Refractive Shifts and Changes in Corneal Curvature Associated With Antibody-Drug Conjugates

Intraepithelial corneal deposits associated with Mirvetuximab soravtansine use for platinum-resistant ovarian cancer

Purpose

Present a case of Mirvetuximab soravtansine (MIRV)-induced intraepithelial corneal deposits, review a proposed mechanism to explain the blurred vision our patient experienced, and explain clinical exams that may be used to support the diagnosis.

Observations

A 63-year-old female with metastatic ovarian cancer diagnosed with intraepithelial corneal deposits two weeks after her first MIRV infusion. Treatment with topical prednisolone acetate 1 % ophthalmic suspension and lubricating eye drops without interruption of her MIRV infusions resulted in complete resolution of blurry vision and corneal deposits.

Conclusions and importance

The natural reversibility of MIRV-induced keratopathies underscores the need for prompt and regular ophthalmic assessments throughout drug administration. Understanding the mechanism behind these corneal changes, how to recognize them in a clinical setting, and expedite their reversal are essential to improve quality-of-life metrics in patients receiving MIRV transfusions.

Practical clinical management of ocular adverse events related to Antibody-Drug Conjugates in gynaecological malignancies

BACKGROUND

The advent of Antibody-Drug Conjugates (ADC) represents a significant advancement in targeted therapy for gynaecological malignancies. However, the ocular toxicities associated with ADCs, particularly Tisotumab Vedotin (TV) and Mirvetuximab Soravtansine (MIRV) necessitate effective mitigation in order to optimise patient care.

METHODS

This review synthesises findings from clinical trials to delineate the spectrum of ocular adverse events induced by ADCs. The analysis focuses on the incidence, onset, severity and reversibility of adverse events. It examines the underlying mechanisms of toxicity and provides management strategies based on study protocols.

RESULTS

Adverse events mainly impact the anterior ocular segment, resulting in conjunctivitis and keratopathy. They affect up to 56 % of patients treated with MIRV and 50 to 60 % of those receiving TV. Symptoms like blurred vision, dryness and pain hinder the patient's quality of life. Events are CTCAE grade 3 or higher in less than 10 % of cases. The median time to onset is 1.3 months. However, ocular toxicity may appear up to 10 months after treatment initiation, indicating a need for prolonged vigilance. Primary prophylaxis calls for local corticotherapy, lubricants and in some cases, vasoconstrictors. Despite the potential for severity, most cases are reversible with local treatment and transient dose reduction and/or delay. Close monitoring is crucial for early detection and subsequent management.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinicians ought to be cognizant of the potential ocular toxicity of ADCs. Proactive prophylaxis, patient education and a multidisciplinary approach involving ophthalmologists are paramount to minimising the impact of these AEs. Further research is essential to measure the real outcome of preventive strategies and balance their benefits with potential short and long-term risks.

Visualization of Keratopathy Associated With the Antibody-Drug Conjugate Belantamab Mafodotin Using Infrared Imaging in Patients With Multiple Myeloma

PURPOSE

The treatment of patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) with the antibody-drug conjugate belantamab mafodotin is affected by ocular adverse effects, most frequently keratopathy with corneal microcyst-like epithelial changes (MECs). To assess ocular side effects, the Keratopathy and Visual Acuity (KVA) scale, based on the extent of keratopathy subjectively graded on slit-lamp examination and the change in best corrected visual acuity from baseline, was created. Advanced corneal imaging techniques have been explored to further characterize MECs and identify objective imaging biomarkers. We examined whether infrared reflectance imaging of the anterior segment (AS-IR) could contribute to the assessment, monitoring, and documentation of corneal toxicity in patients treated with belantamab mafodotin.

METHODS

In addition to the KVA examination, AS-IR imaging was performed. AS-IR images were evaluated for presence of visible hyporeflective lesions and their spatial and temporal distribution between visits and compared with keratopathy identified on slit-lamp examination. To standardize the assessment, a scoring system for lesions on AS-IR was implemented for additional analysis.

RESULTS

Nine patients undergoing treatment with belantamab mafodotin for up to 9 months were examined. All patients exhibited hyporeflective lesions on AS-IR imaging, indicative of corneal toxicity corresponding to MECs observed on slit-lamp examination. AS-IR lesions showed early occurrence, variable quantity and size, and distinct distribution patterns, correlating with clinical findings during treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

As shown for belantamab mafodotin, AS-IR imaging represents a fast, noninvasive, supplemental method for documentation, monitoring, and assessment of corneal adverse effects during treatment with antibody-drug conjugates, which may enable more standardized analyses.

Dehydrated amniotic membrane patch for the treatment of an ocular event secondary to mirvetuximab soravtansine-gynx (MIRV) therapy

•Mirvetuximab soravtansine (MIRV) is used in the treatment of FRα positive, platinum-resistant epithelial ovarian cancer.•MIRV is associated with ocular events, leading to dose delays, dose reductions, and discontinuations of chemotherapy.•Mitigation strategies to prevent treatment disruption have historically relied on corticosteroid and lubricating drops.•Dehydrated amniotic membrane patch to treat MIRV related ocular events is a novel therapeutic option.

Ocular adverse events associated with antibody-drug conjugates used in cancer: Focus on pathophysiology and management strategies

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are designed to maximize cancer cell death with lower cytotoxicity toward noncancerous cells and are an increasingly valuable option for targeted cancer therapies. However, anticancer treatment with ADCs may be associated with ocular adverse events (AEs) such as dry eye, conjunctivitis, photophobia, blurred vision, and corneal abnormalities. While the pathophysiology of ADC-related ocular AEs has not been fully elucidated, most ocular AEs are attributed to off-target effects. Product labelling for approved ADCs includes drug-specific guidance for dose modification and management of ocular AEs; however, limited data are available regarding effective strategies to minimize and mitigate ocular AEs. Overall, the majority of ocular AEs are reversible through dose modification or supportive care. Eye care providers play key roles in monitoring patients receiving ADC therapy for ocular signs and symptoms to allow for the early detection of ADC-related ocular AEs and to ensure the timely administration of appropriate treatment. Therefore, awareness is needed to help ophthalmologists to identify treatment-related ocular AEs and provide effective management in collaboration with oncologists as part of the patient's cancer care team. This review provides an overview of ocular AEs that may occur with approved and investigational ADC anticancer treatments, including potential underlying mechanisms for ADC-related ocular AEs. It also discusses clinical management practices relevant to ophthalmologists for prevention, monitoring, and management of ADC-related ocular AEs. In collaboration with oncologists, ophthalmologists play a vital role in caring for patients with cancer by assisting with the prompt recognition, mitigation, and management of treatment-related ocular AEs.

Ocular side effects of anticancer agents used in the treatment of gynecologic cancers

The treatment landscape of gynecologic cancers has expanded in recent years to include targeted and immune-based therapies. These therapies often have ocular side effects not seen with conventional chemotherapies, some of which can cause significant visual impairment if not recognized in a timely fashion. Clinicians must know how to appropriately identify, mitigate, and treat these ocular adverse events. Management often involves working with an interdisciplinary team of eye specialists, and it is important to know when to refer patients for specialized care. Proactive identification of eye specialists, especially in rural and community settings where access to care can be limited, may be necessary. Here, we discuss the management of common ocular toxicities seen with novel anticancer agents used to treat gynecologic cancers.

Corneal Toxicity in Patients Treated by BELANTAMAB MAFODOTIN: How to Improve and Facilitate Patients Follow-Up Using Refractive Shift?

Purpose: Multiple myeloma (MM) is the second most common neoplastic blood disease worldwide. Belantamab mafodotin is a new antibody conjugate anti-B-cell maturation antigen effective against refractory myelomas. It induces intracorneal microcysts leading to refractive fluctuations. The aim of this study is to assess the value of monitoring refractive fluctuations based on the location of microcystic-like epithelial changes (MECs) to facilitate patient follow-up. Methods: This observational and multicentric study was conducted using data collected from several French centers contacted through secure email through a standardized data collection table. Results: The fluctuation of objective refraction in spherical equivalent confirms a significant myopic shift from peripheral to central forms. A decrease in the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), an increase in keratometry, and an increase in central epithelial pachymetry have also been observed when MECs migrate toward the center. Conclusion: The myopization found in our study in patients with central and paracentral MECs is consistent with current literature. Fluctuations in BCVA, keratometry, and epithelial pachymetry are also consistent. This study is the first real-world study and highlights heterogeneity in follow-up, emphasizing the need to establish multidisciplinary follow-up strategies. The analysis of refractive fluctuations appears to be a reproducible and noninvasive screening method that could facilitate patient follow-up without the need for consultation focused on corneal diseases.

Ocular adverse events associated with antibody-drug conjugates in oncology: a pharmacovigilance study based on FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS)

Background

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) have emerged as the focus and hotspots in the cancer field, yet the accompanying ocular toxicity has often been underestimated. We aimed to comprehensively and comparatively analyze the risk of ocular toxicity associated with various ADCs using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database.

Methods

Data were extracted from the FAERS database from Q3 2011 to Q3 2023. We analyzed the clinical characteristics of ADCs-related ocular adverse events (AEs). These data were further mined by proportional analysis and Bayesian approach to detect signals of ADCs-induced ocular AEs. Moreover, the time to onset of ocular toxicity was also evaluated.

Results

A total of 1,246 cases of ocular AEs were attributed to ADCs. Ocular toxicity signals were observed in patients treated with belantamab mafodotin, brentuximab vedotin, enfortumab vedotin, mirvetuximab soravtansine, sacituzumab govitecan, trastuzumab deruxtecan, and trastuzumab emtansine. Of these, belantamab mafodotin, trastuzumab emtansine, and mirvetuximab soravtansine, whose payloads are microtubule polymerization inhibitors, were more susceptible to ocular toxicity. The ten most common ADCs-related ocular AEs signals are keratopathy [ROR = 1,273.52, 95% CI (1,129.26-1,436.21)], visual acuity reduced [ROR = 22.83, 95% CI (21.2-24.58)], dry eye [ROR = 9.69, 95% CI (8.81-10.66)], night blindness [ROR = 259.87, 95% CI (228.23-295.89)], vision blurred [ROR = 1.78, 95% CI (1.57-2.02)], photophobia [ROR = 10.45, 95% CI (9.07-12.05)], foreign body sensation in eyes [ROR = 23.35, 95% CI (19.88-27.42)], ocular toxicity [ROR = 144.62, 95% CI (117.3-178.32)], punctate keratitis [ROR = 126.21, 95% CI (101.66-156.69)], eye disorder [ROR = 2.71, 95% CI (2.21-3.32)]. In terms of onset time, sacituzumab govitecan displayed an earlier onset of 21 days, while trastuzumab deruxtecan exhibited the latest onset of 223 days.

Conclusion

ADCs may increase the risk of ocular toxicity in cancer patients, leading to serious mortality. With the widespread application of newly launched ADCs, combining the FAERS data with other data sources is crucial for monitoring the ocular toxicity of ADCs. In addition, novel ocular toxicity signals not documented in product labeling were detected. Further research will be necessary to validate our findings in the future.

Incidence and Mitigation of Corneal Pseudomicrocysts Induced by Antibody-Drug Conjugates (ADCs)

Purpose of Review

This study is to highlight the incidence of corneal pseudomicrocysts in FDA-approved antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), and success of preventive therapies for pseudomicrocysts and related ocular surface adverse events (AEs).

Recent Findings

ADCs are an emerging class of selective cancer therapies that consist of a potent cytotoxin connected to a monoclonal antibody (mAb) that targets antigens expressed on malignant cells. Currently, there are 11 FDA-approved ADCs with over 164 in clinical trials. Various AEs have been attributed to ADCs, including ocular surface AEs (keratitis/keratopathy, dry eye, conjunctivitis, blurred vision, corneal pseudomicrocysts). While the severity and prevalence of ADC-induced ocular surface AEs are well reported, the reporting of corneal pseudomicrocysts is limited, complicating the development of therapies to prevent or treat ADC-related ocular surface toxicity.

Summary

Three of 11 FDA-approved ADCs have been implicated with corneal pseudomicrocysts, with incidence ranging from 41 to 100% of patients. Of the six ADCs that reported ocular surface AEs, only three had ocular substudies to investigate the benefit of preventive therapies including topical steroids, vasoconstrictors, and preservative-free lubricants. Current preventive therapies demonstrate limited efficacy at mitigating pseudomicrocysts and other ocular surface AEs.

Ocular surface toxicities associated with modern anticancer therapies

Cancer treatments have recently shifted from broad-spectrum cytotoxic therapies to more focused treatments, maximizing anticancerous activity while reducing toxicity to healthy cells. These modern anticancer therapies (MATs) encompass a wide range of innovative molecules that include immune checkpoint inhibitors and other targeted anticancer therapies, comprising antibody drug conjugates and inhibitors of signal transduction. Some MATs are associated with ocular surface adverse events that can cause severe discomfort and even lead to loss of vision. While these complications remain rare, they are probably underreported. It is likely that both oncologists and ophthalmologists will come across MATs-associated ocular surface-adverse events in their practices, owing to the increasing number of patients being treated with MATs. Rapid identification of ocular surface-adverse events is crucial, as early intervention can manage these conditions to avoid vision loss and reduce negative impacts on quality of life. We discuss characteristics of ocular surface pathologies attributed to MATs, describe the suspected underlying pathophysiological mechanisms, and outline the main lines of treatment.

Ocular Surface Side Effects of Novel Anticancer Drugs

Surgery, anticancer drugs (chemotherapy, hormonal medicines, and targeted treatments), and/or radiation are common treatment strategies for neoplastic diseases. Anticancer drugs eliminate malignant cells through the inhibition of specific pathways that contribute to the formation and development of cancer. Given the ability of such pharmacological medications to combat cancerous cells, their role in the management of neoplastic diseases has become essential. However, these drugs may also lead to undesirable systemic and ocular adverse effects due to cyto/neuro-toxicity and inflammatory reactions. Ocular surface side effects are recognized to significantly impact patient's quality of life and quality of vision. Blepharoconjunctivitis is known to be a common side effect caused by oxaliplatin, cyclophosphamide, cytarabine, and docetaxel, while anastrozole, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil can all determine dry eye disease. However, the potential processes involved in the development of these alterations are yet not fully understood, especially for novel drugs currently available for cancer treatment. This review aims at analyzing the potential ocular surface and adnexal side effects of novel anticancer medications, trying to provide a better understanding of the underlying pharmacological processes and useful insights on the choice of proper management.

Antibody-Drug Conjugates and Ocular Toxicity

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are a growing class of chemotherapeutic agents for the purpose of treating cancers that often have relapsed or failed first- and second-line treatments. ADCs are composed of extremely potent cytotoxins with a variety of side effects, one of the most significant being ocular toxicity. The available literature describes these toxicities as varying in severity and in incidence, although with disparate methods of evaluation and management. Some of the most common toxicities include microcyst-like epithelial keratopathy and dry eye. We discuss proposed mechanisms of ocular toxicity and describe the reports that mention these toxicities. We focus on ADCs with the most published literature and the most significant effects on ocular tissue. We propose areas for further investigation and possible ideas of future management. We provide a comprehensive look at the reports of ADCs in current literature to better inform clinicians on an expanding drug class.

Strategies for Prevention and Management of Ocular Events Occurring With Mirvetuximab Soravtansine

Mirvetuximab soravtansine (MIRV) is a first-in-class antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) targeting folate receptor alpha (FRα) and is indicated for the treatment of adult patients with FRα-positive, platinum-resistant epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer who have received 1 to 3 prior systemic treatment regimens. MIRV has demonstrated single-agent anticancer activity in clinical trials, with a differentiated safety profile comprising primarily low-grade, resolvable gastrointestinal and ocular adverse events (AEs). Pooled safety analysis of 464 MIRV-treated patients across 3 trials, including the phase 2 SORAYA study, found that 50% of patients had ≥1 ocular AEs of interest (AEIs) of blurred vision or keratopathy, the majority being grade ≤2. Grade 3 ocular AEIs occurred in 5% of patients, and 1 patient (0.2%) had a grade 4 event of keratopathy. All grade ≥2 AEIs of blurred vision and keratopathy resolved to grade 1 or 0 in patients with complete follow-up data. MIRV-associated ocular AEs were primarily characterized by resolvable changes to the corneal epithelium, with no cases of corneal ulcers or perforations. This reflects the distinctive, milder ocular safety profile for MIRV compared with that of other ADCs with ocular toxicities in clinical use. To maintain a generally low incidence of severe ocular AEs, patients should follow recommendations for maintaining ocular surface health, including daily use of lubricating eye drops and periodic use of corticosteroid eye drops, and should undergo an eye examination at baseline, at every other cycle for the first 8 cycles of treatment, and as clinically indicated. Dose modification guidelines should be followed to maximize patients' ability to remain on therapy. Close collaboration between all care team members, including oncologists and eye care professionals, will help patients benefit from this novel and promising anticancer agent. This review focuses on the etiology, rates, prevention, and management of MIRV-associated ocular events.