1
|
Sung K, Hosoya K, Deguchi T, Yamashita K, Kim S, Sunaga T, Yasui H, Inanami O, Okumura M. Glutathione-associated redox regulation alleviates radio-resistance of canine cancer stem-like cells with low proteasome activity. Sci Rep 2025; 15:18017. [PMID: 40410310 PMCID: PMC12102148 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-02569-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2025] [Accepted: 05/14/2025] [Indexed: 05/25/2025] Open
Abstract
Radio-resistance of cancer stem-like cells (CSCs) is associated with the failure of radiation therapy. ZsGreen1-positive (ZsG⁺) cells, which exhibit low proteasome activity, have been used to enable the detection and isolation of CSCs. However, the mechanisms of radio-resistance in canine tumor cells with low proteasome activity remain unclear. This study aimed to elucidate the radio-resistance mechanisms of ZsG+ cells by identifying a potential target of canine CSCs. ZsG+ cells, isolated using flow cytometric cell sorting, were compared with ZsG- cells. Sulfasalazine was used to suppress glutathione (GSH) synthesis by inhibiting xCT. In vitro experiments demonstrated a significantly higher radio-resistance in ZsG+ cells than in ZsG- cells. After X-irradiation, ZsG+ cells had fewer p53‑binding protein 1 (53BP1) foci, low reactive oxygen species (ROS) accumulation, and high GSH content. Sulfasalazine caused radiosensitization of ZsG+ cells with an increased number of 53BP1 foci by decreasing GSH contents and increasing ROS accumulation. The low proteasome activity played a role in xCT upregulation. In conclusion, canine tumor cells with low proteasome activity are radio-resistant due to high GSH content and low ROS accumulation. Sulfasalazine causes radiosensitization of the tumor cells by altering redox balance by inhibiting GSH synthesis for effective targeting of canine CSCs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Koangyong Sung
- Laboratory of Veterinary Surgery, Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Graduate School of Veterinary Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Kenji Hosoya
- Veterinary Teaching Hospital, Graduate School of Veterinary Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.
- Laboratory of Advanced Veterinary Medicine, Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Graduate School of Veterinary Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.
| | - Tatsuya Deguchi
- Veterinary Teaching Hospital, Graduate School of Veterinary Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Koya Yamashita
- Laboratory of Radiation Biology, Department of Applied Veterinary Science, Graduate School of Veterinary Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Sangho Kim
- Laboratory of Veterinary Surgery, Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Graduate School of Veterinary Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Takafumi Sunaga
- Laboratory of Veterinary Surgery, Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Graduate School of Veterinary Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Hironobu Yasui
- Laboratory of Radiation Biology, Department of Applied Veterinary Science, Graduate School of Veterinary Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Osamu Inanami
- Laboratory of Radiation Biology, Department of Applied Veterinary Science, Graduate School of Veterinary Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Masahiro Okumura
- Laboratory of Veterinary Surgery, Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Graduate School of Veterinary Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Tire B, Talibova G, Ozturk S. The crosstalk between telomeres and DNA repair mechanisms: an overview to mammalian somatic cells, germ cells, and preimplantation embryos. J Assist Reprod Genet 2024; 41:277-291. [PMID: 38165506 PMCID: PMC10894803 DOI: 10.1007/s10815-023-03008-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2023] [Accepted: 12/12/2023] [Indexed: 01/03/2024] Open
Abstract
Telomeres are located at the ends of linear chromosomes and play a critical role in maintaining genomic stability by preventing premature activation of DNA repair mechanisms. Because of exposure to various genotoxic agents, telomeres can undergo shortening and genetic changes. In mammalian cells, the basic DNA repair mechanisms, including base excision repair, nucleotide excision repair, double-strand break repair, and mismatch repair, function in repairing potential damages in telomeres. If these damages are not repaired correctly in time, the unfavorable results such as apoptosis, cell cycle arrest, and cancerous transition may occur. During lifespan, mammalian somatic cells, male and female germ cells, and preimplantation embryos experience a number of telomeric damages. Herein, we comprehensively reviewed the crosstalk between telomeres and the DNA repair mechanisms in the somatic cells, germ cells, and embryos. Infertility development resulting from possible defects in this crosstalk is also discussed in the light of existing studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Betul Tire
- Department of Histology and Embryology, Akdeniz University School of Medicine, Campus, 07070, Antalya, Turkey
| | - Gunel Talibova
- Department of Histology and Embryology, Akdeniz University School of Medicine, Campus, 07070, Antalya, Turkey
| | - Saffet Ozturk
- Department of Histology and Embryology, Akdeniz University School of Medicine, Campus, 07070, Antalya, Turkey.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Abstract
The raison d'être of meiosis is shuffling of genetic information via Mendelian segregation and, within individual chromosomes, by DNA crossing-over. These outcomes are enabled by a complex cellular program in which interactions between homologous chromosomes play a central role. We first provide a background regarding the basic principles of this program. We then summarize the current understanding of the DNA events of recombination and of three processes that involve whole chromosomes: homolog pairing, crossover interference, and chiasma maturation. All of these processes are implemented by direct physical interaction of recombination complexes with underlying chromosome structures. Finally, we present convergent lines of evidence that the meiotic program may have evolved by coupling of this interaction to late-stage mitotic chromosome morphogenesis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Denise Zickler
- Institute for Integrative Biology of the Cell (I2BC), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Université Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
| | - Nancy Kleckner
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Krauze AV, Zhao Y, Li MC, Shih J, Jiang W, Tasci E, Cooley Zgela T, Sproull M, Mackey M, Shankavaram U, Tofilon P, Camphausen K. Revisiting Concurrent Radiation Therapy, Temozolomide, and the Histone Deacetylase Inhibitor Valproic Acid for Patients with Glioblastoma-Proteomic Alteration and Comparison Analysis with the Standard-of-Care Chemoirradiation. Biomolecules 2023; 13:1499. [PMID: 37892181 PMCID: PMC10604983 DOI: 10.3390/biom13101499] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2023] [Revised: 09/19/2023] [Accepted: 09/20/2023] [Indexed: 10/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common brain tumor with an overall survival (OS) of less than 30% at two years. Valproic acid (VPA) demonstrated survival benefits documented in retrospective and prospective trials, when used in combination with chemo-radiotherapy (CRT). PURPOSE The primary goal of this study was to examine if the differential alteration in proteomic expression pre vs. post-completion of concurrent chemoirradiation (CRT) is present with the addition of VPA as compared to standard-of-care CRT. The second goal was to explore the associations between the proteomic alterations in response to VPA/RT/TMZ correlated to patient outcomes. The third goal was to use the proteomic profile to determine the mechanism of action of VPA in this setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS Serum obtained pre- and post-CRT was analyzed using an aptamer-based SOMAScan® proteomic assay. Twenty-nine patients received CRT plus VPA, and 53 patients received CRT alone. Clinical data were obtained via a database and chart review. Tests for differences in protein expression changes between radiation therapy (RT) with or without VPA were conducted for individual proteins using two-sided t-tests, considering p-values of <0.05 as significant. Adjustment for age, sex, and other clinical covariates and hierarchical clustering of significant differentially expressed proteins was carried out, and Gene Set Enrichment analyses were performed using the Hallmark gene sets. Univariate Cox proportional hazards models were used to test the individual protein expression changes for an association with survival. The lasso Cox regression method and 10-fold cross-validation were employed to test the combinations of expression changes of proteins that could predict survival. Predictiveness curves were plotted for significant proteins for VPA response (p-value < 0.005) to show the survival probability vs. the protein expression percentiles. RESULTS A total of 124 proteins were identified pre- vs. post-CRT that were differentially expressed between the cohorts who received CRT plus VPA and those who received CRT alone. Clinical factors did not confound the results, and distinct proteomic clustering in the VPA-treated population was identified. Time-dependent ROC curves for OS and PFS for landmark times of 20 months and 6 months, respectively, revealed AUC of 0.531, 0.756, 0.774 for OS and 0.535, 0.723, 0.806 for PFS for protein expression, clinical factors, and the combination of protein expression and clinical factors, respectively, indicating that the proteome can provide additional survival risk discrimination to that already provided by the standard clinical factors with a greater impact on PFS. Several proteins of interest were identified. Alterations in GALNT14 (increased) and CCL17 (decreased) (p = 0.003 and 0.003, respectively, FDR 0.198 for both) were associated with an improvement in both OS and PFS. The pre-CRT protein expression revealed 480 proteins predictive for OS and 212 for PFS (p < 0.05), of which 112 overlapped between OS and PFS. However, FDR-adjusted p values were high, with OS (the smallest p value of 0.586) and PFS (the smallest p value of 0.998). The protein PLCD3 had the lowest p-value (p = 0.002 and 0.0004 for OS and PFS, respectively), and its elevation prior to CRT predicted superior OS and PFS with VPA administration. Cancer hallmark genesets associated with proteomic alteration observed with the administration of VPA aligned with known signal transduction pathways of this agent in malignancy and non-malignancy settings, and GBM signaling, and included epithelial-mesenchymal transition, hedgehog signaling, Il6/JAK/STAT3, coagulation, NOTCH, apical junction, xenobiotic metabolism, and complement signaling. CONCLUSIONS Differential alteration in proteomic expression pre- vs. post-completion of concurrent chemoirradiation (CRT) is present with the addition of VPA. Using pre- vs. post-data, prognostic proteins emerged in the analysis. Using pre-CRT data, potentially predictive proteins were identified. The protein signals and hallmark gene sets associated with the alteration in the proteome identified between patients who received VPA and those who did not, align with known biological mechanisms of action of VPA and may allow for the identification of novel biomarkers associated with outcomes that can help advance the study of VPA in future prospective trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andra V. Krauze
- Radiation Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health (NIH), 9000 Rockville Pike, Building 10, CRC, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA (T.C.Z.); (U.S.); (P.T.)
| | - Yingdong Zhao
- Computational and Systems Biology Branch, Biometric Research Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Maryland 20850, USA; (Y.Z.); (M.-C.L.); (J.S.)
| | - Ming-Chung Li
- Computational and Systems Biology Branch, Biometric Research Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Maryland 20850, USA; (Y.Z.); (M.-C.L.); (J.S.)
| | - Joanna Shih
- Computational and Systems Biology Branch, Biometric Research Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Maryland 20850, USA; (Y.Z.); (M.-C.L.); (J.S.)
| | - Will Jiang
- Radiation Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health (NIH), 9000 Rockville Pike, Building 10, CRC, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA (T.C.Z.); (U.S.); (P.T.)
| | - Erdal Tasci
- Radiation Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health (NIH), 9000 Rockville Pike, Building 10, CRC, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA (T.C.Z.); (U.S.); (P.T.)
| | - Theresa Cooley Zgela
- Radiation Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health (NIH), 9000 Rockville Pike, Building 10, CRC, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA (T.C.Z.); (U.S.); (P.T.)
| | - Mary Sproull
- Radiation Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health (NIH), 9000 Rockville Pike, Building 10, CRC, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA (T.C.Z.); (U.S.); (P.T.)
| | - Megan Mackey
- Radiation Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health (NIH), 9000 Rockville Pike, Building 10, CRC, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA (T.C.Z.); (U.S.); (P.T.)
| | - Uma Shankavaram
- Radiation Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health (NIH), 9000 Rockville Pike, Building 10, CRC, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA (T.C.Z.); (U.S.); (P.T.)
| | - Philip Tofilon
- Radiation Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health (NIH), 9000 Rockville Pike, Building 10, CRC, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA (T.C.Z.); (U.S.); (P.T.)
| | - Kevin Camphausen
- Radiation Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health (NIH), 9000 Rockville Pike, Building 10, CRC, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA (T.C.Z.); (U.S.); (P.T.)
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Talibova G, Bilmez Y, Ozturk S. DNA double-strand break repair in male germ cells during spermatogenesis and its association with male infertility development. DNA Repair (Amst) 2022; 118:103386. [DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2022.103386] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2022] [Revised: 08/01/2022] [Accepted: 08/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
6
|
Thielhelm TP, Goncalves S, Welford SM, Mellon EA, Cohen ER, Nourbakhsh A, Fernandez-Valle C, Telischi F, Ivan ME, Dinh CT. Understanding the Radiobiology of Vestibular Schwannomas to Overcome Radiation Resistance. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:4575. [PMID: 34572805 PMCID: PMC8467596 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13184575] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2021] [Revised: 09/06/2021] [Accepted: 09/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Vestibular schwannomas (VS) are benign tumors arising from cranial nerve VIII that account for 8-10% of all intracranial tumors and are the most common tumors of the cerebellopontine angle. These tumors are typically managed with observation, radiation therapy, or microsurgical resection. Of the VS that are irradiated, there is a subset of tumors that are radioresistant and continue to grow; the mechanisms behind this phenomenon are not fully understood. In this review, the authors summarize how radiation causes cellular and DNA injury that can activate (1) checkpoints in the cell cycle to initiate cell cycle arrest and DNA repair and (2) key events that lead to cell death. In addition, we discuss the current knowledge of VS radiobiology and how it may contribute to clinical outcomes. A better understanding of VS radiobiology can help optimize existing treatment protocols and lead to new therapies to overcome radioresistance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Torin P Thielhelm
- Department of Otolaryngology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33136, USA
| | - Stefania Goncalves
- Department of Otolaryngology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33136, USA
| | - Scott M Welford
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33136, USA
| | - Eric A Mellon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33136, USA
| | - Erin R Cohen
- Department of Otolaryngology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33136, USA
| | - Aida Nourbakhsh
- Department of Otolaryngology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33136, USA
| | - Cristina Fernandez-Valle
- Burnett School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Central Florida College of Medicine, Orlando, FL 32816, USA
| | - Fred Telischi
- Department of Otolaryngology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33136, USA
| | - Michael E Ivan
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33136, USA
| | - Christine T Dinh
- Department of Otolaryngology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33136, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ahmed EA, Alzahrani AM, Scherthan H. Parp1-Dependent DNA Double-Strand Break Repair in Irradiated Late Pachytene Spermatocytes. DNA Cell Biol 2020; 40:209-218. [PMID: 33337266 DOI: 10.1089/dna.2020.5727] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 (Parp1) is a member of nuclear enzymes family involved in to the response to genotoxic stresses, DNA repair, and is critical for the maintenance of genome stability. During gametogenesis, genome stability is essential for inheritance and formation of healthy gametes. The latter involves DNA double-strand break (DSB)-driven pairing of homologous chromosomes in first meiotic prophase. By analysis of DSB repair kinetics in male meiotic prophase cells of homologous recombination (HR) and nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ)-deficient mouse models, we previously demonstrated an interplay between HR and the conventional NHEJ repair pathway. In the current work, we evaluate the relative contribution of Parp1-dependent NHEJ to the repair of ectopic ionizing radiation (IR)-induced DSBs in control and Parp1-inhibited mouse pachytene spermatocytes before and after the completion of meiotic recombination in stages VI-XI. The disappearance of large, exogenous DSB-related γ-H2AX foci was quantified 1 and 8 h after 1 Gy γ-irradiation of control and 3,4-dihydro-5-[4-(1-piperidinyl)butoxy]-1(2H)quinolinone (DPQ) Parp1-inhibited mice. Late pachytene control spermatocytes obtained 8 h after IR had repaired >80% of DSBs observed at 1 h after IR. However, only 64% of DSBs were repaired in late spermatocytes of DPQ-treated (Parp1-inhibited) mice. Thus, it appears that Parp1 contributes to the repair of a fraction of DSBs in late prophase I, providing further insights in DNA repair pathway choreography during spermatogenic differentiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emad A Ahmed
- Biological Sciences Department, Faculty of Science, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia.,Laboratory of Molecular Physiology, Zoology Department, Faculty of Science, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt
| | - Abdullah M Alzahrani
- Biological Sciences Department, Faculty of Science, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia
| | - Harry Scherthan
- Institut für Radiobiologie der Bundeswehr in Verb. mit der Universität Ulm, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Laskowski L, Williams D, Seymour C, Mothersill C. Environmental and industrial developments in radiation cataractogenesis. Int J Radiat Biol 2020; 98:1074-1082. [PMID: 32396040 DOI: 10.1080/09553002.2020.1767820] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
Purpose: This review discusses recent developments in our understanding of biological and physiological mechanisms underlying radiation cataractogenesis. The areas discussed include effects of low-dose exposures to the lens including potential relevance of non-targeted effects, the development of new personal-protective equipment (PPE) and standards in clinical and nuclear settings motivated by the updated ICRP recommendations to mitigate exposures to the lens of the eye. The review also looks at evidence from the field linking cataracts in birds and mammals to low dose exposures.Conclusions: The review suggests that there is evidence that cataractogenesis is not a tissue reaction (deterministic effect) but rather is a low dose effect which shows a saturable dose response relationship similar to that seen for non-targeted effects in general. The review concludes that new research is needed to determine the dose response relationship in environmental studies where field data are contradictory and lab studies confined to rodent models for human exposure studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lukasz Laskowski
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - David Williams
- Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambrige, UK
| | - Colin Seymour
- Department of Biology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|