Repeated Low-Level Red Light Therapy for the Control of Myopia in Children: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Photobiomodulation use in ophthalmology - an overview of translational research from bench to bedside

Photobiomodulation (PBM) refers to the process in which wavelengths of light are absorbed by intracellular photoacceptors, resulting in the activation of signaling pathways that culminate in biological changes within the cell. PBM is the result of low-intensity light-induced reactions in the cell in contrast to thermal photoablation produced by high-intensity lasers. PBM has been effectively used in the clinic to enhance wound healing and mitigate pain and inflammation in musculoskeletal conditions, sports injury, and dental applications for many decades. In the past 20 years, experimental evidence has shown the benefit of PBM in increasing numbers of retinal and ophthalmic conditions. More recently, preclinical findings in ocular models have been translated to the clinic with promising results. This review discusses the preclinical and clinical evidence of the effects of PBM in ophthalmology and provides recommendations of the clinical use of PBM in the management of ocular conditions.

Red light instruments for myopia exceed safety limits

PURPOSE

Low-level red light (LLRL) therapy has recently emerged as a myopia treatment in children, with several studies reporting significant reduction in axial elongation and myopia progression. The goal of this study was to characterise the output and determine the thermal and photochemical maximum permissible exposure (MPE) of LLRL devices for myopia control.

METHODS

Two LLRL devices, a Sky-n1201a and a Future Vision, were examined. Optical power measurements were made using an integrating sphere radiometer through a 7-mm diameter aperture, in accordance with ANSI Z136.1-2014, sections 3.2.3-3.2.4. Retinal spot sizes of the devices were obtained using a model eye and high-resolution beam profiler. Corneal irradiance, retinal irradiance and MPE were calculated for an eye positioned at the oculars of each device.

RESULTS

Both devices were confirmed to be Class 1 laser products. Findings showed that the Sky-n1201a delivers laser light as a point source with a 654-nm wavelength, 0.2 mW power (Ø 7 mm aperture, 10-cm distance), 1.17 mW/cm2 corneal irradiance and 7.2 W/cm2 retinal irradiance (Ø 2 mm pupil). The MPE for photochemical damage is 0.55-7.0 s for 2-7 mm pupils and for thermal damage is 0.41-10 s for 4.25-7 mm pupils. Future Vision delivers the laser as an extended source subtending 0.75 × 0.325°. It has a 652-nm wavelength, 0.06 mW power (Ø 7 mm aperture, 10 cm distance), 0.624 mW/cm2 corneal irradiance and 0.08 W/cm2 retinal irradiance (Ø 2 mm pupil). MPE for photochemical damage is 50-625 s for 2-7 mm pupils.

DISCUSSION

For both of the LLRL devices evaluated here, 3 min of continuous viewing approached or surpassed the MPE, putting the retina at risk of photochemical and thermal damage. Clinicians should be cautious with the use of LLRL therapy for myopia in children until safety standards can be confirmed.