AUTOLOGOUS POSTERIOR CAPSULE FLAP TRANSPLANTATION IN THE MANAGEMENT OF REFRACTORY MACULAR HOLE IN A PSEUDOPHAKIC EYE

Development of an Eccentric Macular Hole Followed by Reopening of the Original Macular Hole as a Long-term Sequelae of Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling and Focal Laser Photocoagulation: A Case Report

A macular hole (MH) is a widely known disease among ophthalmologists. Vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling is a standard technique for full-thickness MHs. However, the recurrence of MHs is sometimes seen. In addition, an eccentric MH is known to rarely occur after vitrectomy. An eccentric MH has been considered to require no therapeutic intervention because of its lack of increase in size. This study reports a case of two MHs (a recurrent MH and an enlarged eccentric MH) developed after laser photocoagulation around the injured retina caused by ILM peeling at the initial surgery. A 56-year-old woman presented with an idiopathic MH in her left eye and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was decreased to 20/80. She underwent phacoemulsification and vitrectomy combined with posterior hyaloid removal, ILM peeling, and 20% sulfur hexafluoride gas tamponade.  During the ILM peeling, we performed laser photocoagulation around the injured retina within the arcade. The MH was successfully closed and her BCVA was improved to 20/20 one month after surgery. Eight months after surgery, an eccentric MH occurred next to the photocoagulation spots. However, her BCVA remained 20/20; thus, we just followed up on her eye. Six years after surgery, her BCVA was decreased to 20/200. The eccentric MH increased in size and the original MH re-opened. The second vitrectomy was performed, but ILM had been already peeled within the arcade during the previous surgery and a usable sufficient size of ILM which could be auto-transplanted to the holes was not obtained. Thus, free flaps of the posterior lens capsule were harvested and placed within each hole. Two holes were successfully closed and her BCVA improved to 10/20 at three months after the surgery. Laser photocoagulation around the injured retina derived from ILM peeling may be a risk for recurrent MHs. .

Comparison of three techniques of harvesting full-thickness retinal tissue for large or persistent macular holes

Purpose

To evaluate the success rate of autologous retinal graft (ARG) for the closure of full-thickness macular holes (MHs) and compare the outcomes of three different techniques of harvesting the graft.

Methods

Clinic files of all patients who had undergone ARG for MH using intraocular scissors, membrane loop, or retinal punch to harvest retinal tissue were retrospectively reviewed. All patients were evaluated for MH closure, retinal reattachment, and visual improvement.

Results

Twenty-two eyes of 22 patients were included. ARG was done for 16 eyes (72.7%) with failed, large persistent MH, and six eyes (27.3%) also underwent simultaneous repair of retinal detachment. The basal diameter of MH was 1103.67 ± 310.09 (range 650-1529) μm. Intraocular scissors were used in 10 eyes (45.5%), a membrane loop in five eyes (22.7%), and a retinal punch in seven eyes (31.8%). Silicone oil tamponade was used in seven (31.8%) eyes and gas in 15 (68.1%) eyes. The follow-up ranged from 6 to 18 months. The hole closure rate was 72.7% (16/22). Visual improvement was noted in 18 eyes (81.8%). Retinal reattachment was seen in all eyes. Good graft integration with the surrounding area was seen in 17 eyes (77.3%). Graft retraction was seen in four eyes (18.18%) and graft loss in one eye (4.55%). No significant differences were noted among the three groups.

Conclusion

ARG is successful in closing large, failed MH with and without retinal detachment. A membrane loop and retinal punch are equally useful in harvesting the graft, but scissors are preferable in case the retina is detached. With all three techniques, integration of the graft with the surrounding tissue can be achieved.