Arterial stiffness in normal pregnancy at 11–13 weeks of gestation and risk of late-onset hypertensive disorders of pregnancy

Increase of augmentation index (AIx@75): a promising tool for screening hypertensive pregnancy disorders

BACKGROUND

Screening tools in the first trimester of pregnancy for hypertensive pregnancy disorders need to be determined.

OBJECTIVES

To compare cardiovascular parameters between pregnant (PG) and non-pregnant women (NPG) and to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of arterial stiffness indices in screening for hypertensive pregnancy disorders and their possible association with the mean uterine artery pulsatility index (MUA-PI).

METHODS

This study included 77 pregnant women (11-13.6 gestational weeks) and 77 age-matched non-pregnant women. Cardiovascular parameters were non-invasively measured using Mobil- O-Graph®, a cuff-based oscillometric device. The Doppler Ultrasonographic was used to evaluate the MUA-PI.

RESULTS

Augmentation index (AIx@75) was significantly higher in PG compared to NPG. ROC curve of AIx@75 showed area under curve (AUC): 0.7303, Sensitivity: 74.03% and Specificity: 64.94% and Cutoff: 22.50%. The systolic volume index was lower and the heart rate was higher in PG compared to NPG. Of the 77 pregnant women, 12 had an unfavorable outcome with hypertensive changes. Central systolic blood pressure (109.1 ± 8.84mmHg) and AIx@75 (31.97 ± 5.47%) were significantly higher in the group of pregnant women with outcome compared to the group without outcome (103.0 ± 8.53mmHg and 26.80 ± 8.71%). ROC curve showed better performance of the AIx@75 [AUC: 0.7179, Sensitivity: 83.33% and Specificity: 60.00%, Cutoff: 27.67%] compared to MUA-PI [AUC: 0.5098, Sensitivity: 8.333% and Specificity 98.44%].

CONCLUSIONS

AIx@75 was significantly higher in PG compared to NPG. We compared the AIx@75 of PG with and without outcomes. ROC curve analysis showed that this index could discriminate between PG with and without an outcome. Differently, the MUA-PI did not differ between PG with and without outcome, suggesting the superiority of AIx@75 in relation to MUA-PI as a method of screening in the first trimester for hypertensive disease of pregnancy. AIx@75 did not assotiate with MUA-PI. Prospective studies will be needed to confirm these findings.

Arterial stiffness measurements in pregnancy as a predictive tool for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and preeclampsia: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDPs) are a leading cause of maternal morbidity and mortality worldwide. Unfortunately, accurate early clinical screening methods for the development of these disorders are lacking. Arterial stiffness (AS) is an important hemodynamic indicator of vascular health that has shown promising results for the prediction of HDP onset. Past systematic reviews in the field have reported an increase in AS indices in women who develop HDPs and have highlighted the potential of AS measurements as a predictive tool early in pregnancy. The most recent systematic review, including papers up to 2015, assessed the differences in AS parameters between women with and without pregnancy complications. Since then, there has been a substantial influx of published research on the topic and a growing interest in the incorporation of AS measurements into clinical practice. Thus, we propose a systematic review and meta-analysis that is more inclusive to all HDP subsets and various hemodynamic indices of vascular health to provide a comprehensive overview of the current state of evidence. Specifically, we aim to evaluate these measures in women who develop HDPs compared to normotensive pregnancies to determine which measures are most associated with and/or can predict the development of HDPs. Major databases (Medline, Embase, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, PubMed, and CINAHL), grey literature (Google Scholar) and clinical trials (clinicaltrials.gov) will be searched to identify studies that report AS and hemodynamic measurements in pregnant women with and without HDPs. No restrictions will be made on study type or year. Articles will be independently evaluated by three authors to determine eligibility based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. Methodological quality of included studies will be assessed. Pooled analyses will be conducted using a random-effects model. Publication bias and between-study heterogeneity will also be assessed. Sources of heterogeneity will be explored by sensitivity, subgroup, and/or meta-regression analyses. Results from this study will be shared through scientific conferences and publications in scientific journals. The analysis of potential AS and hemodynamic markers for HDP onset will help inform the development of screening guidelines and clinically relevant cut-off values of AS and hemodynamic markers for HDP risk, guiding future research. There are no applicable ethical considerations to the writing of this protocol.

The Effects of Physical Activity on Arterial Stiffness during Pregnancy: An Observational Study

The objective of the present study was to investigate the relationship between moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) and arterial stiffness in pregnancy. Thirty-nine women participated in this study resulting in 68 measurements in non-pregnant (NP; n=21), first (TM1; n=8), second (TM2; n=20), and third trimesters (TM3; n=19). Compliance, distensibility, elasticity, β-stiffness, and carotid to femoral (central) and carotid to finger (peripheral) pulse wave velocity (PWV) were assessed. MVPA was measured using accelerometry. Multilevel linear regressions adjusted for multiple tests per participant using random effects to generate β coefficients and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were performed. Distensibility, elasticity, β-stiffness, central- and peripheral-PWV did not differ between pregnant and non-pregnant assessments. Carotid artery compliance was higher in TM2 compared to NP. Central PWV (β Coef: -0.14, 95% CI: -0.27, -0.02) decreased from early to mid-pregnancy and increased in late pregnancy. Meeting the MVPA guidelines was significantly associated with central-PWV (Adj. β Coef: -0.34, 95% CI: -0.62, -0.06, p=0.016), peripheral-PWV (Adj. β Coef: -0.54, 95% CI: -0.91, -0.16, p=0.005), and distensibility (Adj. β Coef: -0.001, 95% CI: -0.002, -0.0001, p=0.018), in pregnancy. These results suggest that MVPA may be associated with improved (i.e. reduced) arterial stiffness in pregnancy. Novelty Bullets • Central PWV, distensibility, compliance, elasticity, and ß-stiffness, but not peripheral PWV, exhibited curvilinear relationships with gestational age • Central and peripheral PWV were lower in pregnant women who met the physical activity guidelines of 150 minutes of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity per week.

The cardio-ankle vascular index as a predictor of adverse pregnancy outcomes

OBJECTIVE

To assess the association between maternal hemodynamic parameters; cardio-ankle vascular index (CAVI), representing arterial stiffness; mean arterial pressure (MAP), uterine artery pulsatility index (Ut-PI), and adverse pregnancy outcomes including preeclampsia (PE), fetal growth restriction (FGR), and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM).

METHODS

A prospective cohort study was conducted on low-risk pregnancies. All were serially measured for the mean CAVI, MAP, and Ut-PI for four times at gestational age (GA) 11-14, 18-22, 28-32, and after 36 weeks. Also, the women were followed up for pregnancy outcomes, focusing on PE, FGR, and GDM.

RESULTS

Of 335 recruited cases meeting the inclusion criteria, 16 cases developed PE, 24 cases had FGR, and 83 cases had GDM. Compared to the non-PE group, women developing PE had a significant increase in CAVI at 18-22, 28-32, and after 36 weeks (P-value = 0.021, 0.003, and <0.001, respectively), a significant increase in MAP at all of the four periods (P-value < 0.001, for all periods), and a significant increase in Ut-PI during GA 18-22 weeks (P-value = 0.021). In pregnancies with FGR, there was a significant increase of CAVI at GA 18-22, 28-32 and after 36 weeks (P-value = 0.012, 0.015, and 0.004, respectively), an increase in Ut-PI in all gestational periods (P-value < 0.05) but no changes of MAP throughout pregnancy. In GDM, the three parameters were not significantly different from those in the non-GDM group in all of the four periods. CAVI could predict PE and FGR with AUC of 0.655-0.835 and 0.673-0.760, respectively. CAVI added predictive values when combined with MAP or Ut-PI.

CONCLUSION

Increased CAVI, like MAP and Ut-PI, can be used as a predictor of PE and FGR but not GDM. Also, it has an added predictive value when combined with MAP or Ut-PI.

Wave intensity analysis of maternal arterial stiffness: augmentation index and pulse wave velocity in pregnancies complicated by diabetes or hypertension

PURPOSE

The aim of our study was to compare the maternal arterial stiffness in pregnant women with diabetic disease, hypertension and those with normal pregnancies.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was performed involving 65 pregnant women with diabetic disease (DD group), 26 pregnant women with hypertension (RR group) and 448 women with normal pregnancies (control group). The augmentation index (AIx) and the pulse wave velocity (PWV) of the right carotid artery were assessed using non-invasive sonographic wave intensity analysis. Furthermore, the reliability of the measurements was evaluated in 21 healthy women.

RESULTS

Compared with the controls, the AIx and PWV were increased in the DD group [11.0 (interquartile range, IQR 7.3, 15.2) vs. 5.7 (IQR 2.4, 9.3), P < 0.001; 5.7 (IQR 5.1, 6.4) vs. 5.2 (IQR 4.6, 6.1), P = 0.001; respectively] and the RR group [9.3 (IQR 6.6, 11.5) vs. 5.7 (IQR 2.4, 9.3), P < 0.001; 7.1 (6.3, 7.9) vs. 5.2 (IQR 4.6, 6.1), P < 0.001; respectively]. The intraclass and interclass correlation coefficients were good to excellent for the AIx (ICC: 0.91, P < 0.001 and 0.74, P < 0.002; respectively) and PWV measurements (ICC: 0.71, P < 0.004 and 0.70, P < 0.005; respectively).

CONCLUSION

Pregnancies complicated by diabetic disease or hypertension are associated with increased maternal arterial stiffness. The importance of wave intensity analysis needs to be verified and larger studies are needed to establish both normal and cutoff values that may be relevant for clinical decisions.