Arterial stiffness and blood pressure in treated hypertension: a longitudinal study

Effectiveness of exercise training on arterial stiffness and blood pressure among postmenopausal women: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The acute and long-term benefits of exercise training on cardiovascular health have been well established. The systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to systematically assess the effectiveness of exercise training on arterial stiffness and blood pressure among postmenopausal women with elevated blood pressure.

METHODS

A comprehensive search was conducted on PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, ProQuest, Cochrane Library, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov website from inception to September 30, 2023, to identify the randomized controlled trials (RCTs), which evaluated the effectiveness of exercise training on arterial stiffness and blood pressure in postmenopausal women. Standardized mean differences (SMD), weighted mean differences (WMD), and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated using random/fixed effects models. Quality assessment was performed using the modified Jadad scale and the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. Sensitivity analysis and subgroup analysis were conducted based on drug dosage, treatment duration, and age of administration to further explore potential heterogeneity. Funnel plots were performed to assess publication bias and Begg's regression test was carried out for funnel plot asymmetry.

RESULTS

Twenty-two RCTs involving 1978 participants were included in the quantitative analysis. The mean quality of eligible studies was 4.2 out of 7 based on the modified Jadad scale. The results indicated that exercise training had a significant effect on reducing brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity [MD = - 0.69, 95%CI (- 1.11, - 0.27), P = 0.001], decreasing augmentation index (AIx) [MD = - 6.00, 95%CI (- 6.39, - 5.61), P < 0.00001] and AIx normalized to a heart rate of 75 beats per minute (AIx@75%) [MD = - 7.01, 95%CI - 7.91 to - 6.12, P < 0.00001], lowering systolic blood pressure [MD = - 6.19, 95%CI - 9.24 to - 3.15, P < 0.0001], diastolic blood pressure [MD = - 3.57, 95%CI (- 6.10, - 1.03), P = 0.006) and pulse pressure [MD = - 8.52, 95%CI (- 16.27, - 0.76), P = 0.03]. Subgroup analysis revealed that baseline blood pressure levels had a large impact on the effect of exercise training.

CONCLUSIONS

The systematic review and meta-analysis suggested that exercise training may ameliorate arterial stiffness and reduce blood pressure in postmenopausal women with elevated blood pressure. However, the optimal mode of exercise training that improves arterial stiffness and blood pressure in this population requires further investigation.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42021211268.

Efficacy and safety evaluation of Allisartan Isoproxil in patients with hypertension: a meta-analysis

Objective

This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of Allisartan Isoproxil in the management of hypertension.

Methods

A comprehensive search was conducted across both English and Chinese databases, including the Cochrane Library, Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, Chinese Journal Full Text Database (CNKI), Wanfang Digital Periodical Full Text Database, and VIP Chinese Periodical Database (VIP), up to March 24, 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating alisartan axetil for hypertension management were selected. Literature quality was assessed, and data were extracted for meta-analysis using Stata 15.1 software. The quality of evidence for outcome indicators was evaluated using the GRADE system level.

Results

Six RCTs involving 767 participants were included. Meta-analysis revealed that, compared to placebo, the Allisartan Isoproxil group exhibited a significant reduction in systolic blood pressure (SBP) [WMD = -8.08, 95% CI (-11.81, 4.10), p = 0.000] and brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV) [SMD = -0.69, 95% CI (-1.17, 0.20), p = 0.006]. However, the reduction in diastolic blood pressure (DBP) was not statistically significant [WMD = -5.48, 95% CI (-11.07, 0.10), p = 0.054]. Additionally, compared to calcium channel blockers (CCB) and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARB), Allisartan Isoproxil did not significantly affect SBP [WMD = 0.20, 95% CI (-3.71, 4.10), p = 0.921] or DBP [WMD = 0.16, 95% CI (-2.11, 2.43), p = 0.891]. Allisartan Isoproxil demonstrated superior effects in increasing nitric oxide (NO) levels and decreasing endothelin (ET) levels compared to control groups [WMD = 9.56, 95% CI (6.42, 12.71), p = 0.000], [WMD = -7.42, 95% CI (-11.13, -3.71), p = 0.000], and showed a higher effective control rate of blood pressure [RR = 1.26, 95% CI (1.13, 1.41), p = 0.000]. Subgroup analysis did not reveal significant differences. Regarding safety, there were no statistically significant differences in adverse events between the Allisartan Isoproxil group and the control groups [RR = 0.99, 95% CI (0.74, 1.32), p = 0.928], and no fatal adverse events were reported.

Conclusion

Allisartan Isoproxil is effective in reducing SBP and baPWV, increasing NO, decreasing ET, and achieving a higher control rate of blood pressure in patients with essential hypertension. These benefits are achieved with minimal adverse reactions.

Systematic Review Registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42023467869, identifier PROSPERO CRD42023467869.

Arterial stiffness is associated with prehypertension in both non-hypertensives and treated hypertensives-A matched case control study

BACKGROUND

Prehypertension (PHT) is a cardiovascular health risk defined by blood pressure (BP). Arterial stiffness (AS) provides beyond brachial BP inference on vascular ageing and pulse wave analysis (PWA) can measure it non-invasively.We compared association between AS and PHT using age and gender matched case-controls.

METHODS

This is a sub analysis of previous PWA studies of hypertensives and non-hypertensives. Using oscillometric PWA by Mobil-o-Graph (IEM, Stolberg, Germany), parameters of AS (augmentation pressure and index, reflection magnitude, aortic pulse wave velocity, pulse pressure amplification), brachial hemodynamics (BH), and central hemodynamics (CH; aortic BP, cardiac output related parameters, stroke work) were derived. Age and gender matched case controls were compared as: 1) Nonhypertensives with BP at prehypertensive level (PHT) versus normotensives (NT) (n = 217 each), 2) Under treatment hypertensives with BP at prehypertensive level (PHT-T) versus untreated, nonhypertensives with BP at prehypertensive level (PHT-UT) (n = 74 each).

RESULTS

PHTs had higher AS, BH and CH than NTs, with statistical significance for all but few parameters. PHT-T had comparable BH but higher AS, CH than PHT-UT with significance for few parameters.

CONCLUSION

Pulse wave analysis derived arterial stiffness is associated with prehypertension compared to normal, after age and gender matching. In hypertensives, arterial stiffness is significantly higher despite being treated to prehypertension level as compared to control. It hints arterial stiffness to be better parameter than brachial BP to study prehypertension.

Stiffness and Elasticity of Aorta Assessed Using Computed Tomography Angiography as a Marker of Cardiovascular Health-A Cross-Sectional Study

Cardiovascular (CV) health can be measured using the American Health Association's Life's Simple 7 scale (ALS7). Aortic stiffness (AoS) and elasticity (AoE) can be assessed using various methods, e.g., computed tomography (CT). To measure AoE, we use aortic strain and distensibility (AoD). The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between ALS7, AoS, and AoE. The study group (SG) was composed of 96 patients (mean age 70.41 ± 8.32 years) with a BMI of 25.58 ± 3.12 kg/m2; 28.1% were smokers, 54.2% had hypertension, 11.4% had diabetes, and 67.7% had hypercholesterolemia. The SG was further divided into three subgroups (optimal (ALS7-H), intermediate (ALS7-I), and inadequate (ALS7-L)) based on the ALS7. The AoS and AoE were assessed in each of them. We found that the ALS7-I and ALS7-H had significantly lower AoS values compared to the ALS7-L (AoS: 3.50 ± 0.53 and 4.10 ± 0.70 vs. 4.57 ± 1.03, respectively). The opposite relationship was observed for AoE measured with AoD in the ALS7-H vs. ALS7-L (AoD: 0.23 ± 0.14 vs. 0.11 ± 0.09 cm2/dyn). AoS correlated (r = 0.61) with systolic blood pressure (BP). In our regression model, higher scores on the ALS7 in BP, smoking, and BMI were independent protective factors against greater AoS. Higher ALS7 scores in BP, smoking, BMI, and physical activity were protective factors against lesser aortic strain. Higher scores in ALS7 for BP and smoking were protective factors against lesser AoD. We conclude that better cardiovascular health expressed via higher scores obtained on the ALS7 is associated with lower AoS and higher AoE on CT.