Regression of organ damage following renal denervation in resistant hypertension: a meta-analysis

The effect of renal denervation in microcirculation: focusing on coronary microvascular dysfunction

Arterial hypertension is one of the most prevalent cardiovascular pathologies worldwide. Considering the increased rates of uncontrolled hypertension and treatment non-adherence, catheter-based methods, with the most prominent being renal denervation, have been recently included in international guidelines for the management of the pathology, naming the method the third pillar in hypertension management. However, sympathetic overactivation is not only a major pathophysiologic driver in hypertension, but in other cardiovascular pathologies as well. Considering the effect of renal denervation in hypertension-mediated target organ damage, as well as the pleotropic effects of this modality, recent evidence have evaluated the modality in coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD). Interestingly, despite preclinical data showcase a benefit of renal denervation in microcirculatory homeostasis, with enhancement of endothelial-mediated vasodilation and reduction of inflammation, these effects have failed to be translated into clinical benefit, with the limited, to date, non-interventional studies in coronary microcirculation reporting neutral effects. Therefore, this review aims to delineate the pathophysiological processes which relate microvascular dysfunction with hypertension, discuss the effect of the procedure in hypertension-mediated target organ damage, analyze preclinical and clinical data on the safety and efficacy of renal denervation in improving microcirculatory indices, as well as provide future directions for this novel field.

Echocardiographic findings following renal sympathetic denervation for treatment resistant hypertension, the ReShape CV-risk study

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to describe and compare echocardiographic findings before renal sympathetic denervation (RDN) and 6 and 24 months after the procedure.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with treatment resistant hypertension (TRH) were included in this non-randomised intervention study. RDN was performed by a single experienced operator using the Symplicity Catheter System. Echocardiographic measurements were performed at baseline, and after 6 and 24 months.

RESULTS

The cohort consisted of 21 patients with TRH, with a mean systolic office blood pressure (BP) of 163 mmHg and mean diastolic BP 109 mmHg. Mixed model analysis showed no significant change in left ventricular (LV) mass index (LVMI) or left atrium volume index (LAVI) after the RDN procedure. Higher LVMI at baseline was significantly associated with greater reduction in LVMI (p < 0.001). Relative wall thickness (RWT) increased over time (0.48 mm after two years) regardless of change in BP. There was a small but significant reduction in LV end-diastolic (LVIDd) and end-systolic (LVIDs) diameters after RDN, with a mean reduction of 2.6 and 2.4 mm, respectively, after two years. Progression to concentric hypertrophy was observed only in in patients who did not achieve normal BP values, despite BP reduction after RDN.

CONCLUSION

There was no reduction of LV mass after RDN. We found a small statistically significant reduction in LVIDd and LVIDs, which together with increase in RWT can indicate progression towards concentric hypertrophy. BP reduction after RDN on its own does not reverse concentric remodelling if target BP is not achieved.

Renal denervation for hypertensive heart disease and atrial fibrillation

Accumulating evidence supports the efficacy of renal denervation (RDN) as an antihypertensive treatment. Additionally, several RDN clinical studies, including meta-analyses, have suggested that RDN may potentially have beneficial effects on left ventricular hypertrophy, diastolic function, and new-onset/recurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF), although most studies were not randomized sham-controlled. In particular, the effects of RDN on left ventricular hypertrophy and AF recurrence appear to be relatively evident. Sympathetic activation plays a critical role in the development of hypertension, hypertensive heart disease, and AF. Notably, several studies suggest the cardioprotective effects of RDN even in the absence of significant blood pressure reduction, probably due to its sympathoinhibitory effects. It is imperative to establish the efficacy of RDN in patients with hypertensive heart disease and/or AF, focusing on parameters of sympathetic activity in the clinical setting, including randomized sham-controlled trials. Moreover, further basic research is essential to elucidate the therapeutic mechanisms of RDN beyond blood pressure lowering and the renal nerves-linked pathophysiologies of hypertensive heart disease and AF. This review outlines the effects of renal denervation on hypertensive heart disease, particularly on left ventricular hypertrophy and diastolic function, and on atrial fibrillation. The sympathoinhibitory effect of renal denervation, an important potential mechanism of its beneficial effects on heart disease, is also discussed.

Permanent Pacing Reduces Blood Pressure in Older Patients with Drug-resistant Hypertension: A New Pacing Paradigm?

Hypertension (HTN) is a major contributor to cardiovascular mortality. Many patients with drug-resistant hypertension (DRH) also require permanent pacing (PP). This large retrospective study evaluated the effect of PP for conventional PP indications in older patients with DRH. We reviewed the charts of 176 patients with dual-chamber PP and DRH. The effects of PP on systolic and diastolic blood pressure (sBP and dBP), the number of HTN-related medications, and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) were assessed at 6 months post-implantation and compared with pre-implantation values. Patients were followed up with for ≥72 months. Patients with a decline of >5 mmHg in sBP and decrease in at least one anti-HTN medication were defined as responders (126/176; P < .01). The mean decline in sBP was 9 mmHg, while that in dBP was 3 mmHg (P < .001 for both). Among responders, optimal reductions in sBP, dBP, and medications were seen at a stratification of >50% atrial pacing and <40% ventricular pacing (-12, -6.3, and -1.6, respectively). When right ventricular pacing of <50% was used for dichotomizing, the optimal atrial/ventricular pacing stratification was atrial pacing > 50% and ventricular pacing < 40% (-11.3, -6.3, and -1.6, respectively). A relationship between increasing atrial pacing and a decline in sBP was noted but did not reach statistical significance. However, of those responders who had a >10-mmHg decline in sBP, the majority were paced between 60%-100% in the atria. The LVEF did not change post-PP in either group. In conclusion, PP results in significant improvement in BP control. The observed association warrants further investigation.

Italian Society of Interventional Cardiology (GISE) and Italian Society of Arterial Hypertension (SIIA) Position Paper on the role of renal denervation in the management of the difficult-to-treat hypertension

Renal denervation (RDN) is a safe and effective strategy for the treatment of difficult to treat hypertension. The blood pressure (BP)-lowering efficacy of RDN is comparable to those of many single antihypertensive medications and it allows to consider the RDN as a valuable option for the treatment of difficult to treat hypertension together with lifestyle modifications and medical therapy. A multidisciplinary team is of pivotal importance from the selection of the patient candidate for the procedure to the post-procedural management. Further studies are needed to investigate the effect of RDN on clinical outcomes and to better identify the predictors of BP response to RDN in order to recognize the patients who are more likely to benefit from the procedure.

Left ventricular structure and function following renal sympathetic denervation in patients with HFpEF: an echocardiographic 9-year long-term follow-up

Background

High blood pressure is a major risk factor for cardiac remodeling and left ventricular hypertrophy, increasing cardiovascular risk and leading to heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Since renal sympathetic denervation (RDN) reduces blood pressure in the long term, we aimed to investigate the long-term effect of RDN in patients with HFpEF in the present analysis.

Methods

Patients previously enrolled in a local RDN registry who underwent high-frequency RDN with the use of the Symplicity Flex® renal denervation system between 2011 and 2014 were followed up. The patients were assessed by 24-h ambulatory blood pressure measurement, transthoracic echocardiography, and laboratory tests. We used the echocardiographic and biomarker criteria of the Heart Failure Association (HFA)-PEFF (Pre-test assessment, Echocardiography and Natriuretic Peptide Score, Funkctional testing, and Final aetiology) score to identify patients with HFpEF.

Results

Echocardiographic assessment was available for 70 patients at a 9-year long-term follow-up. Of these patients, 21 had HFpEF according to the HFA-PEFF score. We found a significant reduction of the HFA-PEFF score from 5.48 ± 0.51 points at baseline to 4.33 ± 1.53 points at the 9-year follow-up (P < 0.01). This decrease was due to a greater reduction in morphological and biomarker subcategories [from 1.95 ± 0.22 to 1.43 ± 0.51 points (P < 0.01) and from 1.52 ± 0.52 to 0.90 ± 0.63 points (P < 0.01), respectively] than in the functional one. Morphologically, there was a reduction in left ventricular hypertrophy and left atrial dilation.

Conclusions

The present analysis suggests that RDN may lead to a regression of the extent of HFpEF beyond a reduction in blood pressure and thus possibly contribute to an improvement in prognosis. More detailed information will be provided by ongoing randomized sham-controlled trials.

Taming resistant hypertension: The promise of novel pharmacologic approaches and renal denervation

Resistant hypertension is associated with an exceedingly high cardiovascular risk and there remains an unmet therapeutic need driven by pathophysiologic pathways unaddressed by guideline-recommended therapy. While spironolactone is widely considered as the preferable fourth-line drug, its broad application is limited by its side effect profile, especially off-target steroid receptor-mediated effects and hyperkalaemia in at-risk subpopulations. Recent landmark trials have reported promising safety and efficacy results for a number of novel compounds targeting relevant pathophysiologic pathways that remain unopposed by contemporary drugs. These include the dual endothelin receptor antagonist, aprocitentan, the aldosterone synthase inhibitor, baxdrostat and the nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist finerenone. Furthermore, the evidence base for consideration of catheter-based renal denervation as a safe and effective adjunct therapeutic approach across the clinical spectrum of hypertension has been further substantiated. This review will summarise the recently published evidence on novel antihypertensive drugs and renal denervation in the context of resistant hypertension.

Impact of renal denervation on cardiac remodeling in resistant hypertension: A meta-analysis

Twelve studies involving 433 patients were included. After RDN treatment, LVMI decreased by 13.08 g/m2 (95% confidence interval [CI]: -18.38, -7.78; p < .00001), PWTd decreased by 0.60 mm (95% CI: -0.87, -0.34; p < .00001), IVSTd decreased by 0.78 mm (95% CI: -1.06, -0.49; p < .00001), and LVEF increased by 1.80% (95% CI: 0.71, 2.90; p = .001). However, there were no statistically significant improvements in LVIDd (95% CI: -1.40, 0.24; p = .17) and diastolic function (E/A) (95% CI: -0.04, 0.14; p = .28). Drug treatment for resistant hypertension (RH) is challenging. Renal denervation (RDN) is one of the most promising treatments for RH. Although studies have shown RDN can control blood pressure, the impacts of RDN on cardiac remodeling and cardiac function are unclear. This meta-analysis evaluated the effect of RDN on cardiac structure and function in patients with RH. PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane were used to conduct a systematic search. The main inclusion criteria were studies on patients with RH who received RDN and reported the changes in echocardiographic parameters before and after RDN. Echocardiographic parameters included left ventricular mass index (LVMI), end-diastolic left ventricular internal dimension (LVIDd), left ventricular end-diastolic posterior wall thickness (PWTd), end-diastolic interventricular septum thickness (IVSTd), E/A, and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Data was analyzed using RevMan. Twelve studies involving 433 patients were included. After RDN treatment, LVMI decreased by 13.08g/m2 (95%confidence interval [CI]: -18.38, -7.78, p < .00001), PWTd decreased by 0.60mm (95% CI: -0.87, -0.34, p < 0.00001), IVSTd decreased by 0.78mm (95% CI: -1.06, -0.49, p < .00001), and LVEF increased by 1.80% (95% CI: 0.71, 2.90, p = .001). However, there were no statistically significant improvements in LVIDd (95% CI: -1.40, 0.24, p = .17) and diastolic function (E/A) (95% CI: -0.04, 0.14, p =.28). This meta-analysis finds that RDN can improve left ventricular hypertrophy and ejection fraction in patients with RH but has no significant effect on LVIDd and diastolic function. However, more studies are warranted due to the lack of a strict control group, a limited sample size, and research heterogeneity.

Renal Denervation in the Treatment of Resistant Hypertension and Difficult-to-Control Hypertension - Consensus Document of the Croatian Hypertension League - Croatian Society of Hypertension, Croatian Cardiac Society, Croatian Endovascular Initiative, Croatian Society for Diabetes and Metabolic Diseases, Croatian Renal Association, and Croatian Society of Family Physicians of the Croatian Medical Association

Renal denervation (RDN) as a method of treating arterial hypertension (AH) was introduced in Croatia in 2012. A multidisciplinary team and a network of hospitals that diagnose and treat patients with severe forms of AH were established, and a very strict diagnostic-treatment algorithm was prepared. At monthly meetings patients with truly resistant hypertension who were candidates for RDN were discussed. According to the 2021 ESH position statement and 2023 ESH guidelines, RDN is considered an alternative and additional, not a competitive method of treating patients with various forms of AH which must be performed by following a structured procedure and the patient's preference should be considered. In view of the changes in the global scientific community, the Croatian Hypertension League brings this consensus document on RDN conducted with radiofrequency-based catheter, the only currently available method in Croatia. In this document, exclusion and inclusion criteria are shown, as well as three groups of patients in whom RDN could be considered. The new diagnostic-treatment algorithm is prepared and follow-up procedure is explained. In Croatia, RDN is reimbursed by the national insurance company, thus pharmacoeconomic analyses is also shown. Criteria required by an individual centre to be approved of RDN are listed, and plans for prospective research on RDN in Croatia, including the Croatian registry for RDN, are discussed.

Controversies in Hypertension IV: Renal Denervation

Renal denervation is not a cure for hypertension. Although more recent sham-controlled trials were positive, a significant minority of patients in each trial were unresponsive. The optimal patient or patients need to be defined. Combined systolic/diastolic hypertension appears more responsive than isolated systolic hypertension. It remains uncertain whether patients with comorbidities associated with higher adrenergic tone should be targeted, including obesity, diabetes, sleep apnea, and chronic kidney disease. No biomarker can adequately predict response. A key to a successful response is the adequacy of denervation, which currently cannot be assessed in real time. It is uncertain what is the optimal denervation methodology: radiofrequency, ultrasound, or ethanol injection. Radiofrequency requires targeting the distal main renal artery plus major branches and accessory arteries. Although denervation appears to be safe, conclusive data on quality of life, improved target organ damage, and reduced cardiovascular events/mortality are required before denervation can be generally recommended.

The position of renal denervation in treatment of hypertension: an expert consensus statement

Hypertension is an important risk factor for cardiovascular disease. In the Netherlands, there are approximately 2.8 million people with hypertension. Despite treatment recommendations including lifestyle changes and antihypertensive drugs, most patients do not meet guideline-recommended blood pressure (BP) targets. In order to improve BP control and lower the risk of subsequent cardiovascular events, renal sympathetic denervation (RDN) has been introduced and studied as a non-pharmacological approach. While early data on the efficacy of RDN showed conflicting results, improvements in treatment protocols and study design resulted in robust new evidence supporting the potential of the technology to improve patient care in hypertensive subjects. Recently, 5 randomised sham-controlled trials demonstrated the safety and efficacy of the technology. Modelling studies have further shown that RDN is cost-effective in the Dutch healthcare setting. Given the undisputable disease burden along with the shortcomings of current therapeutic options, we postulate a new, clearly framed indication for RDN as an adjunct in the treatment of hypertension. The present consensus statement summarises current guideline-recommended BP targets, proposed workup and treatment for hypertension, and position of RDN for those patients with primary hypertension who do not meet guideline-recommended BP targets (see central illustration).

An Update on Refractory Hypertension

Purpose of Review

To update on definition, diagnosis, prevalence, patient characteristics, pathophysiology, and treatment of refractory hypertension (RfHTN).

Recent Findings

Refractory hypertension (RfHTN) is defined as blood pressure (BP) that is uncontrolled despite using ≥ 5 antihypertensive medications of different classes, including a long-acting thiazide diuretic and a mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA) at maximal or maximally tolerated doses. This new phenotype is different from resistant hypertension (RHTN), defined as BP that is uncontrolled despite using ≥ 3 medications, commonly a long-acting calcium channel blocker (CCB), a blocker of the renin-angiotensin system (angiotensin-converting enzyme [ACE] inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker [ARB]), and a diuretic. The RHTN phenotype includes controlled RHTN, BP that is controlled on 4 or more medications. RfHTN is largely attributable to increased sympathetic activity, unlike RHTN, which is mainly due to increased intravascular fluid volume frequently caused by hyperaldosteronism and chronic excessive sodium ingestion. Compared to those with controlled RHTN, patients with RfHTN have a higher prevalence of target organ damage and do not have elevated aldosterone levels. Ongoing clinical trials are assessing the safety and efficacy of using devices to aid with BP control in patients with RfHTN.

Summary

RfHTN is a separate entity from RHTN and is generally attributable to increased sympathetic activity.

Clinical Trial Design Principles and Outcomes Definitions for Device-Based Therapies for Hypertension: A Consensus Document From the Hypertension Academic Research Consortium

The clinical implications of hypertension in addition to a high prevalence of both uncontrolled blood pressure and medication nonadherence promote interest in developing device-based approaches to hypertension treatment. The expansion of device-based therapies and ongoing clinical trials underscores the need for consistency in trial design, conduct, and definitions of clinical study elements to permit trial comparability and data poolability. Standardizing methods of blood pressure assessment, effectiveness measures beyond blood pressure alone, and safety outcomes are paramount. The Hypertension Academic Research Consortium (HARC) document represents an integration of evolving evidence and consensus opinion among leading experts in cardiovascular medicine and hypertension research with regulatory perspectives on clinical trial design and methodology. The HARC document integrates the collective information among device-based therapies for hypertension to better address existing challenges and identify unmet needs for technologies proposed to treat the world’s leading cause of death and disability. Consistent with the Academic Research Consortium charter, this document proposes pragmatic consensus clinical design principles and outcomes definitions for studies aimed at evaluating device-based hypertension therapies.

Impact of renal sympathetic denervation on cardiac magnetic resonance-derived cardiac indices in hypertensive patients - A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Renal sympathetic denervation (RDN) is a safe device-based option for the treatment of hypertension although current guidelines do not recommend its use in routine clinical practice. In this meta-analysis, we investigated the effects of RDN in cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR)-derived cardiac indices.

METHODS

This meta-analysis was performed in accordance with the PRISMA statement. A comprehensive systematic search of MEDLINE database and Cochrane library through to January 2021 was performed. The inclusion criteria were studies that enrolled patients undergoing RDN in whom CMR data were provided for left ventricular end-diastolic volume indexed to body surface area (BSA) (LVEDVI), left ventricular end-systolic volume indexed (LVESVI), left ventricular mass indexed (LVMI), and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) pre and post RDN. A random effects model was used for the analyses.

RESULTS

Our search strategy revealed 9 studies that were finally included in the meta-analysis (n=300 patients, mean age: 60 years old, males: 59%). Compared to control group, RDN patients showed significantly lower values in the attained volumes (LVEDVI: -6.70 ml/m2, p=0.01; LVESVI: -3.63 ml/m2, p=0.006). Moreover, RDN group achieved a statistically significant higher attained LVEF (3.49%, p=0.01). A non-significant difference was found in the attained LVMI between RDN and control groups (-2.59 g/m2, p=0.39). Compared to pre-RDN values, RDN reduces significantly the LVMI, the LVEDVI, and the LVESVI while a non-significant change of LVEF was found.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, the current study demonstrates the potential beneficial role of RDN in CMR-derived cardiac indices that reflect adverse remodeling. However, large, randomized studies are needed to elucidate the role of RDN in cardiac remodeling in hypertension, heart failure, and other clinical settings.

The current status of renal denervation for the treatment of arterial hypertension

Despite the availability of safe and effective antihypertensive drugs, blood pressure (BP) control to guideline-recommended target values is poor. Several device-based therapies have been introduced to lower BP. The most extensively investigated approach is catheter-based renal sympathetic denervation (RDN), which aims to interrupt the activity of afferent and efferent renal sympathetic nerves by applying radiofrequency energy, ultrasound energy, or injection of alcohol in the perivascular space. The second generation of placebo-controlled trials have provided solid evidence for the BP-lowering efficacy of radiofrequency- and ultrasound-based RDN in patients with and without concomitant pharmacological therapy. In addition, the safety profile of RDN appears to be excellent in all registries and clinical trials. However, there remain unsolved issues to be addressed. This review summarizes the rationale as well as the current evidence and discusses open questions and possible future indications of catheter-based RDN.

Autonomic Control of the Heart and Its Clinical Impact. A Personal Perspective

This essay covers several aspects of the autonomic control of the heart, all relevant to cardiovascular pathophysiology with a direct impact on clinical outcomes. Ischemic heart disease, heart failure, channelopathies, and life-threatening arrhythmias are in the picture. Beginning with an overview on some of the events that marked the oscillations in the medical interest for the autonomic nervous system, our text explores specific areas, including experimental and clinical work focused on understanding the different roles of tonic and reflex sympathetic and vagal activity. The role of the baroreceptors, not just for the direct control of circulation but also because of the clinical value of interpreting alterations (spontaneous or induced) in their function, is discussed. The importance of the autonomic nervous system for gaining insights on risk stratification and for providing specific antiarrhythmic protection is also considered. Examples are the interventions to decrease sympathetic activity and/or to increase vagal activity. The non-invasive analysis of the RR and QT intervals provides additional information. The three of us have collaborated in several studies and each of us contributes with very specific and independent areas of expertise. Here, we have focused on those areas to which we have directly contributed and hence speak with personal experience. This is not an attempt to provide a neutral and general overview on the autonomic nervous system; rather, it represents our effort to share and provide the readers with our own personal views matured after many years of research in this field.

Renal sympathetic nerve activity regulates cardiovascular energy expenditure in rats fed high salt

We recently reported that a 4% high-salt diet + saline for drinking (HS + saline) leads to a catabolic state, reduced heart rate, and suppression of cardiovascular energy expenditure in mice. We suggested that HS + saline reduces heart rate via the suppression of the sympathetic nervous system to compensate for the high salt intake-induced catabolic state. To test this hypothesis, we directly measured renal sympathetic nerve activity (RSNA) in conscious Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats using a radiotelemetry system. We confirmed that HS + saline induced a catabolic state. HS + saline decreased heart rate, while also reducing RSNA in SD rats. In contrast, Dahl salt-sensitive (DSS) rats exhibited no change in heart rate and increased RSNA during high salt intake. Renal denervation significantly decreased heart rate and attenuated the catabolic state independent of blood pressure in DSS rats fed HS + saline, suggesting that salt-sensitive animals were unable to decrease cardiovascular energy consumption due to abnormal renal sympathetic nerve activation during high salt intake. These findings support the hypothesis that RSNA mediates heart rate during high salt intake in SD rats. However, the insensitivity of heart rate and enhanced RSNA observed in DSS rats may be additional critical diagnostic factors for salt-sensitive hypertension. Renal denervation may benefit salt-sensitive hypertension by reducing its effects on catabolism and cardiovascular energy expenditure.

The Current Status of Devices for the Treatment of Resistant Hypertension

Arterial hypertension is associated with increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Although blood pressure-lowering therapies significantly reduce the risk of major cardiovascular events, blood pressure control remains unsatisfactorily low. Several device-based antihypertensive therapies have been investigated in patients with treatment-resistant hypertension and in patients unable or unwilling to adhere to antihypertensive medication. As the field of device-based therapies is subject to constant change, this review aims at providing an up-to-date overview of different device-based approaches for the treatment of hypertension. These approaches target the sympathetic nervous system (renal denervation, baroreflex amplification therapy, baroreflex activation therapy, and carotid body ablation) or alter mechanical arterial properties by creating an iliac arteriovenous fistula. Notably, the use of all of these treatment options is not recommended for the routine treatment of hypertension by current guidelines but should be investigated in the context of controlled clinical studies.