Keratoconus Characteristics Used in Randomized Trials of Surgical Interventions—A Systematic Review

Keratectasia severity staging and progression assessment based on the biomechanical E-staging

Until recently, corneal topography has been the gold standard in detecting keratectasia and monitoring its progression. The recently introduced ABCD tomographic keratoconus staging system focuses on anterior ("A") and posterior ("B") radius of curvature, thinnest corneal thickness ("C"), best-corrected visual acuity with spectacles ("D") and is supplemented with the introduction of the biomechanical E-staging (BEST, "E"). The need for biomechanical staging arose from the fact of altered biomechanical characteristics of keratectasia in comparison to healthy corneas. Ectatic corneas usually exhibit a biomechanical weakening and greater deformation than healthy corneas when exposed to a biomechanical stressor such as a standardized air puff indentation as provided by the Corvis ST® (CST, Oculus, Wetzlar, Germany). The BEST is based on the linear term of the Corvis Biomechanical Index (CBI) and provides a biomechanical keratoconus severity staging and progression assessment within the CST software. This review traces the development of the BEST as an addition to the tomographic ABCD staging system and highlights its strengths and limitations when applied in daily practice for the detection, monitoring and progression assessment in keratectasia.

Definitions for Keratoconus Progression and Their Impact on Clinical Practice

PURPOSE

There is currently no consensus on which keratoconus need cross-linking nor on how to establish progression. This study assessed the performance of diverse progression criteria and compared them with our clinical knowledge of keratoconus evolution.

METHODS

This was a retrospective, longitudinal, observational study. Habitual progression criteria, based on (combinations of) keratometry (K MAX ), front astigmatism (A F ), pachymetry (P MIN ), or ABCD progression display, from 906 keratoconus patients were analyzed. For each criterion and cutoff, we calculated %eyes flagged progressive at some point (R PROG ), individual consistency C IND (%examinations after progression detection still considered progressive), and population consistency C POP (% eyes with CIND >66%). Finally, other monotonic and consistent variables, such as front steep keratometry (K 2F ), mean radius of the back surface (R mB ), and the like, were evaluated for the overall sample and subgroups.

RESULTS

Using a single criterion (e.g., ∆K MAX >1D) led to high values of R PROG . When combining two, (K MAX and A F ) led to worse C POP and higher variability than (K MAX and P MIN ); alternative criteria such as (K 2F and R mB ) obtained the best C POP and the lowest variability ( P <0.0001). ABC, as defined by its authors, obtained R PROG of 74.2%. Using wider 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) and requiring two parameters over 95CI reduced R PROG to 27.9%.

CONCLUSION

Previous clinical studies suggest that 20% to 30% of keratoconus cases are progressive. This clinical R PROG value should be considered when defining KC progression to avoid overtreatment. Using combinations of variables or wider margins for ABC brings R PROG closer to these clinical observations while obtaining better population consistency than current definitions.

Corneal Stability and Visual Acuity 1 Year After Corneal Cross-linking Assessed Using the ABCD Keratoconus Staging System

PURPOSE

To assess corneal stability and corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) 3, 6, and 12 months following corneal cross-linking (CXL) using the ABCD keratoconus staging system.

METHODS

This prospective longitudinal study included 31 eyes with keratoconus receiving CXL based on the standard Dresden protocol. CDVA, refraction, and Scheimpflug tomography with the Pentacam HR (Oculus Optikgeräte GmbH) were evaluated before and after surgery. Geometric and functional changes were assessed using the actual values and staging of each element of the ABCD keratoconus staging system. A, B, C, and D refer to the anterior and posterior radii of curvature in a 3-mm zone centered on the cor-neal thinnest point, minimum corneal thickness, and CDVA, respectively.

RESULTS

There were no significant changes in the actual values of anterior radius of curvature (P = .497) and CDVA (P = .082), whereas posterior radius of curvature (P = .007) and corneal thinnest point (P < .001) showed significant changes statistically. Pairwise comparison showed only a statistically significant steepening in posterior radius of curvature at 3 months after CXL compared to the preoperative radius (P = .002) and a significant decrease in corneal thinnest point at 3 (P < .001) and 6 (P = .028) months after CXL compared to baseline assessment. Staging of each element of the ABCD keratoconus staging system indicated no change between baseline and 3, 6, and 12 months after CXL.

CONCLUSIONS

The geometric and functional parameters included in the ABCD keratoconus staging system showed stability of corneal status and CDVA 1 year after CXL. [J Refract Surg. 2021;37(10):700-706.].

Keratoconus Features on Corneal Higher-Order Aberration Ablation Maps: Proof-of-Concept of a New Diagnostic Modality

PURPOSE

To assess the potential application of corneal higher-order aberration (HOA) excimer ablation map imaging in identifying reproducible keratoconus (KC) features and to explore if newly derived map metrics correlate to Pentacam KC indices.

METHODS

Case series of 12 eyes with KC ≥ grade 2. Topolyzer Vario corneal imaging with its resultant HOA ablation map islands were analyzed for their centroid, distance from center, angular position, orientation, sphericity, diameter, area, and maximal ablation depth. Correlations to Pentacam indices were studied.

RESULTS

All eyes showed recurrent features with an arrangement of two elliptical paracentral ablation islands, one deep inferotemporal and one shallow superonasal, in direct mirror-like opposition to each other. These were always accompanied by superior peripheral ablation crescents. The two paracentral islands had highly reproducible distance from center (1.2 ± 0.1 mm and 1.3 ± 0. 2 mm) and angular positions (246.8 ± 15.9° and 76.7 ± 7.7°), with greater variation in ablation depth (68.3 ± 33.2 µm and 17.6 ± 12.1 µm). Distance from center of the peripheral superior crescents was highly reproducible (3.3 ± 0.1 mm), with a larger range of depth (74.5 ± 37.2 µm). The deep paracentral inferotemporal island "hot spot" was coincident with the topographical apical cone. Strong correlations were found between the depth of the inferotemporal island and Pentacam indices of posterior radius curvature (PRC: R = -0.74) and Belin/Ambrosio enhanced ectasia total deviation (BAD-D: R = 0.71).

CONCLUSION

The corneal HOA ablation map revealed a recurring, distinct, easily recognizable pattern in KC eyes. There was a strong correlation between the depth of novel HOA ablation map metrics and validated Pentacam KC indices. Novel information can be extracted from the corneal HOA ablation map giving it the potential to be a new modality to diagnose and grade KC.

Repeatability of the Pentacam HR in Various Grades of Keratoconus

PURPOSE

To evaluate the repeatability of an extensive number of relevant indices with the Pentacam HR in keratoconus of varying severity and normal eyes.

DESIGN

Reliability analysis.

METHODS

This study was performed at Antwerp University Hospital, Belgium, and enrolled 20 healthy volunteers (20 eyes) and 69 patients (69 eyes) with keratoconus. Three consecutive measurements were performed by the same operator with Pentacam HR in keratoconus and normal eyes. Exclusion criteria included past ocular surgery, recent rigid contact lens wear, and corneal scarring. The keratoconus group was subdivided according to the Belin/Ambrosio total deviation value: subclinical, mild, and moderate. The within-subject standard deviation and repeatability limit were computed for repeatability assessment. The tolerance index (TI) was calculated to compare across parameters with different measurement scales. For the sample size included, TI > 0.36 signified statistical significance at the 0.05 level.

RESULTS

Repeatability in subclinical keratoconus did not differ significantly from controls (P > .05), except for wavefront aberrations. In mild keratoconus, 11 of 18 (61.1%) anterior corneal, 7 of 14 (50%) posterior corneal, 2 of 5 (40%) pachymetry, 7 of 11 (63.6%) combined, and 1 of 6 (16.7%) densitometry parameters showed significantly worse repeatability compared to controls (TI > 0.36). Repeatability of most parameters worsened in moderate disease. In particular, maximal keratometry and anterior astigmatism showed significantly worse repeatability in moderate keratoconus.

CONCLUSIONS

Measurement variability of Pentacam HR is of clinical relevance when assessing for progression of keratoconus. We provide reference repeatability values and scale independent analysis of relevant corneal parameters in keratoconus of varying degrees.