Body Composition Changes During Traditional Versus Intensive Cardiac Rehabilitation in Coronary Artery Disease

Body Composition Risk Assessment of All-Cause Mortality in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease Completing Cardiac Rehabilitation

BACKGROUND

Obesity, measured by body mass index, is a risk factor for cardiovascular disease. However, the role of body composition, including body fat percentage and lean body mass (LBM), in cardiovascular outcomes has not been well studied in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). This study aims to evaluate the association of body composition with cardiovascular outcomes and all-cause mortality in patients with CAD.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Body composition was obtained via bioelectrical impedance analysis from 1291 patients with CAD before starting cardiac rehabilitation. Patients were divided into quintiles by body composition and analyzed in total and after sex stratification. All-cause mortality and a composite of major adverse cardiovascular events, including acute coronary syndrome, coronary revascularization, heart failure hospitalization, and stroke, were primary study outcomes. In the total cohort adjusted analyses, body mass index, body fat percentage, and LBM were not predictors of all-cause mortality or major adverse cardiovascular events. In sex-stratified analyses, among women, the third LBM quintile was associated with decreased risk of all-cause mortality compared with the lowest LBM quintile (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.07 [95% CI, 0.01-0.57]; P=0.01). No other body composition variables were associated with all-cause mortality or major adverse cardiovascular events in either sex.

CONCLUSIONS

In women with CAD, moderate LBM was associated with lower mortality when compared with low LBM, whereas body fat percentage and body mass index were not associated with mortality or major adverse cardiovascular events in either sex. Future research studying the implications of changes in body composition on outcomes in men and women with CAD is warranted.

Comparison of Traditional and Intensive Cardiac Rehabilitation on Dietary Behavior and Clinical Risk Factor Outcomes: Secondary Analysis Research

PURPOSE

The objective of this study was to assess differences in dietary behavior and clinical risk factor outcomes and explore predictors of change among patients participating in traditional and Pritikin intensive cardiac rehabilitation (CR).

METHODS

This secondary analysis of cardiac registry data from 2015 to 2021 included patients participating in traditional CR (n = 420) or Pritikin intensive CR (n = 1005) at a single hospital site. Dietary behavior outcomes included the Rate Your Plate measure, while clinical risk factor outcomes included fasting lipids, blood pressure, anthropometrics, functional outcomes, and psychosocial assessment. Analysis of covariance examined a difference in Rate Your Plate scores between CR groups. Multivariate analysis of covariance was used to determine differences in clinical risk factor variables between CR groups. Predictors of change in dietary behavior and clinical risk factors were determined through multiple bivariate linear regression models within each CR group.

RESULTS

Both CR programs led to significant improvements though more change was observed among Pritikin intensive CR participants in dietary behavior, anthropometrics, and fasting lipids. Status as a current or recent smoker was not a significant predictor of dietary behavior. Male sex, status as a current or recent smoker, beta-blockers, and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors prescribed were not significant predictors of total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, or non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol for traditional and Pritikin intensive CR groups. There were not significant predictors of blood pressure, body mass, or waist circumference.

CONCLUSION

Although participation in either CR program yielded cardiometabolic benefits, Pritikin intensive CR patients exhibited significantly greater improvements in dietary behavior and clinical risk factors.

Prospective Study of the Impact of Outpatient Intensive Cardiac Rehabilitation on Diet Quality, Health-related Quality of Life, and Cardiovascular Health Indices

Intensive cardiac rehabilitation (ICR) programs are approved by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services on the basis of their expected benefits for cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors and health outcomes. However, the impact of outpatient ICR on diet quality, quality of life (QOL), and CVD risk factors has not been prospectively assessed. The aim of this cohort study was to test the hypothesis that patients enrolled in a Pritikin outpatient ICR program would show improved diet quality, QOL, and CVD health indexes, and that the improvements would be greater than those of patients in traditional cardiac rehabilitation (CR). Patients enrolled in ICR (n = 230) or CR (n = 62) were assessed at baseline and at visit 24. Diet quality was assessed using the Rate Your Plate questionnaire, and QOL was assessed through the Dartmouth COOP Functional Health Assessment questionnaire. Secondary end points included anthropometrics, CVD biomarkers, hemodynamics, and fitness. Patients in ICR programs displayed significant improvements at visit 24 versus baseline in Rate Your Plate and Dartmouth COOP Functional Health Assessment scores, weight, body mass index (BMI), waist circumference, fat mass, total and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, 6-minute walk distance, and grip strength. Patients in ICR had greater improvements in diet quality (p = 0.001), weight (p = 0.001), and BMI (p <0.001) than did those in CR. In summary, this prospective study of Pritikin outpatient ICR revealed significant improvements in diet quality, QOL, adiposity, and other CVD risk factors. The improvements in diet quality, body weight, and BMI were greater than those observed with traditional CR.

Physical and Psychological Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Traditional Cardiac Rehabilitation and Intensive Cardiac Rehabilitation

PURPOSE

Both traditional cardiac rehabilitation (TCR) and intensive cardiac rehabilitation (ICR) have proven benefits for patients with cardiovascular disease. The aim of this study was to compare ICR versus TCR on cardiac rehabilitation (CR) outcomes in patients with cardiovascular disease.

METHODS

In a retrospective cohort study of 970 patients (n = 251, ICR; n = 719, TCR) who were referred for CR between January 2018 and December 2019, 693 (71.4%) patients completed it. The TCR sessions were 90 min (60-min exercise) three times/wk for 12 wk, while ICR sessions were 4 hr (60-min exercise) two times/wk for 9 wk. Primary endpoints were change in cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) (by difference in exercise prescription metabolic equivalents [METs] between the last session and the average of the second and third sessions), anxiety (Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7) scores, percent depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-9 or Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale) scores, and health status (36-item Short Form Health Survey physical and mental composite scores). Linear regression adjusted for imbalanced baseline characteristics (age, race, and diagnosis of angina).

RESULTS

Of the 693 patients who completed CR (ICR = 204/251 [81%] vs TCR = 489/719 [68%], P < .01), mean age was 66 yr and 31% were female. Patients in TCR had a higher improvement in CRF (CR session METs: ICR +1.5 ± 1.2 vs TCR +1.9 ± 1.5, P < .01) but no difference in health status scores. Conversely, patients in ICR had more reduction in anxiety scores (-2 ± 4 vs -1 ± 3, P < .01) and percent reduction in depression scores (-8.3 ± 13.7% vs -5.0 ± 11.7%, P < .01) than patients in TCR.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients in TCR had higher improvement in CRF while patients in ICR had higher improvement in anxiety and depression scores.

Benefits of the First Pritikin Outpatient Intensive Cardiac Rehabilitation Program

PURPOSE

Intensive cardiac rehabilitation (ICR) is a comprehensive, medically supervised exercise treatment program covered by Medicare for patients with approved cardiac diagnoses. The aim of this study was to determine the benefits of the first Pritikin outpatient ICR program.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis included patients referred to ICR or traditional cardiac rehabilitation (CR) during the first 7 yr (2013-2019) at the first facility to implement Pritikin ICR. Intensive cardiac rehabilitation is composed of 36 education sessions on nutrition, exercise, and a healthy mindset, in addition to 36 monitored exercise sessions that comprise traditional CR. Assessments included anthropometrics (weight, body mass index, and waist circumference), dietary patterns, physical function (6-min walk test, [6MWT] Short Physical Performance Battery [SPPB: balance, 4-m walk, chair rise], handgrip strength), and health-related quality of life (Dartmouth COOP, 36-item Short Form Survey). Baseline and follow-up measures were compared within and between groups.

RESULTS

A total of 1963 patients enrolled (1507 ICR, 456 CR, 66.1 ± 11.4 yr, 68% male, 82% overweight or obese); 1141 completed the program (58%). The ICR patients completed 22 exercise and 18 education sessions in 9.6 wk; CR patients completed 19 exercise sessions in 10.3 wk. ICR resulted in improvements ( P < .001 pre vs post) in all anthropometric measures, dietary patterns, 6MWT distance, all SPPB components, grip strength, and health-related quality of life. The improvements in anthropometrics and dietary patterns were greater in ICR than in CR.

CONCLUSIONS

The Pritikin outpatient ICR program promoted improvements in several cardiovascular health indices. Critical next steps are to assess long-term health outcomes after ICR, including cardiac events and mortality.

Effect of Cardiac Rehabilitation on Glomerular Filtration Rate Using Serum Cystatin C Concentration in Patients With Cardiovascular Disease and Renal Dysfunction

PURPOSE

Among patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), little is known about whether the effect of cardiac rehabilitation (CR) on renal function differs across baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate using the serum concentration of cystatin C (eGFRcys). The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of CR on renal function in patients with CKD.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients with CKD (15 ≤ eGFRcys < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2) who participated in our CR program for cardiovascular disease. First, the patients were divided into three groups according to the baseline severity of the eGFRcys: G3a, G3b, and G4 groups. We compared the eGFRcys before and after the CR in each group. Second, to determine the association of baseline eGFRcys with the effect of CR, we fitted a linear regression model using the percent change in the eGFRcys (%ΔeGFRcys) as an outcome.

RESULTS

Of the 203 patients, 122 were in G3a, 60 were in G3b, and 21 were in G4 groups. The mean improvement of eGFRcys in each group was 1.3, 3.1, and 4.8 mL/min/1.73 m2, respectively. The %ΔeGFRcys was larger among patients with lower baseline eGFRcys (0.47% greater improvement of %ΔeGFRcys/one lower baseline eGFRcys; 95% CI, 0.23-0.72%). This association remained significant after adjustment for potential confounders (0.63% greater improvement of %ΔeGFRcys/one lower baseline eGFRcys; 95% CI, 0.35-0.91%).

CONCLUSIONS

The effect of CR on renal function was greater in patients with worse renal dysfunction measured by eGFRcys. A CR program could be useful for patients with severe renal dysfunction and it might have a beneficial effect on their renal function.

Comparison of Lean Mass in Women With and Without Heart Disease

PURPOSE

This proof-of-concept study compared lean mass (LM) between women with heart disease (HD) and without HD.

METHODS

Fifty-six community-dwelling women were pair-matched by age. Heart disease was defined using criteria from the US Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Body composition was measured using multifrequency bioelectrical impedance analysis. Relative LM was calculated against height (kg/m2) as the lean mass index (LMI). Sarcopenia was defined as an LMI <15.0 kg/m2. Strength was measured with a handgrip dynamometer, arm curl test, and chair stand test.

RESULTS

Those with HD had significantly less absolute (38.2 ± 0.8 vs 43.5 ± 1.0 kg; P < .001) and relative (15.3 ± 0.3 vs 16.2 ± 0.3 kg/m2, P = .015) LM compared with those without HD. Body mass was significantly greater for those without HD (76.1 ± 2.1 vs 68.4 ± 2.1 kg; P = .013) and there were no differences in fat mass. Upper body strength was significantly less and lower body strength was diminished but not significantly different in those with HD compared to those without HD (handgrip: P = .016; arm curl: P < .001; chair stand: P = .066).

CONCLUSIONS

In this group of community-dwelling women, those who reported a diagnosis of HD had significantly less LM than those without HD. Although neither group was classified as sarcopenic, women with HD were at greater risk due to lower relative LM. Based on our findings, during cardiac rehabilitation clinicians should counsel women regarding resistance exercise for maintenance of LM in addition to strength.

A Contemporary Review of the Effects of Exercise Training on Cardiac Structure and Function and Cardiovascular Risk Profile: Insights From Imaging

Exercise is a commonly prescribed therapy for patients with established cardiovascular disease or those at high risk for de novo disease. Exercise-based, multidisciplinary programs have been associated with improved clinical outcomes post myocardial infarction and is now recommended for patients with cancer at elevated risk for cardiovascular complications. Imaging studies have documented numerous beneficial effects of exercise on cardiac structure and function, vascular function and more recently on the cardiovascular risk profile. In this contemporary review, we will discuss the effects of exercise training on imaging-derived cardiovascular outcomes. For cardiac imaging via echocardiography or magnetic resonance, we will review the effects of exercise on left ventricular function and remodeling in patients with established or at risk for cardiac disease (myocardial infarction, heart failure, cancer survivors), and the potential utility of exercise stress to assess cardiac reserve. Exercise training also has salient effects on vascular function and health including the attenuation of age-associated arterial stiffness and thickening as assessed by Doppler ultrasound. Finally, we will review recent data on the relationship between exercise training and regional adipose tissue deposition, an emerging marker of cardiovascular risk. Imaging provides comprehensive and accurate quantification of cardiac, vascular and cardiometabolic health, and may allow refinement of risk stratification in select patient populations. Future studies are needed to evaluate the clinical utility of novel imaging metrics following exercise training.