Is the world ready for the STICH 3.0 trial?

Coronary Artery Disease Doubles Excess Mortality in Patients With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction

BACKGROUND

Assessment of coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with heart failure and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (HFrEF) varies between countries and there are only limited data on the long-term impact of CAD in these patients. We examined the association between CAD and mortality in patients with HFrEF undergoing coronary angiography.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Using Danish registries, we identified patients with HFrEF (EF ≤40%) undergoing coronary angiography from 2003 to 2016. We estimated 10-year cumulative incidence proportions and adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) for all-cause death, comparing patients with HFrEF with CAD with patients with HFrEF without CAD. Both groups were further compared with an age- and sex-matched general population cohort in a 1:5 ratio. We included 3294 patients with HFrEF, of whom 1436 (44%) had CAD, as well as 16 365 matched general population individuals. Median follow-up was 5.3 years. Patients with HFrEF with CAD had higher 10-year mortality than patients with HFrEF without CAD (55% versus 33%; aHR, 1.38 [95% CI, 1.19-1.59]). These estimates were consistent across ages, whereas greater extent of CAD was associated with higher mortality (Ptrend<0.01). Compared with the matched general population, the 10-year excess mortality was 29% for patients with HFrEF with CAD (55% versus 26%; aHR, 2.18 [95% CI, 1.92-2.48]), and 15% for patients with HFrEF without CAD (33% versus 17%; aHR, 1.87 [95% CI, 1.63-2.14]).

CONCLUSIONS

Presence and extent of CAD are strongly associated with all-cause mortality in patients with HFrEF and, when compared with a matched general population, presence of CAD doubles excess mortality. This highlights the importance of CAD assessment for prognostication in patients with HFrEF.

Myocardial Revascularization in Patients with Diabetes and Heart Failure-A Narrative Review

Heart failure and diabetes mellitus are major contributors to global morbidity and mortality, with their prevalence continuously rising, primarily due to aging populations and improvements in healthcare. These conditions often coexist or develop sequentially, leading to complex interactions that significantly influence the progression and management of both diseases. Furthermore, heart failure and diabetes are commonly associated with coronary artery disease, which presents a unique challenge in clinical management, particularly in the context of myocardial revascularization. The presence of diabetes exacerbates atherosclerotic progression and impairs endothelial function, while heart failure complicates the perfusion and recovery of myocardial tissue post-intervention. This narrative review delves into the underlying mechanisms contributing to revascularization failure in patients with heart failure and diabetes, emphasizing the importance of understanding these interactions for optimal treatment. The review also summarizes key findings from randomized controlled trials, examining evidence both in the general population and in specific subgroups, including the elderly and patients with left main coronary artery disease, chronic kidney disease, peripheral artery disease, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Understanding these complexities is critical for improving patient outcomes.

Coronary Artery Disease and Heart Failure: Medical Management and Future Direction

Coronary artery disease (CAD) is a leading etiology of heart failure (HF) and serves as a significant therapeutic target to ameliorate HF-associated morbidity and mortality. Key management considerations include pharmacologic treatment, electrophysiological devices, and coronary revascularization, aimed toward preventing CAD progression, left ventricular remodeling, sudden death, and reinfarction. The optimal revascularization strategy for patients with CAD and HF who are surgical candidates requires careful assessment of each patients' unique risk/benefit profile and individual preferences. Several novel pharmacologic agents are in development with hopes of adding to the armamentarium of treatment of CAD and HF.

Temporal Trend in Revascularization for Patients With Ischemic Cardiomyopathy and Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease

BACKGROUND

Current guidelines recommend revascularization in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM). However, there is limited information about the trends and outcomes of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in ischemic cardiomyopathy patients with multivessel coronary artery disease.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Using New Jersey state mandatory registries, 8083 patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy with CABG or PCI revascularization for multivessel coronary artery disease from 2007 to 2018 were included in the analysis. Joinpoint regression and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to assess the annual percentage change in trends and predictors of the 30-day mortality rate, respectively. A decline in CABG procedures was observed from 2007 to 2011 (annual percentage change, -11.5%; P=0.003), followed by stabilization. The PCI trend remained unchanged from 2007 to 2010 and then increased significantly (annual percentage change, 3.2%; P=0.02). In the subsample of patients with proximal left anterior descending artery plus circumflex and right coronary artery, CABG was a predominant procedure until 2011, and the proportion of both procedures did not differ thereafter. In the subsample of patients with left anterior descending artery and any other artery stenosis, PCI remained dominant from 2007 to 2018, while in patients with left main and any other artery stenosis, CABG remained dominant from 2007 to 2018 (P<0.001). The 30-day risk-adjusted mortality rate was higher after PCI versus CABG for each year, but after adjustment for completeness of revascularization, there was no difference between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The patterns of revascularization procedures for patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy with multivessel coronary artery disease have changed over the years, as evidenced by the changes in CABG and PCI trends. CABG and PCI had comparable 30-day risk-adjusted mortality risks.

Do the Few Dictate Care for the Many? Revascularisation Considerations That Go Beyond the Guidelines

The burden of coronary artery disease (CAD) is large and growing, commonly presenting with comorbidities and older age. Patients may benefit from coronary revascularisation with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), yet half of patients with CAD who would benefit from revascularisation fall outside the eligibility criteria of trials to date. As such, the choice of revascularisation procedures varies depending on the CAD anatomy and complexity, surgical risk and comorbidities, the patient's preferences and values, and the treating team's expertise. The recent American guidelines on coronary revascularisation are comprehensive in describing recommendations for PCI, CABG, or conservative management in patients with CAD. However, individual challenging patient presentations cannot be fully captured in guidelines. The aim of this narrative review is to summarise common clinical scenarios that are not sufficiently described by contemporary clinical guidelines and trials in order to inform heart team members and trainees about the nuanced considerations and available evidence to manage such cases. We discuss clinical cases that fall beyond the current guidelines and summarise the relevant evidence evaluating coronary revascularisation for these patients. In addition, we highlight gaps in knowledge based on a lack of research (eg, ineligibility of certain patient populations), underrepresentation in research (eg, underenrollment of female and non-White patients), and the surge in newer minimally invasive and hybrid techniques. We argue that ultimately, evidence-based medicine, patient preference, shared decision making, and effective heart team communications are necessary to best manage complex CAD presentations potentially benefitting from revascularisation with CABG or PCI.