately indicated, joint preservation with AD may be as effective as TRAP and JR for reducing pain associated with TMJO in the short term. However, the rate of conversion or revision should be assessed in future studies.