CLINICAL FEATURES AND OUTCOMES OF INFANTS WITH RETINOPATHY OF PREMATURITY WHO FAIL ANTIVASCULAR ENDOTHELIAL GROWTH FACTOR THERAPY

Comparison of different agents and doses of anti-vascular endothelial growth factors (aflibercept, bevacizumab, conbercept, ranibizumab) versus laser for retinopathy of prematurity: A network meta-analysis

Laser photocoagulation (LPC) and/or intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injections constitute the current standard treatment for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP). This network meta-analysis focus on whether a ranking of interventions may be established for different dose levels of intravitreal injection of anti-VEGF agents (aflibercept, bevacizumab, conbercept, ranibizumab) as primary treatments for ROP versus laser in terms of retreatment rate as primary outcome, and time to retreatment and refractive error as secondary endpoints, since best anti-VEGF dosage remains under debate. Sixty-eight studies (15 randomized control trials and 53 nonrandomized studies) of 12,356 eyes of 6445 infants were retrieved from databases (2005 Jan. - 2023 June). Studies were evaluated for model fit, risk of bias and confidence of evidence in Network Meta-Analysis (CINeMA). Bayesian NMA showed that anti-VEGF drugs were not inferior to laser in terms of retreatment rate. For intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB), doses half of the conventional infant dose showed a low risk of retreatment rate (risk ratio (RR) of 1.43; 95% credible interval (CrI): 0.508, 4.03). On probability ranking as surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) plot, half dose of bevacizumab had a better position than conventional and augmented (1.2-2 times the regular dose) doses. A similar probability trend was observed for half vs. conventional doses of aflibercept and ranibizumab. Conventional infant dose of conbercept showed the lowest risk for retreatment (RR 0.846; 95% CrI: 0.245, 2.91). For secondary endpoints, lower doses of anti-VEGF agents were associated with shorter times to retreatment. The largest changes were noted for the augmented doses of bevacizumab and ranibizumab (0.3 mg) with means of 14.1 weeks (95% CrI: 6.65, 21.6) and 12.8 weeks (95% CrI: 3.19, 20.9), respectively. Finally, NMA demonstrated better refractive profile for anti-VEGF than laser therapy, especially for the conventional infant doses of bevacizumab and ranibizumab which exhibited a significantly better refractive profile than LPC, with mean differences of 1.67 (spherical equivalent - diopters) (95% CrI: 0.705, 2.67) and 2.19 (95% CrI: 0.782, 3.59), respectively. In the SUCRA plots, LPC had a markedly different position with a higher probability for myopia. Further clinical trials comparing different intravitreal doses of anti-VEGF agents are needed, but our findings suggest that low doses of these drugs retain efficacy and may reduce ocular and systemic undesired events.

Long-Term Visual Prognosis of Patients Following Lens-Sparing Vitrectomy for Stage 4A Retinopathy of Prematurity

This study evaluated the long-term visual outcomes of patients in whom at least one eye underwent successful lens-sparing vitrectomy (LSV) for stage 4A retinopathy of prematurity (ROP). A retrospective chart review was conducted using the data of 61 eyes of 42 patients with a minimum 4-year follow-up after successful LSV, with or without anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy, and whose best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was measurable using Landolt rings at the final visit. The mean age at the final follow-up was 10.1 ± 3.3 years. Before LSV, all eyes underwent laser ablation therapy. Twenty eyes (32.8%) with high vascular activity received anti-VEGF therapy before LSV. The mean decimal BCVA at the final follow-up was 0.23 ± 0.26 (range: hand motion to 1.2). Twenty-three eyes (54.1%) had a decimal BCVA of ≥0.4. Among 49 phakic eyes at the final examination, the mean refractive error was -10.1 ± 5.0 D, with 37 eyes (75.5%) having high myopia (>-6.0 D). No significant differences were observed in terms of decimal BCVA and refractive errors between eyes with and without anti-VEGF therapy. Approximately half of the patients had a decimal BCVA of ≥0.4, despite myopic refraction after successful LSV for stage 4A ROP. LSV for stage 4A ROP seemed to be associated with good visual function, despite myopic refraction.

Late sequelae of retinopathy of prematurity in adolescence and adulthood

This article provides information about late complications of retinopathy of prematurity (ROP), especially seen in adolescence and adulthood. The majority of ROP patients recover without complications and treatment, but severe ROP cases should be properly treated. Both prematurity itself and the treatment of ROP cause some changes in the anterior (refractive changes, cataract, and glaucoma) and posterior segments (tractional, rhegmatogenous and exudative retinal detachment, vitreous hemorrhage, etc.,) of the eye and predispose to significant lifelong complications. Awareness of these late complications can minimize severe vision loss with proper follow-up and appropriate treatment. Therefore, life-long ophthalmological follow-up is mandatory in all prematures with the diagnosis of ROP.

Characteristics of Eyes Developing Retinal Detachment After Anti-vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Therapy for Retinopathy of Prematurity

BACKGROUND

We investigated the incidence and clinical characteristics of eyes showing retinal detachment (RD) after anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP).

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of 76 consecutive eyes of 45 patients (18 girls and 27 boys) with stage 3 ROP who received anti-VEGF therapy between January 2012 and August 2020 with a minimum follow-up of 6 months was conducted. Eyes were divided into two groups: the vitrectomy (V) group that required vitrectomy for RD after anti-VEGF therapy and the non-vitrectomy (non-V) group that did not require vitrectomy. Data were collected from patient charts, including sex, postmenstrual age (PMA) at birth, birth weight, PMA at anti-VEGF therapy, comorbidities, reactivation, examination interval, and subsequent vitrectomies.

RESULTS

The median PMA at birth was 24.7 (range, 22.1-29.3) weeks. Twenty-seven eyes (35.1%) exhibited ROP reactivation at 6.4 ± 3.1 weeks after anti-VEGF therapy. The V group included six eyes of five patients, all of whom exhibited reactivation and developed RD 10.1 ± 6.5 weeks after anti-VEGF therapy. The types of RD were conventional (classic) in two eyes and circumferential (unique to RD after anti-VEGF) in four eyes. Three eyes required repeated vitrectomy. All eyes, except one eye in the V group, achieved retinal attachment at the last examination. The non-V group included 70 eyes of 40 patients, of which 21 exhibited reactivation and were treated successfully with laser (17 eyes) or second anti-VEGF (4 eyes). The proportion of eyes with plus disease was significantly higher in the V group (50.0%) than in the non-V group (10.0%) (P = 0.035). V group included 3 of 22 eyes (13.6%) in which the interval between the last examination and the diagnosis of reactivation was <1 week and 3 of 5 eyes (60.0%) in which the interval was more than 1 week (P = 0.024). The two groups showed no significant differences in the other factors.

CONCLUSION

Approximately 8% of eyes developed RD about 10 weeks after anti-VEGF therapy for ROP. Eyes with history of plus disease should be carefully monitored at appropriate intervals after anti-VEGF therapy for ROP.