Recognizing and Managing Bullous Descemet Detachment Secondary to Accidental Hydroseparation During Phacoemulsification/Cataract Surgery by Relaxing Descemetotomy

Relaxing descemetotomy: microscope-integrated OCT-guided technique for acute corneal hydrops

Introduction

3 cases are used to illustrate the technique of Descemet membrane (DM) relaxing incisions followed by air descemetopexy for the management of patients with acute corneal hydrops.

Patients and Clinical Findings

In each case, anterior-segment optical coherence tomography (OCT) demonstrated taut DM detachments and hydrops was refractory to conservative medical management and intracameral air injection.

Diagnosis Intervention and Outcomes

To facilitate the reapproximation of DM and potentiate corneal deturgescence, intraoperative OCT-guided descemetotomy was performed with bent surgical scissors and a bent 30-gauge needle. Subsequent air descemetopexy was successful, and DM reattachment was maintained postoperatively. Corneal edema improved in all patients relatively rapidly postoperatively.

Conclusions

Relaxing descemetotomy with air descemetopexy may be useful in cases of acute corneal hydrops with taut DM detachments that are unresponsive to air tamponade alone.

Central and bullous Descemet membrane detachment during cataract wound hydration: an insightful complication in a post-DALK eye

A 54-year-old man, with history of undergoing deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) 20 months ago, presented with mature senile cataract in the same eye. While undergoing phacoemulsification, a large, central Descemet membrane detachment (DMD) was noted, separating the donor cornea from the host predescemetic layer. No DM tears were noted. Stromal puncture was done at the graft host junction to reduce the extent of DMD. This was followed by a large intracameral air bubble insertion, which resulted in complete resolution of DMD on the first postoperative day. DMD during hydration of wound is a unique complication to be anticipated while doing cataract surgery in an operated DALK eye.

A Comparative Study between Air Bubble Tamponade Alone versus Air Bubble Tamponade with Internal Fluid Aspiration for Nonplanar Descemet's Membrane Detachment after Phacoemulsification

Purpose

To compare the efficacy of air bubble tamponade alone versus air bubble tamponade with internal fluid aspiration for nonplanar Descemet's membrane detachment after clear corneal incision phacoemulsification.

Methods

This study is a prospective, intervention, comparative randomised clinical trial, conducted at a private eye centre, Ismailia, Egypt, from March 2019 to March 2020. It contained 30 eyes of 24 patients who had postphacoemulsification nonplanar Descemet's membrane detachment involving the periphery and the central area of the cornea (>50% of the cornea) with corneal oedema. The patients were divided into two groups: group A: patients with nonplanar DMD affecting the central cornea treated by air bubble tamponade only and group B: patients with nonplanar DMD affecting the central cornea treated by air bubble tamponade augmented by internal fluid aspiration. Trial Registration: This trial was registered at www.pactr.org and the identification number for the registry is PACTR202006612296119.

Results

During the 12-month study period, this study included 30 eyes (24 patients) out of 1356 phaco surgeries with postphacoemulsification nonplanar Descemet's membrane detachment. Six patients had DMD in both eyes, eight patients had DMD in the right eye, and ten patients had DMD in the left eye. All patients have successful surgeries without complications. The calculated incidence rate for visually significant DMD was 2.2% per year. The mean ± SD time interval from cataract surgery to the primary intervention was 4.2 ± 1.1 days. Descemet's membrane was attached in 56.25% of patients in group A (9 out of 16 eyes) and 92.6% of patients in group B (13 out of 14 eyes) with a minimum of one-month follow-up.

Conclusion

Air descemetopexy combined with the internal fluid aspiration demonstrated to be more efficient than air descemetopexy only to treat Descemet's membrane detachment following phacoemulsification. It should be tried before planning other major surgeries in patients with severe Descemet's membrane detachment.

Descemet membrane detachment

Descemet membrane detachment (DMD) is a potential vision-threatening complication that occurs most commonly after cataract surgery. DMD has also been reported to occur in various other surgeries such as keratoplasty, iridectomy, vitrectomy, trabeculectomy, holmium laser sclerostomy, alkali burn, and viscocanalostomy. Major risk factors include advanced age, preexisting endothelial diseases like Fuchs dystrophy or abnormality in the Descemet membrane and stromal interface, hard cataract, prolonged surgical time, ragged clear corneal incisions, and inadvertent trauma with blunt instruments or phacoemulsification probe. Most DMDs are peripheral and resolve spontaneously. Large, central DMDs if not managed appropriately may lead to corneal decompensation and opacification. Several authors have classified DMD depending on its configuration, height, extent, length, and position with respect to pupil. Anterior segment optical coherence tomography has been used to confirm and classify DMD and can also aid in deciding the management plan. Spontaneous reattachment of the DM with conservative management may occur in cases with small, peripheral, planar DMD with nonscrolled edges. Cases with nonplanar, central DMD, scrolled edges, and length >2 mm, however, have to be managed surgically. Descemetopexy is the gold standard for the management of DMD. Other management options include mechanical tamponade, suture fixation, descemetotomy, interface drainage, and keratoplasty. Prompt diagnosis and timely management often leads to a good visual outcome.