Contribution of systemic blood flow to untreated or inadequately controlled systolic--diastolic or isolated systolic hypertension in a community sample of African ancestry

Role of atrial natriuretic peptide in the dissociation between flow relations with ventricular mass and function in a community with volume-dependent hypertension

Background

Whether differential effects of volume load on left ventricular mass (LVM) and function occur in sustained volume-dependent primary hypertension, and the impact of atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) on these effects, is unknown.

Methods

From aortic pressure, velocity and diameter measurements and echocardiography, we determined in an African community (n = 772), the impact of systemic flow-induced increases in central pulse pressure (PPc) and circulating ANP (ELISA) on LVM and indexes of function.

Results

Stroke volume (SV), but not aortic flow (Q), was associated with LVM and mean wall thickness (MWT) beyond stroke work and confounders (p < 0.0001). Adjustments for SV markedly decreased the relationships between PPc and LVMI or MWT. However, neither SV, nor Q were independently associated with either myocardial s', e', or E/e' (p > 0.14) and adjustments for neither SV nor Q modified relationships between PPc and s', e' or E/e' (p < 0.005 to <0.0001). SV was nevertheless strongly and independently associated with ANP (p < 0.0001) and ANP was similarly strikingly associated with s' (p < 0.0001) and e' (p < 0.0005), but not E/e', independent of confounders and several determinants of afterload. Importantly, ANP concentrations were inversely rather than positively associated with LV diastolic dysfunction (DD) (p < 0.005) and lower rather than higher ANP concentrations contributed markedly to the ability to detect DD in those with, but not without LV hypertrophy.

Conclusion

In populations with sustained volume-dependent hypertension, flow (SV)-related increases in PP have a major impact on LV structure, but not on function, an effect attributed to parallel striking beneficial actions of ANP on myocardial function.

Attenuated Relationships Between Indexes of Volume Overload and Atrial Natriuretic Peptide in Uncontrolled, Sustained Volume-Dependent Primary Hypertension

BACKGROUND

Whether systolic blood pressure (SBP) control in sustained volume-dependent primary hypertension is associated with blunted ANP (atrial natriuretic peptide) relationships with indexes of volume load is unknown.

METHODS

Systemic hemodynamics (central pressure, echocardiographic aortic velocity and diameter measurements in the outflow tract), circulating ANP concentrations (ELISA assays) and glomerular and tubular function (24-hour urine collections [n=519]) were determined in a community of African ancestry (n=772).

RESULTS

As compared with those with a controlled SBP, those with an uncontrolled SBP (n=198) showed lower ANP concentrations (P<0.005) despite higher stroke volume and cardiac output (P<0.0001) and renal differences consistent with enhanced fluid retention. In those with a controlled SBP, fractional Na⁺ excretion (FeNa⁺; P<0.0005) and creatinine clearance (glomerular filtration rate; P<0.005) were inversely associated with ANP concentrations independent of confounders. Moreover, in those with a controlled SBP, stroke volume and cardiac output (P<0.0001) were independently and positively associated with ANP concentrations. In addition, in those with a controlled SBP, ANP concentrations were independently and inversely associated with systemic vascular resistance (SVR; P<0.0001) and aortic characteristic impedance (Zc; P<0.005). By contrast, in those with uncontrolled SBP, no relationships between either stroke volume (P>0.25), cardiac output (P>0.29), FeNa⁺ (P>0.77), or glomerular filtration rate (P>0.47) and ANP concentrations were noted. Furthermore, in those with an uncontrolled SBP, no relationships between ANP concentrations and SVR or Zc were observed (P>0.34).

CONCLUSIONS

In a population where primary hypertension is strongly volume-dependent, those with an uncontrolled SBP have an attenuated relationship between ANP and both renal and hemodynamic indexes of volume overload and the vascular effects of ANP.

Independent relationships between renal mechanisms and systemic flow, but not resistance to flow in primary hypertension in Africa

AIMS

Whether renal mechanisms of hypertension primarily translate into increases in systemic vascular resistance (SVR) in all populations is uncertain. We determined whether renal mechanisms associate with either increases in SVR (and impedance to flow) or systemic flow in a community of African ancestry.

METHOD

In a South African community sampled across the full adult age range (n = 546), we assessed stroke volume (SV), peak aortic flow (Q), SVR, characteristic impedance (Zc) and total arterial compliance (TAC) from velocity and diameter measurements in the outflow tract (echocardiography) and central arterial pressures. Renal changes were determined from creatinine clearance (glomerular filtration rate, GFR) and fractional Na+ excretion (FeNa+) (derived from 24-h urine collections).

RESULTS

Independent of confounders (including MAP and pressures generated by the product of Q and Zc), SV (and hence cardiac output) (P < 0.0001) and Q (P < 0.01), but not SVR, Zc or TAC (P = 0.09-0.20) were independently associated with decreases in both GFR (index of nephron number) and FeNa+. Through an interactive effect (P < 0.0001), the impact of GFR on SV or Q was strongly determined by FeNa+ and vice versa. The relationship between the GFR-FeNa+ interaction and either SV or Q was noted in those above or below 50 years of age, although neither GFR, FeNa+ nor the interaction were independently associated with SVR, Zc or TAC at any age.

CONCLUSION

Across the full adult lifespan, in groups of African ancestry, renal mechanisms of hypertension translate into increases in systemic flow rather than into resistance or impedance to flow.

Hemodynamic and Functional Correlates of Concentric vs. Eccentric LVH in a Community-Based Sample With Prevalent Volume-Dependent Hypertension

BACKGROUND

Whether in volume-dependent primary hypertension, concentric left ventricular (LV) remodeling beyond hypertrophy (LVH) represents the impact of a pressure rather than a volume overload, is unclear.

METHODS

Using central arterial pressure, and aortic velocity and diameter measurements in the outflow tract (echocardiography), we determined the factors that associate with concentric LVH or remodeling in a community of African ancestry (n = 709) with prevalent volume-dependent primary hypertension.

RESULTS

Both left ventricular mass index (LVMI) and relative wall thickness (RWT) were positively and independently associated with end diastolic volume (EDV), stroke volume (SV), and peak aortic flow (Q) (P < 0.05 to <0.0001). However, neither LVMI nor RWT were positively and independently associated with systemic vascular resistance (SVR), or aortic characteristic impedance (Zc) or inversely associated with total arterial compliance (TAC). Consequently, both concentric (P < 0.0001) and eccentric (P < 0.0001) LVH were associated with similar increases in EDV, SV, and either office brachial, central arterial, or 24-hour blood pressures (BP), but neither increases in SVR or Zc nor decreases in TAC. LV RWT, but not LVMI was nevertheless independently and inversely associated with myocardial systolic function (midwall shortening and s') (P < 0.05 to <0.005) and decreases in LV systolic function were noted in concentric (P < 0.05), but not eccentric LVH.

CONCLUSIONS

In volume-dependent primary hypertension, concentric LVH is determined as much by volume-dependent increases in systemic flow and an enhanced BP as eccentric LVH. Concentric remodeling nevertheless reflects decreases in systolic function beyond LVH.

Impact of stroke work on the ability of left ventricular mass to account for pressure effects on function in a community with prevalent systemic flow-dependent hypertension

AIMS

To determine whether the confounding influence of stroke work on left ventricular mass (LVM) limits the ability of LVM to detect hypertensive LV dysfunction in systemic flow-dependent hypertension.

METHODS

In a community with prevalent systemic flow-dependent hypertension (n = 709), arterial haemodynamics, LVM and LV function were determined using central arterial pressure, aortic velocity and diameter measurements in the outflow tract, and echocardiography with tissue Doppler imaging.

RESULTS

In multivariate models, stroke work showed markedly stronger relations with LVM index (LVMI) than blood pressure load [central arterial SBP (SBPc), backward wave pressure (Pb), 24-h SBP] (P < 0.0001 for comparisons). In contrast, although SBPc, Pb, and 24-h SBP were inversely associated with myocardial tissue shortening (s') and lengthening (e') velocity, stroke work was not. With adjustments for stroke work, positive relationships between SBPc, Pb, or 24-h SBP and LVMI were eliminated (P = 0.20 to P = 0.89), but strong relations between BP and s', e' or E/e' (P = 0.009 to P < 0.0001) remained. In mediation analysis, stroke work fully accounted for BP effects on LVMI, but explained none of the effects of BP on LV function. Hence LVMI accounted for little of the impact of BP load on LV function. Although LVMI beyond stroke work (inappropriate LVM) improved on relations between LVMI and s', it failed to improve on relations with e' or E/e' and contributed little beyond LVMI to the impact of BP on LV function.

CONCLUSION

In systemic flow-dependent hypertension, the impact of stroke work markedly limits the ability of LVM to account for adverse effects of hypertension on LV function.