INCOG 2.0 Guidelines for Cognitive Rehabilitation Following Traumatic Brain Injury: What's Changed From 2014 to Now?

Occupational Therapy Practice in Adult Rehabilitation of Persistent Postconcussion Symptoms: A Scoping Review

IMPORTANCE

The role of occupational therapy in the rehabilitation of adults with persistent postconcussion symptoms (PPCS) following mild traumatic brain injury is an emerging practice area. Research that contributes to growing knowledge and understanding of the profession's role may increase the recognition and visibility of occupational therapy in concussion rehabilitation programs.

OBJECTIVE

To identify and categorize (using World Health Organization International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health [WHO ICF] One-Level Classification domains) existing literature that describes occupational therapy practice (including assessments and interventions) in the rehabilitation of adults with PPCS.

DATA SOURCES

Five scientific databases (MEDLINE, Embase, Emcare, PsycINFO, and CINAHL Complete) and gray literature were searched.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA COLLECTION

Eligibility criteria included publications between 2013 and 2023, written in English, and within the peer-reviewed literature or on specified web domains (.gov, .edu, or .org).

FINDINGS

Nineteen publications from 16 sources met eligibility criteria, consisting of quantitative studies (n = 6); case studies, series, or reports (n = 3); qualitative studies (n = 2); systematic or scoping literature reviews (n = 2); and gray literature sources (n = 3). The United States was the origin for many sources (n = 10). Assessments and interventions reported were heterogenous, mapping across 27 of the 30 WHO ICF One-Level Classifications.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Evidence to inform occupational therapy practice in adult PPCS rehabilitation is limited; however, some useful information about the assessments and interventions used by occupational therapists was found. At a time when considerable advancements in concussion rehabilitation are occurring, further research on evidence-informed occupational therapy practice is required. Plain-Language Summary: This study reviewed existing evidence about the role of occupational therapy in the rehabilitation of adults with persistent postconcussion symptoms (PPCS). It identifies and methodically documents a range of occupational therapy assessments and interventions described in the literature that may be used by occupational therapists within concussion rehabilitation programs or research. The study also categorizes these by using an internationally recognized taxonomy, the World Health Organization's International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. The review offers a novel synthesis of published evidence to guide occupational therapy practice and inform resource allocation in concussion rehabilitation. It also highlights the need for further research about the role of occupational therapy-including both high-quality evidence of current approaches and identification of future practice opportunities-in the rehabilitation of adults experiencing PPCS following brain injury.

Bridging Gaps in Neuropsychological Rehabilitation Intensity for Post-Stroke Population in Spain

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to analyze the treatment intensity applied in neurorehabilitation centers in Spain and its relationship with sociodemographic, biomedical, and cognitive variables in post-stroke patients. Current guidelines recommend rehabilitation sessions lasting at least 45 min per day, 2-5 days/week, but there is no consensus on neuropsychology intensity.

METHOD

This Spanish multicenter, observational, descriptive cross-sectional study included 163 adult participants diagnosed with stroke, collecting 48 biopsychosocial variables. Statistical analyses, including non-parametric tests and linear regressions, were conducted to assess the relationship between intervention intensity and the studied variables.

RESULTS

Our findings reveal an average neuropsychology of 59 min/week, significantly below international recommendations for intensive therapies. Patients in subacute phases (<6 months) and those with severe cognitive impairment (Montreal Cognitive Assessment <21) receive higher-intensity interventions, though still far from optimal standards. Significant differences were also identified between center types, reflecting variations in the resources available.

CONCLUSION

This study not only highlights the need to establish clear intensity criteria in neuropsychology but also provides a foundation for future experimental studies to evaluate the impact of increased intensity on cognitive outcomes. Additionally, future research should analyze whether the observed differences between center types could lead to inequalities in access to therapies. These unique data in the Spanish context can serve as a starting point for designing more equitable and effective clinical guidelines.

Understanding 'quality' in adult traumatic brain injury rehabilitation from the perspectives of different stakeholders: a participatory mixed methods study

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to explore how 'quality' is understood for traumatic brain injury (TBI) rehabilitation from the perspectives of the rehabilitation recipients, their families and the providing clinicians.

RESEARCH DESIGN

A participatory study using a mixed-methods, triangulation design.

METHODS

The study involved 1. a systematic literature search; 2. Individual semi-structured interviews with people with TBI and/or their caregivers and TBI rehabilitation clinicians, and 3. an online consensus process.

OUTCOMES AND RESULTS

22 participants (7 people with TBI, 8 caregivers, 7 clinicians) participated in individual interviews. Their transcribed data were coded into broad categories via in-depth reflexive, thematic analysis; these categories were then mapped to 13 quality domains extracted from the literature. The emergent themes were then presented to the individuals, via an electronic consensus tool in two rounds. This resulted in 12 prioritized domains of quality that encompass service features, staff qualities and effectiveness.

CONCLUSION

These evidence-informed and consensus-agreed indicators for quality may help guide both the provision and evaluation of TBI rehabilitation, that is valued and meaningful.

Experiences and attitudes towards agitated behaviours in TBI ICU patients (EXSTATIC): understanding various management practices through qualitative interviews with nurses

INTRODUCTION & OBJECTIVES

Agitation is a common complication after an acute TBI in ICU patients. Professionals have a range of strategies to address agitation. Yet the absence of evidence-based guidelines and how these strategies are implemented complicates the management and safety may often be compromised for both ICU professionals and patients. This project explores experiences and attitudes of ICU-nurses to better understand the management of agitated behaviors in acute TBI-patients.

METHODS

Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 12 ICU-nurses from two Level-1 trauma centers in Canada. The interviews explored experiences and perceptions of managing agitation in critically ill TBI-patients. Interviews were analyzed using thematic analysis, facilitating the examination of how management practices interface with contextual variables and clinical strategies.

RESULTS

Five themes were identified: (1) a variety of symptoms differing according to patient profile and time since awakening, (2) different agitation management approaches stem from different concerns, (3) strategies used by nurses to manage agitation, (4) contextual factors influence management, and (5) potential opportunities to improve integrated care model.

CONCLUSIONS

This research describes nurses' perceptions and helps understand management of agitation, by considering underlying contexts and factors affecting TBI-agitated patients management, how ICU itself contributes to agitation and potential areas for improvement.

Cognitive Rehabilitation for Adults with a History of Traumatic Brain Injury

Cognitive rehabilitation following traumatic brain injury (TBI) involves a targeted, individualized approach to address deficits in attention, memory, executive functions, and/or other cognitive domains. This overview highlights the importance of thorough assessment to inform cognitive rehabilitation, a multidimensional approach, and current best practices in intervention strategies. It provides exemplar compensatory strategies for each cognitive domain. In addition to broad clinical practice guidelines, it also addresses unique considerations that may be warranted in some subgroups with TBI. Finally, outcome measurement is summarized.

Traumatic brain injuries: a neuropsychological review

The best predictor of functional outcome in victims of traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a neuropsychological evaluation. An exponential growth of research into TBI has focused on diagnosis and treatment. Extant literature lacks a comprehensive neuropsychological review that is simultaneously scholarly and practical. In response, our group included, and went beyond a general overview of TBI's, which commonly include definition, types, severity, and pathophysiology. We incorporate reasons behind the use of particular neuroimaging techniques, as well as the most recent findings on common neuropsychological assessments conducted in TBI cases, and their relationship to outcome. In addition, we include tables outlining estimated recovery trajectories of different age groups, their risk factors and we encompass phenomenological studies, further covering the range of existing-promising tools for cognitive rehabilitation/remediation purposes. Finally, we highlight gaps in current research and directions that would be beneficial to pursue.

Revising the Pragmatics Profile of Everyday Communication Skills for traumatic brain injury: An international Delphi study

BACKGROUND

Assessment tools that assess pragmatic skills in adults with a mild-severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) are hard to access, not person-centred and have a high risk of clinician bias. The Pragmatics Profile is an informant report tool that was originally designed to assess pragmatic skills in people with a developmental disability.

AIMS

The aim of this study was to seek consensus from a panel of experts and create a version of the Pragmatics Profile for the TBI population.

METHODS AND PROCEDURES

A three-round modified Delphi methodology panel of 13 experts were invited to comment anonymously on the suitability of each question from the Pragmatics Profile modified for those with TBI until ≥ 80% agreement was reached.

OUTCOMES AND RESULTS

The Pragmatics Profile (TBI) included 66 questions that achieved consensus after three rounds of the Delphi panel. Qualitative analysis illuminated themes relating to adults with TBI and the need to include contextual factors.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

The outcome of this project was a revised version of the Pragmatics Profile which is suitable for adults with a mild-severe TBI, informed by experts and freely available online. Future research exploring the tool's utility and acceptability is the next step in its evaluation.

WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS

What is already known on this subject Assessment of the everyday functional use of language is challenging but vital. This is particularly true for those who have traumatic brain injury (TBI) where the communication outcomes can be highly variable and may include difficulties with conversational turn-taking, topic maintenance and reading social cues. There are limited tools available to clinicians and those tend to be rating scales or checklists which have a high risk of clinician bias. Available tools have a limited ability to capture the individual's personal social communication goals. What this paper adds to existing knowledge This study created an online Pragmatics Profile (PP) for TBI based on experts' opinions. This paper details the themes that emerged during the process of revising the PP for those with TBI. What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work? The PP-TBI adds to the toolkit for speech and language therapists working with people with TBI. It meets recent recommendations in the literature to create an interview-based tool. The versatility of an online tool combined with revised input from a panel of experts increases the likelihood that clinicians will utilise this tool. Given the long-term use of the original PP by clinicians for almost 30 years and a focus on personalised care, the format and approach are also likely to be acceptable to clinicians.

Lessons Learned From Moving to Living Guidelines-The Canadian Clinical Practice Guideline for the Rehabilitation of Adults With Moderate-to-Severe TBI

OBJECTIVE

It is often challenging for providers to remain up to date with best practices gleaned from clinical research. Consequently, patients may receive inappropriate, suboptimal, and costly care. Living clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) maintain the methodological rigor of traditional CPGs but are continuously updated in response to new research findings, changes in clinical practice, and emerging evidence. The objective of this initiative was to discuss the lessons learned from the transformation of the Canadian Clinical Practice Guideline for the Rehabilitation of Adults with Traumatic Brain Injury (CAN-TBI) from a traditional guideline update model to a living guideline model.

DESIGN

The CAN-TBI Guideline provides evidence-based rehabilitative care recommendations for individuals who have sustained a TBI. The Guideline is divided into 2 sections: Section I, which provides guidance on the components of the optimal TBI rehabilitation system, and Section II, which focuses on the assessment and rehabilitation of brain injury sequelae. A comprehensive outline of the living guideline process is presented.

RESULTS

The CAN-TBI living guideline process has yielded 351 recommendations organized within 21 domains. Currently, 30 recommendations are supported by level A evidence, 81 recommendations are supported by level B evidence, and 240 consensus-based recommendations (level C evidence) comprise 68% of the CAN-TBI Guideline.

CONCLUSION

Given the increasing volume of research published on moderate-to-severe TBI rehabilitation, the CAN-TBI living guideline process allows for real-time integration of emerging evidence in response to the fastest-growing topics, ensuring that practitioners have access to the most current and relevant recommendations.

Equity considerations in clinical practice guidelines for traumatic brain injury and the criminal justice system: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is disproportionately prevalent among individuals who intersect or are involved with the criminal justice system (CJS). In the absence of appropriate care, TBI-related impairments, intersecting social determinants of health, and the lack of TBI awareness in CJS settings can lead to lengthened sentences, serious disciplinary charges, and recidivism. However, evidence suggests that most clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) overlook equity and consequently, the needs of disadvantaged groups. As such, this review addressed the research question "To what extent are (1) intersections with the CJS considered in CPGs for TBI, (2) TBI considered in CPGs for CJS, and (3) equity considered in CPGs for CJS?".

METHODS AND FINDINGS

CPGs were identified from electronic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO), targeted websites, Google Search, and reference lists of identified CPGs on November 2021 and March 2023 (CPGs for TBI) and May 2022 and March 2023 (CPGs for CJS). Only CPGs for TBI or CPGs for CJS were included. We calculated the proportion of CPGs that included TBI- or CJS-specific content, conducted a qualitative content analysis to understand how evidence regarding TBI and the CJS was integrated in the CPGs, and utilised equity assessment tools to understand if and how equity was considered. Fifty-seven CPGs for TBI and 6 CPGs for CJS were included in this review. Fourteen CPGs for TBI included information relevant to the CJS, but only 1 made a concrete recommendation to consider legal implications during vocational evaluation in the forensic context. Two CPGs for CJS acknowledged the prevalence of TBI among individuals in prison and one specifically recommended considering TBI during health assessments. Both CPGs for TBI and CPGs for CJS provided evidence specific to a single facet of the CJS, predominantly in policing and corrections. The use of equity best practices and the involvement of disadvantaged groups in the development process were lacking among CPGs for CJS. We acknowledge limitations of the review, including that our searches were conducted in English language and thus, we may have missed other non-English language CPGs in this review. We further recognise that we are unable to comment on evidence that is not integrated in the CPGs, as we did not systematically search for research on individuals with TBI who intersect with the CJS, outside of CPGs.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings from this review provide the foundation to consider CJS involvement in CPGs for TBI and to advance equity in CPGs for CJS. Conducting research, including investigating the process of screening for TBI with individuals who intersect with all facets of the CJS, and utilizing equity assessment tools in guideline development are critical steps to enhance equity in healthcare for this disadvantaged group.

Meta-analysis of Cognitive Rehabilitation Interventions in Veterans and Service Members With Traumatic Brain Injuries

MAIN OBJECTIVE

Cognitive difficulties are some of the most frequently experienced symptoms following mild-to-moderate traumatic brain injuries (TBIs). There is meta-analytic evidence that cognitive rehabilitation improves cognitive functioning after TBI in nonveteran populations but not specifically within the veteran and service member (V/SM) population. The purpose of the current meta-analysis was to examine the effect of cognitive rehabilitation interventions for V/SMs with a history of mild-to-moderate TBI.

DESIGN AND MAIN MEASURES

This meta-analysis was preregistered with PROSPERO (CRD42021262902) and used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) checklist for reporting guidelines. Inclusion criteria required studies to have (1) randomized controlled trials; (2) used adult participants (aged 18 years or older) who were US veterans or active-duty service members who had a history of mild-to-moderate TBI; (3) cognitive rehabilitation treatments designed to improve cognition and/or everyday functioning; (4) used objective neuropsychological testing as a primary outcome measure; and (5) been published in English. At least 2 reviewers independently screened all identified abstracts and full-text articles and coded demographic and effect size data. The final search was run on February 24, 2023, using 4 databases (PubMed, PsycINFO, Web of Science, and Google Scholar). Study quality and bias were examined using the revised Cochrane Risk-of-Bias Tool for Randomized Trials.

RESULTS

We identified 8 articles meeting full criteria (total participants = 564; 97% of whom had a history of mild TBI). Compared with control groups, participants showed a small, but significant, improvement in overall objective neuropsychological functioning after cognitive rehabilitation interventions. Interventions focusing on teaching strategies had a larger effect size than did those focusing on drill-and-practice approaches for both objective neuropsychological test performance and performance-based measures of functional capacity.

CONCLUSION

There is evidence of cognitive improvement in V/SMs with TBI histories after participation in cognitive rehabilitation. Clinician-administered interventions focusing on teaching strategies may yield the greatest cognitive improvement in this population.

Capacity building for providers of cognitive rehabilitation in Queensland: a needs analysis survey

Background Cognitive rehabilitation of people with traumatic brain injury is a complex and challenging area of practice. Practitioners working in cognitive rehabilitation require ongoing training to stay abreast of new research and best practice interventions. A needs analysis was conducted to inform the development of a capacity building program for cognitive rehabilitation providers. Methods A cross-sectional online survey of providers of cognitive rehabilitation services in Queensland collected data on demographic information, perceptions of knowledge, skills and confidence in cognitive rehabilitation, previously completed training, desired training opportunities and delivery methods, and barriers and facilitators to engaging in training. Results The 103 respondents included 67 occupational therapists, 17 speech pathologists, 12 psychologists and seven social workers with a broad range of practice experience. Participants perceived a need for further training, with executive function and functional cognition the most desired topics. The number of topics previously trained on was significantly correlated with levels of knowledge, skills and confidence (P   Conclusion Cognitive rehabilitation providers in Queensland reported a need for further training, delivered flexibly, with a focus on managing complex cognitive impairments.

Addressing ADL ability in people with poststroke cognitive impairments: A Danish survey of clinical practice

BACKGROUND

In Denmark, stroke represents a leading disability cause. While people with difficulties in performing activities of daily living (ADL) due to poststroke cognitive impairments are often referred to occupational therapy, limited knowledge is available on the nature of these services.

AIM/OBJECTIVE

To explore how Danish occupational therapists describe their practice when addressing decreased ADL ability in people with poststroke cognitive impairments in hospital and municipality settings.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

National, cross-sectorial, web-based public survey.

RESULTS

244 occupational therapists accessed the survey; 172 were included in the analysis. Most respondents could indicate the theory guiding their reasoning; half used standardised assessments. Regarding intervention, restorative and acquisitional models were preferred; specific strategies were identified. Intensity: 30-45 min 3-4 times/week in hospitals; 30-60 min 1-2 times/week in municipalities.

CONCLUSIONS

Therapists report to be guided by theory in their reasoning. Standardised assessments are used to a higher extend than previously reported. Still, the results invite critical reflections on correct use of assessment instruments, content and intensity of interventions, and how therapists keep themselves updated.

SIGNIFICANCE

The results document the need for practice improvements and may inform the definition of standard care in future trials.

Equity considerations in clinical practice guidelines for traumatic brain injury and homelessness: a systematic review

Background

Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) predominantly prioritise treatment and cost-effectiveness, which encourages a universal approach that may not address the circumstances of disadvantaged groups. We aimed to advance equity and quality of care for individuals experiencing homelessness and traumatic brain injury (TBI) by assessing the extent to which homelessness and TBI are integrated in CPGs for TBI and CPGs for homelessness, respectively, and the extent to which equity, including consideration of disadvantaged populations and the PROGRESS-Plus framework, is considered in these CPGs.

Methods

For this systematic review, CPGs for TBI or homelessness were identified from electronic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO), targeted websites, Google Search, and reference lists of eligible CPGs on November 16, 2021 and March 16, 2023. The proportion of CPGs that integrated evidence regarding TBI and homelessness was identified and qualitative content analysis was conducted to understand how homelessness is integrated in CPGs for TBI and vice versa. Equity assessment tools were utilised to understand the extent to which equity was considered in these CPGs. This review is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42021287696).

Findings

Fifty-eight CPGs for TBI and two CPGs for homelessness met inclusion criteria. Only three CPGs for TBI integrated evidence regarding homelessness by recognizing the prevalence of TBI in individuals experiencing homelessness and identifying housing as a consideration in the assessment and management of TBI. The two CPGs for homelessness acknowledged TBI as prevalent and recognised individuals experiencing TBI and homelessness as a disadvantaged population that should be prioritised in guideline development. Equity was rarely considered in the content and development of CPGs for TBI.

Interpretation

Considerations for equity in CPGs for homelessness and TBI are lacking. To ensure that CPGs reflect and address the needs of individuals experiencing homelessness and TBI, we have identified several guideline development priorities. Namely, there is a need to integrate evidence regarding homelessness and TBI in CPGs for TBI and CPGs for homelessness, respectively and engage disadvantaged populations in all stages of guideline development. Further, this review highlights an urgent need to conduct research focused on and with disadvantaged populations.

Funding

Canada Research Chairs Program (2019-00019) and the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care (Grant #725A).