The Impact of Contemporary Contact Lenses on Contact Lens Discontinuation

Investigation of the influencing factors on subjective evaluation in initial and end-of-day silicone hydrogel contact lens wear

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to investigate the factors influencing subjective ratings of comfort, vision quality, dryness, and satisfaction at both initial and end-of-day wear among young Asian wearers of silicone hydrogel contact lenses.

METHODS

Participants aged 20 to 24 years who were satisfied wearers of silicone hydrogel daily disposable contact lenses were recruited. Each participant attended two scheduled visits. During the first visit (Day 1), ocular health, refractive error, visual acuity, first and average non-invasive tear break-up time (F-NITBUT and A-NITBUT), and subjective ratings were measured without lenses and 15 min after wearing Somofilcon A daily disposable lenses. On the second visit (Day 7), follow-up data were collected after seven consecutive days of lens wear.

RESULTS

A total of 59 healthy participants (mean age: 20.86 ± 1.29 years) participated in this study. Visual acuity demonstrated a significant negative correlation with comfort, vision quality, and satisfaction after 15 min of Somofilcon A lens wear on Day 1 and a positive correlation with dryness. Additionally, A-NITBUT was significantly positively correlated with vision quality. On Day 7, visual acuity was negatively correlated with overall vision quality after 8 h of wear. However, residual refraction and F-NITBUT showed no significant correlation with comfort, vision quality, dryness, or satisfaction after 15 min of wear on Day 1-8 h on Day 7.

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest that higher visual acuity at initial lens wear was strongly associated with improved subjective comfort, vision quality, and overall satisfaction, as well as reduced dryness. Furthermore, a longer average tear break-up time was associated with improved vision quality. For prolonged lens use, visual acuity was only associated with vision quality. Visual acuity plays a significant role in subjective ratings at the initial lens wear, while tear break-up time may serve as a predictor for subjective vision quality.

Drug releasing contact lenses and their application to disease presentations

Eye drops, the most common method for anterior segment treatment, face challenges of inefficiency, with less than 7% instilled drugs typically reaching target tissues of interest. The advent of contact lens drug delivery systems offers a paradigm shift, enhancing drug residence time and bioavailability on the ocular surface. This review focuses on the considerations and challenges in developing contact lenses for drug delivery, particularly for managing four categories of ocular diseases: anterior segment infections, dry eye disease, ocular allergies, and glaucoma. Each disease category requires tailored therapeutic approaches, and the technical intricacies of drug-releasing contact lenses must address concerns related to lens properties, drug release duration, and safety. The aim of this review is to provide insights into the therapeutic needs of ocular diseases and offer a comprehensive overview of the progress made in this innovative approach. The emergence of a commercially available ketotifen fumarate-releasing lens serves as a testament to the feasibility and potential benefits of this innovative approach, paving the way for further refinement and targeted applications in ocular therapeutics.

Patient considerations versus actual reasons for contact lens cessation: Insights from a survey-based study

PURPOSE

To analyze and compare non-contact lens-related and contact lens-related reasons influencing cessation considerations in current contact lens wearers (CLWs) with the actual reasons for cessation reported by discontinued CLWs.

METHODS

This was an cross-sectional study with face-to-face survey administered to current and discontinued CLWs by trained optometrists at the General Óptica centers across Spain. The survey included basic demographic information, and explored both non-contact lens-related and contact lens-related reasons that led current CLWs to consider cessation or resulted in cessation among discontinued CLWs.

RESULTS

A total of 1266 surveys, including 764 from current CLWs and 502 from discontinued CLWs, were included. Regarding non-contact lens-related reasons for cessation, discontinued CLWs more frequently reported a "Preference for wearing spectacles" (13.1 % vs. 3.8 %, P < 0.05) and "Recommendation by an eye care practitioner" (5.2 % vs. 0.6 %, P < 0.05), while current CLWs more often cited "Refractive surgery" (15.8 % vs. 9.4 %, P < 0.05). For contact lens-related reasons for cessation, discontinued CLWs more frequently reported "Difficulty handling contact lenses" (10.6 % vs. 1.9 %, P = 0.001), whereas current CLWs more commonly cited "Contact lens-related ocular symptoms" (57.6 % vs. 43.8 %, P < 0.05). Agreement between groups was generally low for all reasons analyzed, ranging from -0.115 to 0.103.

CONCLUSIONS

The reasons for cessation from the perspective of current and discontinued CLWs yield different results. By addressing the reasons considered by current CLWs, while taking into account the reasons most strongly associated with cessation in discontinued CLWs, eye care practitioners could proactively prevent CL cessation.

Mel4-coated hyaluronic acid-laden etafilcon A contact lenses: Improved wettability with retained antimicrobial properties

Soft contact lenses are a common mode of vision correction used worldwide. However, contact lens wearers often experience discomfort and are at risk of developing microbial infections. To address these issues, we designed Mel4-coated hyaluronic acid-laden etafilcon contact lenses to improve wettability while providing antimicrobial properties. The process involved the interaction of the etafilcon lens, which carries a net negative charge, with positively charged Mel4 (a cationic antimicrobial peptide). This was followed by interaction with hyaluronic acid (a negatively charged polymer). The components were then crosslinked using EDC-NHS [N-(3-dimethyl aminopropyl)-N'-ethyl carbodiimide hydrochloride and N-Hydroxy succinimide] to form amide bonds between the compounds and the lens. In this study, four batches of lenses were prepared: the first consisted of conventional HA-soaked lenses (SM-HA-L), the second consisted of lenses soaked in Mel4 and HA (SM-Mel4-HA-L), the third batch consisted of HA crosslinked with the lens (HA-Cr-L), and the fourth consisted of lenses soaked in Mel4 and HA, followed by crosslinking (Mel4-HA-Cr-L). During the washing and sterilization steps, SM-HA-L lenses showed high leaching compared to SM-Mel4-HA-L lenses, while HA-Cr-L and Mel4-HA-Cr-L lenses showed no leaching. A hyaluronidase breakdown assay revealed 5.37 μg, 9.28 μg, 8.04 μg, and 6.07 μg of HA per lens for SM-HA-L, SM-Mel4-HA-L, HA-Cr-L, and Mel4-HA-Cr-L, respectively. The wettability (contact angle) of SM-Mel4-HA-L lenses was improved compared to HA-Cr-L and Mel4-HA-Cr-L lenses. In vitro release studies showed no leaching of HA, indicating permanent entrapment or binding of HA to the contact lens surface. Both the SM-Mel4-HA-L lenses and crosslinked Mel4-HA-Cr-L lenses could significantly reduce the adhesion of Pseudomonas aeruginosa 6294 and Staphylococcus aureus 31 to the lenses. In conclusion, the presence of HA improved wettability, while Mel4 retained its antimicrobial activity, highlighting its potential to advance existing contact lens technology with improved wettability and antimicrobial properties.

Repeatability of lipid layer thickness using LipiView® following removal of contact lenses and its relationship to comfort

PURPOSE

To assess the repeatability of lipid layer thickness (LLT) measurement using the LipiView® interferometer after daily disposable contact lens (CL) wear and correlation with ocular comfort in soft contact lens wearers.

METHODS

A prospective study was conducted over two consecutive months, wherein CL wearers (n = 20) wore either Somofilcon A or Verofilcon A daily disposable CLs in a crossover design, switching lenses after 1 month. The pre-corneal tear film LLT was measured at the end of each month after CLs had been worn for at least 6 h. Using the LipiView® interferometer, three measurements of the LLT (average, maximum and minimum) were recorded. Subjects' symptoms were evaluated with the Contact Lens Dry Eye Questionnaire-8 (CLDEQ-8) and correlations sought between post-lens pre-corneal tear film LLT and symptoms.

RESULTS

The average, maximum and minimum intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) of LLT measurements at baseline were 0.57, 0.39 and 0.66, respectively, indicating poor (ICC < 0.4) to moderate (≥0.4, <0.75) repeatability. Coefficients of repeatability (CR) were 20.4, 24.8 and 20.8, respectively. After daily disposable CL wear, the ICC values were 0.66, 0.72 and 0.63 (indicating moderate repeatability), with CR values of 25.7, 32.0 and 23.3, respectively. Although all the ICC values of the pre-corneal LLT increased after daily disposable lens wear indicating improved repeatability, the CR values also increased, indicating larger spread of data. However, in both cases, these increases were not significantly different from baseline. There were no significant differences in pre-corneal LLT between the two lens types and no significant correlation with comfort scores (baseline: r = -0.11, p = 0.67; Verofilcon A lenses: r = 0.19, p = 0.45; Somofilcon A lenses r = 0.13, p = 0.62) for either lens.

CONCLUSIONS

The repeatability of average, maximum and minimum LLT measurements performed by LipiView remained stable during CL wear. There was no significant correlation between LLT and comfort scores.

Real-Time Changes in the Comfort of a Toric, Monthly, Soft Contact Lens Over a Long Day of Wear

Purpose

The purpose of this work was to determine the comfort performance of a toric, monthly, silicon hydrogel CL (lehfilcon A; TOTAL30 for Astigmatism) over a long day of wear.

Methods

This was a 1-month, 3-visit, prospective, single-arm study. Adult, 18- to 45-year-old CL wearers with good vision who were minimally symptomatic (CLDEQ-8 scores ≤12) were enrolled. Subjects were required to have astigmatism ranging from -0.75 D to -2.50 D in each eye and were required to wear the study CLs from about 8:00 AM until 12:00 AM each day. Comfort data with the study CL throughout the wear day were collected via text messaging.

Results

A total of 47 subjects who had a mean ± SD age of 29.5 ± 7.0 years were analyzed. Within a specified time point across the month of wear, CL comfort did not vary (all p-value ≥ 0.82), yet CL comfort did decrease across the wear day for all days evaluated (all p-value <0.001). Most subjects found their CLs to be comfortable with only 1.8% of subjects reporting an uncomfortable score at CL application and only 8.5% of subjects reporting an uncomfortable score after 16 hours of CL wear.

Conclusion

A high level of consistency and predictability in comfort was found within the first month of wearing lehfilcon A CLs. This suggests that patients with minimal CL-related discomfort at initial fitting of a lehfilcon A CL may likely tolerate longer wear time with minimal discomfort across the entire month of wear.

Clinical Trialsgov Id

NCT06052046.

Tear Cytokines as Predictive Biomarkers of Success in Contact Lens Discomfort Management

PURPOSE

To analyze changes in tear levels of inflammatory mediators in symptomatic contact lens (CL) wearers after refitting with daily disposable CLs and to identify potential biomarkers of success in CL discomfort (CLD) management.

METHODS

Symptomatic CL wearers (CLDEQ-8 ≥ 12) were refitted (V1) with daily disposable CLs (Delefilcon A). After one month (V2), participants were classified into the post-fitting non-symptomatic (CLDEQ <12) and symptomatic (CLDEQ ≥12) groups. At each visit, the participants were clinically evaluated, tears were collected, and 20 inflammatory mediators and substance P (SP) were measured using multiplex immunobead analysis and ELISA, respectively. The detection rates and concentrations were compared between visits and groups, and logistic regression models were performed.

RESULTS

Forty-three subjects (32 women/11 men; mean age: 23.2 ± 4.9 years) were enrolled. The IL-1β and IL-9 detection rates were higher at V2 (p ≤ 0.044). The detection rates of IL-1β, IL-9, MIP-1α/CCL3, and MMP-9 at V1 (p ≤ 0.045) and IL-17A at V2 (p ≤ 0.014) were higher in the post-fitting symptomatic group. The tear IL-9 concentration was increased at V2 (p = 0.018). The tear concentrations of fractalkine/CX3CL1, IL-2, IL-6, IL-10, MCP-3/CCL7, MIP-1β, NGF, RANTES/CCL5, and TNF-α were higher in the post-fitting symptomatic group (p ≤ 0.044). Additionally, levels of fractalkine/CX3CL1, IL-2, IL-6, IL-10, RANTES/CCL5, and TNF-α at V1 were significantly associated with the post-fitting grouping (p ≤ 0.044).

CONCLUSIONS

Low tear concentrations of specific inflammatory mediators may be used as a predictive biomarker of success for refitting symptomatic CL wearers with daily disposable CLs. However, complementary treatments might be required for symptomatic CL wearers with higher levels of these inflammatory molecules.

Comfort advantages demonstrated with a novel soft contact lens: A randomized clinical trial

Purpose

To compare comfort outcomes between a novel daily disposable contact lens - designed to maximize comfort - and an established control. The hypothesis was that the test lens would be superior to the control for four key comfort questionnaire items: end-of-day comfort, all-day comfort, visual comfort while driving at night, and reduction of ocular fatigue from digital device use.

Methods

This randomized, controlled, subject-masked, parallel-arm study enrolled young (18-39 years), healthy, myopic, contact lens wearers with an up-to-date prescription at 19 investigational sites in the United States. Subjects wore either the test (ACUVUE® OASYS MAX 1-Day, senofilcon A) or control (Dailies Total1®, delefilcon A) lens for 2 weeks of bilateral, daily disposable wear before completing comfort questionnaire items, each of which had 5 or 6 response options. For each item, the odds ratio for positive (top-two-box) responses was estimated from a binomial generalized linear mixed model. A gatekeeping approach combined with the truncated Hochberg procedure was used for multiplicity adjustment.

Results

Of 344 enrolled subjects, 342 subjects were randomized and dispensed lenses, with 171 subjects per lens group. Among the 342 subjects, 68.4% were female, 83.6% were White, and the average age was 29.7 (±5.53) years. The test lens was statistically superior to the control for all four comfort questions: odds ratios (test vs. control) were 2.01 (95% CI: 1.25, 3.22) for end-of-day comfort, 2.17 (alpha-adjusted CI: 1.30, 3.64) for all-day comfort, 2.00 (alpha-adjusted CI: 1.18, 3.41) for reducing ocular fatigue from digital device use, and 1.77 (95% CI: 1.04, 3.02) for comfortable vision while driving at night.

Conclusion

The test lens demonstrated statistically superior physical and visual comfort, as measured by the four comfort endpoints, compared to the control. The test lens had significantly greater odds of favorable responses for all comfort items compared to the control.

Optimization of the Oxygen Permeability of Non-Silicone Hydrogel Contact Lenses Through Crosslinking Modifications

The main weakness of non-silicone hydrogel contact lenses is their low oxygen permeability (Dk). Hence, we have tried to optimize their Dk using various concentrations and lengths of the poly (ethylene glycol) dimethacrylate crosslinker in a mixture of N,N-Dimethylacrylamide and Cyclohexyl methacrylate monomers. After synthesizing the different contact lenses, we evaluated their chemical, optical, and mechanical properties. The resultant non-silicone hydrogel contact lenses presented similar high water contents (75.69-80.60%) and adequate optical (e.g., a transmittance ranging from 85.91% to 99.91% and a refractive index between 1.3630 and 1.3740) and elongation at break (178.95-356.05%) characteristics for clinical applications. Conversely, they presented high contact angles (81.00-100.00°) and a low Young's modulus (0.066-0.167 MPa). Regarding the impact of the crosslinking modifications, the water content, contact angle, refractive index, transmittance, and Young's modulus of the synthesized lenses were slightly affected by crosslinker conditions. In contrast, the elongation at break (178.95-356.05%) and, more importantly, the oxygen permeability, which reached values of up to 73.90 Fatt units, were considerably impacted by the crosslinker conditions. To our knowledge, this study demonstrates for the first time that, in addition to water, other usual hydrogel components, like crosslinkers, can modulate the Dk of non-silicone contact lenses. It also provides a simple and scalable method to fabricate more permeable non-silicone lenses.

Investigation of Delefilcon A Contact Lenses for Symptomatic Daily Disposable Contact Lens Wearers with Dry Eye Disease: A Prospective Comparative Study

Purpose

This prospective comparative study aimed to assess the effects on contact lens comfort, dryness, and wear time when symptomatic daily disposable (DD) contact lens (CL) wearers were refit with delefilcon A (DT1) lenses.

Patients and Methods

Thirty five symptomatic DD CL wearers with dry eye disease as determined according to the TFOS DEWS 2 guidelines, were enrolled and completed the study. Participants wore their habitual DD CLs during an initial assessment and were subsequently refit with DT1 for 1 month. Participants were masked to the study lens type. Subjective ratings of end-of-day comfort and dryness, average wear time, and comfortable wear time were evaluated as primary endpoints.

Results

Of the 35 participants, two participants were classified as aqueous deficient dry eye, while the remaining participants exhibited symptoms primarily due to evaporative causes. The median CLDEQ-8 score for dryness significantly improved from 17 (fair) with habitual lenses to 13 (good) with DT1 lenses (p < 0.01). Participants reported significantly better end-of-day comfort (p = 0.01) and less end-of-day dryness (p = 0.01) with DT1 compared to their habitual DD lenses. The comfortable wear time was significantly longer with DT1 (8.5 ± 4.1 hours) compared to habitual DD lenses (6.7 ± 3.2 hours) (p = 0.04). No significant differences were observed in vision ratings (p = 0.07).

Conclusion

Refitting symptomatic DD CL wearers with DT1 resulted in improved end-of-day comfort, reduced end-of-day dryness, and extended comfortable wear time compared to their habitual lenses. These findings suggest that DT1 may offer benefits for symptomatic DD wearers with dry eye disease.

A Comparison of Subjective Symptoms of Two Types of Silicone Hydrogel One-Day Disposable Contact Lenses

PURPOSE

This study aimed to evaluate the comfort and discomfort of two types of soft contact lenses (SCLs) by comparing their quality of vision, fit, subjective dryness, and handling.

METHODS

A total of 62 SCL wearers with contact lens (CL) discomfort were recruited. They were fitted with narafilcon A and verofilcon A for two weeks each by crossover. The comfort of the two types of SCLs was compared by having each participant answer a modified 5-Item Dry Eye Questionnaire (m-DEQ5, scores for vision, wearing comfort, and handling: the total score of the five items is a maximum of 25, higher being better) and modified Japanese version of the 8-item Contact Lens Dry Eye Questionnaire (m-J-CLDEQ-8: scores for discomfort and dry eye symptoms: the total score of the eight items is a maximum of 44; lower is better) survey forms. Results: Overall, the m-DEQ5 and m-J-CLDEQ-8 scores for the two SCLs of narafilcon A and verofilcon A were higher than the median of 3.0 points. Scores for 4 of 5 items and total scores in m-DEQ5 (18.7 ± 3.4 vs. 21.6 ± 2.5) were significantly higher and better in verofilcon A than in narafilcon A (p<0.01). Scores for 8 of 8 items and total scores on the m-J-CLDEQ-8 (15.2 ± 7.9 vs. 8.4 ± 4.9) were also significantly lower and better in verofilcon A than in narafilcon A (p<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Verofilcon A provided excellent vision, comfort, and ease of handling and was less likely to cause dry eye symptoms or eye discomfort. These results suggest that verofilcon A is an excellent option for patients with dry eye symptoms and CL discomfort.

The roles of neural adaptation and sensitization in contact lens discomfort

PURPOSE

To investigate the roles of neural adaptation and sensitization in contact lens discomfort (CLD).

METHODS

Cooling stimuli (20 °C) were applied to the cornea in a group comprising 24 symptomatic and 25 asymptomatic contact lens (CL) wearers as well as 15 non-CL wearing controls, using a computerized Belmonte esthesiometer. The adaptation paradigm consisted of 20 repetitive stimuli at threshold, sub- and supra-threshold levels. The sensitization paradigm involved five levels of suprathreshold stimuli ranging between 1x to 2x threshold. Following each stimulus, participants rated the sensation magnitude regarding intensity, coolness and irritation. Measurements were taken with habitual CL (BL_CL), after 2 weeks of no-CL (No_CL) and after restarting habitual CL wear (ReSt_CL).

RESULTS

The symptomatic subjects exhibited a lower threshold but reported enhanced sensations during the adaptation and sensitization paradigm, compared to the asymptomatic and control groups (all p ≤ 0.021). At the BL_CL and ReSt_CL visits, they showed increased ratings to repeated subthreshold stimuli (p = 0.025) and greater irritation during the sensitization paradigm (p ≤ 0.032). Ratings in asymptomatic and control groups were relatively unchanged over time (p ≥ 0.181). Logistic regression revealed a link between the augmented sensory responses and increased likelihood with CLD.

CONCLUSION

The maladaptive sensory responses seen in CLD subjects, with reduced adaptation and heightened sensitization to ocular surface stimulation, suggest an imbalance between sensitization and adaptation in CLD. As CLD may represent a reversible subcategory of dry eye, it can serve as a human dry eye model for studying the neurosensory effect of ocular surface stimulation.

Epidemiology and Risk Factors of Dry Eye Disease: Considerations for Clinical Management

Dry eye disease is a multifactorial condition characterised by tear film instability, hyperosmolarity and ocular surface inflammation. Understanding the epidemiology of dry eye disease and recognising both modifiable and non-modifiable risk factors can assist eye care practitioners in assessing, treating, and managing patients with the condition. This review considers current knowledge surrounding its incidence and prevalence, as well as associated demographic, systemic, ocular, and iatrogenic, and lifestyle-related modifiable risk factors. Population-based prevalence estimates vary according to the diagnostic criteria used to define dry eye disease, as well as severity and demographic characteristics of the population. Considering recent data and variable population demographics, conservative prevalence estimates suggest that 10-20% of the population over 40 years of age report moderate to severe symptoms and/or seek treatment for dry eye disease. Individuals with specific non-modifiable demographic risk factors may be at increased risk of developing dry eye disease. Advanced age, female sex and East Asian ethnicity have been identified as key non-modifiable demographic features predisposing individuals to dry eye disease. Systemic conditions that have been associated with an increased risk of dry eye disease include migraine, Sjögren syndrome, connective tissue disorders, mental health disorders, diabetes mellitus and androgen deficiency. Medications that may contribute to this risk include antidepressants, antihistamines, and hormone replacement therapy. Ocular and iatrogenic risk factors of dry eye disease include blepharitis, Demodex infestation, ocular surgery, blink completeness, contact lens wear, and topical ophthalmic medications. A range of modifiable lifestyle factors that can increase the risk of dry eye disease have also been identified, including low humidity environments, digital screen use, quality of sleep, diet, and eye cosmetic wear. Dry eye is a common disease affecting millions globally. Increasing knowledge regarding its associated risk factors can better prepare the eye care practitioner to successfully manage patients with this ocular surface disease.

Ocular thermography and clinical measurements in symptomatic and asymptomatic soft contact lens wearers

SIGNIFICANCE

Symptoms of dryness and discomfort are the main reasons for contact lens dropout. Clinical tests for this purpose are invasive or subjective. Ocular thermography may help to assess the ocular discomfort and dryness in a noninvasive and objective manner.

PURPOSE

This study aimed to investigate the relationship of ocular thermography with clinical measurements in habitual symptomatic and asymptomatic soft contact lens wearers.

METHODS

Forty habitual contact lens wearers were evaluated in two age- and gender-matched asymptomatic and symptomatic groups (Contact Lens Discomfort Questionnaire scores ≤8 and ≥14, respectively). Clinical measurements took place during visit 1 (with contact lens in situ and after contact lens removal) and at baseline after a 2-week washout period (visit 2). The Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) questionnaire, noninvasive tear breakup time, bulbar conjunctival hyperemia, and corneal staining were assessed. Thermal cooling rate was computed in the central and lower cornea during natural blinking (30 s) and sustained eye opening (10 s).

RESULTS

Dry eye symptoms (OSDI score) were significantly higher in the symptomatic group during contact lens wear (p<0.001) and at baseline (p = 0.001). Thermal cooling rate was significantly higher in the symptomatic group in the lower cornea (10 s, p=0.013) with the contact lens in situ and in the central cornea (30 s, p=0.045) after contact lens removal. At baseline, dry eye symptoms (OSDI score) significantly correlated with cooling rate in the central cornea region for the symptomatic group (30 s: r = -0.5, p=0.03; 10 s: r = -0.63, p=0.005). Noninvasive tear breakup time correlated with cooling rate in the central cornea region at baseline in the symptomatic group (30 s, r = 0.6, p=0.005; 10 s, r = 0.55, p=0.018). Cooling rate in the central cornea region (10-s duration, p<0.0001) and noninvasive tear breakup time (p<0.0001) were identified as significant predictor variables for dry eye symptoms at baseline.

CONCLUSIONS

Noninvasive tear breakup time and thermal cooling rate were identified as significant predictor variables for contact lens-induced dry eye. These findings may suggest the potential for the additional application of ocular thermography in the evaluation of contact lens discomfort.

YouTube as a learning source for contact lens insertion and removal

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Contact lens neophytes often learn about contact lens insertion and removal through YouTube videos of unknown quality.

BACKGROUND

This study evaluates the quality of soft contact lens insertion and removal videos on YouTube.

METHODS

A search for the keywords 'Contact lens insertion', 'Contact lens removal', 'Put in contact lens', and 'Take off contact lens' was performed on YouTube. The first 50 videos for each keyword were evaluated. The number of views, source of the publisher, days since upload, and video quality were scored based on the content in the videos. The maximum score of insertion and removal videos were 7 and 5 respectively. The videos were classified into three groups by publisher category: videos published by eye care professionals, companies and YouTubers.

RESULTS

Only 45 contact lens insertion and 44 removal videos met the inclusion criteria and were analysed. Insertion and removal videos published by YouTubers had the highest view and view rate. However, their quality scores were significantly lower than videos published by eye care professionals and companies. Videos uploaded by companies had the highest scores (insertion: 5.00 ± 1.10; removal: 3.25 ± 0.75). The mean scores of insertion and removal videos published by YouTubers were 1.65 ± 0.93 and 1.00 ± 0.89, respectively, while the insertion and removal videos uploaded by eye care professionals scored 3.58 ± 2.07 and 2.75 ± 1.53, respectively. There was also a negative correlation between the quality scores and view rate (p = 0.008, r = -0.41).

CONCLUSION

Contact lens insertion and removal videos uploaded by YouTubers had the highest view rate but the lowest quality. Videos made by companies included most essential elements.

Perception and awareness of the public about presbyopia and its corrective approaches in Saudi Arabia: a population-based survey

BACKGROUND

This study investigated patients' awareness of presbyopia and its management approaches and their preferred methods for near vision correction.

METHODS

In Saudi Arabia, 785 participants (aged between 35 and 60 years) completed a structured survey online, consisting of hard copies and direct interviews. The survey consisted of twenty-eight items divided into three parts. It was designed to record participants' awareness of and preferences for presbyopia and its refractive corrections. Nonparametric tests and descriptive analyses were conducted to analyse participants' responses.

RESULT

Approximately half of the participants had difficulty with near vision activities, such as reading newspapers or using mobile phones. Among all the participants, 76% were not aware of presbyopia. The prevalence of uncorrected presbyopia was 48% of the 785. The majority (82%) felt that spectacles were acceptable for correction of presbyopia. Most reported that they did not experience social stigma when using reading spectacles (87% of participants). When asked if they were aware of management approaches other than spectacles, 72% responded with not at all. Most participants had no earlier knowledge of the use of multifocal contact lenses or eye drops for presbyopia correction (67% and 82%, respectively). In the present study, some tendencies to use corrective approaches to presbyopia other than spectacles were noted. Finally, participants' age, sex, region, education, and income had a statistically significant impact on essential parts of their responses (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Presbyopia is a highly prevalent age-related ocular disorder, and a significant percentage of cases are uncorrected due to a lack of awareness or reluctance to wear spectacles. More efficient health education about presbyopia and its corrective alternatives is urgently needed.

The association between participant-reported ratings of comfort, dryness and vision quality in soft contact lens wearers

INTRODUCTION

Previous literature has indicated an association between participant-reported perceptions (e.g., ratings) of comfort, dryness and vision quality during soft contact lens wear. However, these reports do not account for participant- and lens-specific factors which may impact the interpretation of these results. The purpose of this project was to quantify the association between these participant-reported ratings while accounting for both participant- and lens-specific factors.

METHODS

Participant-reported ratings (scale 0-100) of comfort, dryness and quality of vision for 675 soft contact lens wearers (1207 eyes) were aggregated across 31 studies completed at Indiana University. Linear mixed-effects regression modelling was performed on each outcome rating individually. Covariate-adjusted models incorporated both participant- (e.g., age, sex) and lens-related (e.g., lens material, edge and optics) factors. The models were statistically adjusted for the duration of lens wear in hours and cumulative days of exposure.

RESULTS

Consistent with estimates from covariate-adjusted regression models, pairwise Spearman correlations [95% CI] between dryness and comfort (rs = 0.71, [0.69, 0.74]), vision quality and comfort (rs = 0.53, [0.49, 0.57]) and vision quality and dryness (rs = 0.49, [0.42, 0.54]) were all positive and had p < 0.001. Average participant-reported ratings of comfort, dryness and vision quality decreased by (bs [95% CI]) = -0.81 [-1.15, -0.46] -0.34 [-0.67, 0.0005] and -0.90 [-1.19, -0.60] rating units, respectively, for each hour of lens wear.

CONCLUSIONS

Significant positive associations were found between participant-reported measures of comfort, dryness and vision quality during soft contact lens wear. The associations between these ratings and the participant- and lens-related factors that drive them should be considered by clinicians and manufacturers when fitting and designing soft contact lenses.

Refitting contact lens dropouts into a modern daily disposable contact lens

PURPOSE

To determine the number of previous contact lens (CL) wearers who could be comfortably refitted into delefilcon A (DAILIES TOTAL1®) CLs.

METHODS

This was a 6-month, three-visit study that recruited subjects who discontinued CLs within the past 2 years because of discomfort or dryness symptoms. Subjects were required to have Standard Patient Evaluation of Eye Dryness (SPEED) questionnaire scores ≤3 and to be able to wear spherical study CLs. Subjects were asked to complete a ±50 comfort visual analogue scale (VAS) at 1 month and a Likert questionnaire after 1 and 6 months of CL wear to understand the subjects' CL experience.

RESULTS

All 60 subjects who were fitted with the study CLs were still wearing them after 1 month, while one subject had dropped out by 6 months. Subjects had a median (interquartile range) age of 24.0 (7.0) years (71.7% female). They reported a median VAS score of 44.0 (8.0) units at the 1-month visit, with all reporting a comfortable score. At the 1-month/6-month visits, 98.3%/93.2%, 86.5%/78.0% and 93.2%/91.5% of subjects responded that they were very satisfied or satisfied with their vision, their end-of-day CL comfort and overall CL comfort, respectively. The same subjects responded that they were very likely or likely to continue to wear the study CLs at 1 (89.6%) and 6 months (80.7%) and to recommend the study CLs to a friend at 1 (98.3%) and 6 months (93.2%).

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest that when encountering a CL dropout, a practitioner could educate a patient about trying an alternative CL and consider delefilcon A lenses as an option.

End-of-day assessment of asymptomatic versus highly symptomatic soft contact lens wearers

PURPOSE

To investigate differences in key clinical parameters between asymptomatic and highly symptomatic soft contact lens (CL) wearers after 14 h of wear.

METHODS

In this pilot investigation, Phase 1 identified asymptomatic (CLDEQ-8 score ≤ 7) and highly symptomatic (CLDEQ-8 score ≥ 20) subjects after fitting with nelfilcon A CLs. Phase 2 investigated the following over a single nelfilcon A CL-wearing day (14 ± 2 h): blinking characteristics, tear meniscus height (TMH), non-invasive tear break-up time (NIBUT), tear film osmolarity and eyelid margin staining. Parameters for the two groups were compared using linear mixed models and post-hoc testing. The relationship between comfort scores and the clinical parameters was also investigated.

RESULTS

Overall, 161 and 42 subjects were enrolled into Phase 1 and 2, respectively. Twenty-five asymptomatic and 17 symptomatic subjects completed Phase 2. Lower eyelid TMH was decreased after 14 h in symptomatic compared with asymptomatic subjects (least square mean [LSM] difference -0.04 mm, 95% CI: -0.07, -0.01). Osmolarity was lower in symptomatic than in asymptomatic subjects at fitting (LSM difference -9.89, 95% CI: -18.91, -0.86). Upper eyelid margin staining was greater after 14 h in symptomatic than in asymptomatic subjects (LSM difference 0.53, 95% CI: 0.01, 1.05) and greater after 14 h than baseline in the symptomatic group (LSM difference 0.61, 95% CI: 0.16, 1.07). There was a significant relationship between comfort and upper eyelid margin staining (r = -0.40, 95% CI: -0.63, -0.11) and blink rate (r = -0.31, 95% CI: -0.57, -0.003).

CONCLUSION

The potential parameters most effective in differentiating asymptomatic from symptomatic wearers were upper eyelid margin staining and lower TMH. The parameter with the strongest relationship to comfort was upper eyelid margin staining, where higher comfort scores were associated with lower levels of staining.

Subjective Symptoms of First-Time Wearers of Verofilcon A Silicone Hydrogel One-Day Disposable Contact Lenses: A First Time Use of Verofilcon A (FTVeA) Study

Purpose: Verofilcon A, a new daily disposable silicone hydrogel soft contact lens (SCL), is expected to be more comfortable to wear due to its smooth surface. This study aims to compare the comfort level of verofilcon A with eyeglasses in first-time SCL wearers. Methods: A total of 58 new SCL wearers participated in this study. Participants' comfort scores while wearing glasses or verofilcon A were examined at baseline (glasses) and one and four weeks after starting to wear the SCLs. Results: At the end of the one-month study period, no participants had abandoned wearing the SCLs due to discomfort. The vision scores (1-10) for glasses (baseline) and SCLs (week one, week four) were better with SCLs than glasses in the morning (7.9 ± 1.9 vs 8.9 ± 1.3, 9.0 ± 1.2, p<0.01), during the day (8.0 ± 1.6 vs 9.0 ± 1.1, 8.9 ± 1.2, p<0.01), at the end of the day (7.2 ± 2.1 vs 8.5 ± 1.5, 8.7 ± 1.4, p<0.01), and the entire day (7.7 ± 1.7 vs 8.9 ± 1.2, 8.7 ± 1.3, p<0.01). The percentages of participants who agreed that wearing SCLs at week four was as good as or better than glasses in terms of overall vision, peripheral vision, vision at the end of the day, comfort during the day, comfort at the end of the day, less fatigue during the day, and less fatigue at the end of the day were 91.4%, 100.0%, 91.4%, 89.7%, 82.8%, 87.9%, and 89.7%, respectively. Of the participants, 93.1%, 100.0%, and 93.1% felt that the SCLs were easy to wear, more comfortable than expected, and would like to purchase the same lenses in the future, respectively. Conclusion: These findings suggest that verofilcon A is more comfortable than glasses and is effective as an introductory lens for first-time SCL wearers.

Comparative Analysis of the Osmoprotective Effects of Daily Disposable Contact Lens Packaging Solutions on Human Corneal Epithelial Cells

Purpose

Contact lens (CL) wear challenges the balance of the ocular surface environment by increasing water evaporation and tear osmolarity. Maintaining ocular surface homeostasis during CL wear remains a goal of lens manufacturers and an important consideration for eye care professionals. The purpose of this study was to measure the metabolic activity and inflammatory responses of a transformed human corneal epithelial cell (THCEpiC) line under hyperosmotic conditions in the presence of CL packaging solutions.

Methods

CL packaging solutions sampled from seven daily disposable silicone hydrogel CL blister packages were prepared at 25% and made hyperosmolar (400 mOsm/kg) with NaCl. THCEpiCs were incubated with each solution for 24 hr, after which cell culture supernatants were collected. THCEpiC metabolic activity was determined by an alamarBlue assay. Concentrations in cell culture supernatants of inflammatory cytokine (interleukin [IL]-6) and chemokine (IL-8), as well as monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1), were quantitated by specific enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays.

Results

THCEpiC metabolic activity under hyperosmolar conditions decreased in the presence of somofilcon A and senofilcon A solutions (p=0.04 and 0.004, respectively), but no other solution (all p≥0.09). Concentrations of IL-6 increased in the presence of delefilcon A, somofilcon A, narafilcon A, and senofilcon A solutions (all p≤0.001), but no other solution (all p≥0.08), while those of IL-8 increased in the presence of all solutions (all p≤0.03) but kalifilcon A (p>0.99), and those of MCP-1 increased in the presence of delefilcon A, verofilcon A, somofilcon A, and stenfilcon A solutions (all p<0.0001), but no other solution (all p>0.99).

Conclusion

CL packaging solutions differ in their capacity to inhibit epithelial inflammation. THCEpiC inflammatory response was less in the presence of a CL packaging solution containing osmoprotectants than in solutions lacking osmoprotectants under moderately hyperosmolar conditions in vitro. Clinical studies are warranted to further substantiate the benefit of osmoprotectants.

Impact of the physical properties of contact lens materials on the discomfort: role of the coefficient of friction

Contact Lens Discomfort (CLD) is the main cause in contact lens (CLs) discontinuation, referred in literature as drop-out phenomenon. Despite such evidence was reported in several clinical studies, a relationship between physico-chemical properties of CLs and CLD is not still totally understood. In this regard, the friction of CLs surfaces seems to be related to discomfort feeling events, probably due to an alteration of the lubricate function of the tear film after the CL placement inside the ocular environment. In the last years, many studies have been finalized to the friction measurements of CLs surface, finding conflicting data due to a lack in standardized protocol. The aim of this review is primarily to show evident relationships between CLs surface properties (i.e. wettability, tear evaporation, tear film quality, etc.) and the coefficient of friction (CoF), resulting therefore the most relevant physical quantity in the CLs characterization. In addition, we reported the most recent studies in CLs tribology, which highlight that the introduction of a standard protocol in CoF measurements is necessary to obtain reproducible results, considering the aim to evaluate in a more precise way the relationship between this material surface property and comfort in CLs users.

Patient Satisfaction and Tear Film Break-Up Time After First-Time Wearing of Silicone Hydrogel Contact Lenses

PURPOSE

The dryness and discomfort associated with soft contact lenses (SCLs) prevent their continued use. Recently, verofilcon A, a new daily disposable silicone hydrogel material SCL, was introduced, which has a high water content (surface water content of 80% or more) that overcomes the low water content drawback of silicone hydrogels. In this study, we evaluated the non-invasive tear break-up time (NIBUT) and comfort level in individuals wearing verofilcon A SCL for the first time.

METHODS

We enrolled 42 first-time SCL wearers, comprising 84 eyes. NIBUT was measured using the DR-1α® dry eye observation device at the state of the naked eye before SCL wear (baseline) and at one and four weeks after the first SCL wear. Additionally, we conducted a questionnaire survey during the fourth week to assess the comfort level (0-10) of SCL wear. Results: The NIBUT values were significantly higher at one week (10.8 ± 2.2 s, p<0.01) and four weeks (11.4 ± 2.2 s, p<0.01) after the first SCL wear than those at baseline (5.9 ± 2.0 s). Comfort level in SCL use was significantly higher at one week (9.0 ± 1.1, p<0.01) and four weeks (8.7 ± 1.2, p<0.01) than that at baseline (7.8 ± 1.8), and this level was higher regardless of the baseline NIBUT value.

CONCLUSION

Prolonged BUT and increased comfort levels were observed in individuals wearing verofilcon A SCLs. Improvement in tear fluid retention was found to alleviate dry eye and discomfort, suggesting that verofilcon A may be a beneficial introductory lens for first-time SCL wearers.

Current approaches to soft contact lens handling training - Global perspectives

PURPOSE

All neophyte contact lens wearers require training on how to handle contact lenses. Currently, almost no published information exists describing the most common approaches used by those involved in such training in soft contact lens wearers. This study aimed to gather information on the approaches taken by those conducting this training worldwide.

METHODS

An online survey was created in English and translated to Spanish and distributed internationally via social media, conference attendees, and professional contacts. The anonymous survey included information on workplace setting of respondents, information about the typical approaches used for application and removal of soft contact lenses, length of the appointment, and success rate with their approach. Survey responses were received between May 2021 and April 2022.

RESULTS

A total of 511 individuals completed the survey and responses were received from 31 countries with 48.7% from the UK. The most common approach taught for application was to have the patient hold the upper eyelashes (84.7%) and to hold the lower eyelid with the same hand as the lens (89.4%). Lenses were applied directly to the cornea by 57.7% of the respondents. The most common approach taught for lens removal was to drag the lens inferiorly from the cornea prior to removal (49.3%). Most respondents did not use videos to aid the teaching appointment (62.0%); however, they felt that their approach was successful in most cases (90). Application and removal training sessions lasted a median of 30 min and contact lenses were typically dispensed after the instructor witnessing successful application and removal three times.

CONCLUSION

Various methods are adopted globally for training of application and removal of soft contact lenses, with many advising a patient-specific approach is required for success. The results of this survey provide novel insights into soft contact lens handling training in clinical practice.

Clinical Investigation of Flat Pack Toric Contact Lenses and Wearer Attitudes to Environmental Impact

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the performance of a novel flat pack toric daily disposable contact lens compared with traditionally packaged toric lenses in a randomized, crossover study. Environmental attitudes to contact lens wear were also explored.

METHODS

Habitual contact lens wearers were recruited to wear a hioxifilcon A (Miru 1 day Flat Pack Toric, Menicon, Nagoya, Japan) test lens and a control lens: either nelfilcon A (Dailies AquaComfort Plus, Alcon, Geneva, Switzerland) or etafilcon A (1-Day Acuvue Moist, Johnson & Johnson, New Brunswick, NJ). Objective lens performance was assessed at fitting, and participants wore lenses in a randomized order for three consecutive days. Subjective measures of lens performance (comfort, vision, and handling) were then assessed by a questionnaire, with further questions on overall lens preference and environmental perceptions.

RESULTS

Objective measures of lens fit were similar for the test and control lenses, except for distance VA which was better with the control lenses ( P <0.05; difference of two logMAR letters). End of day comfort was greater with the test lens, but this did not reach significance. Both lenses demonstrated similar scores for overall satisfaction. 87.5% of participants indicated the environmental impact of contact lenses to be important/extremely important to them, with 100% of participants identifying the flat pack packaging as having a smaller environmental impact.

CONCLUSION

Overall, the lenses used in the study performed to similar levels. Environmental credentials are important to contact lens wearers, which may contribute to overall lens preference.

Evaluating the Performance of Verofilcon A Daily Disposable Contact Lenses in a Group of Heavy Digital Device Users

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of verofilcon A daily disposable contact lenses (CL) in CL wearers who identified themselves as heavy digital device users.

Patients and Methods

This prospective, non-masked, open-label study enrolled CL wearers who reported ≥6 hours digital device use per day. Participants were dispensed with the verofilcon A study lenses for 14±2 days, to be worn for at least 5 days a week and 10 hours per day, while continuing their normal routine of digital device use. Participants rated the lens performance at the Day 14 visit using a 0-100 (with 100 being best) scale. Ratings were completed at lens insertion, after 6 hours of digital device use, just before CL removal and for overall experience. Participants also completed a 4-point (strongly agree/disagree, slightly agree/disagree) Likert scale-based questionnaire.

Results

Thirty-two participants were eligible and completed the study (27 females; age 25.8 ± 6.0 years, ranging from 19 to 40). Overall lens performance ratings at the Day 14 visit (mean ± standard deviation) for comfort, dryness, and clarity of vision were 91 ± 11, 88 ± 11, and 92 ± 9, respectively. Subjective ratings were stable throughout the day with no significant differences after insertion, after 6 hours of digital device use and before CL removal (all p>0.05). The majority of participants agreed that the study lenses performed well, provided good all-day comfort (28/32; p<0.01) and good all-day vision (29/32; p<0.01). Participants also agreed that after ≥6 hours of digital device use they were satisfied with CL comfort (27/32; p<0.01), vision (29/32; p<0.01) and that the lenses provided good performance (26/32; p<0.01).

Conclusion

Verofilcon A lenses were found to perform well, with high ratings for comfort, dryness and vision that remained high throughout the day, during extensive digital device use.

Clinical performance and Willingness To Pay for soft toric contact lenses in low and moderate astigmats

PURPOSE

To determine clinical performance and the 'Willingness To Pay' for toric vs. spherical soft contact lenses in an astigmatic population.

METHODS

In the clinical study, subjects with binocular low to moderate astigmatism (-0.75DC to -1.50DC) wore pairs of soft toric (Biofinity toric) and spherical (Biofinity) contact lenses in random sequence. Visual acuity (high and low contrast, monocular and binocular), subjective comfort and subjective vision were recorded. In the economics study, first subjects who had participated in the clinical study were presented with a series of randomised economic scenarios in order to determine their Willingness To Pay a premium (i.e. an increase) for toric lenses. Then, a similar set of scenarios were presented to a much larger group of online respondents and again, Willingness To Pay was established.

RESULTS

For the four measures of visual acuity, the Biofinity toric lens out-performed the Biofinity spherical lens by 0.6 to 1.1 lines.. Subjective vision performance was statistically significantly better with the toric lens for the distance task only. Comfort scores were not significantly different. Similar findings for Willingness To Pay were established for the clinical subjects and for the online respondents. The Willingness To Pay premium (additional fee) for a monthly supply of toric lenses (over spherical lenses) was between £13 and £16, if a toric lens provides better vision and similar comfort, as shown in the clinical study.

CONCLUSION

Consumers are willing to pay a monthly premium of around 50% to benefit from the typical experience of better vision and similar comfort for toric vs. spherical lenses. The level of additional cost for toric lenses compared to their spherical equivalents is less than this in the market, so eye care professionals should consider that toric lenses are delivering a greater clinical return than anticipated by wearers for the relatively small increase in price.

Silicone hydrogel versus hydrogel soft contact lenses for differences in patient-reported eye comfort and safety

BACKGROUND

Ocular discomfort is the leading cause of permanent discontinuation of soft contact lens (SCL) wear. Silicone hydrogel and hydrogel materials are the two major categories of SCLs, with silicone hydrogel materials being newer and more breathable than hydrogel materials. Whether comfort is associated with SCL material is controversial despite numerous studies. Similarly, the difference between these materials in terms of safety outcomes (e.g. frequency of microbial keratitis) is unclear.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the comparative effectiveness and safety of silicone hydrogel compared with hydrogel SCLs on self-reported comfort, dry eye test results, and adverse events in SCL-wearing adults 18 years of age or older.

SEARCH METHODS

The Cochrane Eyes and Vision Information Specialist searched the electronic databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs). There were no restrictions on language or date of publication. We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, including the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Trials Register; 2022, Issue 6), MEDLINE Ovid, Embase.com, PubMed, LILACS (Latin American and Caribbean Health Science Information database), ClinicalTrials.gov, and World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP). We also searched the reference lists of identified studies, review articles, and guidelines for information about relevant studies that may not have been identified by our search strategy. Furthermore, we contacted investigators regarding ongoing trials. The most recent database search was conducted on 24 June 2022.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Our search selection criteria included RCTs, quasi-RCTs, and cross-over RCTs.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We applied standard Cochrane methodology.

MAIN RESULTS

We included seven parallel-group RCTs conducted in the USA, the UK, Australia, Germany, India, and Turkey. A total of 1371 participants were randomized. The duration of SCL wear ranged from one to 52 weeks. Study characteristics and risk of bias The median number of participants per trial was 120 (interquartile range: 51 to 314), and the average age ranged from 20.7 to 33.0 years. Women represented the majority of participants (range 55% to 74.9%; 5 RCTs). Collectively, the included trials compared eight different silicone hydrogel SCLs with three different hydrogel SCLs. Five trials compared daily disposable SCLs, and two compared extended wear SCLs (worn for seven days and six nights). New SCL wearers were enrolled in three trials. Two trials included both new and established SCL wearers, and two trials did not report participants' history of SCL use. Five trials were sponsored by industry. We judged the overall risk of bias to be 'high' or 'some concerns' for the safety and efficacy outcomes. Findings One trial reported Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) results, with the evidence being very uncertain about the effects of SCL material on OSDI scores (mean difference -1.20, 95% confidence interval [CI] -10.49 to 8.09; 1 RCT, 47 participants; very low certainty evidence). Three trials reported visual analog scale comfort score results, with no clear difference in comfort between materials, but the evidence was of very low certainty; trial results could not be combined because the three trials reported results at different time points. The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of SCL material on discontinuation of contact lens wear (risk ratio [RR] 0.64, 95% CI 0.11 to 3.74; 1 RCT, 248 participants). None of the included trials reported Contact Lens Dry Eye Questionnaire (CLDEQ-8) or Standard Patient Evaluation of Eye Dryness (SPEED) scores. There was no evidence of a clinically meaningful difference (> 0.5 unit) between daily disposable silicone hydrogel and hydrogel SCLs in corneal staining, conjunctival staining, or conjunctival redness (very low certainty evidence). Adverse events Very low certainty evidence from two trials comparing daily disposable SCLs suggested no evidence of a difference between lens materials in the risk of vision-threatening adverse events at one to four weeks (RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.08 to 5.51; 2 RCTs, 368 participants). Two trials comparing extended wear SCLs indicated that hydrogel SCLs may have a 2.03 times lower risk of adverse events at 52 weeks compared with silicone hydrogel SCLs (RR 2.03, 95% CI 1.38 to 2.99; 815 participants), but the certainty of evidence was very low.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The overall evidence for a difference between all included silicone hydrogel and hydrogel SCLs was of very low certainty, with most trials at high overall risk of bias. The majority of studies did not assess comfort using a validated instrument. There was insufficient evidence to support recommending one SCL material over the other. For extended wear, hydrogel SCL may have a lower risk of adverse events at 52 weeks compared to silicon hydrogel. Future well-designed trials are needed to generate high certainty evidence to further clarify differences in SCL material comfort and safety.

Polysaccharides in contact lenses: From additives to bulk materials

As the number of applications has increased, so has the demand for contact lenses comfort. Adding polysaccharides to lenses is a popular way to enhance comfort for wearers. However, this may also compromise some lens properties. It is still unclear how to balance the variation of individual lens parameters in the design of contact lenses containing polysaccharides. This review provides a comprehensive overview of how polysaccharide addition impacts lens wear parameters, such as water content, oxygen permeability, surface wettability, protein deposition, and light transmittance. It also examines how various factors, such as polysaccharide type, molecular weight, amount, and mode of incorporation into lenses modulate these effects. Polysaccharide addition can improve some wear parameters while reducing others depending on the specific conditions. The optimal method, type, and amount of added polysaccharides depend on the trade-off between various lens parameters and wear requirements. Simultaneously, polysaccharide-based contact lenses may be a promising option for biodegradable contact lenses as concerns regarding environmental risks associated with contact lens degradation continue to increase. It is hoped that this review will shed light on the rational use of polysaccharides in contact lenses to make personalized lenses more accessible.

The Biocompatibility Analysis of Artificial Mucin-Like Glycopolymers

The ocular surface is covered by a tear film consisting of an aqueous/mucin phase and a superficial lipid layer. Mucins, highly O-glycosylated proteins, are responsible for lubrication and ocular surface protection. Due to contact lens wear or eye disorders, lubrication of the ocular surface can be affected. Artificial glycopolymers which mimic natural mucins could be efficient in ophthalmic therapy. Various neutral, positively, and negatively charged mucin-mimicking glycopolymers were synthesized (n = 11), cultured in different concentrations (1%, 0.1%, and 0.01% w/v) with human corneal epithelial cells (HCE), and analyzed by various cytotoxicity/viability, morphology, and immunohistochemistry (IHC) assays. Six of the eleven glycopolymers were selected for further analysis after cytotoxicity/viability assays. We showed that the six selected glycopolymers had no cytotoxic effect on HCE cells in the 0.01% w/v concentration. They did not negatively affect cell viability and displayed both morphology and characteristic markers as untreated control cells. These polymers could be used in the future as mucin-mimicking semi-synthetic materials for lubrication and protection of the ocular surface.

Visual discomfort and contact lens wear: A review

The purpose of this manuscript is to describe how vision influences contact lens discomfort and review the evidence supporting the hypothesis that contact lens discomfort can be caused by vision and vision-related disorders. Contact lens discomfort is a misunderstood and difficult to manage clinical condition. Most treatments and strategies aimed at alleviating discomfort focus on optimizing the contact lens fit and its relationship with the ocular surface, but these strategies commonly fail at relieving discomfort symptoms. Many vision and vision-related disorders share symptoms with those reported by uncomfortable contact lens wearers. This paper will review evidence and literature that describes how these vision and vision-related disorders may influence comfort in contact lens wearers. Acknowledging how vision influences contact lens discomfort will improve future research intended to better understand the condition, allow for more effective clinical management, and reduce rates of discontinuation.

TFOS Lifestyle: Impact of contact lenses on the ocular surface

Several lifestyle choices made by contact lens wearers can have adverse consequences on ocular health. These include being non-adherent to contact lens care, sleeping in lenses, ill-advised purchasing options, not seeing an eyecare professional for regular aftercare visits, wearing lenses when feeling unwell, wearing lenses too soon after various forms of ophthalmic surgery, and wearing lenses when engaged in risky behaviors (e.g., when using tobacco, alcohol or recreational drugs). Those with a pre-existing compromised ocular surface may find that contact lens wear exacerbates ocular disease morbidity. Conversely, contact lenses may have various therapeutic benefits. The coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic impinged upon the lifestyle of contact lens wearers, introducing challenges such as mask-associated dry eye, contact lens discomfort with increased use of digital devices, inadvertent exposure to hand sanitizers, and reduced use of lenses. Wearing contact lenses in challenging environments, such as in the presence of dust and noxious chemicals, or where there is the possibility of ocular trauma (e.g., sport or working with tools) can be problematic, although in some instances lenses can be protective. Contact lenses can be worn for sport, theatre, at high altitude, driving at night, in the military and in space, and special considerations are required when prescribing in such situations to ensure successful outcomes. A systematic review and meta-analysis, incorporated within the review, identified that the influence of lifestyle factors on soft contact lens dropout remains poorly understood, and is an area in need of further research. Overall, this report investigated lifestyle-related choices made by clinicians and contact lens wearers and discovered that when appropriate lifestyle choices are made, contact lens wear can enhance the quality of life of wearers.

Real-Time Ocular Comfort Reporting in Monthly Replacement Contact Lens Wearers

Purpose

To map contact lens (CL) comfort over the full wear day and across 1 month's wear in established, asymptomatic to minimally symptomatic, reusable, soft CL wearers.

Methods

Adult, 18- to 45-year-old, participants were recruited and required to have 20/20 best-corrected visual acuity or better and must have been asymptomatic to minimally symptomatic CL wearers. Participants were required to be able to wear TOTAL30® sphere CLs and have minimal astigmatism. Participants were fit in the study CLs and asked to wear these CLs daily for the next month for 16 hours per day each day. Participants were asked to complete a visual analog scale (VAS) survey via text message at time of CL application and after 8, 10, 12, 14, and 16 hours of wear and at CL removal on days 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 and at 2 weeks and 1 month. The utilized VAS had a ±50 scale with positive scores being comfortable, negative scores being uncomfortable, and scores of 0 being neutral comfort.

Results

Forty-eight participants were recruited who had a mean ± SD age of 26.2 ± 5.2 years (71% female). Mean initial VAS CL comfort scores at initial CL dispense were 45.56 ± 9.20 units. Mean CL wear times for any of the days evaluated were at least 14.80 ± 2.41 hours per day and did not differ across the study (p = 0.77). Mean comfort VAS scores significantly decreased over the wear day (all days p ≤ 0.02), yet there were no significant differences in VAS comfort scores across the same time of day for the duration of the study (all times p ≥ 0.06).

Conclusion

This study determined that while CL wearers were slightly less comfortable at the end of the day compared to application, this comfort change was minimal given that the average participants had overwhelmingly good comfort at all time-points evaluated. Comfort scores were likewise consistent across 1 month of wear.

Challenges to the new soft contact lens wearer and strategies for clinical management

Soft contact lens discontinuations have a dramatic impact on the overall success of this form of vision correction, and evidence suggests that the reasons for contact lens cessation are different for new wearers than for established lens users. In descending order, these relate to vision, discomfort, handling, inconvenience/loss of interest, ocular health and cost. This paper considers the background and underlying evidence for these causes of soft lens discontinuation in new wearers, and presents clinical management strategies to minimise this phenomenon. Such measures can reasonably be expected to significantly reduce the number of contact lens discontinuations leading to happier patients, increased satisfaction for eye care professionals (ECPs), and greater success for both individual practices and the contact lens industry more broadly.

Orthokeratology in adults and effect on quality of life

OBJECTIVE

To determine changes in various ocular parameters of adults wearing orthokeratology (ortho-k) lenses and their levels of satisfaction and quality of life (QoL) after commencing treatment.

METHODS

Adults aged 18-38 years, with mild to moderate myopia and astigmatism < 1.50D, were wearing ortho-k lenses for one year. Data collection, which included history taking, refraction, axial length (AL), corneal topography, corneal biomechanics, and biomicroscopy examination, was performed at baseline and every 6 months during the study period. The level of satisfaction with the treatment and QoL was determined via questionnaires.

RESULTS

Forty-four subjects completed the study. AL was shortened significantly at the 12-month visit: AL -0.03 (-0.45 to 0.13) mm compared to baseline (p < 0.05). A significant number of subjects in both groups presented with overall and central corneal staining, but the majority were mild (Grade 1). Central endothelial cell density was reduced by 40/mm² (loss rate 1.4 %) (p < 0.05). High scores were obtained in the satisfaction questionnaire, with no significant differences between visits. At the 12-month visit, NEI-RQL-42 total score, dependence on correction, activity limitation, appearance, and satisfaction with the treatment all significantly increased compared to baseline values.

CONCLUSIONS

Results suggest that ortho-k can be an effective and safe myopia correction technique for adults with low to moderate myopia, improving daytime vision without serious adverse events. Satisfaction with ortho-k lens wear was high, particularly those who were dependent on vision correction and found spectacles or contact lenses limiting specific activities or cosmetically undesirable.

Ocular signs and symptoms of orthokeratology patients associated with povidone iodine-based disinfecting solution

PURPOSE

To determine the frequency and severity of ocular symptoms and signs in new orthokeratology (ortho-k) subjects using a povidone iodine (PI) disinfecting system compared to those present before lens wear, and whether these were associated with cleaning regimes.

METHODS

This study recruited 80 subjects from two myopia control studies, who used a PI disinfecting solution for routine use. Ocular symptoms and signs at baseline, one- and six-month after lens wear were reported via questionnaires and ocular examination, respectively. To determine if rates of occurrence were attributable to differences in cleaning regime, subjects were randomly assigned into four groups with respect to routine care procedures, which involved various combinations of rubbing and use of a daily and/or enzymatic cleaner.

RESULTS

Sixty-eight subjects completed all aspects of the study. As there were no significant differences in incidence of signs and symptoms between the four groups before and after lens wear (Friedman tests, p > 0.07), data were combined for further analysis. Prior to lens wear, itchiness (69 %) and dryness (53 %) were the most commonly reported symptoms. The frequency and severity of all symptoms remained similar after lens wear (p > 0.10). Presence of follicles in the lower tarsal conjunctiva (22 %) and conjunctival injection (15 %) was frequently observed, but reduced significantly after lens wear (p < 0.01). Mild corneal staining, noted in 13 % of subjects at baseline, did not change significantly over time (p = 0.17). Ocular signs were not necessarily reflected in symptoms and vice versa.

CONCLUSION

Use of a PI-based solution did not increase the frequency or severity of ocular signs and symptoms observed before lens wear. Absence of a difference in occurrence of ocular discomfort with respect to cleaning regimes indicated that the use of the PI-based solution may adequately clean the lenses over a 6-month period.

Wearer Experience and Eye Care Professional Acceptance with a 1 Day Multifocal Contact Lens

Purpose

A large observational survey was undertaken to determine eye care professional (ECP) and patient experience of stenfilcon A multifocal soft contact lens (MyDay multifocal) when prescribed in a real-world setting.

Methods

A total of 196 ECPs from eleven countries fit up to ten presbyopes with stenfilcon A multifocal. Data were collected on fit success at the initial visit, patient satisfaction with comfort, vision at distance, intermediate, and near, overall vision, overall satisfaction, and handling at the initial and follow-up visits after 1-2 weeks of wear. ECPs completed questionnaires on multifocal fitting experience and expectations before and after the fitting period.

Results

A total of 196 pre-fitting and 141 post-fitting ECP surveys were collected. A total of 1505 initial fits (mean age 53.4, range 38 to 81 years, 73% female, 27% neophytes) and 1440 follow-up visits were completed. The mean distance vision contact lens prescription was -1.32DS (range -12.00DS to +8.00DS) with Add powers: Low 56%, Medium 24%, and High 21%. At the follow-up visit 77% (n=1108) of trials were successful. Mean patient satisfaction ratings (1-10 scale, where 1 is not at all satisfied, and 10 extremely satisfied) at the initial visit were higher than eight out of ten for comfort, vision, and overall satisfaction, and were not significantly different after 1-2 weeks of wear. Stenfilcon A multifocal was preferred by 66% of patients over their habitual correction. In most cases mean satisfaction scores and the proportion of patients highly satisfied were not significantly different between myopes and hyperopes, across Add range, between new and habitual wearers, and wearers of frequently replaced and 1 day contact lenses.

Conclusion

ECPs in real-world clinical settings found stenfilcon A multifocal contact lenses easy to fit to a wide range of patients, with a high fit success rate and high levels of patient satisfaction for overall comfort, vision, satisfaction, and handling.

Short-Term Fit Assessment of a Novel Daily Disposable, Toric, Silicone Hydrogel Contact Lens

Purpose

The development of new contact lens materials and designs are necessary to minimise patient dropout. A lens material with water surface technology was recently developed to incorporate toric design. The on-eye stability of a toric contact lens is critical to a successful toric lens fitting. In an effort to establish if the new daily disposable verofilcon A toric silicone hydrogel lens provides fast stability for ease of fit, this study assessed the initial and short-term on-eye stability of this new lens.

Patients and Methods

Habitual full-time wearers of soft contact lenses, aged 18 or over, were enrolled and fit with the verofilcon A toric lens. Study endpoints included lens settling time, axis orientation at specific time-points within 10 minutes after insertion, lens oscillation with blink, lens movement and centration, and scribe mark visibility.

Results

Thirty-nine subjects completed the study; 67% were female and mean age was 34.1 ± 10.8 years (range 18 to 61). The majority of verofilcon A toric lenses (98.7%) settled on average within 60 seconds. Average lens orientation was 3° from six o’clock position within two minutes of insertion. The lenses showed minimal oscillation with blink; 98.7% of the eyes demonstrated ≤5° oscillation with blink. All lenses showed optimal/acceptable lens movement and centration and the scribe mark was reported as easily visible in 96% of eyes. Practitioners reported a 99% first lens fit success rate.

Conclusion

The novel verofilcon A toric lens was highly successful with the first lens, had excellent on-eye stability and good fit characteristics. These qualities make this new lens a good option for lens wearers. Furthermore, it fulfills the needs of practitioners who want a toric lens that is easy and predictable to fit.

Evaluation of Wear Experience with Soft Daily Disposable Lenses for Astigmatism over 16 Hours of Wear

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to assess the wear experience of participants while wearing a toric daily disposable contact lens with water surface technology over long days of lens wear.

METHODS

Existing soft toric contact lens wearers were fit with the daily disposable study lenses. Participants assessed their initial comfort, vision, and satisfaction with the lenses by visual analog scale (VAS) survey. After a successful 1-week follow-up visit, participants were scheduled for 5 survey days, in which surveys were deployed to their smartphones for immediate assessments of comfort and quality of vision on a 1-10 scale at 10, 12, 14, and 16 hours of lens wear on 5 subsequent weeknights. The final study visit assessed visual acuity, and overall lens wear experience surveys were completed with VAS surveys. The overall median and interquartile (IQR) range of all surveys were calculated.

RESULTS

Thirty bilateral toric lens wearers completed the study. Median (IQR) initial impression VAS scores were 97(12) for quality of vision, 100(9) for comfort, and 96(10) for satisfaction. Median evening surveys resulted in comfort scores of 10(1) at 10 hours, 9(2) at 12 hours, 9(2) at 14 hours, and 8(2) at 16 hours of wear. Median evening surveys resulted in quality of vision scores of 10(1) at 10 hours, 10(2) at 12 hours, 9(2) at 14 hours, and 9(3) at 16 hours of wear. VAS scores for overall experience were 97(9) for comfort, 95(13) for vision, and 8(31) for dryness. End-of-day VAS scores were 93(21) for comfort, 90(15) for vision, and 21(38) for dryness. Mean (±standard deviation) OU LogMAR visual acuity with the study lenses was -0.19(0.06).

CONCLUSION

Surveys of wear experience resulted in high scores for comfort and vision over the course of a long day of wear with the daily disposable study lenses in this population of patients with astigmatism.

A Review of Contact Lens-Related Risk Factors and Complications

The purpose of this article is to develop a modern strategy for handling difficulties related to contact lenses and their care. A growing number of people throughout the world are currently concerned by eye-related undesirable activities in allergy sufferers and those wearing contact lenses. While many wearers who experience ocular discomfort exhibit dryness as a symptom, many other contact lens-related pain symptoms also include irritation and fatigue, and managing coexisting diseases must be done in accordance with aspects of wearing contact lenses, all of which undoubtedly increase discomfort.

It is typical for contact lens storage containers to have persistent microbial contamination, which has been linked to microbial keratitis (MK) and clear corneal invasion. Contact lens-associated MK is an interesting, potentially sight-threatening complexity arising from wearing soft contact lenses. Estimates show that for every 10,000 persons who wear contact lenses each year, there are 2 to 5 occurrences of MK. Investigating separate determinants for contact lens-associated MK and evaluating their impact on infection load is one of the challenges in their administration. It is hoped that this will offer a useful outline of the complicated issues of contact lens wear that are both infectious and non-infectious. Recent epidemiological studies detailing the risk factors associated with contact lens use, and the effect of pathogen and individual immune profiles on the severity of diseases have enlightened how we might interpret the prophylaxis and prevention of contact lens-related corneal infection. The most dreaded side effect of contact lens use, infectious keratitis linked with contact lenses, will be reviewed, along with the most recent advancements in its diagnosis and treatment.

Differences in Practitioner Experience, Practice Type, and Profession in Attitudes Toward Growing Contact Lens Practice

OBJECTIVE

To investigate eye care practitioners' attitudes and perceptions toward potential interventions that can enhance contact lens (CL) practice across the world, and how this is influenced by their practice setting.

METHODS

A self-administered, anonymized survey was constructed in English and then forward and backward translated into six more languages. The survey was distributed online via social media platforms and mailing lists involving reputed international professional bodies.

RESULTS

In total, 2,222 responses from 27 countries with sufficient responses were analyzed (53% females, median age- 37 years). Most of the respondents were optometrists (81.9%) and 47.6% were from stand-alone/independent practices. Median working experience in CL prescribing was 11.0 years (IQR: 18.0, 4-22 years). Over two-third of them declared themselves to be very hopeful (22.9%) or hopeful (45.1%) about the future of their CL practice. Among the potential interventions proposed, continuous update of knowledge and skills and competently managing CL-related complications were rated the most important (median score: 9/10 for each). Practitioners working in national/regional retail chains expressed higher proactivity in recommending CLs (9/10) than those in local chains, hospitals, and universities (for all 8/10, P<0.05). National differences were also identified in eye care practitioner attitudes and perceptions (P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The study provided important information to delineate a variety of elements characterizing CL practice across the world. These insights can serve as a basis to design strategies at national and international levels.

Associations Between Lid Wiper Microvascular Responses, Lens Fit, and Comfort After One Day of Contact Lens Adaptation by Neophytes

PURPOSE

To determine associations between lid wiper microvascular responses, lens fit, and comfort after 1 day of contact lens adaptation by neophytes.

METHODS

Functional slitlamp biomicroscopy was used to image the microvascular network of the upper tarsal conjunctiva, lid wiper, and bulbar conjunctiva. Fractal dimension was obtained to represent vessel density. Ultra-high-resolution optical coherence tomography was used to image the lens edge and fitting characteristics, including lens movement and lens-induced conjunctival indentation. Ocular comfort was rated using a 50-point visual analogue scale (VAS). Forty-nine healthy subjects without a history of contact lens wear were recruited. A contact lens was then fitted in the right eye. Imaging was taken at baseline and 6 hr after lens wear.

RESULTS

The changes of VAS comfort score were negatively related to the changes of the vessel density in the lid-wiper (R 2 =0.18, P =0.002) and bulbar conjunctiva (R 2 =0.13, P =0.009). However, the changes of VAS were positively related to the changes in vessel density of the tarsal conjunctiva (R 2 =0.11, P =0.02). The changes of ocular microvasculature were not related to the objective metrics of the lens-fitting characteristics ( P >0.05). Similarly, the changes in the VAS comfort score were not related to the objective metrics of the lens-fitting characteristics ( P >0.05).

CONCLUSION

Contact lens discomfort seemed to relate to lid wiper microvascular responses rather than fitting characteristics after 1 day of contact lens adaptation by neophytes.

Visual performance with multifocal contact lenses and progressive addition spectacles

PURPOSE

As presbyopia occurs, new visual demands create a need for clear vision at multiple distances. Many spectacle wearers adapt into progressive addition lenses (PAL) in order to see clearly at distance, intermediate, and near. A multifocal contact lens provides the ability to see at these same distances without the prismatic effects of a spectacle lens or the peripheral obstruction of a spectacle frame. No studies have been done to date comparing the effect of these types of presbyopic vision correction on a variety of tests of visual performance representative of everyday tasks.

METHODS

A battery of visual performance tasks were completed by subjects while wearing their habitual PAL spectacles. These subjects were then fit with a multifocal contact lens and wore lenses for 2 weeks or more before completing the tasks again. These functional vision tests included assessments of coincidence anticipation timing, peripheral search and hand-eye coordination, and dynamic visual acuity. Following functional vision testing, subjects completed a preference survey comparing both types of refractive correction while performing common activities of daily living.

RESULTS

Performance on the majority of the tests of visual performance were equivalent (P < 0.05) when comparing PAL spectacles and multifocal contact lenses. Survey results demonstrated a preference for multifocal contact lenses overall.

CONCLUSION

PAL spectacles are widely prescribed for presbyopic patients. The findings of this study suggest that in addition to providing excellent vision, multifocal contact lenses provide functional vision performance equal to PAL spectacle wear and patients may prefer them over PAL spectacles.

Safety and Efficacy of a New Water Gradient Biomimetic Monthly Replacement Spherical Contact Lens Material (Lehfilcon A)

Purpose

The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and performance of the investigational lens, lehfilcon A, when worn in a daily wear modality and replaced monthly as compared to the commercially available comfilcon A contact lens.

Methods

This was a multicenter, prospective, controlled, double-masked, randomized, parallel-group clinical study with bilateral lens wear for 3 months. In all, 115 subjects completed the study (77 with test lehfilcon A and 38 with control comfilcon A contact lenses). Distance visual acuity (VA) was assessed using Snellen VA. Lens performance was assessed by examining lens fit/movement, centration, front surface wettability and front/back surface deposits using slit-lamp biomicroscopy.

Results

At the 3-month follow-up visit, all eyes had a distance VA of 20/20 or better. Further, lens fit/movement was assessed as optimal in 92.9% of the eyes with lehfilcon A and 89.2% with comfilcon A. There were no ratings of unacceptably tight or loose fits for either contact lens material. Lens centration was assessed as optimal in 98.7% of eyes with lehfilcon A and 94.6% with comfilcon A. For front and back surface deposits, both materials showed minimal lens surface deposits. Front surface wettability was assessed as grade 0 or 1 for most of the study lenses in both lens groups across all attended study visits. There were no ocular adverse events related to the study lenses.

Conclusion

Overall, lehfilcon A showed excellent VA, optimal lens fitting characteristics, a clean surface, high wettability, and low risk for adverse events after 3 months of lens wear.

Long Day Wear Experience with Water Surface Daily Disposable Contact Lenses

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to assess the wear experience of silicone hydrogel daily disposable contact lenses with water surface technology over a long day of lens wear.

METHODS

Thirty-five soft contact lens wearers were refit with the daily disposable study lenses and participants scored their initial impressions of comfort, vision and satisfaction using a visual analog scale (VAS). Participants used their smart phones to complete surveys of comfort and vision on a scale of 1-10 at 10, 12, 14, and 16 hours of lens wear on 5 weeknights. A participant score for each time point was calculated by averaging the evening responses. End of study VAS surveys of symptoms were also completed.

RESULTS

Median (Interquartile Range) VAS initial impression scores were 99.00 (12.00) for quality of vision, 98.00 (16.00) for comfort, and 100.00 (13.00) for satisfaction. The end of study surveys found end of day median VAS scores of 87.00 (19.00) for end of day quality of vision and 75.00 (24.50) for end of day comfort. The median score for overall quality of vision was 93.00 (14.00) and for overall comfort was 93.00 (16.50). The median score for end of day dryness was 37.00 (55.00) and overall dryness was 13.00 (34.00).

CONCLUSION

The daily disposable lenses with water surface treatment used in this study maintained high median scores for comfort and quality of vision for up to 16 hours of wear.

What we know about the scleral profile and its impact on contact lens fitting

Scleral contact lens fitting has provided practitioners with one of the earliest pieces of evidence that the sclera was more often asymmetric than symmetric. Some preliminary observations such as different haptic alignment patterns over the sclera in 360 degrees, the appearance of fogging in the fluid chamber and excessive tear out-in flow through specific meridians, quadrants, or areas of the haptic provide evidence of some scleral asymmetry. The advent of technologies that allowed measurement of the scleral profile led to formal research confirming that only about 6% of scleras are symmetric, while the rest are toric, quad-specific, or irregular. This has an evident impact on how to focus scleral lens fitting. Measuring the scleral profile also provided us with true ocular sagittal height data for cord diameters beyond the cornea. Although high variability was expected in pathological eyes, healthy eyes also showed a wide range of ocular sagittal heights. Due to this variability among healthy eyes, a discussion has emerged on whether the one-size-fits-all approach to soft lens fitting is a proper strategy to fit the whole spectrum of sagittal heights. The traditional mode of selecting the parameters for custom soft lenses through corneal parameters is also questioned.

Ocular Surface Immune Cell Profiles in Contact Lens-Induced Discomfort

Purpose

Contact lens–induced discomfort (CLD) remains a primary factor in discontinuation or prevention of contact lens wear. Thus, we investigated the role of ocular surface immune cells in subjects with CLD.

Methods

Habitual contact lens (CL) wearers with CLD (n = 19; 38 eyes) and without CLD (n = 21; 42 eyes) as determined by the Contact Lens Dry Eye Questionnaire-8 was included in a trial. Enrolled subjects used either of the two types of CL (designated as CL-A or CL-D). Ocular surface cells from the bulbar conjunctiva were obtained by impression cytology. The collected cells were phenotyped using fluorochrome-conjugated antibodies specific for leukocytes (CD45⁺), neutrophils (CD66b^+,High,Low), macrophages (CD163⁺), T cells (CD3⁺CD4⁺, CD3⁺CD8⁺), natural killer (NK) cells (CD56^{+, High, Low}), natural killer T (NKT) cells (CD3⁺CD56⁺), and gamma delta T (γδT) cells (CD3⁺γδTCR⁺) by flow cytometry. Further, corneal dendritic cell density (cDCD) was also determined using in vivo confocal microscopy.

Results

Significantly higher proportions of CD45⁺ cells were observed in subjects with CLD compared to those without CLD. The percentages of CD66b^Total,Low, CD163⁺, pan T cells, CD4⁺T cells, CD8⁺T cells, CD56^{Total,High,Low} (NK) cells, and NKT cells, as well as the CD4/CD8 ratio, were significantly higher in CLD subjects. The proportion of T cells (CD4, CD8, CD4/CD8 ratio, NKT cells) and macrophages exhibited a direct association with discomfort score. The percentages of CD45⁺, CD66b^Total,Low, CD163⁺, CD3⁺, CD56^{Total,High,Low}, and NKT cells and cDCD were significantly higher in CLD subjects wearing CL-D. The percentages of CD66b^High, CD4⁺T cells, CD8⁺T cells, NKT cells, and CD4/CD8 ratio were significantly higher in CLD subjects wearing CL-A.

Conclusions

Increased proportions of ocular surface immune cells are observed in CLD, and the lens type could impact the immune cells associated with CLD.

Translational Relevance

The association between the proportion of altered ocular surface immune cell subsets and contact lens–induced discomfort underpins the importance of considering immune-related aspects during contact lens development and in the clinical management of ocular surface pain.

OSDI Questions on Daily Life Activities Allow to Detect Subclinical Dry Eye in Young Contact Lens Users

Dry eye disease (DED) is difficult to detect in young contact lens (CL) wearers, who usually have no signs, mild symptoms and an ocular surface disease index (OSDI) below the DED diagnosis values (OSDI ≥ 13). We investigate if some of the 12 OSDI questions (OSDI A—ocular symptoms; OSDI B—vision-related functionality; OSDI C—environmental triggers) contribute the most to classify young CL as symptomatic. TBUT and tear volume are also measured. Age, gender and refraction error-matched eye glasses (EG) wearers participated as the control. CL and EG data were compared with t-test and z-test. Confusion matrices and logistic correlation analyses were performed to define the contribution of each OSDI question to classify symptomatic subjects. OSDI classified symptomatic CL better than the tear volume or TBUT values. In CL, only OSDI B and C values were significantly higher in symptomatic vs. asymptomatic subjects (p < 0.001), while values of all twelve OSDI questions were significantly higher in symptomatic vs. asymptomatic EG (p < 0.05−0.001). All OSDI questions contribute equally to identify symptomatic EG, while only OSDI B questions on daily life visual functions are significant to classify symptomatic CL wearers at risk to develop DED or at a subclinical stage. CL wearers scoring ≥ 2 on the OSDI B questions should be considered for preventive treatments, even if their clinical sings are scarce or absent.

Dynamic Changes of Ocular Surface in First-Time Contact Lens Wearers and the Effective Factors of Contact Lens Discomfort

Purpose

The purpose of the study is to investigate the dynamic changes in ocular surface indicators in first-time contact lens (CL) wearers and identify the most influential factors in CL discomfort (CLD).

Methods

A total of 26 healthy non-CL wearers (26 eyes) were recruited and fitted monthly with disposable hydrogel CLs. Each participant underwent a full ocular surface evaluation, which include Efron grading, tear film breakup time, Schirmer's I test, corneal dendritic cell (DCs) imaging by in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM), and conjunctival microvasculature evaluation by functional slit-lamp biomicroscopy. CLD was assessed using the Ocular Surface Disease Index questionnaire at baseline, 1 week, 1, 3, and 6 months after wearing it and another 6 months after discontinuing it.

Results

Clinical signs and CLD were significantly increased in the first week (p < 0.05). The microvascular response and DC activation peaked at the 1-month interval (p < 0.05). During CL wear, CLD is positively correlated with corneal staining (B = 0.238, p = 0.002), papillary conjunctivitis (B = 0.245, p < 0.001), and microvascular blood flow velocity (B = 0.353, p < 0.001). After discontinuation, only DC activation remained elevated at 6 months, whereas the other signs recovered.

Conclusions

The first week of CL wear was the main period for the appearance of ocular surface clinical signs, and the first month was the main period for the activation of subclinical inflammation. Corneal staining and conjunctival microvascular response are the main factors affecting CLD. Even if the clinical signs recover after discontinuing wear, subclinical inflammation may persist.