A Comparison of Dry Eye Diagnostic Tests Between Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Age-Matched Females

The effect of pregnancy on meibomian gland, tear film, cornea and anterior segment parameters

AIM

In this prospective study, we aimed to examine the effect of physiological and pathological changes that occur during pregnancy in regard to Meibomian Gland (MG) structure, tear film, cornea and anterior segment parameters.

METHODS

The following groups were compared: 49 eyes of 49 pregnant women at 16-20 weeks of pregnancy (P16 Group), 46 eyes of 46 pregnant women at 32-36 weeks of pregnancy (P32 Group) and 51 eyes of 51 participants who were not pregnant (P0 Group). The groups were compared in terms of the first break-up time (NIF-BUT) and average break-up time (NIAvg-BUT) values. Non-contact meibography and MG loss rates were also compared.

RESULTS

The groups were found to be compatible in terms of age (P=0.052). The mean NIF-BUT values in the P16, P32 and P0 groups were 4.7 ±2.7, 6 ±3 and 6.7 ±3.1 seconds, respectively (P=0.055). The mean MG loss rates for the upper lid in the P16, P32 and P0 groups were 35.3%±12.6, 33.4%±11.4 and 15.5%±5.4, respectively. The loss rates for the lower lid in the P16, P32 and P0 groups were found to be 40.5%±18.6, 40.5%± 14.4 and 20.1%±8.1, respectively (P=0.000, p=0.000). The mean anterior chamber value (ACV) was found in the P16, P32 and P0 groups with 160.8 ±31.8, 150.9 ±26.5 and 165.9 ±26.5 µm³, respectively (P=0.035).

CONCLUSION

MG loss was found to be higher in pregnant groups compared to the non-pregnant groups. We found minimal instability in the tear film of the pregnant groups. We believe that pregnant women should be followed closely in terms of ocular surface diseases.

Functional and Morphological Evaluation of Meibomian Glands in the Assessment of Meibomian Gland Dysfunction Subtype and Severity

PURPOSE

To classify subtypes of meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) and evaluate the dependency of dry eye signs, symptoms, and parameters on MGD subtype.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

STUDY POPULATION

the right eyes of 447 patients with MGD of various subtypes and 20 healthy volunteers.

METHODS

Patients were divided into 4 subtypes of MGD based on meibum expression, meibum quality, and MG loss on meibography images (meibograde of 0-6). Subtypes were patients with high meibum delivery (hypersecretory and nonobvious MGD) and those with low meibum delivery (hyposecretory and obstructive MGD). Additional clinical tests included tear film break-up time (TFBUT), ocular staining, osmolarity, Schirmer I, blink interval timing and the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) questionnaire.

RESULTS

A total of 78 eyes had hypersecretory MGD; 49 eyes had nonobvious MGD; 66 eyes had hyposecretory MGD; and 254 eyes had obstructive MGD. Increased tear film osmolarity and lower TFBUT were found in the low-delivery groups; hyposecretory (P = 0.006, P = 0.016) and obstructive MGD (P = 0.008, P = 0.006) relative to high-delivery MGD (hypersecretory and nonobvious groups, respectively). Worse ocular symptoms and ocular staining were also found in low-delivery MGD groups than the high delivery MGD groups (P < 0.01 and P < 0.006, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with low-delivery MGD had worse dry eye parameters and ocular symptoms than those with high meibum delivery, indicating the pivotal role of meibum secretion in ocular surface health that should be targeted in MGD therapy. Furthermore, nonobvious MGD cannot be diagnosed using conventional dry eye tests and requires morphologic assessment of meibography images to confirm MG loss.

Diagnostic Test Efficacy of Meibomian Gland Morphology and Function

Meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) is the leading cause of dry eye and proposed treatments are based on disease severity. Our purpose was to establish reliable morphologic measurements of meibomian glands for evaluating MGD severity. This retrospective, cross-sectional study included 100 MGD patients and 20 controls. The patients were classified into dry eye severity level (DESL) 1–4 based on symptoms and clinical parameters including tear-film breakup time, ocular staining and Schirmer I. The gland loss, length, thickness, density and distortion were analyzed. We compared the morphology between patients and controls; examined their correlations to meibum expressibility, quality, and DESL. Relative to controls, the gland thickness, density and distortion were elevated in patients (p < 0.001 for all tests). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.98 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.96–1.0) for gland loss, and 0.96 (CI 0.91–1.0) for gland distortion, with a cutoff value of six distorted glands yielding a sensitivity of 93% and specificity of 97% for MGD diagnosis. The gland distortion was negatively correlated to the meibum expressibility (r = −0.53; p < 0.001) and DESL (r = −0.22, p = 0.018). In conclusion, evaluation of meibomian gland loss and distortion are valuable complementary clinical parameters to assess MGD status.